Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
1.
Food Chem ; 132(3): 1395-1405, 2012 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29243628

ABSTRACT

The effect on quality were assessed for gilthead seabream fed five different diets: control (basal diet); BHT (basal diet with 200mgkg-1 of butylated hydroxytoluene); rosemary (basal diet with 600mgkg-1 of rosemary extract -Rosmarinus officinalis); carvacrol (basal diet with 500mgkg-1 of essential oil of Thymbra capitata, carvacrol chemotype); and thymol (basal diet with 500mgg-1 of essential oil of Thymus zygis, subspecies gracilis, thymol chemotype). After 18weeks of experimentation, the animals were stored on ice at 4°C for 0, 7, 14, and 21days. Physical-chemical, microbiological and sensory analyses were carried out at each sampling point to determine the degree of deterioration in the gilthead seabream. Lower indices of oxidation were observed in animals who were administered feeds supplemented with BHT, carvacrol and (to a lesser degree) rosemary. Lower bacteria counts were observed for the BHT and thymol groups, in addition to a slower deterioration in terms of sensory perception. Accordingly, the addition of natural antioxidants to the diet may have an added effect on fish quality, delaying post mortem deterioration.

2.
Br J Nutr ; 103(7): 1008-14, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19889244

ABSTRACT

Dark chocolate (DC) may be cardioprotective by antioxidant properties of flavonoids. We investigated the effect of DC (860 mg polyphenols, of which 58 mg epicatechin) compared with white chocolate (WC; 5 mg polyphenols, undetectable epicatechin) on plasma epicatechin levels, mononuclear blood cells (MNBC) DNA damage and plasma total antioxidant activity (TAA). Twenty healthy subjects followed a balanced diet (55 % of energy from carbohydrates, 30 % from fat and 1 g protein/kg body weight) for 4 weeks. Since the 14th day until the 27th day, they introduced daily 45 g of either WC (n 10) or DC (n 10). Whole experimental period was standardised in antioxidant intake. Blood samples were collected at T(0), after 2 weeks (T(14)), 2 h and 22 h after the first chocolate intake (T(14+2 h) and T(14+22 h)), and at 27th day, before chocolate intake (T(27)), 2 h and 22 h after (T(27+2 h) and T(27+22 h)). Samples, except for T(14+2 h) and T(27+2 h), were fasting collected. Detectable epicatechin levels were observed exclusively 2 h after DC intake (T(14+2 h) = 0.362 (se 0.052) micromol/l and T(27+2 h) = 0.369 (se 0.041) micromol/l); at the same times corresponded lower MNBC DNA damages (T(14+2 h) = - 19.4 (se 3.4) % v. T(14), P < 0.05; T(27+2 h) = - 24 (se 7.4) % v. T(27), P < 0.05; T(14+2 h) v. T(27+2 h), P = 0.7). Both effects were no longer evident after 22 h. No effect was observed on TAA. WC did not affect any variable. DC may transiently improve DNA resistance to oxidative stress, probably for flavonoid kinetics.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Cacao/chemistry , Catechin/pharmacology , DNA Damage/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Adult , Antioxidants/metabolism , Catechin/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Oxidative Stress/genetics , Plant Extracts/blood , Young Adult
3.
Transplant Proc ; 38(8): 2367-70, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17097936

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Information provided by primary care workers about organ donation significantly affects the attitude of the general public. The objective of this study was to evaluate information about donation requested by the general public in health centers in an autonomous community (region) of Spain and to find out how many workers provided relevant information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was taken and stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location (six health areas of our autonomous regional community, 45 municipal councils), among primary care health workers in order to obtain a total of 428 respondents in 34 primary care centers. A study was undertaken of information requested and provided about organ donation and transplantation. The chi square test was applied and differences were considered significant at levels of P < .05. RESULTS: Forty-three percent (n=185) of the workers surveyed indicated that information had been requested from them about organ donation and transplantation. This request for information was much greater from physicians than from the other types of workers (P = .015). Furthermore, 54% of primary care health workers (n=229) reported having provided information about donation, especially physicians (64%), with this being mainly favorable. Information had also been provided by nurses (59%) and ancillary staff (34%). CONCLUSION: Information requested from primary care health workers by the general public about organ donation and transplantation is increasing when we compare it to data from previous years. Around half of primary care workers have offered information about transplantation. Therefore, it is fundamental that these workers have adequate and correct information to provide patients and families.


