Laparoscopic Total Pancreatectomy After Laparoscopic Whipple.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of a second de novo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with prior cancer has been reported to be 6%.1,2 however, as survival increases through improvements in systemic therapy, this incidence of a de novo PDAC after prior PDAC may become more prevalent.3-8 In this context, a structured and stepwise approach to a total pancreatectomy for a second de novo PDAC after a prior PDAC treated with a pancreaticoduodenectomy is detailed. PATIENTS: We present two similar cases. The first patient was a 71-year-old female with de novo body PDAC, and the second was a 50-year-old female with de novo tail PDAC. To rule out recurrence, immunohistochemical staining as well as the review of biopsies by two experienced pathologists were employed. Both patients had undergone a laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC 4 and 3 years prior. Each patient received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent a safe laparoscopic total pancreatectomy. TECHNIQUE: Prior to surgery, three-dimensional anatomic and port site modeling is performed to optimize the understanding of the spatial relationship between the tumor, blood vessels, and adjacent organs involved. The port site modeling (including pneumoperitoneum simulation) focuses on the optimal port set-up for dissecting the biliopancreatic limb off the portal vein. Following complete mobilization of the biliopancreatic limb, the biliopancreatic limb is staple-divided between the hepatico- and pancreaticojejunostomy. Great care must be taken to avoid accidental staple injury to the hepatic artery or celiac trunk. The remainder of the dissection is akin to a standard distal pancreaticosplenectomy. CONCLUSION: Virtual pancreatectomy modeling facilitates an optimal set-up for the critical step of this case, i.e. dissection of the pancreaticojejunostomy off the portal vein. Early division of the biliopancreatic limb between hepatico- and pancreatojejunostomy is crucial to facilitating the remainder of the dissection. Laparoscopic total pancreatectomy for a de novo PDAC after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy may become more common as survival of patients with prior PDAC improves over time.

Recurrence and tumor-related death after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Background & Aims: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a growing epidemic and a risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated the long-term outcomes of liver resection (LR) for HCC in patients with MS. Rates, timing, patterns, and treatment of recurrences were investigated, and cancer-specific survivals were assessed. Methods: Between 2001 and 2021, data from 24 clinical centers were collected. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival were analyzed as well as recurrence patterns and treatment. The analysis was conducted using a competing-risk framework. The trajectory of the risk of recurrence over time was applied to a competing risk analysis. For post-recurrence survival, death resulting from tumor progression was the primary endpoint, whereas deaths with recurrence relating to other causes were considered as competing events. Results: In total, 813 patients were included in the study. Median OS was 81.4 months (range 28.1-157.0 months), and recurrence occurred in 48.3% of patients, with a median RFS of 39.8 months (range 15.7-174.7 months). Cause-specific hazard of recurrence showed a first peak 6 months (0.027), and a second peak 24 months (0.021) after surgery. The later the recurrence, the higher the chance of receiving curative intent approaches (p = 0.001). Size >5 cm, multiple tumors, microvascular invasion, and cirrhosis were independent predictors of recurrence showing a cause-specific hazard over time. RFS was associated with death for recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.985, 95% CI: 0.977-0.995; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Patients with MS undergoing LR for HCC have good long-term survival. Recurrence occurs in 48% of patients with a double-peak incidence and time-specific hazards depending on tumor-related factors and underlying disease. The timing of recurrence significantly impacts survival. Surveillance after resection should be adjusted over time depending on risk factors. Impact and implications: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a growing epidemic and a significant risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study demonstrated that patients who undergo surgical resection for HCC on MS have a good long-term survival and that recurrence occurs in almost half of the cases with a double peak incidence and time-specific hazards depending on tumor-related factors and underlying liver disease. Also, the timing of recurrence significantly impacts survival. Clinicians should therefore adjust follow-up after surgery accordingly, considering timing of recurrence and specific risk factors. Also, the results of the present study might help design future trials on the use of adjuvant therapy following resection.

Temporal trends of health disparity in the utilization of curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: are we making progress?

