Reducing postnatal pain from perineal tears by using lignocaine gel: a double-blind randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Perineal pain is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity in the early puerperium. Several randomized trials have shown that topical application of local anesthetics is effective in reducing postepisiotomy pain, but no randomized study has assessed the efficacy of local anesthetics for other perineal trauma. This study investigated if topically applied 2 percent lignocaine gel was an effective treatment for this group of women. METHODS: A double-blind placebo controlled trial was conducted in a regional teaching hospital in the northwest of England. One hundred and forty-nine women who had sustained a first- or second-degree tear were allocated by sealed envelopes to the lignocaine gel or placebo group. The primary outcome was self-reported pain at 24 hours postdelivery as measured on a numerical rating scale (pain score). Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 48 hours, the need for oral analgesia, and maternal satisfaction. Based on a pilot study, we calculated that 128 women were required to detect a 25 percent difference in pain scores between the two groups with 80 percent power (alpha = 0.05). The pain scores of women in each trial arm were compared using the unpaired t test and 95 percent confidence intervals. RESULTS: Women using lignocaine gel had lower average pain scores, although this only reached statistical significance at 48 hours after delivery (p = 0.023). In general, women liked using the study gel. No difference was found in consumption of oral analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that lignocaine gel may be effective on the second postnatal day. Further research is required to assess the optimum timing of this intervention and the population that would most benefit from its use.

Cardiovascular and secretory immunoglobulin A reactions to humorous, exciting, and didactic film presentations.

Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in saliva and cardiovascular activity were measured at rest and in response to three film extracts varying in affective content. Subjective ratings of film impact confirmed a priori assumptions; the humorous film was rated as funnier than the other two films, the didactic film as more boring than the other two films, and the exciting film as more exciting and more stressful than the other two films. The films elicited distinct patterns of cardiovascular autonomic activity. The exciting film provoked changes characteristic of beta-adrenergic activation: increased systolic blood pressure (SBP); heart rate (HR); cardiac output (CO); and shortened pre-ejection period (PEP). The didactic film had little impact on cardiovascular activity. While an increase in total peripheral resistance (TPR) occurred, the humorous film was largely notable for a reduction in beta-adrenergic drive, as evidenced by reduced CO and a lengthening of PEP. In contrast to previous research reporting a rise in sIgA particular to humorous exposures, the sIgA secretion rate, although enhanced by exposure to the films, did not vary with film content.