Subject(s)
Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation/psychology , Attitude to Death , Attitude to Health , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Geography , Humans , Male , Spain , Transplantation/statistics & numerical data
4.
Transplant Proc ; 38(8): 2603-5, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17098014

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a technical variation of auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation (AHLT) that is rarely studied but that simplifies the AHLT surgical technique because it does not act on the portal area. The objective of this study was to analyze the hemodynamic consequences of this auxiliary transplant in an experimental model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten AHLT-PVA were analyzed in a pig model. A PiCCO (Pulsion) monitor was used for the hemodynamic study of the recipient. The following were measured: cardiac index, (CI), systemic vascular resistance index, (SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), global end-diastolic volume, central venous pressure, and intrathoracic blood volume. The measurements were taken at four times during transplant: at baseline, after inferior vena cava clamping, after graft reperfusion, and at closure. RESULTS: After graft reperfusion there was a reduction in SVRI (968 +/- 168.03 vs 1686.25 +/- 290.66; P < .05) and in MAP, and there was an increase in CI. At the end of the transplant MAP and SVRI recovered (1254.2 +/- 225.79 vs 968 +/- 168.03; P < .05) but CI remained slightly high. The end-diastolic volume showed greater variation than central venous pressure, although this was only statistically significant at the inferior vena cava clamping phase (244.75 +/- 52.05 vs 333.37 +/- 170.13; P < .05). DISCUSSION: Heterotopic liver transplantation with portal arterialization is well-tolerated hemodynamically. Graft reperfusion decreases SVRI and increases CI to compensate for this. This behavior, which in healthy recipients like ours is not a problem, could imply a contraindication in patients with a prior hyperdynamic state.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/physiology , Portal Vein/surgery , Animals , Blood Pressure , Heart Function Tests , Models, Animal , Monitoring, Physiologic , Pulse , Reperfusion , Swine , Transplantation, Heterotopic , Vascular Resistance , Vena Cava, Inferior/physiology , Vena Cava, Inferior/surgery
5.
Clin Transplant ; 20(6): 719-24, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17100721

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Most Spanish transplant centers have on-going living kidney transplant programs. However, such transplants are not increasing as a proportion of the total number of kidney transplants. The objective of this study is to analyze the attitude of kidney patients on the kidney transplant waiting list toward living kidney donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients studied were selected from those included on the kidney transplant waiting list from November 2003 until September 2005 (n = 221). Attitude toward living donation was evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire. It was completed in a direct personal interview with an independent health-care worker from the Transplant Unit. Student's t-test and the chi-squared test were applied. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen patients completed the questionnaire (97%), of which 35% would accept a related living kidney if it were offered to them, 60% would prefer to wait on the waiting list and the remaining 5% are undecided. Up to 66% (n = 134) of patients report that a member of their family or a friend have offered them an organ for donation. Eighty-nine percentage believe that there is some risk involved in living kidney donation, although it is not a factor that affects whether an organ would be accepted or not (p = 0.767). The psychosocial variables that affect attitude toward accepting a related living kidney are: (i) age: the youngest are those who are most likely to accept (40 vs. 45-yr-old; p = 0.010); (ii) descendents: patients without descendents are more likely to accept a living organ (56% vs. 27%; p < 0.000); (iii) marital status: a greater percentage of single respondents would be prepared to receive this type of transplant compared to the group of married respondents (55% vs. 30%. p = 0.007); and (iv) level of education: those with a higher level of education are more likely to accept a living organ (43% have secondary or university studies vs. 28% who only have primary education; p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant do not have a very favorable attitude toward receiving a related-living donor organ, although members of their family have offered them one of their organs. The profile of a patient who would accept a related-living donated kidney is a young, single person, without descendents, and with a high level of education.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Living Donors/psychology , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Waiting Lists , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
6.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 25(8): 972-6, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16890119