BACKGROUND: Liver-directed treatments - ablative therapy (AT), surgical resection (SR), liver transplantation (LT), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) - improve the overall survival of patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although racial and socioeconomic disparities affect access to liver-directed therapies, the temporal trends for the curative-intent treatment of HCC remain to be elucidated. METHODS: This study performed chi-square, logistic regression, and temporal trends analyses on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2011 to 2019. The outcome of interest was the rate of AT, SR, LT (curative-intent treatments), and TACE utilization, and the primary predictors were racial/ethnic group and socioeconomic status (SES; insurance status). RESULTS: African American and Hispanic patients had lower odds of receiving AT (African American: odds ratio [OR], 0.78; P < .001; Hispanic: OR, 0.84; P = .005) and SR (African American: OR, 0.71; P < .001; Hispanics: OR, 0.64; P < .001) than White patients. Compared with White patients, the odds of LT was lower in African American patients (OR, 0.76; P < .001) but higher in Hispanic patients (OR, 1.25; P = .001). Low SES was associated with worse odds of AT (OR, 0.79; P = .001), SR (OR, 0.66; P < .001), and LT (OR, 0.84; P = .028) compared with high SES. Although curative-intent treatments showed significant upward temporal trends among White patients (10.6%-13.9%; P < .001) and Asian and Pacific Islander/other patients (14.4%-15.7%; P = .007), there were nonsignificant trends among African American patients (10.9%-10.1%; P = .825) or Hispanic patients (12.2%-13.7%; P = .056). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated concerning disparities in the utilization of curative-intent treatment for HCC based on race/ethnicity and SES. Moreover, racial/ethnic disparities have widened rather than improved over time.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear today whether the poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was further worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this may affect providers and patients, today. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on care delivery and outcomes of patients with PDAC in the United States. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for PDAC, between 2017 and 2020. Changes in the number of diagnoses and treatment patterns were compared annually for the entire cohort. Changes in surgical outcomes and median time from diagnosis to treatment were compared and analyzed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed. RESULTS: Of 127,613 patients with PDAC, PDAC diagnoses from 2017 (30,573) to 2019 (33,465) increased but decreased in 2020 (31,218). The number of patients receiving surgery or radiotherapy was stable between 2017 to 2019 (21.75% ± 0.05% and 13.9% ± 0.3%, respectively) but decreased in 2020 (20.7% and 12.4% respectively). Although patients received chemotherapy with increasing frequently from 2016 (60.7%) to 2019 (63.5%), this trend stopped in 2020 (63%). Of 27,490 patients undergoing surgery, the mean time from diagnosis to surgery increased from 2017 (34 days) to 2019 (56 days), with an increase in delay in 2020 (81 days). Moreover, patients who were tested for COVID-19, had a longer median time from diagnosis to surgery even if tested negative (COVID+, 140 days; COVID-, 112 days; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although the oncologic quality of PDAC surgery remained the same during the pandemic, not only did the pandemic lead to an underdiagnosis of PDAC and care delays, but even the suspicion of COVID-19 in patients with a negative test adversely affected their care.

Does adjuvant treatment improve survival in R1 resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? The risk of overtreatment.

BACKGROUND: Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with positive margins in up to half of the patients. It remains unclear whether adjuvant therapies contribute to improved survival in patients undergoing R1 resection for pCCA. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2004 and 2016. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1756 patients were included (286 surgical patients and 1470 nonsurgical patients). Patients who underwent R0 resection showed a significantly better median overall survival (OS) than that of patients who underwent R1 resection (41.7 vs 21.4 months, respectively; P = .003). Nevertheless, OS was better in patients who underwent R1 resection than in nonsurgical patients (21.4 vs 6.3 months, respectively; P < .001). Patients undergoing chemoradiation after R1 resection had similar OS to that of those receiving any other adjuvant therapy (21.4 vs 19.4 months, respectively; P = .789) or no adjuvant treatment (21.4 vs 19.8 months, respectively; P = .925). After uni- and multivariable analyses, T stage ≥3 and R1 margins were independently associated with worse survival after surgery. CONCLUSION: As currently neither radiation, chemoradiation, nor chemotherapy seem to significantly improve survival in patients who underwent R1 resection for pCCA, high-quality surgical resection remains critically important. Moreover, the concern of overtreatment of patients who underwent R1 resection with current adjuvant therapeutic regimes exists.

Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: Is Enucleation Safe?

