Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Community Health ; 43(3): 534-542, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29188464

ABSTRACT

Sleep-related infant deaths are a leading cause of infant mortality in Georgia, and these deaths are largely associated with unsafe sleep practices among caregivers. In early 2016, the Georgia Department of Public Health launched the Georgia Safe to Sleep Hospital Initiative, providing hospitals with safe infant sleep information and educational materials to be distributed to families and newborns. This study examined the knowledge and behaviors of a sample of Georgia parents after the implementation of the Hospital Initiative and identified the family characteristics and intervention components most closely associated with the knowledge and practice of safe infant sleep. The primary caretakers of all infants born in Georgia from August to October 2016 were invited to complete a web-based survey 1 month after hospital discharge. The final sample size included 420 parents of newborns, and the primary outcomes assessed included two measures of knowledge and four measures of infant sleep behaviors regarding infant sleep position and location. Most respondents demonstrated knowledge of the correct recommended sleep position (90%) and location (85%). Logistic regression revealed that receipt of information in the hospital was significantly correlated with safe sleep behaviors, and infant sleep habits tended to influence safe sleep practices. Additionally, Medicaid parents receiving bassinets from the hospital were 74% less likely to bed share (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.007). Implementation of a statewide hospital initiative was associated with high levels of parental knowledge and behavior and may have been successful in reducing the practice of bed sharing among Medicaid parents.


Subject(s)
Beds , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Infant Health , Parents , Georgia , Humans , Infant , Infant Equipment , Infant, Newborn , Safety , Sleep , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 18(1): 13-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24365547

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the yield of undetected active tuberculosis (TB), TB and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and the number needed to screen (NNS) to detect a case using active case finding (ACF) in an urban community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: In a door-to-door survey conducted in Rubaga community from January 2008 to June 2009, residents aged ≥15 years were screened for chronic cough (≥2 weeks) and tested for TB disease using smear microscopy and/or culture. Rapid testing was used to screen for HIV infection. The NNS to detect one case was calculated based on population screened and undetected cases found. RESULTS: Of 5102 participants, 3868 (75.8%) were females; the median age was 24 years (IQR 20-30). Of 199 (4%) with chronic cough, 160 (80.4%) submitted sputum, of whom 39 (24.4%, 95%CI 17.4-31.5) had undetected active TB and 13 (8.1%, 95%CI 6.7-22.9) were TB-HIV co-infected. The NNS to detect one TB case was 131 in the whole study population, but only five among the subgroup with chronic cough. CONCLUSION: ACF obtained a high yield of previously undetected active TB and TB-HIV cases. The NNS in the general population was 131, but the number needed to test in persons with chronic cough was five. These findings suggest that boosting the identification of persons with chronic cough may increase the overall efficiency of TB case detection at a community level.


Subject(s)
Coinfection , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Chronic Disease , Cough/diagnosis , Cough/epidemiology , Cough/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Predictive Value of Tests , Sputum/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/microbiology , Uganda/epidemiology , Urban Health , Young Adult
4.
Inj Prev ; 12(5): 290-5, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17018668

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and direct medical costs for fatal and non-fatal fall injuries among US adults aged >or=65 years in 2000, for three treatment settings stratified by age, sex, body region, and type of injury. METHODS: Incidence data came from the 2000 National Vital Statistics System, 2001 National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program, 2000 Health Care Utilization Program National Inpatient Sample, and 1999 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Costs for fatal falls came from Incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States; costs for non-fatal falls were based on claims from the 1998 and 1999 Medicare fee-for-service 5% Standard Analytical Files. A case crossover approach was used to compare the monthly costs before and after the fall. RESULTS: In 2000, there were almost 10 300 fatal and 2.6 million medically treated non-fatal fall related injuries. Direct medical costs totaled 0.2 billion dollars for fatal and 19 billion dollars for non-fatal injuries. Of the non-fatal injury costs, 63% (12 billion dollars ) were for hospitalizations, 21% (4 billion dollars) were for emergency department visits, and 16% (3 billion dollars) were for treatment in outpatient settings. Medical expenditures for women, who comprised 58% of the older adult population, were 2-3 times higher than for men for all medical treatment settings. Fractures accounted for just 35% of non-fatal injuries but 61% of costs. CONCLUSIONS: Fall related injuries among older adults, especially among older women, are associated with substantial economic costs. Implementing effective intervention strategies could appreciably decrease the incidence and healthcare costs of these injuries.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/economics , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Incidence , Male , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
5.
Am J Epidemiol ; 154(11): 1077-85, 2001 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11724726

ABSTRACT

Postlicensure surveillance of a newly licensed rotavirus vaccine suggested an increased risk of intussusception. Little was known about the amount of risk parents would tolerate to obtain the vaccine's benefits or the extent to which risk would reduce the price parents would pay for the vaccine. Parents of infants aged 12 months or younger were asked to accept or reject two hypothetical vaccines associated with varying degrees of risk. Parents chose from a list the amount they would pay for two additional hypothetical vaccines, with and without a risk of intussuception. The authors conducted face-to-face surveys in September 1999 among a convenience sample of parents in three US cities. Of 405 eligible parents, 260 (64%) participated. To achieve a 90% acceptance rate, the vaccine could be associated with no more than 1,794 (95% confidence interval: 1,551, 2,025) cases of intussusception in a fully vaccinated, national cohort of infants. The median willingness to pay for three vaccine doses, when vaccination was associated with 1,400 cases of intussusception, was $36 (95% confidence interval: $28, $46) compared with $110 (95% confidence interval: $96, $126) for the risk-free vaccine. The most important aspect of this study may be the methodology to assess how parents balance the benefits and risks of childhood vaccines.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Intussusception/etiology , Parents/psychology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intussusception/epidemiology , Male , Risk Factors , Rotavirus Vaccines/economics , Safety , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 16(3): 248-63, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10198666

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Because human and financial resources are limited, health efforts must focus on prevention strategies that yield the most benefit for the investment. Many current strategies identified in the literature offer opportunities to promote health at a reasonable cost. OBJECTIVE: To present a literature-based review of evidence demonstrating that prevention can be an effective and wise use of resources through CDC's An Ounce of Prevention ... What Are the Returns? Second Edition. DESIGN: Systematic review of cost-effectiveness literature for a selected group of prevention strategies. SETTING: Prevention strategies relevant to the U.S. population. RESULTS: Data indicate that the health conditions considered can be addressed through prevention strategies that are either cost effective or cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: An Ounce of Prevention ... What Are the Returns? Second Edition can be used to conveniently access information on prevention strategies, the diseases and injuries they address, and their cost effectiveness. It also complements other comprehensive prevention guides. However, limitations of the available cost-effectiveness studies indicate that standardized procedures should be followed for studies of all recommended prevention strategies. Researchers must standardize review procedures to improve both the quality and comparability of studies.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Health Status , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Life Expectancy , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Preventive Health Services/economics , United States/epidemiology
7.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 19: 125-52, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9611615

ABSTRACT

Cost-effectiveness analysis, an analytic tool that expresses as a ratio the cost of obtaining an additional unit of health outcome, can help decision makers achieve more health protection for the same or less cost. We characterize the state of the cost-effectiveness analysis literature by reviewing how this technique is applied to various clinical and public health interventions. We describe the results of cost-effectiveness analyses for over 40 interventions to reduce cancer, heart disease, trauma, and infectious disease. The cost-effectiveness ratios for these interventions vary enormously, from interventions that save money to those that cost more than $1 million per year of life gained. The methods used to derive the cost-effectiveness ratios also vary considerably, and we summarize this variation within each health area. Greater uniformity of analytical practice will be necessary if cost-effectiveness analysis is to become a more influential tool in debates about resource allocation.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/economics , Coronary Disease/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Health Services Research/methods , Neoplasms/economics , Public Health/economics , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Services Research/economics , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL