Proportion and predictors of FVC decline in patients with interstitial lung disease.

RATIONALE: The proportion of patients who develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), along with risk factors for progression remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with an increased risk of developing PPF among patients at a referral center. METHODS: We identified patients with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) seen within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. Utilizing a retrospective observational approach we estimated the risk of developing progression by diagnosis group and identified key clinical predictors using the FVC component of both the original progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (PFILD) and the proposed PPF (ATS) criteria. RESULTS: We identified 5934 patients with a diagnosis of ILD. The cumulative incidence of progression over the 24 months was similar when assessed with the PFILD and PPF criteria (33.1 % and 37.9 % respectively). Of those who met the ATS criteria, 9.5 % did not meet the PFILD criteria. Conversely, 4.3 % of patients who met PFILD thresholds did not achieve the 5 % absolute FVC decline criteria. Significant differences in the rate of progression were seen based on underlying diagnosis. Steroid therapy (HR 1.46, CI 1.31-1.62) was associated with an increased risk of progressive fibrosis by both PFILD and PPF criteria. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the definition used, the cumulative incidence of progressive disease is high in patients with ILD in the 24 months following diagnosis. Some differences are seen in the risk of progression when assessed by PFILD and PPF criteria. Further work is needed to identify modifiable risk factors for the development of progressive fibrosis.

Impact of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease on healthcare use: association between fvc decline and inpatient hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Many types of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may transition to progressive chronic-fibrosing ILDs with rapid lung function decline and a negative survival prognosis. In real-world clinical settings, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures demonstrating progressive decline may be linked to negative outcomes, including increased risks of costly healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Thus, we assessed the relationship between rate of decline in lung function and an increase in HRU, specifically inpatient hospitalization, among patients with chronic fibrosing ILD. METHODS: This study utilized electronic health records from 01-Oct-2015 to 31-Oct-2019. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) had ≥ 2 fibrosing ILD diagnosis codes, clinical activity for ≥ 15 months, and ≥ 2 FVC tests occurring 6 months apart. Patients with missing demographic data, IPF, or use of nintedanib or pirfenidone were excluded. Two groups were defined by relative change in percent of predicted FVC (FVC% pred) from baseline to 6 months: significant decline (≥ 10%) vs. marginal decline/stable FVC (decrease < 10% or increase). The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of an inpatient hospitalization 6 months after the first FVC value. Descriptive and multivariable analysis was conducted to examine the impact of FVC decline on occurrence of inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: The sample included 566 patients: 13% (n = 75) with significant decline and 87% (n = 491) with marginal decline/stable FVC; their mean age (SD) was 65 (13.7) years and 56% were female. Autoimmune diagnoses were observed among 40% of patients with significant decline, and 27% with marginal decline/stable FVC. The significant decline group had better lung function at baseline than the marginal/stable group. For patients with FVC% <80% at baseline, reduction of FVC% ≥10% was associated with significantly increased odds of an inpatient hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; confidence interval [CI] 1.17, 6.94 [p = 0.021]). CONCLUSION: Decline in FVC% ≥10% was associated with increased odds of inpatient hospitalization among patients with reduced lung function at baseline. These findings support the importance of preserving lung function among patients with fibrosing ILD.

Effect of Antifibrotic Therapy on Survival in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Real-world studies have reported reduced mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with antifibrotic therapy; however, the initiation or discontinuation of therapy during these studies may have introduced bias. This study investigated the effect of antifibrotic therapy on mortality and other outcomes in patients with IPF using causal inference methodology. METHODS: Data from a multicenter US registry of patients with IPF were used to assess the effect of antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib or pirfenidone) on death, death or lung transplant, respiratory-related hospitalization, and acute worsening of IPF (defined as any health care encounter deemed due to acute worsening of IPF). This study used the Gran method, which accounts for differences in patient characteristics and for treatment initiations and discontinuations during follow-up. The analysis cohort was limited to patients who started antifibrotic therapy on or after the day of enrollment or had never taken it. FINDINGS: Among the 499 patients analyzed, 352 (70.5%) received antifibrotic therapy. Estimated event rates of death at 1 year were 6.6% (95% CI, 6.1-7.1) for treated patients and 10.2% (95% CI, 9.5-10.9) for control patients. There was a numerical reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-1.03; P = 0.060) but numerical increases in risks of respiratory-related hospitalization (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.90-3.92; P = 0.091) and acute worsening of IPF (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.36-8.09; P = 0.496) in treated versus control patients. IMPLICATIONS: Analyses based on causal inference methodology suggest that patients with IPF who receive antifibrotic therapy have improved survival.