BACKGROUND: While solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas are oncologically low-risk tumors, their resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or partial pancreatectomy (PP) carries a significant risk for morbidity. To balance the favorable prognosis with the surgical morbidity of pancreas resection, this study explores the oncologic safety of enucleation (EN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for resected SPT from January 2004 through December 2020. Perioperative outcomes and survival were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis (with log-rank test). Survival analysis was performed to compare patients with and without lymph node (LN) metastases and binary logistic regression for predictors of LN metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 922 patients met inclusion criteria; 18 patients (2%) underwent EN, 550 (59.6%) underwent PP, and 354 (38.4%) underwent PD. Mean tumor size was 57.6 mm. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for EN compared with PP and PD groups (3.8 versus 6.2 versus 9.4 days, p < 0.001). There was a nonsignificant improvement in unplanned readmission [0% versus 8% versus 10.7% (p = 0.163)], 30-day mortality [0% versus 0.5% versus 0% (p = 0.359)], and 90-day mortality [0% versus 0.5% versus 0% (p = 0.363)] between EN, PP, and PD groups. Survival analyses showed no difference in OS when comparing EN versus PP (p = 0.443), and EN versus PD (p = 0317). Patients with LN metastases (p < 0.001) fared worse, and lymphovascular invasion, higher T category (T3-4) and M1 status were found as predictors for LN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: EN may be considered for select patients leading to favorable outcomes. Because survival was worse in the rare cohort of patients with LN metastases, the predictors for LN metastasis identified here may aid in stratifying patients to EN versus resection.

Innovations in surgery for gallbladder cancer: A review of robotic surgery as a feasible and safe option.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgical techniques in the treatment of gallbladder cancer, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic methods. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature searched for comparative analyses of patient outcomes following robotic, open, and laparoscopic surgeries, focusing on oncological results and perioperative benefits. RESULTS: Five total studies published between 2019 and 2023 were identified. Findings indicate that robotic-assisted surgery for gallbladder cancer is as effective as traditional methods in terms of oncological outcomes, with potential advantages in precision and perioperative recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery offers a viable and potentially advantageous alternative for gallbladder cancer treatment, warranting further research to confirm its benefits and establish comprehensive surgical guidelines.

Laparoscopic Caudate Resection: How to Safely Manage the Spiegel/IVC Interface.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive caudate lobectomy, or even paracaval caudate resection, can be associated with significant bleeding due to its abutment of inferior vena cava (IVC), portal pedicle and hepatic veins.1-3 This risk can be magnified by cirrhosis as well as response to neoadjuvant therapy (a common phenomenon after excellent response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy), leading to obliteration or even fusion of the hepato-caval space.4-7 PATIENT: A 68-year-old female with stage IVa colorectal adenocarcinoma was found to have a single liver metastasis (3.8 × 3.1 cm) in the paracaval caudate lobe. The patient received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to inflammatory fusion of the hepato-caval space. Despite this, the patient underwent a safe laparoscopic Spiegel process resection. TECHNIQUE: Prior to surgery, three-dimensional liver and port site modeling was performed to optimize the understanding of the spatial relationship between the tumor, IVC, and portal-hepatic veins. Following inflow control of portal veinous branches, the fused hepato-caval space was dissected. The adhesions were then sharply dissected to mobilize the paracaval caudate lobe off the IVC. Using scissors rather than an energy device reduced the risk of inadvertent thermal injury to the IVC. CONCLUSION: Preoperative virtual hepatectomy facilitates surgical planning, increasing the understanding of the tumor/vessel relationship and port placement. In case of a fused hepato-caval space, low central venous pressure and judicious management of short hepatic vein branches are the key for a successful dissection. Moreover, anticipation of a fused hepato-caval space and its strategic management are paramount when performing a minimally invasive caudate resection.

Laparoscopic Dissection of Lymph Node Station 16-Why and How?

BACKGROUND: Dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes (Station 16) provides an important prognosticator for patients with gastrointestinal, colorectal, and hepatobiliary cancers.1-4 For example, a positive Station 16 lymph node has been shown to lead to 2-year survival of 3% in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma, akin to stage IV disease.5,6 Thereby, Station 16 involvement can help with the risk/benefit stratification of the decision to move forward with radical surgery.7-9 Furthermore, it has been shown for gallbladder cancer that involvement of Station 16 cannot necessarily be predicted from the dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes only.10,11 TECHNIQUE: With the patient in the French position, a complete Kocherization and a Cattel-Braasch maneuver is performed, allowing for visualization of LN station 16b. Station 16b is the inferior border of the station 16 compartment. The left renal vein (LRV) serves as an important landmark to identify the superior border of the dissection comprised by Stations 16a2 and 16b1. Station 16a2 dissection may be associated with a traction injury of the left renal vein or damage of right renal or suprarenal arteries and is dissected if there are specific concerns regarding involvement. CONCLUSIONS: While station 16 provides important prognostic information for risk stratification, a strategic and stepwise approach is needed for a safe sampling. This is accomplished by wide mobilization of the duodenum, implementation of thermal fusion to minimize chyle leak, and careful dissection below the left renal vein.

Global practice patterns of preoperative image reconstruction for liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3-D) liver modeling is used globally; however, its actual practice is limited to a few centers. This study aimed to assess practice patterns and barriers to the use of 3-D modeling among liver surgeons worldwide. METHODS: A survey approved by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association research council consisting of 27 questions was conducted using an online questionnaire. Incomplete responses were excluded. RESULTS: Of 235 respondents from 46 countries, 81.3% reported experience with 3-D modeling; however, only 21% used it in > 75% of cases. Surgeons using 3-D reconstruction were older (P = .025), worked more frequently at academic facilities (P = .007), and had more years of experience (P = .001), especially in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) (P = .038). In addition, 3-D rendering was performed by surgeons in 50.8% of cases. Liver volumetry was the most frequent indication (80.1%), and decreased postoperative complications were the main perceived benefit (53.6%). CONCLUSIONS: More experience in liver surgery because of seniority, case volume, and openness to novel technology (MILS) is associated with a greater appreciation for the value of 3-D modeling. Our results suggest the need for senior surgeons to help early-career surgeons consider 3-D modeling for the reported benefit of reduced intra- and postoperative complications.

Subsegmental approaches to S7: anatomic laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic and nonanatomic robotic transthoracic.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver surgery of postero-superior segments (S4a, S7, S8) remains a challenge. The caudal view, an increased distance between trocars and the operative field, and the liver fulcrum limiting the view, contribute to the difficulty [1, 2]. We and other groups have previously reported the use of intercostal trocars to access subdiaphragmatic tumors (transdiaphragmatic approach) [3-5], only few reports on a laparoscopic total transthoracic approach, none (to our knowledge) dynamic manuscripts of a total transthoracic robotic approach, and none (to our knowledge) that use preoperative port site and anatomic modelling exist. Further, we developed a total transthoracic (thoracoscopic) approach to avoid a hostile abdomen, while bringing viewing axis and instruments close to the target [6-10]. In this context, this report details the advantages of a laparoscopic vs. robotic transthoracic approach. According to institutional protocol, reports of individual cases in print or video format do not require institutional review board approval. PATIENT: A 68-year-old male on peritoneal dialysis with left colon adenocarcinoma and a single synchronous liver metastasis in S6-7 close to the root of the right hepatic vein underwent a laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic metastasectomy. Two years later, the patient developed a recurrent 1.5 cm liver metastasis in S7, which lend itself to a robotic transthoracic approach. TECHNIQUE: Following 3-D modelling and virtual port placement planning, the first metastasectomy was performed laparoscopically using a transdiaphragmatic approach. The recurrence was managed transthoracically due to more apical, subdiaphragmatic location. For this operation, a robotic approach was optimal as robotic wrist articulation facilitates manipulation via the limited intercostal space. This was particularly helpful during the diaphragmatic reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Total transthoracic liver surgery is certainly an advanced procedure requiring superior MIS liver skills. Recommendations for starting with a total transthoracic approach are not unlike from starting a standard, none-transthoracic liver surgery. Early on in the experience we recommend advanced liver MIS skills, and single, small, subdiaphragmatic tumors away from major vessels. Nonetheless, when these recommendations are followed a total transthoracic approach may be safer and result in less access trauma, than traversing a hostile abdomen to reach the posterior-superior liver. Both laparoscopic and robotic transthoracic approaches can facilitate the resection of subdiaphragmatic tumors, especially in patients with hostile abdomens. While the laparoscopic approach has advantages due to a broader spectrum of available surgical tools (flexible tip camera, parenchymal dissection, and energy devices), the robotic wrist articulation facilitates manipulation via the restricted intercostal space.