ABSTRACT

The attitude of health-care workers, especially in transplant-related services, is fundamental in the process of organ procurement. In this study we examine the attitude of workers in transplant-related services toward cadaveric organ donation and transplantation (ODT) in a third-level hospital in Spain. A random sample was stratified according to type of service and job category (n = 309) among personnel in transplant-related services (organ procurement units, transplant units and follow-up units). Attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was evaluated using a validated psychosocial questionnaire. Seventy percent (n = 215) of respondents were found to be in favor of donation, as opposed to 30% against or undecided (n = 94). Regarding job category, attitude was most favorable among physicians (86%, n = 99; p = 0.000). With respect to type of service, attitude tended to be more negative in organ procurement units and more positive in the follow-up units of transplanted patients (41% vs 81%, p = 0.013). Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables, significant results were found with respect to the following factors: (1) age (39 vs 42 years, p = 0.007); (2) having discussed ODT with family members or with a partner (p = 0.007); (3) understanding of the concept of brain death (p = 0.001); (4) attitude toward carrying out an autopsy (p = 0.001); and (5) concern about the possibility of mutilation after organ extraction. Attitude toward cadaveric donation was lower than expected among personnel in transplant-related services, especially among ancillary personnel and workers in organ procurement units.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Personnel, Hospital , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
8.
Xenotransplantation ; 13(5): 447-54, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16925669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In situations of extreme urgency when there is a need for vital organs, xenotransplantation could provide a bridge until the arrival of a human organ. However, it is important to find out the level of acceptance of this potential therapy among the health care workers who would be involved in its implementation. The objective of this study is to analyze attitude among personnel in a hospital with a pre-clinical xenotransplantation program toward xenotransplantation and to determine the variables that influence this attitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample (n=1168) was taken and stratified according to job category and service. Attitude toward xenotransplantation was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Contact was made with the head of each service who was given an explanation of the project. This person was made responsible for the distribution and collection of the survey in each service in randomly selected work shifts. Such a survey was completed anonymously and was self-administered. A random sample of 250 individuals from our regional community was used as a control group. RESULTS: The survey completion rate was 98% (n=1148). Most respondents are in favor (67%), 7% are against and 26% undecided. Such an attitude is more favorable in the control group (74% vs. 67%; P=0.0378). The following factors are positively related to such an attitude: (1) male sex (P<0.0005); (2) a younger age (P=0.013); (3) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (P=0.002); (4) knowing that the church has a positive attitude toward donation and transplantation (P<0.0005); (5) a partner's favorable attitude toward transplantation (P<0.0005); (6) a physician's job category (P<0.0005); (7) a resident physician's job contract situation (P=0.017); (8) a respondent's belief that he or she may need a transplant in the future (P<0.0005); and (9) a favorable attitude toward human donation, whether this be cadaveric or living (P<0.0005). In the multivariate analysis, the following persist as independent variables: (1) sex (odds ratio=1.6); (2) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (odds ratio=2.2); (3) a partner's unfavorable attitude toward transplantation (odds ratio=0.3); (4) a favorable attitude toward cadaveric donation (odds ratio=2); and (5) attitude toward living liver donation (odds ratio=3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Attitude toward xenotransplantation is not as favorable among hospital personnel as it is in the general public and this is determined by many factors. It will be necessary for research groups to periodically carry out awareness-raising activities about our findings in our own centers, to avoid the rejection that could be generated by a lack of awareness.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Transplantation, Heterologous/psychology , Adult , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , Animals , Emergency Treatment , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Transplantation, Heterologous/ethics
10.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 853-7, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647491

