The association of environmental factors with neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of environmental factors, rehabilitation services during therapy and socioeconomic status (SES - insurance type), with neurocognitive outcomes at the end of therapy for survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: Survivors (n = 236) treated on the St. Jude Total Therapy Study 16 completed end of therapy testing with performance measures (IQ, attention, processing speed, fine motor skills, academics) and caregiver ratings (attention, executive function, adaptive skills). Environmental factors were abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: Distribution of sex (47.3% female, p = 0.399), treatment arm (45.5% low risk, 54.5% standard/high risk p = 0.929), insurance type (47.7% private, 52.3% public/none, p = 0.117), and mean age at diagnosis (7.7 vs. 6.8 years, p = 0.143) were similar for groups with (n = 110; 46.6%) and without (n = 126; 53.6%) rehabilitation services during therapy. Compared to those without rehabilitation, the rehabilitation group (n = 110; 46.4%) had more caregiver reported problems with attention (Z = -0.28 vs. 0.43, p = 0.022), executive function (Z = -0.50 vs. -0.08, p = 0.003), and adaptive skills (Z = -0.41 vs.-0.13, p = 0.031). Among the rehabilitation group, there was no difference in outcomes by insurance status. Among those without rehabilitation, those with public insurance had worse neurocognitive outcomes than those with private insurance in IQ (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.45, p = 0.0115), processing speed (Z = -0.10 vs. -0.75, p = 0.0030), reading (Z = 0.18 vs. -0.59, p < 0.0001), and math (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.50, p = 0.0021). CONCLUSION: Participation in rehabilitation services during early intensive therapy is associated with end of therapy caregiver-reported neurocognitive outcomes in daily life.

Cognitive outcomes following contemporary treatment without cranial irradiation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has included the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation in up to 20% of children with high-risk disease despite known cognitive risks of this treatment modality. METHODS: Patients enrolled on the St Jude ALL Total Therapy Study XV, which omitted prophylactic cranial irradiation in all patients, were assessed 120 weeks after completion of consolidation therapy (n = 243) using a comprehensive cognitive battery. χ(2) analysis was used to compare the percentage of below-average performers among the entire ALL patient group to the expected rate based on the normative sample. Univariate logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of intensity of chemotherapy (treatment arm), age at diagnosis, and sex on the probability of below-average performance. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, the ALL group had a statistically significantly higher risk for below-average performance on a measure of sustained attention (67.31% more than 1 SD below the normative mean for omission errors, P < .001) but not on measures of intellectual functioning, academic skills, or memory. Patients given higher intensity chemotherapy were at greater risk for below-average performance compared with those given lower intensity therapy on measures of processing speed (27.14% vs 6.25%, P = .009) and academic abilities (Math Reasoning: 18.60% vs 3.90%, P = .008; Word Reading: 20.00% vs 2.60%, P = .007; Spelling: 27.91% vs 3.90%, P = .001) and had higher parent-reported hyperactivity (23.00% vs 9.84%, P = .018) and learning problems (35.00% vs 16.39%, P = .005). Neither age at diagnosis nor sex was associated with risk for below-average cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Omitting cranial irradiation may help preserve global cognitive abilities, but treatment with chemotherapy alone is not without risks. Caregiver education and development of interventions should address both early attention deficits and cognitive late effects.

Verbal working memory impairment in schizophrenia patients and their first-degree relatives: evidence from the digit span task.

OBJECTIVE: The evidence for verbal working memory deficits in schizophrenia has been inconsistent. Few studies have evaluated verbal working memory in the first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients, who likely share the genetic diathesis for schizophrenia but not the potential confounds associated with chronic mental illness. METHOD: The Wechsler Digit Span Task was used to investigate verbal working memory in 52 schizophrenia patients, 56 of their first-degree relatives, and 73 nonpsychiatric comparison subjects. RESULTS: The nonpsychotic relatives showed no impairment on the forward digit span task, a measure of general attention, but did show impairment on the backward digit span task, a measure of verbal working memory. Schizophrenia patients showed impairment on both the forward and backward digit span tasks. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the forward and backward digit span tasks tap different cognitive abilities that are differentially associated with the diathesis for schizophrenia. Working memory deficits associated with schizophrenia appear to be generalized and not limited to the spatial modality.