Practical management of oral treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Lessons from ADAPT, EXPEDITE, and expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Oral treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue approved to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) by delaying disease progression and improving exercise capacity. Higher doses of oral treprostinil correlate with increased treatment benefit. Titrations may be challenging due to common side effects of prostacyclin-class therapies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The multicenter, prospective, real-world, observational ADAPT Registry study followed adult patients with PAH for up to 78 weeks after initiating oral treprostinil (NCT03045029). Dosing, titration, and transitions of oral treprostinil were at the discretion of the prescriber. Patient-reported incidence and treatment of common side effects were collected to understand side effect management and tolerability. Insights from literature and expert recommendations were added to provide a consolidated resource for oral treprostinil use. RESULTS: In total, 139 participants in ADAPT completed ≥1 weekly survey; (median age 60.0 years, 76% female). Median treatment duration of oral treprostinil was 13.1 months. During early therapy (Months 1-5), 62% (78/126) of patients reported headache and diarrhea, and 40% (50/126) reported nausea. At Month 6, many patients who reported side effects during early therapy reported an improvement (61% headache, 44% diarrhea, 70% nausea). Common side effect treatments, including acetaminophen, loperamide, and ondansetron were effective. Approximately one-quarter of patients reporting the most common side effects were untreated at Month 6. CONCLUSION: Patient selection for, and initiation and titration of oral treprostinil should be individualized and may include parenteral treprostinil induction-transition for faster titration. Assertive side effect management may help reach higher and more efficacious doses of oral treprostinil.

Exploring the therapeutic utility of the factor XIa inhibitor asundexian.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Factor XIa inhibitors are a promising novel class of anticoagulants that attenuate pathological thrombosis with minimal interference with hemostasis. These effects contrast with those of conventional anticoagulants, which may exhibit adverse events of untoward bleeding precluding treatment in some patients. A variety of investigational pharmacological modalities have been developed and studied to target factor XIa. SUMMARY: Asundexian is a small molecule inhibitor of factor XIa that has been evaluated in several clinical studies. It has been studied as an oral, once-daily medication and found to inhibit approximately 90% of factor XIa activity at doses of 20 to 50 mg. Phase 2 trials have demonstrated the potential for improved safety compared to standard of care in certain treatment settings, such as in atrial fibrillation. For other indications, such as noncardioembolic stroke and acute myocardial infarction, asundexian has been used in addition to background antiplatelet therapy. In these instances, asundexian did not show a difference in the incidence of bleeding events compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Phase 3 trials have recently been launched; however, the OCEANIC-AF trial was prematurely discontinued due to inefficacy of asundexian vs apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Another phase 3 trial, OCEANIC-AFINA, is planned to compare asundexian to placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke who are deemed ineligible for anticoagulation.

Towards consensus recommendations for pharmacogenetics testing.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Post-Discharge Treatment Patterns among Patients Treated with Apixaban or Warfarin during Hospitalization for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE).

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs), such as apixaban and warfarin, are indicated for reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and are often initiated in the hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate OAC continuity from inpatient to outpatient settings and the risk of recurrent VTE among patients with an initial event. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized hospital charge data and medical and prescription claims from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2022 to identify adults treated with apixaban or warfarin while hospitalized for VTE. Patients were followed to assess switching or discontinuation post-discharge and the risk of recurrent VTE. The index date was the date of the first apixaban or warfarin claim within 30 days post-discharge. Results: Of the 19,303 eligible patients hospitalized with VTE, 85% (n = 16,401) were treated with apixaban and 15% (n = 2902) received warfarin. After discharge, approximately 70% had ≥1 fill for their respective apixaban or warfarin therapy. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation over the 6 months following index was 50.5% and 52.2% for the apixaban and warfarin cohorts, respectively; the cumulative incidence of switching was 6.0% and 20.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 1.2 and 2.5 per 100 person-years for the apixaban and warfarin cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of patients continued their apixaban or warfarin therapy following hospital discharge; however, a considerable proportion either switched or discontinued OAC upon transitioning from inpatient care. Among those who continued therapy, discontinuation, switch, and recurrent VTE occurred less often with apixaban vs. warfarin.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Diltiazem Use in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction After Implementation of a Clinical Support System.