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The deficit in transplantable organs is making it necessary to find alternative sources. One possibility is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs may be rejected by society and among health professionals. Primary Care is fundamental for promoting matters of health; in Spain it has access to nearly 100% of the population. Our objective was to analyze the acceptance of this therapy, although it is experimental, among Primary Care professionals, given that they are the ones most involved in spreading information about this therapy if it was confirmed to be useful. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location among Primary Care personnel, including 428 professionals in 32 health centers among population of 2851 professionals. Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial attitudes validated in our geographical area. Contact was made in each center with the Doctor Coordinator for doctors, the Nursing Coordinator for nurses, and an Administrative Officer for ancillary personnel. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS: Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were similar to those obtained in human organs: favorable in 79% (n = 325), whereas 19% (n = 78) had doubts and 2% (n = 10) were against. The attitude was more favorable in men (89% vs 72%; P < .000), those who had cared for transplant patients (84% vs 71%; P = .009), those with previous experience in organ donation and transplantation (84% vs 75%; P = .033), those with an attitude in favor of cadaveric organ donation (83% vs 66%; P < .0001), and those in favor of living donation of the kidney (P < .000) or the liver (P < .000), as well as those who believed that they may need a transplant at some time in the future (84% vs 74%; P = .045). There was a clear difference in attitude according to job category (P = .018): approval rates were 89% for doctors, 76% for nurses, and 70% for ancillary personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward future application of xenotransplantation were quite positive among doctors. However, the attitudes of nursing and ancillary personnel were similar to those of the general population. The main factors related to such an attitude depended mainly on the previous relationship and attitude of the respondent toward human organ donation and transplantation.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Transplantation, Heterologous , Animals , Attitude to Health , Female , Humans , Male , Nurses , Physicians , Sex Characteristics , Spain
11.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 863-5, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The attitudes of health care personnel, specifically doctors, have a significant influence on public attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of Primary Care (PC) doctors toward living organ donation and to determine the psychosocial factors that condition these attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by geographical location (six health areas in our community) among PC doctors, including 155 respondents from 32 health centers. Attitudes toward donation were evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire validated in our geographical area. Contact was made with the Doctor Coordinator in each center for distribution of the questionnaires, which were completed anonymously. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate the data. RESULTS: When the living donor is not related, only 21% (n = 32) of PC doctors were in favor of living kidney donation, and only 20% (n = 31) for living liver donation (P > .05). In contrast, these percentages were 90% and 89% in favor of kidney and liver related donation, respectively. Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables affecting these attitudes, there was only an association with their partner's opinion (P = .009 for kidney and P = .000 for liver), and the possibility of needing a transplant oneself (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: PC doctors have favorable attitudes toward related living donation. If living donation is promoted by transplant coordination units, such PC professionals could act as a source of positive information about the matter for the general public.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Transplantation , Family , Geography , Humans , Living Donors , Spain , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Procurement
12.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 858-62, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647492