Burden of illness in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively new clinical concept describing a variety of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis with associated lung function decline and worsening chest imaging. Little is known about health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study analyzed the adjusted HCRU and cost burden among patients with incident non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD vs matched patients with incident fibrosing ILD that had not yet progressed. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of insured US adults newly diagnosed with non-IPF fibrosing ILD from October 2016 to June 2019, conducted using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Progressive disease was identified using claims-based proxies comprising health care utilization associated with management of progressive fibrosing ILD. Patients in the progressive population were 1:1 propensity score matched to not-yet-progressed patients on the basis of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All-cause HCRU and health care costs were presented as weighted per-patient-per-month (PPPM) measures to account for variable follow-up. Differences in study outcomes between matched cohorts were evaluated using Z-tests for continuous measures and Rao-Scott tests for binary measures. RESULTS: The postmatch cohorts comprised 11,025 patients with evidence of progression matched to 11,025 patients with not-yet-progressed fibrosing ILD. Mean (SD) weighted PPPM counts of follow-up health care encounters were significantly higher for the progressive vs not-yet-progressed cohort: ambulatory visits, 4.2 (3.6) vs 3.1 (3.3); emergency department visits, 0.3 (0.5) vs 0.1 (0.3); and inpatient (IP) stays, 0.1 (0.2) vs 0.0 (0.1) (P < 0.001 for all). Among patients with an IP stay, those with progressive disease had more inpatient days than those with not-yet-progressed disease (mean [SD] 1.6 [2.4] days vs 1.0 [1.3] days, P < 0.001). Mean weighted PPPM (SD) all-cause health care costs were also significantly higher for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients, including total costs ($4,382 [$9,597] vs $2,243 [$4,162], P < 0.001), medical costs ($3,662 [$9,150] vs $1,627 [$3,524], P < 0.001), and pharmacy costs ($720 [$2,097] vs $616 [$2,070], P = 0.002). The difference in medical costs between cohorts was driven primarily by higher inpatient costs for progressive vs not-yet-progressed patients ($1,729 [$7,557] vs $523 [$2,118], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive fibrosing ILD carries a substantial economic and health care burden. Among patients with incident non-IPF fibrosing ILD, all-cause HCRU and costs were significantly higher for those with a progressive phenotype than for matched patients whose disease had not yet progressed. The cost differential was driven primarily by hospitalizations, which were longer and more frequent for the progressive cohort. Disclosures: This work was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Drs Conoscenti and Shetty are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim (BI). Dr Singer was an employee of BI at the time the study was conducted. Dr Brown was a paid consultant for BI for this study. Dr Bengtson, Ms Anderson, and Dr Brekke are employees of Optum, which was contracted by BI to conduct the study. Medical writing assistance was provided by Yvette Edmonds, PhD (Optum), and was contracted and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Impact of timing of nintedanib initiation among patients newly diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

AIMS: While nintedanib treatment has been shown to slow the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in patients across varying levels of lung function, the effect of treatment timing on outcomes has not been examined. We assessed hospitalization risk and medical costs among patients with IPF based on the timing of nintedanib initiation after IPF diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims study included data from 04/01/2014-09/30/2019 for patients aged ≥40 years who initiated nintedanib within 1 year of IPF diagnosis. Patients were assigned to study cohorts based on the time from IPF diagnosis to nintedanib initiation. All-cause hospitalization and all-cause medical costs were modeled using marginal structural models including inverse probability weights to adjust for both baseline and time-varying characteristics. RESULTS: Of 11,195 patients diagnosed with IPF during the identification period, 449 met the study selection criteria (mean age 72.3 years, 68% male, mean follow-up time 13.3 months). Adjusted hospitalization risk and medical costs both varied significantly by the timing of nintedanib initiation (p < .001 and p = .020, respectively). Adjusted weighted hospitalization risk was higher among untreated vs. treated patients in months 2-3, months 4-6, and months 7-12 after diagnosis (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.97 [1.09-3.56], p = .026; 2.62 [1.22-5.63], p = .014; and 5.57 [2.31-13.45], p < .001, respectively). Medical costs were 69% higher for patients initiating treatment in months 2-3 vs. month 1 (cost ratio [95% CI] 1.69 [1.20-2.38], p = .003). LIMITATIONS: Disease severity could not be assessed because clinical data were unavailable; however, proxies such as oxygen use were included to adjust for between-cohort differences in disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who initiate nintedanib promptly after IPF diagnosis may have reduced hospitalization risk and medical costs compared with those who start treatment later. Additional studies are warranted to improve understanding of the impact of prompt antifibrotic therapy on patient outcomes.