BACKGROUND: Despite atrial fibrillation guideline recommendations, many patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF) continue to receive IV diltiazem for acute rate control. OBJECTIVE: Our institution recently implemented a clinical decision support system (CDSS)-based tool that recommends against the use of diltiazem in patients with an EF ≤ 40%. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of adherence to the aforementioned CDSS-based tool. METHODS: This multi-hospital, retrospective study assessed patients who triggered the CDSS alert and compared those who did and did not discontinue diltiazem. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinical deterioration. The primary endpoint was compared utilizing a Fisher's Exact Test, and a multivariate logistic regression model was developed to confirm the results of the primary analysis. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included in this study with 146 patients in the nonadherent group (received diltiazem) and 100 patients in the adherent group (did not receive diltiazem). There was a higher proportion of patients experiencing clinical deterioration in the alert nonadherence group (33% vs 21%, P = 0.044), including increased utilization of inotropes and vasopressors, and higher rate of transfer to ICU. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In patients with heart failure with reduced EF, diltiazem use after nonadherence to a CDSS alert resulted in an increased risk of clinical deterioration. This study highlights the need for improved provider adherence to diltiazem clinical decision support systems.

Empowering personalized pharmacogenomics with generative AI solutions.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates an AI assistant developed using OpenAI's GPT-4 for interpreting pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing results, aiming to improve decision-making and knowledge sharing in clinical genetics and to enhance patient care with equitable access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AI assistant employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which combines retrieval and generative techniques, by harnessing a knowledge base (KB) that comprises data from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). It uses context-aware GPT-4 to generate tailored responses to user queries from this KB, further refined through prompt engineering and guardrails. RESULTS: Evaluated against a specialized PGx question catalog, the AI assistant showed high efficacy in addressing user queries. Compared with OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5, it demonstrated better performance, especially in provider-specific queries requiring specialized data and citations. Key areas for improvement include enhancing accuracy, relevancy, and representative language in responses. DISCUSSION: The integration of context-aware GPT-4 with RAG significantly enhanced the AI assistant's utility. RAG's ability to incorporate domain-specific CPIC data, including recent literature, proved beneficial. Challenges persist, such as the need for specialized genetic/PGx models to improve accuracy and relevancy and addressing ethical, regulatory, and safety concerns. CONCLUSION: This study underscores generative AI's potential for transforming healthcare provider support and patient accessibility to complex pharmacogenomic information. While careful implementation of large language models like GPT-4 is necessary, it is clear that they can substantially improve understanding of pharmacogenomic data. With further development, these tools could augment healthcare expertise, provider productivity, and the delivery of equitable, patient-centered healthcare services.

Management Considerations for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Pharmacotherapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and progressive disease with significant morbidity and mortality risk. Several medications targeting three major disease pathways are approved for treatment. However, the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension pharmacotherapies in a patient admitted to an intensive care unit poses unique challenges. Factors such as intubation and altered mental status may prevent the continuation of home oral and/or inhaled therapy, and the progression of the disease may require escalation of therapy. This review will focus on practical management strategies for the continuation of home pulmonary arterial hypertension pharmacotherapy and escalation of therapy.

