Creating a Rapid Assessment Zone with Limited Emergency Department Capacity Decreases Patients Leaving Without Being Seen: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Patients leaving the emergency department before treatment (left without being seen) result in increased risks to patients and loss of revenue to the hospital system. Rapid assessment zones, where patients can be quickly evaluated and treated, have the potential to improve ED throughput and decrease the rates of patients leaving without being seen. We sought to evaluate the impact of a rapid assessment zone on the rate of patients leaving without being seen. METHODS: A pre- and post-quality improvement process was performed to examine the impact of implementing a rapid assessment zone process at an urban community hospital emergency department. Through a structured, multidisciplinary approach using the Plan, Do, Check, Act Deming Cycle of process improvement, the triage area was redesigned to include 8 rapid assessment rooms and shifted additional ED staff, including nurses and providers, into this space. Rates of patients who left without being seen, median arrival to provider times, and discharge length of stay between the pre- and postintervention periods were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests when appropriate. RESULTS: Implementation of the rapid assessment zone occurred February 1, 2021, with 42,115 ED visits eligible for analysis; 20,731 visits before implementation and 21,384 visits after implementation. All metrics improved from the 6 months before intervention to the 6 month after intervention: rate of patients who left without being seen (5.64% vs 2.55%; c2 = 258.13; P < .01), median arrival to provider time in minutes (28 vs 11; P < .01), and median discharge length of stay in minutes (205 vs 163; P < .01). DISCUSSION: Through collaboration and an interdisciplinary team approach, leaders and staff developed and implemented a rapid assessment zone that reduced multiple throughput metrics.

Strategies for coping with stress in emergency medicine: Early education is vital.

INTRODUCTION: Physician burnout has received considerable attention in the literature and impacts a large number of emergency medicine physicians, but there is no standardized curriculum for wellness in resident education. A culture change is needed to educate about wellness, adopt a preventative and proactive approach, and focus on resiliency. DISCUSSION: We describe a novel approach to wellness education by focusing on resiliency rather than the unintended endpoint of physician burnout. One barrier to adoption of wellness education has been establishing legitimacy among emergency medicine (EM) residents and educators. We discuss a change in the language of wellness education and provide several specific topics to facilitate the incorporation of these topics in resident education. CONCLUSION: Wellness education and a culture of training that promotes well-being will benefit EM residents. Demonstrating the impact of several factors that positively affect emergency physicians may help to facilitate alert residents to the importance of practicing activities that will result in wellness. A change in culture and focus on resiliency is needed to adequately address and optimize physician self-care.

Comparison of research case definitions for carpal tunnel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess agreement between different case definitions of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) for epidemiological studies. METHODS: We performed a literature search for papers suggesting case definitions for use in epidemiological studies of CTS. Using data elements based on symptom questionnaires, hand diagrams, physical examinations, and nerve conduction studies collected from 1107 newly-hired workers, each subject in the study was classified according to each of the case definitions selected from the literature. We compared each case definition to every other case definition, using the Kappa statistic to measure pair-wise agreement on whether each subject met the case definition. RESULTS: We found six unique papers in a 20-year period suggesting a case definition of CTS for use in population-based studies. We extracted seven case definitions. Definitions included different parameters: (i) symptoms only, (ii) symptoms and physical examination, (iii) symptoms and either physical examination or median nerve conduction study, and (iv) symptoms and nerve conduction study. When applied to our study population, the prevalence of CTS using different case definitions ranged from 2.5-11.0%. The percentage of misclassification was between 1-10%, with generally acceptable levels of agreement (kappa values ranged from 0.30-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Different case definitions resulted in widely varying prevalences of CTS. Agreement between case definitions was generally good, particularly between those that required very specific symptoms or the combination of symptoms and physical examination or nerve conduction. The agreement observed between different case definitions suggests that the results can be compared across different research studies of risk factors for CTS.

Physical examination has a low yield in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: physical examination is often used to screen workers for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In a population of newly hired workers, we evaluated the yield of such screening. METHODS: our study population included 1,108 newly hired workers in diverse industries. Baseline data included a symptom questionnaire, physical exam, and bilateral nerve conduction testing of the median and ulnar nerves; individual results were not shared with the employer. We tested three outcomes: symptoms of CTS, abnormal median nerve conduction, and a case definition of CTS that required both symptoms and median neuropathy. RESULTS: of the exam measures used, only Semmes-Weinstein sensory testing had a sensitivity value above 31%. Positive predictive values were low, and likelihood ratios were all under 5.0 for positive testing and over 0.2 for negative testing. CONCLUSION: physical examination maneuvers have a low yield for the diagnosis of CTS in workplace surveillance programs and in post-offer, pre-placement screening programs.