Claims-based Prevalence of Disease Progression among Patients with Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Other than Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the United States.

Rationale: Chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a progressive phenotype is a clinical concept describing the broad group of ILDs characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis. The prevalence of progressive fibrotic ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is not well understood. Objectives: We used a novel algorithm to estimate the prevalence range of disease progression among patients with non-IPF fibrotic ILD in a U.S. claims database. Methods: This was a retrospective study including adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) insurance using administrative claims data from October 2015 to September 2019. Patients likely to have non-IPF fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype were identified via an algorithm that incorporated ILD-related diagnosis codes (excluding IPF) and claims-based proxies for fibrotic ILD progression, including pulmonary function tests, chest imaging, oral corticosteroid (OCS) medications, immunosuppressive medications, lung transplant, oxygen therapy, palliative care, and respiratory hospitalization. The prevalence range of non-IPF fibrotic ILD with progressive disease behavior was calculated using strict and lenient case definitions to account for potential imprecision in the progression proxies. Results: Of nearly 9 million study-eligible patients, 17,136 were identified with non-IPF fibrosing ILD. The prevalence of disease progression per 10,000 (95% confidence interval) ranged from 12.14 (11.74-12.54) to 29.05 (28.43-29.67) over a mean observation time of 1.44 years for MAPD enrollees (n = 14,686), and from 0.89 (0.81-0.97) to 2.36 (2.24-2.48) over a mean observation time of 1.29 years for commercial enrollees (n = 2,450). Prevalence estimates increased with age for both insurance types. Among patients with progression, 4,097 met at least two progression proxies not considering OCS (strict case definition) and 9,946 met at least one progression proxy (lenient case definition). The mean (standard deviation) number of proxies met was 2.1 (1.3), and the most common individual proxies met (alone or in combination with other proxies) were OCS use (48.9%), respiratory hospitalization (44.2%), and oxygen therapy (44.1%). Conclusions: This is among the first claims-based estimates of the prevalence of non-IPF chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype. Our analysis indicates that this phenotype is rare in the overall population but increases substantially with increasing age.

Associations between resources and practices of ILD centers and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the IPF-PRO Registry.

BACKGROUND: Performance benchmarks for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have not been established. We used data from the IPF-PRO Registry, an observational registry of patients with IPF managed at sites across the US, to examine associations between the characteristics of the enrolling sites and patient outcomes. METHODS: An online survey was used to collect information on the resources, operations, and self-assessment practices of IPF-PRO Registry sites that enrolled ≥ 10 patients. Site variability in 1-year event rates of clinically relevant outcomes, including death, death or lung transplant, and hospitalization, was assessed. Models were adjusted for differences in patient case mix by adjusting for known predictors of each outcome. We assessed whether site-level heterogeneity existed for each patient-level outcome, and if so, we investigated potential drivers of the heterogeneity. RESULTS: All 27 sites that enrolled ≥ 10 patients returned the questionnaire. Most sites were actively following > 100 patients with IPF (70.4%), had a lung transplant program (66.7%), and had a dedicated ILD nurse leader (77.8%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the event rates of clinically relevant outcomes across the sites. After controlling for patient case mix, there were no outcomes for which the site variance component was significantly different from 0, but the p-value for hospitalization was 0.052. Starting/completing an ILD-related quality improvement project in the previous 2 years was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.44, 0.82]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of data from patients with IPF managed at sites across the US found no site-specific characteristics or practices that were significantly associated with clinically relevant outcomes after adjusting for patient case mix. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511. Registered 5 August 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01915511.