Pharmacogenomics in the Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Perspectives.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease with heterogeneous causes that can lead to right ventricular (RV) failure and death if left untreated. There are currently 10 medications representative of five unique pharmacologic classes that are approved for treatment. These have led to significant improvements in overall clinical outcome. However, substantial variability in dosing requirements and treatment response is evident, leading to suboptimal outcome for many patients. Furthermore, dosing is empiric and iterative and can lead to delays in meeting treatment goals and burdensome adverse effects. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) associations have been reported with certain PAH medications, such as treprostinil and bosentan, and can explain some of the variability in response. Relevant genes associated with treprostinil include CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CAMK2D, and PFAS. CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 are the genes encoding the major metabolizing liver enzymes for treprostinil, and reduced function variants (*2, *3) with CYP2C9 were associated with lower treatment persistence. Additionally, a higher CYP2C9 activity score was associated with a significantly less risk of treatment discontinuation. Other genes of interest that have been explored with treprostinil include CAMK2D, which is associated with right ventricular dysfunction and significantly higher dose requirements. Similarly, PFAS is associated with lower concentrations of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and significantly higher dose requirements. Genes of interest with the endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) class include GNG2 and CYP2C9. A genetic variant in GNG2 (rs11157866) was linked to a significantly increased rate of clinical improvement with ERAs. The *2 variant with CYP2C9 (encoding for the major metabolizing enzyme for bosentan) was significantly associated with a higher risk for elevations in hepatic aminotransferases and liver injury. In summary, this article reviews the relevant pharmacogenes that have been associated to date with dosing and outcome among patients who received PAH medications.

DOAC Dosing Discordance Using Different Estimates of Kidney Function and Outcomes.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although Food and Drug Administration labeling for DOACs uses estimated creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation, estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is often reported. The objectives of this study were to evaluate DOAC dosing discordance and to determine whether discordance based on various estimates of kidney function is associated with bleeding or thromboembolism. The study was an institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of patients at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 12, 2016. Data were obtained through electronic medical records. Adults who received a medication charge for rivaroxaban or dabigatran, had a diagnosis code for atrial fibrillation, and had a serum creatinine within 3 days of DOAC initiation were included. Doses were considered discordant if the calculated dose based on CKD-EPI did not match the patient's dose during index admission, if dosed correctly using C-G. Association of discordance with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and clinical outcomes was determined using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Rivaroxaban discordance was present among 49 of the 644 (8%) patients who were dosed correctly with C-G. Dabigatran discordance was present among 17 of the 590 (3%) patients who were dosed correctly. Discordance with rivaroxaban was found to increase the risk of thromboembolism when using CKD-EPI (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.02-7.79, P = .045) versus C-G. Our findings emphasize the need to dose DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban, appropriately in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Impact of a Medication Optimization Clinic on Heart Failure Hospitalizations.

Efforts to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) through team-based care may affect outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study evaluated the impact of an innovative medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF who are not receiving optimal GDMT are referred to MOC and managed by a team comprised of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, clinical pharmacist, and HF cardiologist. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of MOC (n = 206) compared with usual care (n = 412) with a 2:1 propensity-matched control group. The primary clinical outcome was the incidence of HF hospitalizations at 3 months after the index visit. Kaplan-Meier cumulative event curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustment were conducted. A significantly higher proportion of patients in MOC received quadruple therapy (49% vs 4%, p <0.0001), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (60% vs 27%, p <0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (59% vs 37%, p <0.0001), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (60% vs 10%, p <0.0001). The primary outcome was significantly lower in the MOC versus the control group (log-rank, p = 0.0008). Cox regression showed that patients in the control group were more than threefold more likely to be hospitalized because of HF than those in the MOC group (p = 0.0014). In conclusion, the MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risk of HF hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF.