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To reduce the number of family organ donation refusals, it is necessary not only to act on the general public but also on the health care system. In this respect, there are data suggesting that the percentage of hospital personnel against donation is high, especially among ancillary personnel. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of ancillary hospital professionals toward donation of their own organs and determine factors that conditioned such attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample in a third-level hospital with a solid organ transplant program was stratified by ancillary services: administrative, porters, maintenance, cleaning, and cooking. Attitudes toward donation of one's own organs after death were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial aspects validated in our area. It included various psychosocial variables that could affect such attitudes. The Student t test and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: We analyzed 277 respondents of mean age 43 +/- 8 years and 96% women. The level of acceptance of organ donation was 64% (n = 178), whereas 46% were either against or undecided (n = 98). The variables which determined the attitudes were understanding of brain death (P = .004); attitude toward cadaveric manipulation, especially toward autopsy (P = .013) and cremation (P = .004); concern about mutilation after donation (P = .014); religion (P = .032); partner's attitude toward donation (P < .0001); and possibility of needing an organ in the future (P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Ancillary hospital personnel had similar attitudes toward donation as those of the general public as observed in other studies. The attitudes were determined by many psychosocial factors. A campaign to raise awareness among professionals has become a priority, given that working in a hospital, their unfavorable attitude could have a strong negative impact on the general public.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Personnel, Hospital , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Transplantation , Adult , Employment , Family , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain , Tissue Donors
13.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 866-8, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Rural areas present a worse attitude toward organ donation. However, the factors conditioning this attitude are not well known. Our aim was to determine the profile of the population opposed to donation in rural areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample stratified by age and sex was obtained from municipalities with less than 10,000 inhabitants. Attitudes toward donation were assessed by a questionnaire which evaluated variables that may influence these attitudes. A descriptive statistical study used the Student t test and chi-square test as well as a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 181 respondents, 63% were in favor of donation and 37% against or undecided. Among the reasons to be against donation were rejection of body mutilation (43%) and fear of apparent death (41%). The psychosocial variables against donation were age >or=44 years, primary education or below, no previous experience with donation, no prosocial activities, an unfavorable opinion of the partner, and fear of corpse mutilation. The variables persisting in the multivariate analysis were level of education, previous experience, prosocial activities, and fear of corpse manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Among the rural population the profile of a person opposed to donation was someone older than 44 years, with a low level of education and no previous experience with donation, who does not participate in prosocial activities and is opposed to corpse manipulation.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Rural Population , Tissue Donors , Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude to Death , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 869-74, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze acceptance of cadaveric and living organ donation for transplantation among resident doctors, given that they are the new professionals of medicine who will have to encourage and develop transplant programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random survey was performed on resident doctors in a third-level hospital with an organ transplant program which is accredited for undergraduate and postgraduate education (n = 171). Attitudes toward cadaveric and living donation were evaluated using a questionnaire including various psychosocial variables that might affect such attitudes. We used the Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: The sample was composed of responses by 171 resident doctors of mean age 28 +/- 4 years with 56% women. Attitudes toward cadaveric donation were favorable in 92% (n = 157). As for living donation, the percentage in favor of nonrelated donation was low: 23% for kidney and 19% for liver. However, when the donation was from a relative, the percentages increased to levels similar to those of cadaveric donation, namely 88% and 85% for kidney and liver, respectively. No differences were observed in attitudes toward cadaveric or living donation according to various psychosocial variables. CONCLUSIONS: The trainee doctors showed favorable attitudes toward human cadaveric organ donation as well as living related donation, which suggests a relaunch of living donors in the near future. However, there was not much acceptance of nonrelated donation, as has also been seen in studies of the general public in our geographical area.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Medical Staff, Hospital , Tissue Donors , Transplantation , Adult , Cadaver , Female , Heart Transplantation , Hospitals, Special , Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Male , Pancreas Transplantation , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Transplant Proc ; 38(3): 963-6, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16647519

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate liver graft integrity and function using scintigraphy and ultrasonography in a porcine model of auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization (AHLT-PVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Doppler ultrasonography we evaluated eight AHLT-PVA by parenchymal echogenicity, portal and arterial anatomy, and portal and biliary system flow. Two types of scintigraphy were performed: microaggregated human albumin colloid scintigraphy and diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) scintigraphy, both labeled with 99mTc. RESULTS: The animals were distributed into two groups. The first group consisted of three animals with clinical suspicion of graft dysfunction, in which the ultrasonographic study revealed areas of parenchymal destructuring. In the scintigraphic study, heterogenous uptake was observed; there was no uptake in one animal. Necropsy of these three animals revealed areas of graft necrosis. The second group consisted of five animals with good clinical evolutions, in which the ultrasonographic study showed portal dilation, portal flow with arterial spiculations, and homogenous echogenicity of the hepatic parenchyma. The scintigraphic study revealed homogenous uptake by the graft and an elimination speed of the hepatobiliary agent similar to that of the native liver. CONCLUSIONS: An heterogenous echostructure of the graft provided a sign of poor prognosis indicating necrosis in the same way as heterogenous uptake or nonuptake of radioisotope upon scintigraphy. Scintigraphy is a good method to evaluate biliary function and bile elimination. In an AHLT-PVA, the main ultrasound findings derived from arterialization were dilation of the portal system and portal flow with arterial spiculations.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/methods , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Portal Vein/surgery , Animals , Liver Transplantation/physiology , Models, Animal , Radionuclide Imaging , Swine , Transplantation, Heterotopic , Ultrasonography, Doppler
19.
Ups J Med Sci ; 111(3): 353-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17578802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Attitude of health personnel, especially of physicians, has a significant influence on populational attitude towards organ donation and transplantation. The objective here is to analyse the attitude of Primary Care (PC) physicians towards cadaveric organ donation and transplantation and to determine the factors which condition this attitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was stratified by geographical location (six health areas of our community) among PC physicians. A total of 155 responses from 32 health centres were collected. Attitude towards donation was evaluated using a psychosocial attitudinal questionnaire about donation validated in our geographical area. The co-ordinator of physicians in each centre was contacted in each centre and was made responsible for distribution and collection of the questionnaires which were completed anonymously. The chi2 test and Student's t-test were applied. RESULTS: 88% (n=136) of the PC physicians are in favour of organ donation, 1% (n=2) are against and 11% (n=17) are undecided. Up to 84% of the PC physicians (n=130) have attended to transplant patients, although this fact is not related to a more positive attitude towards donation (p=0.059). In addition, 64% (n=99) have provided favourable information about organ donation and transplantation to their patients and one of the physicians admits having provided unfavourable information about the matter. On analysing the psychosocial variables which influence such an attitude, a relationship has only been found with respect to two variables: attitude towards cadaveric manipulation (p=0.035) and a partner's opinion towards the subject (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PC physicians have a very favourable attitude towards donation of their own organs and constitute a positive source of information on the subject for the general public.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Physicians, Family , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology , Psychology , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data
20.
Nefrología (Madr.) ; 25(6): 678-683, nov.-dic. 2005. graf
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-048628

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El trasplante de órganos es una terapéutica que necesita de la sociedadpara su desarrollo. Los objetivos son: 1) Conocer cómo está estructuradala opinión de la población mayor de 15 años de edad de nuestra comunidadhacia la donación de sus órganos; 2) Analizar las variables psicosociales que influyenen esa opinión y 3) Definir los perfiles poblacionales hacia el tema.Material y Métodos: Muestra (n = 2.000) aleatoria y estratificada por edad, sexoy localización geográfica (error para 95,5%, e ± 2,24) a la que se aplica un cuestionariode aspectos psicosociales sobre donación de órganos. Estadística descriptiva,t de Student, Chi2 y un análisis de regresión logística.Resultados: Un 63% tiene una opinión favorable hacia la donación de sus órganos,de ellos un 11% posee el carnet de donante. Se objetiva asociación estadísticaentre opinión favorable y distintas variables psicosociales (p 50 años, con estudios primarios-inferiores, sin experiencia previasobre el tema, que desconoce el concepto de muerte encefálica y la opinión desu pareja hacia la donación, que no ha obtenido información sobre donación através de foros especializados, con opinión desfavorable hacia la donación de sangrey actividades prosociales y temeroso de la manipulación de su cadáver trasfallecer


Introduction: Organ transplantation is a therapy which depends on society forits development. The objectives here are: 1) to understand the structure of publicopinion towards organ donation in the population aged over 15 years of age inour Community; 2) to analyse the psychosocial variables which affect this opinionand 3) to define the population profiles on this matter.Materials and methods: Random sample (n = 2.000) stratified for age, sex andgeographical location (error for 95.5%, e ± 2.24) to whom we apply a questionnaireabout the psychosocial aspects of organ donation. Descriptive statistics, Student’st-test, Chi-squared test and logistical regression analysis.Results: 63% have a favourable attitude towards organ donation, of which 11%have a donor’s card. A statistical association has been observed between favourablepublic opinion and different psychosocial variables (p 50 years of age, with primary studies or below, with no previous experienceof the matter, who does not understand the concept of brain death northeir partner’s opinion towards donation, who has not found out any informationabout donation through specialised forums, with an unfavourable opinion towardsblood donation or pro-social activities and who is fearful of manipulation of thecadaver after death


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Humans , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Renal Dialysis , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/methods , Blood Flow Velocity , Cross-Sectional Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...