Delivery of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate to the Upper Nasal Space for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Technology in Action.

Oral tablets account for the majority of medications used to acutely treat migraine, but relief can be limited by their rates of dissolution and absorption. The nose is an attractive alternative route of drug delivery since it provides patient convenience of at-home use, gastrointestinal (GI) avoidance, and rapid absorption of drugs into systemic circulation because of its large surface area. However, the site of drug deposition within the nasal cavity should be considered since it can influence drug absorption. Traditional nasal devices have been shown to target drug delivery to the lower nasal space where epithelium is not best-suited for drug absorption and where there is an increased likelihood of drug clearance due to nasal drip, swallowing, or mucociliary clearance, potentially resulting in variable absorption and suboptimal efficacy. Alternatively, the upper nasal space (UNS) offers a permeable, richly vascularized epithelium with a decreased likelihood of drug loss or clearance due to the anatomy of this area. Traditional nasal pumps deposit <5% of active drug into the UNS because of the nasal cavity's complex architecture. A new technology, Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD®), is a handheld, manually actuated, propellant-powered, administration device that delivers drug specifically to the UNS. A dihydroergotamine (DHE) mesylate product, INP104, utilizes POD technology to deliver drug to the UNS for the acute treatment of migraine. Results from clinical studies of INP104 demonstrate a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, consistent and predictable dosing, rapid systemic levels known to be effective (similar to other DHE mesylate clinical programs), safety and tolerability on the upper nasal mucosa, and high patient acceptance. POD technology may have the potential to overcome the limitations of traditional nasal delivery systems, while utilizing the nasal delivery benefits of GI tract avoidance, rapid onset, patient convenience, and ease of use.

Headache neuroimaging: A survey of current practice, barriers, and facilitators to optimal use.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand current practice, clinician understanding, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to optimal headache neuroimaging practices. BACKGROUND: Headaches are common in adults, and neuroimaging for these patients is common, costly, and increasing. Although guidelines recommend against routine headache neuroimaging in low-risk scenarios, guideline-discordant neuroimaging is still frequently performed. METHODS: We administered a 60-item survey to headache clinicians at the Veterans Affairs health system to assess clinician understanding and attitudes on headache neuroimaging and to determine neuroimaging practice patterns for three scenarios describing hypothetical patients with headaches. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, stratified by clinician type (physicians or advanced practice clinicians [APCs]) and specialty (neurology or primary care). RESULTS: The survey was successfully completed by 431 of 1426 clinicians (30.2% response rate). Overall, 317 of 429 (73.9%) believed neuroimaging was overused for patients with headaches. However, clinicians would utilize neuroimaging a mean (SD) 30.9% (31.7) of the time in a low-risk scenario without red flags, and a mean 67.1% (31.9) of the time in the presence of minor red flags. Clinicians had stronger beliefs in the potential benefits (268/429, 62.5%) of neuroimaging compared to harms (181/429, 42.2%) and more clinicians were bothered by harms stemming from the omission of neuroimaging (377/426, 88.5%) compared to commission (329/424, 77.6%). Additionally, APCs utilized neuroimaging more frequently than physicians and were more receptive to potential interventions to improve neuroimaging utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of clinicians believed neuroimaging was overused for patients with headaches, many would utilize neuroimaging in low-risk scenarios with a small probability of changing management. Future studies are needed to define the role of currently used red flags given their importance in neuroimaging decisions. Importantly, APCs may be an ideal target for future optimization efforts.

The Diagnosis and Management of Posttraumatic Headache with Associated Painful Cranial Neuralgias: a Review and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Cranial neuralgias are common in the setting of posttraumatic headache. They may exacerbate underlying primary headache disorders and therefore may be overlooked in clinical practice. Frequently, cranial neuralgias generate neuropathic symptoms such as lancinating pain and sensory dysesthesias. Cranial neuralgias are identified based on a clinical history of focal neuropathic pain and physical exam findings including tenderness with palpation and percussion, at times eliciting radiating pain or paresthesias in the corresponding sensory nerve distribution. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article is a brief review of the literature and a retrospective report of 2 cases of posttraumatic headache with associated painful cranial neuralgias. RECENT FINDINGS: Two patients presented with headaches that met criteria for posttraumatic headache, but their history and physical examination suggested the presence of a focal painful cranial neuralgia. One patient was diagnosed with auriculotemporal neuralgia, which was exquisitely responsive to an auriculotemporal nerve block. The second patient was diagnosed with supratrochlear neuralgia, which was effectively treated with a supratrochlear nerve block. In both cases, adequate treatment of the painful cranial neuralgia resulted in significant improvement of the baseline PTH. Painful cranial neuralgias frequently occur within the clinical spectrum of posttraumatic headache, but are often undiagnosed. Treatment options for painful cranial neuralgias are often different than those traditionally employed for posttraumatic headache without cranial neuralgias, which can include peripheral nerve blockade, neuropathic medications, and in refractory cases, peripheral nerve decompression surgery.

