Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Immunohematology ; 33(1): 19-22, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608324

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) can present challenges in the blood bank. During transplantation, patients receive components that are ABO-compatible with both the donor graft and recipient; this practice can strain group O red blood cell (RBC) inventories.1 In addition, there are risks for acute hemolysis at the time of infusion and in the early post-transplant period.1,2 In ABO major-incompatible bone marrow HSCTs, which contain significant quantities of donor RBCs that are ABOi with recipient plasma, it is common to perform a RBC depletion of the bone marrow in an effort to minimize hemolysis at the time of infusion.2 Furthermore, patients with high-titer ABO antibodies may undergo a prophylactic, pre-transplant plasma exchange to further reduce the risk of acute hemolysis, delayed RBC engraftment, and pure RBC aplasia.2-4 ABO minor-incompatible HSCTs, in which donor plasma is ABOi with the recipient, have less risk for hemolysis at the time of infusion but can result in transient hemolysis approximately 10-21 days post-transplant, especially in patients undergoing nonmyeloablative HSCT and/or patients who have not received methotrexate for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis.1-4 In these patients, viable donor B-lymphocytes in the graft may expand and produce ABO antibodies capable of hemolyzing patient RBCs.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease , ABO Blood-Group System , Blood Group Incompatibility , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans
4.
Immunohematology ; 33(1): 15-21, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28425751

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab represent a new class of immunotherapeutic drugs for treating patients with advanced cancer. Known as checkpoint inhibitors, these drugs act to upregulate the cellular and humoral immune response to tumor antigens by inhibiting T-cell autoregulation. As a consequence, they can be associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to loss of self-tolerance, including rare cases of immune-related cytopenias. We performed a retrospective clinical chart review, including serologic, hematology, and chemistry laboratory results, of two patients who developed red blood cell (RBC) autoantibodies during treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor. Serologic testing of blood samples from these patients during induction therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab, respectively, showed their RBCs to be positive by the direct antiglobulin test (IgG+, C3+) and their plasma to contain panreactive RBC autoantibodies. Neither patient had evidence of hemolysis. Both patients developed an additional irAE during treatment. A literature review for patients who had developed immune-mediated cytopenia following treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor was performed. Nine other patients were reported with a hematologic irAE, including six with anemia attributable to autoimmune anemia, aplastic anemia, or pure RBC aplasia. Hematologic irAEs tend to occur early during induction therapy, often coincident with irAEs of other organs. In conclusion, checkpoint inhibitors can be associated with the development of autoantibodies, immune-mediated cytopenias, pure RBC aplasia, and aplastic anemia. Immunohematology reference laboratories should be aware of these agents when evaluating patients with advanced cancer and new-onset autoantibodies, anemia, and other cytopenias.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Autoantibodies/immunology , Erythrocytes/immunology , Aged , Autoantigens/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Ipilimumab , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nivolumab , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Clin Apher ; 32(4): 215-223, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27442906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although many apheresis centers offer extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), little is known about current treatment practices. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to assess ECP practice internationally. RESULTS: Of 251 responses, 137 met criteria for analysis. Most respondents were from North America (80%). Nurses perform ECP at most centers (84%) and the majority of centers treat adults only (52%). Most centers treat fewer than 50 patients/year (83%) and perform fewer than 300 procedures/year (70%). Closed system devices (XTS and/or Cellex) are used to perform ECP at most centers (96%). The most common indications for ECP are acute/chronic skin graft versus host disease (89%) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (63%). The typical wait time for ECP treatment is less than 2 weeks (91%). Most centers do not routinely perform quality control assessment of the collected product (66%). There are device-specific differences in treatment parameters. For example, XTS users more frequently have a minimum weight limit (P = 0.003) and use laboratory parameters to determine eligibility for treatment (P = 0.03). Regardless of device used, the majority of centers assess the clinical status of the patient before each procedure. Greater than 50% of respondents would defer treatment for hemodynamic instability due to active sepsis or heart failure, positive blood culture in the past 24 h or current fever. CONCLUSION: This survey based study describes current ECP practices. Further research to provide evidence for optimal standardization of patient qualifications, procedure parameters and product quality assessment is recommended.