Clinical outcomes and cost of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Open (OA), laparoscopic (LA), and percutaneous (PA) ablation are all ablation approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilized in the United States today. However, it remains unclear today which approach is (A) most effective, (B) cost-efficient, and (C) nationally practiced. METHODS: In-hospital mortality and cost were collected from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for patients undergoing liver ablation from 2011 to 2018. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, disposition, and perioperative composite complications. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for differences in patient and hospital baseline characteristics. RESULTS: One thousand and one hundred and twenty-five LA, 1221 OA, and 1068 PA liver ablations were analyzed. After IPTW, in-hospital mortality risk was significantly lower in PA versus OA cohorts (0.57% vs. 2.90%, p < 0.001) and reduced among PA patients, yet not significantly different from the LA cohort (0.57% vs. 1.64%, p = 0.056). The median length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the PA and LA group compared to OA (2 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). The median hospitalization costs were significantly lower for PA ($44,884 vs. $90,187, p < 0.001) and LA ($61,445 vs. $90,187, p < 0.001) compared to OA. Moreover, we found significant regional differences regarding the use of each ablation approach, with the Midwest having the lowest rates of PA and LA. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized after ablation for HCC, PA leads to the lowest hospital cost. Both PA and LA result in lower peri-operative morbidity and mortality relative to OA. Despite these reported advantages, there are significant regional differences with respect to ablation availability suggesting the need to promote the standardization of best practices.

R1 pancreatic cancer patients benefit from chemoradiation when initiation of adjuvant therapy is delayed.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer (PDAC) has been demonstrated to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment (AT) regimen for R1-margin patients remains unclear. This retrospective study investigates the impact of AC vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) on survival (OS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with PDAC who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into, (A) AC<60 days, (B) ACRT<60 days, (C) AC≥60 days, and (D) ACRT≥60 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 13 740 patients, median OS was 23.7 months. For R1 patients, median OS for timely AC and ACRT, and delayed AC and ACRT was 19.91, 19.19, 15.24, 18.96 months, respectively. While time of AC initiation was an insignificant factor for R0 patients (p = 0.263, CI 0.957-1.173), a survival benefit was found for R1 patients who received AC<60 vs. ≥60 days (p = 0.041, CI 1.002-1.42). Among R1 patients, administration of delayed ACRT achieves the same survival benefit of timely AC initiation (p = 0.074, CI 0.703-1.077). CONCLUSION: The study suggests value in ACRT for patients with R1 margins when delay of AT≥60 days cannot be avoided. Hence, ACRT may mitigate the negative impact of delayed AT initiation for R1-patients.

Central Pericystectomy for Hydatid Cyst Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Compared to open resection for hepatic hydatid cysts, a laparoscopic approach may combine the benefit of reduced morbidity with complete cyst removal. Nonetheless, intraoperative cyst rupture during a laparoscopic approach due to reduced tactile feedback is a valid concern.1-3 Today, the laparoscopic experience remains limited even in high incidence regions.4 Here, a structured approach to laparoscopic pericystectomy is demonstrated. PATIENT: A 37-year-old male from Uruguay presents with worsening abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. A 4-phase liver CT shows a large complex liver cyst (8.8 × 8.2 × 11.3 cm), encompassing the left hepatic lobe while abutting right hepatic vein (RHV), anterior fissure vein (AFV) and inferior vena cava (IVC). Further, the cyst causes mass effect on the hepatic vein vasculature. CT appearance is consistent with a large hydatid cyst with distorted hepatic anatomy resulting in compensatory hypertrophy of segments II, VI and VII. Appropriate institutional review board (IRB) and inform consent was obtained. TECHNIQUE: Following neoadjuvant albendazole for 4 weeks to minimize any effects in case of inadvertent cyst spillage, the patient tested negative for echinococcal antibody. For surgical planning, the patient's anatomy was modeled to optimize the understanding of the complex spatial relationship between cyst, portal pedicle and hepatic veins. Further, port sites were preoperatively modelled to optimize port placement in the context of the altered anatomy from compensatory hepatic hypertrophy. During surgery, with the patient in a modified French position, the liver was completely mobilized. Then, a parenchymal transection plane was developed guided by RHV, AFV and IVC, while biliary radicals entering directly into the cyst were controlled individually. The complex transection plane resulted in preservation of the unaffected liver segments I, II, VI and VII. CONCLUSION: The multimodal approach demonstrated here included pretreatment with albendazole followed by safe laparoscopic pericystectomy. In the preoperative setting, albendazole can reduce the risk of recurrence if spillage occurs during surgery. In inoperable patients, it has been previously shown to be an effective monotherapy for small (< 5 cm) CE1 and CE3a cysts.5 For preoperative planning, an automated image reconstruction software (Fujifilm Synapse 3D) is used. The software creates a 3D model of the liver segmentation and vessels from contrast-enhanced CT and MR images. In addition to modelling the liver, port placement in relation to the liver is being simulated prior to surgery to optimize port placement at the time of surgery. During the case, the parenchymal transection is guided by RHV, AFV and IVC. The common postoperative complication of persistent biliary leakage was avoided by controlling each biliary radicals entering the cyst from the liver parenchyma. Biliary leaks are a common complication and have been positively correlated with the cyst diameter (~ 79% of cysts with diameter of 7.5 cm or greater have cysto-biliary fistula).6 In this context, indocyanine green may help to identify relevant biliary radicals entering the cyst or aid in recognizing bile leaks. If the stepwise approach described here is followed, minimally invasive pericystectomy represents a safe alternative to open surgery, harnessing the advantages of minimal risk of recurrence due to complete cyst removal and low morbidity.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To compare minimally invasive (MILR) and open liver resections (OLRs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). BACKGROUND: Liver resections for HCC on MS are associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. No data on the minimally invasive approach in this setting exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter study involving 24 institutions was conducted. Propensity scores were calculated, and inverse probability weighting was used to weight comparisons. Short-term and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 996 patients were included: 580 in OLR and 416 in MILR. After weighing, groups were well matched. Blood loss was similar between groups (OLR 275.9±3.1 vs MILR 226±4.0, P =0.146). There were no significant differences in 90-day morbidity (38.9% vs 31.9% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.08) and mortality (2.4% vs 2.2% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.84). MILRs were associated with lower rates of major complications (9.3% vs 15.3%, P =0.015), posthepatectomy liver failure (0.6% vs 4.3%, P =0.008), and bile leaks (2.2% vs 6.4%, P =0.003); ascites was significantly lower at postoperative day 1 (2.7% vs 8.1%, P =0.002) and day 3 (3.1% vs 11.4%, P <0.001); hospital stay was significantly shorter (5.8±1.9 vs 7.5±1.7, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: MILR for HCC on MS is associated with equivalent perioperative and oncological outcomes to OLRs. Fewer major complications, posthepatectomy liver failures, ascites, and bile leaks can be obtained, with a shorter hospital stay. The combination of lower short-term severe morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes favor MILR for MS when feasible.

Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide. Procedure difficulty and patient outcomes depend on several factors which are not considered in the current literature, including the learning curve, generating confusing and subjective results. This study aims to create a scoring system to calculate the learning curve of LC based on hepatobiliopancreatic (HPB) experts' opinions during an educational course. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was submitted to the panel of experts attending the HPB course at Research Institute against Digestive Cancer-IRCAD (Strasbourg, France) from 27-29 October 2022. Experts scored the proposed variables according to their degree of importance in the learning curve using a Likert scale from 1 (not useful) to 5 (very useful). Variables were included in the composite scoring system only if more than 75% of experts ranked its relevance in the learning curve assessment ≥4. A positive or negative value was assigned to each variable based on its effect on the learning curve. Results: Fifteen experts from six different countries attended the IRCAD HPB course and filled out the questionnaire. Ten variables were finally included in the learning curve scoring system (i.e., patient body weight/BMI, patient previous open surgery, emergency setting, increased inflammatory levels, presence of anatomical bile duct variation(s), and appropriate critical view of safety (CVS) identification), which were all assigned positive values. Minor or major intraoperative injuries to the biliary tract, development of postoperative complications related to biliary injuries, and mortality were assigned negative values. Conclusions: This is the first scoring system on the learning curve of LC based on variables selected through the experts' opinions. Although the score needs to be validated through future studies, it could be a useful tool to assess its efficacy within educational programs and surgical courses.