Tricuspid Regurgitation After Heart Transplantation: The Cause or the Result of Graft Dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common following heart transplantation and has been shown to adversely influence patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify causes of progression to moderate-severe TR in the first 2 y after transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of all patients who underwent heart transplantation over a 6-y period. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed at month 0, between 6 and 12 mo, and 1-2 y postoperatively to determine the presence and severity of TR. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included, of whom 142 underwent TTE before first endomyocardial biopsy. At month 0, 127 (78%) patients had nil-mild TR before first biopsy, whereas 36 (22%) had moderate-severe TR. In patients with nil-mild TR, 9 (7%) progressed to moderate-severe TR by 6 mo and 1 underwent tricuspid valve (TV) surgery. Of patients with moderate-severe TR before first biopsy, by 2 y, 3 had undergone TV surgery. The use of postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the latter group was significant (78%; P < 0.05) as was rejection profile ( P = 0.02). Patients with late progressive moderate-severe TR had a significantly higher 2-y mortality than those who had moderate-severe TR immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study has shown that in the 2 main groups of interest (early moderate-severe TR and progression from nil-mild to moderate-severe TR), TR is more likely to be the result of significant underling graft dysfunction rather than the cause of it.

Impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in bridge to transplant recipients of contemporary durable mechanical circulatory support.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes in advanced heart failure. We studied the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in bridge to transplant (BTT) durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) recipients. METHODS: Patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD, n = 96) or biventricular support (BiV, n = 11) as BTT underwent frailty assessment. Frailty was defined as ≥ 3 physical domains of the Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP) or ≥ 2 physical domains of the FFP plus cognitive impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: No difference in mortality at 360 days was observed in frail (n = 6/38, 15.8%) vs non-frail (n = 4/58, 6.9%) LVAD supported patients, p = 0.19. However, there was a significant excess mortality in frail BiV (n = 4/5) vs non-frail BiV (n = 0/6) supported patients, p = 0.013. In all patients, frail patients compared to non-frail patients experienced longer intensive care unit stay, 12 vs 6 days (p < 0.0001) and hospital length of stay, 48 vs 27 days (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in hemocompatibility and infection related adverse events. The majority (n = 22/29, 75.9%) of frail patients became non-frail following MCS; contrastingly, a minority (n = 3/42, 7.1%) became frail from being non-frail (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal markers of frailty are common in patients undergoing BTT-MCS support and those used herein predict mortality in BiV-supported patients, but not in LVAD patients. These findings may help us better identify patients who will benefit most from BiV-BTT therapy.