Feasibility of a virtual service delivery model to support physical activity engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic for those with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: The current pandemic has reduced access to safe, monitored physical activity (PA) programs for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). The use of telerehabilitation has the potential for continuing activity engagement without risking virus exposure. The present study evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of an online group-based PA program for persons with SCI. METHODS: This preliminary pre-post study delivered an online group-based PA program to persons with SCI. The program consisted of 1-hour sessions twice weekly for six weeks. Online PA satisfaction questionnaires were assessed at post-treatment. Psychosocial subscales from the NeuroQOL-SF were assessed. RESULTS: Participants were adult females between 3 and 32 years post-injury, 1 tetraplegic and 3 paraplegics (n = 4). All participants were highly satisfied with the online instruction, overall content, and videoconferencing platform. Participants stated that the online program was beneficial for their overall physical and psychosocial wellbeing. The program resulted in improvement in anxiety and satisfaction with social roles and activities. CONCLUSION: The current pilot study demonstrates the acceptability and limited efficacy of an online PA program for those with SCI. The program resulted in improved overall perceived wellbeing and satisfaction with social roles and activities. These results have important implications for the clinical implementation of online PA programs in a hospital and community setting.

Low Adherence to Post Emergency Department Follow-Up Among Hypertensive Patients With Medical Insurance.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in hypertension control in the insured, adult population could improve morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension in the United States. The emergency department (ED) is a potential site of intervention, where individuals are diagnosed with asymptomatic hypertension and referred to primary care. OBJECTIVE: To inform intervention strategies, we identified risk factors of nonadherence to primary care follow-up among individuals aged 18-60 years with a primary discharge diagnosis of asymptomatic hypertension in the ED. METHODS: Data were obtained from a commercial claims database for January 2012-September 2015. A total of 84,929 individuals were included. Rate of nonadherence to primary care follow-up was determined for individuals billed for a primary discharge diagnosis of essential hypertension. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios. The relationships between demographic and clinical variables with nonadherence to follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the study population did not adhere to follow-up within 30 days of ED discharge. Risk factors for nonadherence included no history of recent visit with primary care (odds ratio [OR] 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-1.93) and multiple prior ED visits (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.57-1.73). Protective characteristics included history of filling antihypertensive prescriptions in the last year (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.40-0.43); or history of filling a 30-day antihypertensive prescription on day of diagnosis (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.80-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals without a recent primary care visit or who visit the ED frequently are at higher risk of nonadherence to follow-up for hypertension, despite medical insurance. Insurance status may not overcome individual level barriers to follow-up.

"Making My Own Decisions Sometimes": A Pilot Study of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Perspectives on Medical Decision-Making.

This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the medical decision-making preferences and experiences of young adult survivors of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers. We conducted key informant interviews and a cross-sectional mailed survey with young adult survivors (currently aged 18-39 years) of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancers in South Texas. Of the responding survivors, almost all wanted to be actively involved in medical decision-making, but preferences regarding family and doctor involvement varied. In open-ended responses, the most commonly reported concerns related to medical decision-making were feelings of uncertainty and fear of receiving bad news. Survivors reported that they desired more information in order to feel better about medical decision-making. Due to the variety of preferences regarding decision-making and who to include in the process, physicians should be prepared to ask and accommodate patients regarding their decision-making preferences.