Evaluation of Potential Racial Disparities in CYP2C19-Guided P2Y12 Inhibitor Prescribing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Black patients suffer worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than White patients. Inequities in antiplatelet prescribing may contribute to this health disparity. We compared P2Y12 inhibitor prescribing by race following CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy selection after PCI. Patients from 9 sites that performed clinical CYP2C19 genotyping after PCI were included. Alternative therapy (e.g., prasugrel or ticagrelor) was recommended for CYP2C19 no-function allele carriers, in whom clopidogrel is predicted to be less effective. The primary outcome was choice of P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel vs. alternative therapy) based on genotype. Of 3,342 patients included, 2,448 (73%) were White, and 659 (20%) were Black. More Black than White patients had a no-function allele (34.3% vs. 29.7%, P = 0.024). At hospital discharge following PCI, 44.2% of Black and 44.0% of White no-function allele carriers were prescribed alternative therapy. At the time of the last follow-up within 12 months, numerically fewer Black (51.8%) than White (56.7%) no-function allele carriers were prescribed alternative therapy (P = 0.190). However, the difference was not significant after accounting for other factors associated with P2Y12 inhibitor selection (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.08). Alternative therapy use did not differ between Black (14.3%) and White (16.7%) patients without a no-function allele (P = 0.232). Among real-world patients who received CYP2C19 testing after PCI, P2Y12 inhibitor prescribing rates did not differ between Black and White patients. Our data suggest an absence of racial disparity in genotype-guided antiplatelet prescribing among patients receiving CYP2C19 testing.

Antiplatelet Therapy and Bleeding Outcomes With CYP2C19 Genotyping.

PURPOSE: The impact of antiplatelet therapy with availability of CYP2C19 genotyping on bleeding in a real-world setting has not been extensively studied. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, cohort study conducted between December 2015 and October 2019 with 1-year follow-up. Patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CYP2C19 genotyping, and received P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. The primary outcome was time to first bleed of any severity using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Secondary outcomes included time to first major bleed and rates of antiplatelet switching. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 697 of 2091 (33%) participants at a median of 15 days. Major bleeding occurred in 176 (8%) of patients. Compared to clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46). For patients without CYP2C19 no function alleles, treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.90). Similar associations were observed for major bleeding. No difference in ischemic events was observed. Among patients discharged on ticagrelor or prasugrel, 199 (36%) were de-escalated to clopidogrel within 1 year. De-escalation was more likely after a bleed if patients did not have a no function allele (35.9% vs 19.1%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Bleeding is common in post-PCI patients on antiplatelet therapy. Patients on high potency agents had higher bleeding risk in the population at-large and in non-carriers of CYP2C19 no function alleles. Genotype-guided antiplatelet de-escalation should be further explored in prospective studies.

An expert panel Delphi consensus statement on the use of palliative care in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains high and referral to palliative or supportive care (P/SC) specialist services is recommended when appropriate. However, access to P/SC is frequently a challenge for patients with a noncancer diagnosis and few patients living with PAH report P/SC involvement in their care. A modified Delphi process of three questionnaires completed by a multidisciplinary panel (N = 15) was used to develop expert consensus statements regarding the use of P/SC to support patients with PAH. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. There was a strong consensus that patients should be referred to P/SC when disease symptoms become unmanageable or for end-of-life care. Services that achieved consensus were pain management techniques, end-of-life care, and psychosocial recommendations. Palliative or supportive care should be discussed with patients, preferably in-person, when disease symptoms become unmanageable, when starting treatment, when treatment-related adverse events occur or become refractory to initial intervention. Care partners and patient support groups were considered important in improving a patient's overall health outcomes, treatment adherence, and perception of care. Most patients with PAH experience cognitive and/or psychosocial changes and those who receive psychosocial management have better persistence and/or compliance with their treatment. These consensus statements provide guidance to healthcare providers on the "who and when" of referral to palliative care services, as well as the importance of focusing on the psychosocial aspects of patient care and quality of life.

CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diverse Clinical Settings.

Background Studies have demonstrated increased risk of major atherothrombotic events in CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) variant carriers versus non-carriers treated with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate real-world outcomes with the clinical implementation of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Methods and Results Data from 9 medical centers where genotyping was performed in the setting of PCI were included. Alternative therapy with prasugrel or ticagrelor was recommended for patients with a CYP2C19 LOF variant. The primary outcome was the composite of major atherothrombotic events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, or hospitalization for unstable angina) within 12 months following PCI. Moderate or severe/life-threatening bleeding within 12 months was a secondary outcome. Among 3342 patients, 1032 (31%) were LOF carriers, of whom 571/1032 (55%) were treated with alternative therapy. In LOF carriers, the rate of major atherothrombotic events was lower in patients treated with alternative therapy versus clopidogrel (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI 0.39-0.82). In those without a LOF allele, no difference was observed (adjusted HR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.71-1.60). There was no difference in bleeding with alternative therapy versus clopidogrel in either LOF carriers or those without a LOF allele. Conclusions Real-world data demonstrate lower atherothrombotic risk in CYP2C19 LOF carriers treated with alternative therapy versus clopidogrel and similar risk in those without a LOF allele treated with clopidogrel or alternative therapy. These data suggest that PCI patients treated with clopidogrel should undergo genotyping so that CYP2C19 LOF carriers can be identified and treated with alternative therapy.

A pilot study of oral treprostinil pharmacogenomics and treatment persistence in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analog used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. Dosing is empiric and based on tolerability. Adverse effects are common and can affect treatment persistence. Pharmacogenomic variants that may affect treprostinil metabolism and transport have not been well-characterized. We aimed to investigate the pharmacogenomic sources of variability in treatment persistence and dosing. METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited from an IRB approved biobank registry at a single pulmonary hypertension center. A cohort of patients who received oral treprostinil were screened for participation. Pharmacogenomic analysis was for variants in CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and ABCC4. A retrospective review was conducted for demographics, clinical status, dosing, and response. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data and Kruskal-Wallis test or Wilcoxon rank sum were used for continuous data. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients received oral treprostinil and were consented. Their median age was 53 years, 73% were female, and 93% were White. The median total daily dose was 22.5 mg (13.5, 41) at last clinical observation. 40% of patients discontinued treatment with a majority due to adverse effects. Approximately 27% of patients had a loss-of-function variant in CYP2C8 (*1/*3 or *1/*4), whereas 47% of patients had a loss-of-function variant in CYP2C9 (*1/*2, *1/*3, or *2/*2). Minor allele frequencies for ABCC4 (rs1751034 and rs3742106) were 0.17 and 0.43, respectively. Survival analysis showed that increased CYP2C9 activity score was associated with decreased risk for treatment discontinuation [hazard ratio (HR): 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02, 0.91; p = 0.04]. Genetic variants were not significantly associated with dosing. CONCLUSION: Genetic variants responsible for the metabolism and transport of oral treprostinil were common. Increased CYP2C9 activity score was associated with decreased risk for treatment discontinuation. However, dosing was not associated with genetic variants in metabolizing enzymes for treprostinil. Our findings suggest significant variability in treatment persistence to oral treprostinil, with pharmacogenomics being a potentially important contributor.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Special Populations: Elderly, Obesity, and Renal Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and provide recommendations for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation in obese patients, elderly patients, and patients with chronic kidney disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple retrospective cohort studies have shown no difference in bleeding, stroke, or venous thromboembolism outcomes between DOACs and warfarin in patients who are obese, elderly, or those with chronic kidney disease or on dialysis. Some studies have shown that DOACs have a lower bleeding risk than warfarin in these populations. DOACs may be a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who are obese, elderly, or those with chronic kidney disease or on dialysis. Apixaban may improve clinical outcomes by lowering the risk of bleeding versus warfarin. DOACs may also be an effective and safe alternative to warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in obese patients; however, additional studies are needed to assess their use in elderly patients and those with CKD.

Pharmacologic Prevention of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

ABSTRACT: Establishing efficient perfusion into the myocardium is the main purpose in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but the process of reperfusion is not without risk and can damage the myocardium paradoxically. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment for reperfusion injury, and efforts to find an efficient preventive approach are still ongoing. In the past 3 decades, there have been many successful animal studies on how to prevent reperfusion injury; nonetheless, translation to the clinical setting has almost always proven disappointing. In this article, we review clinical studies on the prevention of reperfusion injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a pharmacologic-based approach. We categorize all the agents that are evaluated for the prevention of myocardial reperfusion injury based on their mechanisms of action into 5 groups: drugs that can reduce oxidative stress, drugs that can affect cellular metabolism, rheological agents that target microvascular obstruction, anti-inflammatory agents, and agents with mixed mechanisms of action. Then, review all the clinical studies of these agents in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Finally, we will discuss the possible reasons for the failure in translation of studies into practice and propose potential solutions to overcome this problem.

Use of Disproportionality Analysis to Identify Previously Unknown Drug-Associated Causes of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced QTc-prolongation is a well-known adverse drug reaction (ADR), however there is limited knowledge of other drug-induced arrhythmias. PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine the drugs reported to be associated with arrhythmias other than QTc-prolongation using the FAERS database, possibly identifying potential drug causes that have not been reported previously. METHODS: FAERS reports from 2004 quarter 1 through 2019 quarter 1 were combined to create a dataset of approximately 11.6 million reports. Search terms for arrhythmias of interest were selected from the Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) Version 12.0. Frequency of the cardiac arrhythmias were determined for atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, bradyarrhythmia, bundle branch block, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation and linked to the reported causal medications. Reports were further categorized by prior evidence associations using package inserts and established drug databases. A reporting odds ratio (ROR) and confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the ADRs for each drug and each of the 6 cardiac arrhythmias. RESULTS: Of the 11.6 million reports in the FAERS database, 68,989 were specific to cardiac arrhythmias of interest. There were 61 identified medication-reported arrhythmia pairs for the 6 arrhythmia groups with 33 found to have an unknown reported association. Rosiglitazone was the most frequently medication reported across all arrhythmias [ROR 6.02 (CI: 5.82-6.22)]. Other medications with significant findings included: rofecoxib, digoxin, alendronate, lenalidomide, dronedarone, zoledronic acid, adalimumab, dabigatran, and interferon beta-1b. CONCLUSION: Upon retrospective analysis of the FAERS database, the majority of drug-associated arrhythmias reported were unknown suggesting new potential drug causes. Cardiac arrhythmias other than QTc prolongation are a new area of focus for pharmacovigilance and medication safety. Consideration of future studies should be given to using the FAERS database as a timely pharmacovigilance tool to identify unknown adverse events of medications.

A Systemwide Approach for Navigating the Dilemma of Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor Interference With Unfractionated Heparin Anti-Factor Xa Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Oral factor Xa inhibitors are known to significantly increase heparin anti-Xa concentrations, which leads to inaccuracies when monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH). Guidance for managing this laboratory interference is lacking, creating substantial uncertainty in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe a strategy used by a large academic institution for managing the controversy of laboratory interference in the setting of oral factor Xa inhibitor use and provide effectiveness and safety data for this approach. METHODS: In December 2016, a new Heparin IV Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Interference PowerPlan (a comprehensive order set) was made available in the electronic health record (Cerner, North Kansas City, MO) throughout the health system. We retrospectively examined 169 patients with events reported in the error reporting system, RISKMASTER, and evaluated reports with and without the use of the PowerPlan. Effectiveness was determined through evaluation of thrombosis. The Naranjo criteria for causality were applied to assess thrombotic events. RESULTS: Of 56 events that were reported with apixaban when the PowerPlan was not ordered, 4 (7%) thrombotic events occurred within 7 days of UFH initiation. One out of the 4 events (25%) that occurred when the PowerPlan was not appropriately initiated was considered probable using the Naranjo Scale. Three additional events (75%) were possible using the Naranjo Scale. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The Heparin IV DOAC Interference PowerPlan appears to be conducive to positive patient outcomes when evaluating voluntary reported events and may assist clinicians with managing the therapeutic dilemma of this laboratory interference.