Position paper of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology on the impact of COVID-19 on Italian oncology and the path forward: the 2021 Matera statement.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected cancer care and research by disrupting the prevention and treatment paths as well as the preclinical, clinical, and translational research ecosystem. In Italy, this has been particularly significant given the severity of the pandemic's impact and the intrinsic vulnerabilities of the national health system. However, whilst detrimental, disruption can also be constructive and may stimulate innovation and progress. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has recognized the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care continuum and research and proposes the '2021 Matera statement' which aims at providing pragmatic guidance for policymakers and health care institutions to mitigate the impact of the global health crisis on Italian oncology and design the recovery plan for the post-pandemic scenario. The interventions are addressed both to the pillars (prevention, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, health care professionals) and foundations of cancer care (communication and care relationship, system organization, resources, research, networking). The priorities to be implemented can be summarized in the MATERA acronym: Multidisciplinarity; Access to cancer care; Telemedicine and Territoriality; Equity, ethics, education; Research and resources; Alliance between stakeholders and patients.

Predictive role of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase expression in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil.

OBJECTIVE: The combined assessment of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene expressions in metastatic colorectal cancer has been reported to be able to predict the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. In order to evaluate the prognostic role in the adjuvant setting, we investigated the TS, DPD and TP expression in primary tumors of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: TS, DPD and TP expression levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissues from 62 patients with Dukes' stage B and C colorectal cancers who underwent surgery and received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU. The median follow-up was 90 months (range 17-127). RESULTS: Dukes' stage C cancer and high TS expression were independent markers of poor prognosis for disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.0009 and p = 0.007, respectively) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.0005 and p = 0.011, respectively). By multivariate analysis, patients with high DPD expression had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.005) compared to patients with low DPD expression. In the combined analysis of 2 markers, patients with low TS and low DPD had the best outcome in terms of DFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.03). The analysis of all 3 proteins showed that the patients with low expression of all 3 markers had significantly longer DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.01) than patients with a high value of any one of the protein expressions. However, the joint analysis of 3 markers (group with TS-/DPD-/TP-) could not identify a subgroup of patients with a better prognosis compared to the analysis of 2 markers (group with TS-/DPD-). The analysis of Dukes' stage C cancer patients confirmed a significant benefit in terms of DFS and OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) when all 3 markers had low expression. We also found a positive significant correlation between TS and TP protein expression (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective investigation suggests that the combined assessment of TS and DPD may be useful to evaluate the prognosis of patients with Dukes' B and C colon carcinoma receiving 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. The role of TP as a predictor for 5-FU-based therapy needs further investigations.

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study.

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.

Predictive value of thymidylate synthase expression in resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Recent investigations have focused on the prognostic value of thymidylate synthase (TS) assessment in metastases of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In order to evaluate the prognostic impact of TS expression after resection of metastases of colorectal cancer followed by systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, we performed an immunohistochemical characterisation of TS in the primary tumours and in the corresponding radically resected hepatic and pulmonary metastases. An additional objective was to compare the levels of TS in primary and metastatic disease. TS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody TS 106. The study population consisted of 60 patients: 48 underwent liver and 12 lung resection. All of them received adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy according to the Mayo Clinic schedule. In the 49 evaluable primary tumours, TS score was high in 53% and low in 47% of patients, while in the 60 metastatic samples TS immunostaining was high in 33% and low in 67%. There was a significantly smaller number of high TS expressors in metastatic than in primary tumours (P<0.04). No correlation was observed between TS expression and the site of the metastasis. TS status did not significantly correlate with the median disease-free interval (DFI) after metastasectomy, although this parameter was longer for patients with low TS immunoreactivity in the resected metastases than for those with high TS lesions (19.6 versus 13.8 months). Patients with high TS levels, however, had a significantly shorter median overall survival (OS) (27.6 months) than those with low TS expression (36.3 months) (P<0.008). TS status in the resected metastases confirmed its independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis and was the only prognostic marker of OS in the subgroup of patients with resected liver metastases. These results suggest that high TS levels in resected metastases of colorectal cancer are associated with a poor outcome after surgery and 5-FU adjuvant therapy; therefore, a prospective assessment of TS levels in resected colorectal metastases could be useful to define which patients will most likely benefit from 5-FU adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy. Chemotherapeutic agents that target TS may not be the appropriate adjuvant treatment after metastasectomy for patients with a high TS expression in the resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Vinorelbine and alternating cisplatin and ifosfamide in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

In order to explore the activity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNL) and alternating cisplatin (CDDP) and ifosfamide (IFX) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a phase II study was performed. Seventy chemoradiotherapy naive patients with NSCLC, stage IIIA, IIIB and IV disease, PS (ECOG)

Treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma with a 5-fluorouracil-based or a cisplatin-based regimen: two parallel randomized phase II studies.

BACKGROUND: Although many drug combination therapies have been proposed, there is no standard therapy for patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. The superiority of combination therapy over monochemotherapy has not been demonstrated convincingly. To explore the role of monochemotherapy, the authors evaluated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), modulated by 6S-leucovorin (6S-LV) and a cisplatin-containing regimen, which was comprised of epirubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin with the addition of the reversal agent lonidamine (EEP-L). METHODS: After stratification according to performance status (PS) and resection of the primary tumor, 72 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were randomized to 2 parallel Phase II trials with 5-FU/6S-LV and EEP-L, respectively. Thirty-six patients in Study A received bolus 6S-LV, 100 mg/m2, followed by bolus 5-FU, 370 mg/m2, on Days 1-5 and 36 others in Study B received epirubicin, 30 mg/m2, on Days 1 and 5; etoposide, 100 mg/m2, on Days 1, 3, and 5; cisplatin, 30 mg/m2, on Days 2 and 4; and lonidamine, 150 mg/day. RESULTS: There were 6 partial responses (18.2%) (95% confidence interval [CI] +/- 13.2) in Study A and 7 partial responses (21.9%) (95% CI +/- 14.3) in Study B. Partial responses were more frequent in patients with resected tumors or with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 0-1. The median duration of response was 8.8 and 8.3 months, respectively, in Study A and Study B. The median survival reached 8 months in Study A and 9 months in Study B. In the whole population of patients survival was significantly higher in patients with a PS of 0-1 (P < 0.05). Patients with a PS of 0-1 and a resected tumor had the significantly longest survival both in EEP-L treated patients and in all evaluable patients in the two studies. The most frequent World Health Organization Grade 3-4 toxic effects were gastrointestinal in Study A and hematologic in Study B. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 5-FU, modulated with 6S-LV, is moderate in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, similar to cisplatin-containing regimens. PS and other prognostic factors could influence the response rate, which does not appear to be a reliable parameter for evaluating the outcome of chemotherapy trials.

Effect of cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil plus (S)-leucovorin.

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently being investigated in advanced colorectal cancer. In an attempt to improve the results obtainable for the association of 5-FU and leucovorin, we decided to add cisplatin to 5-FU and (6S)-leucovorin (S-LV) after disease progression. The hypothesis was that a pharmacological enhancement of the efficacy of 5-FU would result in responses in 5-FU-unresponsive patients or in a second response in previously responding patients. A group of 28 5-FU+S-LV-pretreated patients, with advanced measurable colorectal cancer, were treated with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 80 mg/m2 S-LV and 370 mg/m2 5-FU as an i. v. bolus for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. We obtained 3 partial responses (response rate: 11 +/- 11%), while 11 patients had stable disease (39 +/- 18%). Among the 3 responders, 1 patient had earlier achieved a partial response, a second stable disease and 1 had disease progression after the previous 5-FU+S-LV treatment. The median survival time for all 28 patients was 11 months. Toxicity was minimal and consisted of mild and reversible gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. We believe that further studies must be carried out to establish the real impact of the synergism between cisplatin, 5-FU and S-LV in untreated patients.