An Update on Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cranial Pachymeningitis for the Headache Practitioner.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to review idiopathic hypertrophic cranial pachymeninigitis (IHCP), describe common head pain patterns and features associated with the disorder, suggest potential classification of head pain syndromes based on the recently published International Classification of Headache Disorders-3, explore pathophysiology found to be associated with cases of IHCP, and indicate common treatment for the disorder. RECENT FINDINGS: It is suggested that a subset of IHCP is an IgG4-related autoimmune disorder. Patients with IHCP were found to have elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein and lymphocytic pleocytosis. Corticosteroids are a mainstay of treatment. Other immunosuppressive agents and steroid sparing agents as add-on therapy may have utility in the treatment of cases refractory to corticosteroids alone. Clinical manifestations of IHCP depend upon the location of the inflammatory lesions and compression of the adjacent nervous system structures. Headache and loss of cranial nerve function were the most common presenting features of hypertrophic cranial pachymeninigitis. Several headache diagnoses may result from IHCP. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is the standard imaging modality for diagnosing. Although the pathophysiology is poorly understood, many cases of hypertrophic pachymeninigitis (HP) are thought to be closely related to inflammatory disorders. Cases of HP previously thought to be idiopathic may have IgG4 pathophysiology. CSF and serological studies are helpful. Treatment involves immunosuppressive agents. Advancement in neuroimaging, assays, tests, and further delineation of inflammatory disorders affecting the nervous system may provide further insight to the etiology of cases of HP previously considered and diagnosed as idiopathic.

The current state of acute treatment for migraine in adults in the United States.

Migraine is a common and disabling disorder with substantial personal, social, and economic burden that affects 37 million people in the United States. Risk factors for migraine include age, sex, and genetics. The goal of acute treatment of migraine attacks is to stop the pain and associated symptoms of the migraine attack and return the patient to normal function. The acute treatment landscape for migraine has recently expanded beyond the standard nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, triptans, ergotamines, and combination therapies, to include neuromodulation devices, and recently approved calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists and a serotonin (5-HT1F) receptor agonist. Unmet acute treatment needs still exist due to lack of efficacy, unwanted side effects, or contraindication to treatment. Effective treatment of migraine requires the clinician to assess the patient, make an accurate diagnosis, and then offer appropriate therapy based on the patient's medical history, comorbidities, and preferences, as well as published clinical evidence. The objective of this narrative review is to familiarize primary care clinicians with the variety of acute treatment options available in the United States today based on clinical trial findings, meta-analyses, evidence-based guidelines, and professional society consensus statements.

Headache neuroimaging: Routine testing when guidelines recommend against them.

AIMS: The aim of this article is to determine the patient-level factors associated with headache neuroimaging in outpatient practice. METHODS: Using data from the 2007-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS), we estimated headache neuroimaging utilization (cross-sectional). Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between patient-level factors and neuroimaging utilization. A Markov model with Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate neuroimaging utilization over time at the individual patient level. RESULTS: Migraine diagnoses (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9) and chronic headaches (routine, chronic OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6; flare-up, chronic OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.96) were associated with lower utilization, but even in these populations neuroimaging was ordered frequently. Red flags for intracranial pathology did not increase use of neuroimaging studies (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.95-2.2). Neurologist visits (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.99-2.9) and first visits to a practice (OR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4) were associated with increased imaging. A patient with new migraine headaches has a 39% (95% CI 24-54%) chance of receiving a neuroimaging study after five years and a patient with a flare-up of chronic headaches has a 51% (32-68%) chance. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroimaging is routinely ordered in outpatient headache patients including populations where guidelines specifically recommend against their use (migraines, chronic headaches, no red flags).

Spawning site selection and contingent behavior in Common Snook, Centropomus undecimalis.

Reproductive behavior affects spatial population structure and our ability to manage for sustainability in marine and diadromous fishes. In this study, we used fishery independent capture-based sampling to evaluate where Common Snook occurred in Tampa Bay and if it changed with spawning season, and passive acoustic telemetry to assess fine scale behavior at an inlet spawning site (2007-2009). Snook concentrated in three areas during the spawning season only one of which fell within the expected spawning habitat. Although in lower numbers, they remained in these areas throughout the winter months. Acoustically-tagged snook (n = 31) showed two seasonal patterns at the spawning site: Most fish occurred during the spawning season but several fish displayed more extended residency, supporting the capture-based findings that Common Snook exhibit facultative catadromy. Spawning site selection for iteroparous, multiple-batch spawning fishes occurs at the lifetime, annual, or intra-annual temporal scales. In this study we show colonization of a new spawning site, indicating that lifetime spawning site fidelity of Common Snook is not fixed at this fine spatial scale. However, individuals did exhibit annual and intra-seasonal spawning site fidelity to this new site over the three years studied. The number of fish at the spawning site increased in June and July (peak spawning months) and on new and full lunar phases indicating within population variability in spawning and movement patterns. Intra-seasonal patterns of detection also differed significantly with sex. Common Snook exhibited divergent migration tactics and habitat use at the annual and estuarine scales, with contingents using different overwintering habitat. Migration tactics also varied at the spawning site at the intra-seasonal scale and with sex. These results have important implications for understanding how reproductive behavior affects spatio-temporal patterns of fish abundance and their resilience to disturbance events and fishing pressure.

Is sinus disease the cause of my headaches? An update on sinus disease and headache.

The interplay between head pain caused by sinus disease and primary headaches is complex. Classification of secondary headaches, attributed to disorders of the nose or paranasal sinuses has been recently updated. New treatments including office- based procedures are emerging for patients with chronic sinusitis. This paper briefly reviews sinus disease and headache.