Subject(s)
Photopheresis/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Patient Selection , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Skin Transplantation/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Transfusion ; 48(10): 2106-13, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18631162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, acute hemolytic transfusion reactions (AHTRs) have been reported after transfusion of group O single-donor apheresis platelets (SDPs) to group A, B, and AB recipients. Current methods for identifying "high-titer" SDPs include tube and gel methods. The risk of a high-titer unit is considered low with group O, poststorage, pooled platelet concentrates (PPLTs); however, data regarding anti-A and anti-B titers in PPLTs are lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Anti-A and anti-B titers were determined in 185 PPLTs by direct agglutination using manual gel and tube methods. PPLTs tested included 124 group O PPLTs, 25 group A PPLTs, 26 group B PPLTs, and 10 PPLTs containing a mix of either groups O plus A or groups O plus B (mixed PPLTs). The reciprocal of the highest dilution giving macroscopic agglutination was considered the agglutinin titer. RESULTS: Mean anti-A and anti-B titers in group O PPLTs were, respectively, 16 and 8 by tube and 64 and 32 by gel (p < 0.0001). Gel titers were one to two dilutions higher than tube and sensitive to reagent red cell lots. With the use of at least 64 as a critical titer, 60 percent of group O PPLTs tested by gel would be considered high-titer. In mixed PPLTs, the addition of one non-group O PLT significantly decreased or neutralized the corresponding anti-A or anti-B (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Anti-A and anti-B titers in group O PPLTs are comparable to those reported in group O SDPs and significantly lower than titers reported in AHTR. A critical direct agglutinin titer of 64 for identifying high-titer units by gel is too low and should be increased to 128 or higher.


Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System/immunology , Antigens, Human Platelet/immunology , Blood Component Removal , Blood Group Incompatibility/immunology , Isoantigens/immunology , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Agglutination Tests/methods , Blood Group Incompatibility/epidemiology , Blood Platelets/immunology , Humans , Isoantigens/blood , Platelet Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Blood ; 105(8): 3356-64, 2005 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15613545

ABSTRACT

Platelets express ABH antigens, which can adversely effect platelet transfusion recovery and survival in ABH-incompatible recipients. To date, there has been no large, comprehensive study comparing specific donor factors with ABH expression on platelet membranes and glycoconjugates. We studied ABH expression in 166 group A apheresis platelet donors by flow cytometry, Western blotting, and thin layer chromatography relative to donor age, sex, A1/A2 subgroup, and Lewis phenotype. Overall, A antigen on platelet membranes, glycoproteins, and glycosphingolipids was linked to an A1 red blood cell (RBC) phenotype. Among A1 donors, platelet ABH varied significantly between donors (0%-87%). Intradonor variability, however, was minimal, suggesting that platelet ABH expression is a stable, donor-specific characteristic, with 5% of A1 donors typing as either ABH high- or low-expressers. Group A2 donors, in contrast, possessed a Bombay-like phenotype, lacking both A and H antigens. Unlike RBCs, ABH expression on platelets may be determined primarily by H-glycosyltransferase (FUT1) activity. Identification of A2 and A1 low expressers may increase the availability and selection of crossmatched and HLA-matched platelets. Platelets from group A2 may also be a superior product for patients undergoing A/O major mismatch allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation.


Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System/immunology , ABO Blood-Group System/metabolism , Blood Platelets/immunology , Blood Platelets/metabolism , Platelet Transfusion , Adult , Aged , Blood Component Removal , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Lewis Blood Group Antigens/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins/immunology , Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Tissue Donors
9.
Blood ; 101(2): 711-21, 2003 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12393713

ABSTRACT

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are complex macromolecules on cell membranes that have been shown to play a role in neutrophil differentiation, activation, phagocytosis, and adhesion to both microorganisms and vascular endothelium. Because GSLs are often cryptic antigens on cell membranes, little is known regarding GSL expression in early myelopoiesis. To study the latter, myeloblasts were collected from patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) who required therapeutic leukocytopheresis for hyperleukocytosis. The neutral GSLs were isolated and identified by high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), HPTLC immunostaining, gas chromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance, and fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry. Like mature peripheral blood neutrophils, myeloblasts expressed glucosylceramide, lactosylceramide, and the neolacto-family GSLs, lactotriaosylceramide and neolactotetraosylceramide. Unlike neutrophils and chronic myeloid leukemia, most ANLL samples also expressed the globo-series GSLs, globotriaosylceramide and globotetraosylceramide. Globo GSL expression was strongly associated with a myeloblastic (ANLL M0-M2) and monoblastic phenotype (M5). A weak association was also noted with expression of either lymphoid (P <.10) or early hematopoietic markers (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase [TdT], CD34; P <.10). Globo-positive ANLL samples bound both shiga toxin and parvovirus B19 on HPTLC immunostaining. Based on these findings, we propose that neolacto and globo GSLs are expressed during early myeloid differentiation. Globotriaosylceramide expression on myeloblasts, and possibly myeloid stem cells, may have important implications for the use of shiga toxin as an ex vivo purging agent in autologous stem cell transplantation. Expression of globotetraosylceramide, the parvovirus B19 receptor, on myeloblasts may also explain the association between B19 infection, aplastic anemia, and chronic neutropenia of childhood.


Subject(s)
Glycosphingolipids/analysis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/metabolism , Carbohydrate Conformation , Cell Differentiation , Ceramides/analysis , Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Globosides/analysis , Glycosphingolipids/biosynthesis , Glycosphingolipids/chemistry , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid/metabolism , Myelopoiesis , Parvovirus B19, Human/metabolism , Receptors, Virus/analysis , Shiga Toxin/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL