Subject(s)
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation , Fibrinolysis , Hemostasis , Humans , Fibrinolysis/physiology , Fibrinolysis/drug effects , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/blood , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/diagnosis , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/physiopathology , Hemostasis/physiologyABSTRACT
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were among the groups impacted more severely by the COVID-19 pandemic, with higher rates of severe disease and COVID-19-related mortality. MM and COVID-19, plus post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, are associated with endothelial dysfunction and injury, with overlapping inflammatory pathways and coagulopathies. Existing treatment options for MM, notably high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation and novel chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, are also associated with endothelial cell injury and mechanism-related toxicities. These pathologies include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity that may be exacerbated by underlying endotheliopathies. In the context of these overlapping risks, prophylaxis and treatment approaches mitigating the inflammatory and pro-coagulant effects of endothelial injury are important considerations for patient management, including cytokine receptor antagonists, thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants, and direct endothelial protection with defibrotide in the appropriate clinical settings.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Myeloma , Polydeoxyribonucleotides , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , Polydeoxyribonucleotides/therapeutic use , Polydeoxyribonucleotides/pharmacology , Immunotherapy/methods , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/prevention & control , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Endothelium, Vascular/metabolism , Endothelium, Vascular/immunologyABSTRACT
Based on emerging evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19 were published in 2022. Since then, at least 16 new randomized controlled trials have contributed additional evidence, which necessitated a modification of most of the previous recommendations. We used again the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology for assessment of level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Five recommendations had the LOE upgraded to A and 2 new recommendations on antithrombotic treatment for patients with COVID-19 were added. Furthermore, a section was added to answer questions about COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), for which studies have provided some evidence. We only included recommendations with LOE A or B. Panelists agreed on 19 recommendations, 4 for nonhospitalized, 5 for noncritically ill hospitalized, 3 for critically ill hospitalized, and 2 for postdischarge patients, as well as 5 for vaccination and VITT. A strong recommendation (COR 1) was given for (a) use of prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin/unfractionated heparin in preference to prophylactic dose, and (c) for use of antiplatelet factor 4 enzyme immunoassays for diagnosing VITT. A strong recommendation was given against (COR 3) the addition of an antiplatelet agent in hospitalized, noncritically ill patients. These international guidelines provide recommendations for countries with diverse healthcare resources and COVID-19 vaccine availability.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fibrinolytic Agents , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Immunothrombosis-immune-mediated activation of coagulation-is protective against pathogens, but excessive immunothrombosis can result in pathological thrombosis and multiorgan damage, as in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The NACHT-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome produces major proinflammatory cytokines of the interleukin (IL)-1 family, IL-1ß and IL-18, and induces pyroptotic cell death. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway also promotes immunothrombotic programs including release of neutrophil extracellular traps and tissue factor by leukocytes, and prothrombotic responses by platelets and the vascular endothelium. NLRP3 inflammasome activation occurs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In preclinical models, NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockade restrains COVID-19-like hyperinflammation and pathology. Anakinra, recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, showed safety and efficacy and is approved for the treatment of hypoxaemic COVID-19 patients with early signs of hyperinflammation. The non-selective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine reduced hospitalization and death in a subgroup of COVID-19 outpatients but is not approved for the treatment of COVID-19. Additional COVID-19 trials testing NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockers are inconclusive or ongoing. We herein outline the contribution of immunothrombosis to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, and review preclinical and clinical evidence suggesting an engagement of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in the immunothrombotic pathogenesis of COVID-19. We also summarize current efforts to target the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in COVID-19, and discuss challenges, unmet gaps, and the therapeutic potential that inflammasome-targeted strategies may provide for inflammation-driven thrombotic disorders including COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inflammasomes , Humans , Inflammasomes/metabolism , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism , Thromboinflammation , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , InflammationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) released overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnostic criteria in 2001. Since then, DIC has been understood as the end-stage consumptive coagulopathy and not the therapeutic target. However, DIC is not merely a decompensated coagulation disorder, but also includes early stages with systemic activation in coagulation. Thus, the ISTH has recently released sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) criteria that can diagnose compensated-phase of coagulopathy with readily available biomarkers. MAIN BODY: DIC is a laboratory-based diagnosis due to various critical conditions, although sepsis is the most common underlying disease. The pathophysiology of sepsis-associated DIC is multifactorial, and in addition to coagulation activation with suppressed fibrinolysis, multiple inflammatory responses are initiated by activated leukocytes, platelets, and vascular endothelial cells as part of thromboinflammation. Although overt DIC diagnostic criteria were established by ISTH to diagnose the advanced stage of DIC, additional criteria that can detect an earlier stage of DIC were needed for potential therapeutic considerations. Accordingly, the ISTH introduced SIC criteria in 2019 that are easy to use and require only platelet count, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score. SIC score can be used to evaluate disease severity and determine the timing of potential therapeutic interventions. One of the major disadvantages in treating sepsis-associated DIC is the lack of availability of specific therapeutic approaches beyond treating the underlying infection. Clinical trials to date have failed because included patients who were not coagulopathic. Nevertheless, in addition to infection control, anticoagulant therapy will be the choice for sepsis-associated DIC. Therefore, the efficacy of heparin, antithrombin, and recombinant thrombomodulin has to be proven in future clinical studies. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to develop a novel therapeutic strategy against sepsis-associated DIC and improve the outcomes. Consequently, we recommend screening and monitoring DIC using SIC scoring system.
ABSTRACT
Coagulopathy is a severe and frequent complication in critically ill patients, for which the pathogenesis and presentation may be variable depending on the underlying disease. Based on the dominant clinical phenotype, the current review differentiates between hemorrhagic coagulopathies, characterized by a hypocoagulable and hyperfibrinolysis state, and thrombotic coagulopathies with a systemic prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic phenotype. We discuss the differences in pathogenesis and treatment of the common coagulopathies.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation , Thrombosis , Humans , Critical Illness/therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/therapy , Thrombosis/complications , Phenotype , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) has detrimental impact on patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. Data on CAT education, communication, and awareness among the general cancer population are scanty. METHODS: We present the preliminary results of an ongoing patient-centered survey including 27 items covering major spheres of CAT. The survey, available in 14 languages, was promoted and disseminated online through social networks, email newsletters, websites, and media. RESULTS: As of September 20, 2022, 749 participants from 27 countries completed the survey. Overall, 61.8% (n = 460) of responders were not aware of their risk of CAT. Among those who received information on CAT, 26.2% (n = 56) were informed only at the time of CAT diagnosis. Over two thirds (69.1%, n = 501) of participants received no education on signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE); among those who were educated about the possible clinical manifestations, 58.9% (n = 119) were given instructions to seek consultation in case of VTE suspicion. Two hundred twenty-four respondents (30.9%) had a chance to discuss the potential use of primary thromboprophylaxis with health-care providers. Just over half (58.7%, n = 309) were unaware of the risks of bleeding associated with anticoagulation, despite being involved in anticoagulant-related discussions or exposed to anticoagulants. Most responders (85%, n = 612) valued receiving CAT education as highly relevant; however, 51.7% (n = 375) expressed concerns about insufficient time spent and clarity of education received. CONCLUSIONS: This ongoing survey involving cancer patients with diverse ethnic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds highlights important patient knowledge gaps. These findings warrant urgent interventions to improve education and awareness, and reduce CAT burden.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Antithrombotic agents reduce risk of thromboembolism in severely ill patients. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may realize additional benefits from heparins. Optimal dosing and timing of these treatments and benefits of other antithrombotic agents remain unclear. In October 2021, ISTH assembled an international panel of content experts, patient representatives, and a methodologist to develop recommendations on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for patients with COVID-19 in different clinical settings. We used the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology to assess level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Only recommendations with LOE A or B were included. Panelists agreed on 12 recommendations: three for non-hospitalized, five for non-critically ill hospitalized, three for critically ill hospitalized, and one for post-discharge patients. Two recommendations were based on high-quality evidence, the remainder on moderate-quality evidence. Among non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the panel gave a strong recommendation (a) for use of prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin (LMWH/UFH) (COR 1); (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic dose LMWH/UFH in preference to prophylactic dose (COR 1); but (c) against the addition of an antiplatelet agent (COR 3). Weak recommendations favored (a) sulodexide in non-hospitalized patients, (b) adding an antiplatelet agent to prophylactic LMWH/UFH in select critically ill, and (c) prophylactic rivaroxaban for select patients after discharge (all COR 2b). Recommendations in this guideline are based on high-/moderate-quality evidence available through March 2022. Focused updates will incorporate future evidence supporting changes to these recommendations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Aftercare , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Patient Discharge , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , RivaroxabanABSTRACT
Heatstroke is increasingly becoming a significant concern due to global warming. Systemic inflammation and coagulopathy are the two major factors that provoke life-threatening organ dysfunction in heatstroke. Dysregulated thermo-control induces cellular injury, damage-associated molecular patterns release, hyperinflammation, and hypercoagulation with suppressed fibrinolysis to produce heatstroke-induced coagulopathy (HSIC). HSIC can progress to disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiorgan failure if severe enough. Platelet count, D-dimer, soluble thrombomodulin, and inflammation biomarkers such as interleukin-6 and histone H3 are promising markers for HSIC. In exertional heatstroke, the measurement of myoglobin is helpful to anticipate renal dysfunction. However, the optimal cutoff for each biomarker has not been determined. Except for initial cooling and hydration, effective therapy continues to be explored, and the use of antiinflammatory and anticoagulant therapies is under investigation. Despite the rapidly increasing risk, our knowledge is limited, and further study is warranted. In this review, we examine current information and what future efforts are needed to better understand and manage HSIC.
ABSTRACT
Factor XI (FXI) deficiency (hemophilia C or Rosenthal disease) was first described in the 1950s in a multigenerational family experiencing bleeding related to surgery and dental procedures. Managing patients with FXI deficiency presents several challenges, including a lack of correlation of bleeding symptoms with FXI activity levels, the large volume of fresh frozen plasma required to achieve hemostatic FXI levels, lack of availability of FXI concentrate in certain regions of the world, and the inherent thrombotic risk associated with replacement therapy. This article summarizes presentation, diagnosis, and management of patients with FXI deficiency in a variety of clinical settings.
Subject(s)
Factor XI Deficiency , Factor XI , Factor XI Deficiency/diagnosis , Factor XI Deficiency/therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostasis , Humans , ThrombosisSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Hospitals , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The first patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged at the end of 2019. This novel viral infection demonstrated unique features that include prothrombotic clinical presentations. However, one year after the first occurrence, there remain many unanswered questions. We tried to address some of the important queries in this review. AREAS COVERED: We raised the following critical questions. 'Why is COVID-19 so hypercoagulable?', 'Why are most coagulation test results relatively normal?', 'Why is COVID-19-associated coagulopathy more thrombotic than most other infectious diseases?', 'Why is arterial thrombus formed frequently?', 'Is anticoagulant therapy for COVID-19 effective?', and 'Are there racial disparities in thrombosis in COVID-19?' EXPERT OPINION: There are commonalities and differences in the pathogeneses and clinical features between COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. Correct understanding will help discussing appropriate anticoagulation prophylaxis or treatment for thromboembolism.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , COVID-19 , Thromboembolism , Thrombosis , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and life-threatening complication in sepsis. Sepsis-associated DIC is recognized as the systemic activation in coagulation with suppressed fibrinolysis that leads to organ dysfunction in combination with systemic intravascular inflammation. In this process, thrombin contributes a key role in connecting both coagulation and inflammation. Endothelial injury, a result of sepsis, causes DIC due to the effect of multiple activated factors that include neutrophils, platelets, and damage-associated molecular patterns. Recent advances in the understanding of pathophysiology have made it possible to diagnose sepsis-associated DIC at earlier timing with better accuracy. However, progress in the treatment is still limited, and new therapeutics for sepsis-associated DIC are needed.