Hospitalizations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations are common among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated the impact of hospitalizations on outcomes in patients with IPF. METHODS: The IPF-PRO Registry is an observational US registry that enrolled patients with IPF that was diagnosed or confirmed at the enrolling center in the previous 6 months. Associations between patient characteristics and hospitalization, and between hospitalization and mortality, were analyzed using Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1002 patients with IPF were enrolled into the IPF-PRO Registry. Over a median follow-up time of 23.7 months (maximum: 67.0 months), 568 patients (56.7%) had at least one hospitalization. Of these patients, 319 (56.2%) had at least one respiratory-related hospitalization and 120 (21.1%) had at least one hospitalization with ventilatory support. Younger age (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.55, 0.84] per 5-year increase for patients < 62 years), lower BMI (0.96 [0.93, 0.98] per 1-point increase), lower FVC % predicted (0.90 [0.83, 0.97] per 10% increase), oxygen use at rest (2.85 [2.18, 3.72]) and history of pulmonary hypertension (2.02 [1.37, 2.96]) at enrollment were associated with an increased risk of respiratory-related hospitalization during follow-up. In a multivariable model, there was an eightfold increase in the risk of mortality during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge compared with outside of this period. The risk of mortality associated with a respiratory hospitalization or a hospitalization with ventilatory support was even greater. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the IPF-PRO Registry demonstrate that hospitalizations are common among patients with IPF. The risk of mortality during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge was high, particularly among patients who were hospitalized for a respiratory cause or received ventilatory support. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511. Registered 5 August 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01915511.

Implementation of guideline recommendations and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Data from the IPF-PRO registry.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the extent to which clinical practice is aligned with international guidelines for the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated the extent to which management guidelines for IPF have been implemented in the US IPF-PRO Registry and associations between implementation of guidelines and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We assessed the implementation of eight recommendations in clinical practice guidelines within the 6 months after enrollment: visit to a specialized clinic; pulmonary function testing; use of oxygen in patients with resting hypoxemia and exercise-induced hypoxemia; referral for pulmonary rehabilitation; treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease; initiation of anti-fibrotic therapy; referral for lung transplant evaluation. An implementation score was calculated as the number of recommendations achieved divided by the number for which the patient was eligible. Associations between implementation score and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 727 patients, median (Q1, Q3) implementation score was 0.6 (0.5, 0.8). Patients with an implementation score >0.6 had greater disease severity than those with a lower score. Implementation was lowest for referral for pulmonary rehabilitation (19.5%) and lung transplant evaluation (22.3%). In unadjusted models, patients with higher implementation scores had a greater risk of death, death or lung transplant, and hospitalization, but no significant associations were observed in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Management guidelines were more likely to be implemented in patients with IPF with greater disease severity. When adjusted for disease severity, no association was found between implementation of management guidelines and clinical outcomes.

A retrospective study of in-hospital mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis between 2015 and 2018.

Hospitalizations are common in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and are associated with high mortality. We used data from the Premier Healthcare Database to determine in-hospital mortality rates and the factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with IPF in the era of approved antifibrotic drugs.The Premier Healthcare Database is a detailed and broadly representative database of hospital admissions and discharges in the US. Patients with IPF who were hospitalized between 1 January 2015 and 28 February 2018 were identified using a diagnostic algorithm comprising International Classification of Diseases -9 and International Classification of Diseases -10 diagnostic codes and billing data. Associations between patient-, hospital- and treatment-related factors and a composite outcome of death during the index visit, lung transplant during the index visit but >1 day after admission, or death during a readmission within 90 days of the index visit were analyzed using logistic regression.The cohort comprised 9667 hospitalized patients with IPF. In total, 1414 patients (14.6%) met the composite outcome: 1036 (10.7%) died during the index visit, 371 (3.8%) died during a readmission within 90 days; 7 (0.1%) underwent lung transplant >1 day after admission. Factors significantly associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome included mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 6.41 [95% CI: 5.24, 7.84]), admission to the intensive care unit (1.73 [1.49, 2.00]), attendance by a critical care physician (2.12 [1.33, 3.38]), older age (1.20 [1.12, 1.28] per 10-year increase), and use of intravenous steroids (1.16 [1.00, 1.34]), intravenous antibiotics (1.49 [1.22, 1.83]) and opioids (3.41 [2.95, 3.93]). Factors significantly associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome included female sex (0.70 [0.61, 0.80]), comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.69 [0.60, 0.78]), attendance by a family medicine physician (0.67 [0.48, 0.94]) or internal medicine physician (0.59 [0.46, 0.75]), and use of oral steroids (0.62 [0.51, 0.77]), statins (0.76 [0.67, 0.87]) and proton pump inhibitors (0.80 [0.70, 0.92]).In conclusion, patients with IPF are at risk of mortality during a hospital stay or readmission within 90 days, particularly those who receive mechanical ventilation.

Effects of Nintedanib on Quantitative Lung Fibrosis Score in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Nintedanib slows disease progression in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) by reducing decline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). The effects of nintedanib on abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography scans have not been previously studied. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a Phase IIIb trial to assess the effects of nintedanib on changes in Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score and other measures of disease progression in patients with IPF. METHODS: 113 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nintedanib 150 mg bid or placebo double-blind for ≥6 months, followed by open-label nintedanib. The primary endpoint was the relative change from baseline in QLF score (%) at month 6. Analyses were descriptive and exploratory. RESULTS: Adjusted mean relative changes from baseline in QLF score at month 6 were 11.4% in the nintedanib group (n=42) and 14.6% in the placebo group (n=45) (difference 3.2% [95% CI: -9.2, 15.6]). Adjusted mean absolute changes from baseline in QLF score at month 6 were 0.98% and 1.33% in these groups, respectively (difference 0.35% [95% CI: -1.27, 1.96]). Adjusted mean absolute changes from baseline in FVC at month 6 were -14.2 mL and -83.2 mL in the nintedanib (n=54) and placebo (n=54) groups, respectively (difference 69.0 mL [95% CI: -8.7, 146.8]). CONCLUSION: Exploratory data suggest that in patients with IPF, 6 months' treatment with nintedanib was associated with a numerically smaller degree of fibrotic change in the lungs and reduced FVC decline versus placebo. These data support previous findings that nintedanib slows the progression of IPF.

Time to diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the IPF-PRO Registry.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with high mortality. Patient characteristics associated with diagnostic delays are not well described. METHODS: Subjects who had not been diagnosed with IPF prior to referral and received a new diagnosis of IPF at an enrolling centre for the IPF-PRO (Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes) Registry were characterised as having a longer (>1 year) or shorter (≤1 year) time from symptom onset to diagnosis and from first imaging evidence of fibrosis to diagnosis. Patient characteristics, evaluations and time to death or lung transplant were compared between these cohorts. RESULTS: Among 347 patients with a symptom onset date, 49% were diagnosed with IPF >1 year after symptom onset. These patients were slightly younger and had more cardiac comorbidities than patients diagnosed ≤1 year after symptom onset. Among 454 patients with a date for imaging evidence of fibrosis, 78% were diagnosed with IPF ≤1 year later. A greater proportion of patients with >1 year versus ≤1 year from imaging evidence of fibrosis to diagnosis had cardiac comorbidities and gastro-oesophageal reflux. There was no significant difference in time to death or lung transplant between groups by time to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The time from symptom onset to diagnosis remains over 1 year in approximately half of the patients with IPF, but once imaging evidence is obtained, most of the patients are diagnosed within a year. Cardiac conditions and gastro-oesophageal disorders were more commonly reported in patients with a longer time to diagnosis.

Antifibrotic Drug Use in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the IPF-PRO Registry.

Rationale: Two antifibrotic medications, nintedanib and pirfenidone, have been approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the United States. Few data have been published on the use of these medications in clinical practice.Objectives: To investigate patterns of use of antifibrotic medications in the United States.Methods: The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) Registry, a multicenter U.S. registry, has enrolled patients with IPF that was diagnosed or confirmed at the enrolling center in the past 6 months. Data from patients enrolled from June 5, 2014, to March 4, 2018, were used to determine antifibrotic medication use ("treatment") in the enrollment window and in a follow-up window approximately 6 months later. Associations between patient characteristics and treatment status were tested using logistic regression.Results: Overall, 551 of 782 eligible patients (70.5%) were treated in the enrollment window. Younger age, lower forced vital capacity percentage predicted, oxygen use with activity, worse self-rated health (based on the Short Form 12 or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score), referral to the enrolling center by a pulmonologist, use of a lung biopsy in diagnosis, and carrying a diagnosis of IPF to the enrolling center were associated with being treated. Among 534 patients treated at enrollment who had follow-up data, 94.0% remained treated in follow-up. Better self-rated health (based on the Short Form 12 mental component score or EuroQoL score) and not using oxygen with activity at enrollment were associated with continuing treatment in follow-up. Among 172 patients who were untreated at enrollment and had follow-up data, 29.7% started treatment in follow-up. Lower diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide percentage predicted, a family history of interstitial lung disease, a history of sleep apnea, and a definite diagnosis of IPF at enrollment were associated with starting treatment in follow-up.Conclusions: The majority of patients in the IPF-PRO Registry were receiving an approved medication for IPF at enrollment. Treatment at enrollment was associated with greater disease severity, more compromised quality of life, and the use of oxygen with activity.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01915511).

Associations between Patient-reported Outcomes and Death or Lung Transplant in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes Registry.

Rationale: Progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is accompanied by worsening of symptoms, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. However, the utility of patient-reported outcomes as predictors of mortality remains uncertain.Objectives: To assess whether patient-reported outcomes are independently associated with mortality beyond clinical risk factors in patients with IPF.Methods: Data from the observational IPF Prospective Outcomes Registry were used to examine associations between patient-reported outcomes at enrollment and the composite outcome of death or lung transplant in the following year. Associations were examined using univariable models and models adjusted for age and clinical variables that have been associated with death or lung transplant in patients with IPF in this cohort (oxygen use, forced vital capacity % predicted, and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide % predicted at enrollment).Results: Among 662 patients, 45 died and 12 underwent lung transplant over 1 year. In the model adjusted for age and clinical variables that were associated with death or lung transplant, worse scores on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.48] per 10-point increase), SGRQ activity score (HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54] per 10-point increase) and SGRQ symptoms score (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.36] per 10-point increase) were associated with death or lung transplant over 1 year.Conclusions: Patient-reported outcomes that assess symptoms and physical activity are independently associated with mortality in patients with IPF.

Hospital-Based Resource Use and Costs Among Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Enrolled in the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and serious condition that is associated with high health-care resource use. The goal of this study was to estimate hospital-related resource use and costs by using a national, prospective registry of patients who were diagnosed with IPF or who had their diagnosis confirmed at the enrolling center in the past 6 months in the United States. METHODS: Participants enrolled between June 5, 2014, and April 12, 2016, in the ongoing Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes Registry were included (N = 300). Time to first hospitalization was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier methods. Annualized costs were estimated for hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and ED visits. RESULTS: At enrollment, most participants were male (75%), white (95%), commercially insured (64%), smokers (68%), had an FVC between 50% and 80% predicted (66%), and received antifibrotic drugs (55%). During the first 12 months of follow-up, participants averaged 0.11 ED visit, 0.42 hospitalization, 0.08 ICU admission, 2.18 hospital days, and 0.45 ICU day. Probability of hospitalization was 18% and 30% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and was highest for those with FVC < 50% predicted/diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide < 30% predicted. Mean annual costs (95% CI) for ICU admission and inpatient care were $10,098 ($4,732-$16,662) and $13,975 ($8,482-$20,918), respectively, per patient. CONCLUSIONS: IPF is associated with a substantial economic burden incurred by patients requiring hospital care. Future research in IPF should focus on improving clinical outcomes while reducing cost of care in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01915511; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Disease Severity and Quality of Life in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the IPF-PRO Registry.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the association between clinically measured disease severity markers and quality of life (QOL) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The study examined the associations between objective disease severity metrics and QOL in a contemporary IPF population. METHODS: This study evaluated baseline data from patients enrolled in the multicenter, US-based Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes Registry between June 2014 and July 2018. Disease severity metrics included FVC % predicted, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (Dlco) % predicted, supplemental oxygen use with activity, supplemental oxygen use at rest, and two summary scores (the Gender-Age-Lung Physiology index, based on gender, age, and % predicted values for Dlco and FVC; and the Composite Physiologic Index, based on % predicted values for Dlco, FVC, and FEV1). Multivariable adjusted regression models were used to examine cross-sectional associations between each severity measure and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score. RESULTS: Among 829 patients with complete SGRQ data, the median (interquartile range) SGRQ score at enrollment was 40 (26-53), with higher scores indicating worse QOL. Modest SGRQ impairments were observed with increasing Gender-Age-Lung Physiology score (2.9 [1.8-4.0] per 1-point increase] and with increasing Composite Physiologic Index scores (3.0 [2.4-3.6] per 5-point increase). Substantial SGRQ impairments were observed for oxygen use with activity (15.6 [12.9-18.2]), oxygen use at rest (16.2 [13.0-19.4]), and decreasing Dlco (5.0 [4.0-6.1] per 10% decrease in % predicted). CONCLUSIONS: Objective measures of disease severity, including severity scores, physiologic parameters, and supplemental oxygen use, are associated with worse QOL in patients with IPF. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01915511; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A US Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hospitalizations are associated with high mortality. We sought to determine in-hospital mortality rates and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with IPF. METHODS: Patients with IPF were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database, a representative administrative dataset that includes > 20% of hospital discharges in the US, using an algorithm based on diagnostic codes and billing data. We used logistic regression to analyze associations between patient-, hospital-, and treatment-related characteristics and a composite primary outcome of death during the index visit, lung transplant during the index visit and > 1 day after admission, or death during a readmission within 90 days. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 6665 patients with IPF hospitalized between October 2011 and October 2014. A total of 963 (14.4%) met the primary outcome. Factors significantly associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome included mechanical ventilation [odds ratio 4.65 (95% CI 3.73, 5.80)], admission to the intensive care unit [1.83 (1.52, 2.21)], treatment with opioids (3.06 [2.57, 3.65]), and a diagnosis of pneumonia [1.44 (1.21, 1.71)]. Factors significantly associated with a lower risk included concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [0.65 (0.55, 0.77)] and female sex [0.67 (0.57, 0.79)]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IPF, particularly those receiving mechanical ventilation or intensive care, are at substantial risk of death or lung transplant during hospitalization or death during a readmission within 90 days.

Predictors of death or lung transplant after a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the IPF-PRO Registry.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with a variable clinical course and high mortality. We used data from a large national US registry of patients with IPF to investigate relationships between patient characteristics, including markers of disease severity, and mortality. METHODS: The analysis cohort comprised patients enrolled in the IPF-PRO Registry from its inception on 5 June 2014 to 26 October 2017. The primary criterion for inclusion in this registry is that patients must be diagnosed or confirmed with IPF at the enrolling centre within 6 months. Associations between patient characteristics and markers of disease severity at enrolment and mortality outcomes were investigated using univariable, multivariable and adjustment models. RESULTS: Among 662 patients enrolled, 111 patients died or had a lung transplant over a follow-up period of 30 months. The probability of being free of both events at month 30 was 50.6% (95% CI: 40.0, 60.2). When patient characteristics and markers of disease severity were jointly examined in a multivariable analysis, oxygen use at rest (hazard ratio [HR] 2.44 [95% CI: 1.45, 4.10]), lower forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted (HR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.10, 1.49] per 10% decrease) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted (HR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.04, 1.51] per 10% decrease) were significantly associated with increased risk of death or lung transplant. The risk of death or lung transplant increased with increasing age in patients ≥62 years old (HR 1.18 [95% CI: 0.99, 1.40] per 5-year increase), and decreased with increasing age in patients <62 years old (HR 0.60 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.92] per 5-year increase). CONCLUSIONS: In an observational US registry of patients with IPF, oxygen use at rest, lower FVC % predicted, and lower DLco % predicted were associated with risk of death or lung transplant. An audio podcast of the lead author discussing these data can be downloaded from: http://www.usscicomms.com/respiratory/snyder/IPF-PROsurvival1/ . TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01915511 .