Subject(s)
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/blood , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/etiology , Sepsis/complications , Blood Platelets , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Endothelial Cells , Fibrinolysis , Humans , Inflammation , Neutrophils , Prognosis , Thrombin/physiologyABSTRACT
Thromboembolic events contribute to morbidity and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As a result, thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is universally recommended for hospitalized patients based on multiple guidelines. However, ethnic differences with respect to thrombogenicity have been reported and the incidence of thromboembolic events is considered to be lower in the Asian population. Despite the importance of thromboprophylaxis, bleeding is also a side effect that should be considered. We examine the data relating to potential ethnic differences in thrombosis and bleeding in COVID-19. Although sufficient data is not yet available, current evidence does not oppose routine anticoagulant use and thromboprophylaxis using a standard dose of LMWH for admitted patients regardless of ethnicity based on our review.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Ethnicity , SARS-CoV-2 , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Biological Variation, Population , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Humans , Mortality , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Prognosis , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (MF) are stem cell clonal neoplasms characterized by expansion of late myeloid cells. Thrombosis risk is elevated in MPNs and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Current consensus guidelines make no specific recommendations regarding anticoagulant choice for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in MPNs, with most evidence supporting the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for secondary prophylaxis. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now increasingly being used, although with limited data on safety and efficacy in MPNs specifically. The widespread adoption of DOACs is based on new, high-quality evidence demonstrating safety and efficacy of DOAC treatment for cancer-associated VTE. However, these studies include few if any MPN patients, and MPNs have disease-specific considerations that may elevate thrombosis and bleeding risk. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence behind current treatment recommendations for thrombosis in MPNs, with special attention to the use of DOACs.
Subject(s)
Janus Kinase 2/metabolism , Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy , Myeloproliferative Disorders/metabolism , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Humans , Mutation , Myeloproliferative Disorders/complications , Neoplasms/metabolism , Secondary Prevention , Venous Thromboembolism/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) characterized by the elevated D-dimer without remarkable changes of other global coagulation markers is associated with various thrombotic complications and disease severity. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the pathophysiology of this unique coagulopathy. METHODS: The authors performed online search of published medical literature through PubMed using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV-2," "coronavirus," "coagulopathy," and "thrombus." Then, selected 51 articles that closely relevant to coagulopathy in COVID-19. RESULTS: The primary targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are the pneumocytes, immune cells, and vascular endothelial cells. The alveolar damage and the pulmonary microvascular thrombosis are the major causes of acute lung injury in COVID-19. The endotheliopathy that occurs is due to direct SARS-CoV-2 infection and activation of other pathways that include the immune system and thromboinflammatory responses leading to what is termed CAC. As a result, both microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events occur in arterial, capillary, venule, and large vein vascular beds to produce multiorgan dysfunction and thrombotic complications. In addition to the endothelial damage, SARS-CoV-2 also can cause vasculitis and presents as a systemic inflammatory vascular disease. Clinical management of COVID-19 includes anticoagulation but novel therapies for endotheliopathy, hypercoagulability, and vasculitis are needed. CONCLUSION: The endotheliopathy due to direct endothelial infection with SARS-COV-2 and the indirect damage caused by inflammation play the predominant role in the development of CAC. The intensive control of thromboinflammation is necessary to improve the outcome of this highly detrimental contagious disease.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Vasculitis/virology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/drug therapy , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Endothelial Cells , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Lung/blood supply , Microvessels , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , PubMed , Pulmonary Embolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/virologyABSTRACT
Thrombotic complications and coagulopathy frequently occur in COVID-19. However, the characteristics of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) are distinct from those seen with bacterial sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), with CAC usually showing increased D-dimer and fibrinogen levels but initially minimal abnormalities in prothrombin time and platelet count. Venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis are more frequent in CAC compared to SIC/DIC. Clinical and laboratory features of CAC overlap somewhat with a hemophagocytic syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and thrombotic microangiopathy. We summarize the key characteristics of representative coagulopathies, discussing similarities and differences so as to define the unique character of CAC.