Mortality and major postoperative complications within 1 year after vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing vascular procedures are prone to developing postoperative complications affecting their short­term mortality. Prospective reports describing the incidence of long­term complications after vascular surgery are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the incidence of complications 1 year after vascular surgery and to evaluate an association between myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) and 1­year mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a substudy of a large prospective cohort study Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION). Recruitment took place in 28 centers across 14 countries from August 2007 to November 2013. We enrolled patients aged 45 years or older undergoing vascular surgery, receiving general or regional anesthesia, and hospitalized for at least 1 night postoperatively. Plasma cardiac troponin T concentration was measured before the surgery and on the first, second, and third postoperative day. The patients or their relatives were contacted 1 year after the procedure to assess the incidence of major postoperative complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 2641 patients who underwent vascular surgery, 2534 (95.9%) of whom completed 1­year follow­up. Their mean (SD) age was 68.2 (9.8) years, and the cohort was predominantly male (77.5%). The most frequent 1­year complications were myocardial infarction (224/2534, 8.8%), amputation (187/2534, 7.4%), and congestive heart failure (67/2534, 2.6%). The 1­year mortality rate was 8.8% (223/2534). MINS occurred in 633 patients (24%) and was associated with an increased 1­year mortality (hazard ratio, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.14-3.72; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major postoperative complications after vascular surgery is high. The occurrence of MINS is associated with a nearly 3­fold increase in 1­year mortality.

One-year Outcomes after Discharge from Noncardiac Surgery and Association between Predischarge Complications and Death after Discharge: Analysis of the VISION Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In previous analyses, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, major bleeding, and sepsis were independently associated with most deaths in the 30 days after noncardiac surgery, but most of these deaths occurred during the index hospitalization for surgery. The authors set out to describe outcomes after discharge from hospital up to 1 yr after inpatient noncardiac surgery and associations between predischarge complications and postdischarge death up to 1 yr after surgery. METHODS: This study was an analysis of patients discharged after inpatient noncardiac surgery in a large international prospective cohort study across 28 centers from 2007 to 2013 of patients aged 45 yr or older followed to 1 yr after surgery. The study estimated (1) the cumulative postdischarge incidence of death and other outcomes up to a year after surgery and (2) the adjusted time-varying associations between postdischarge death and predischarge complications including myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, major bleeding, sepsis, infection without sepsis, stroke, congestive heart failure, clinically important atrial fibrillation or flutter, amputation, venous thromboembolism, and acute kidney injury managed with dialysis. RESULTS: Among 38,898 patients discharged after surgery, the cumulative 1-yr incidence was 5.8% (95% CI, 5.5 to 6.0%) for all-cause death and 24.7% (95% CI, 24.2 to 25.1%) for all-cause hospital readmission. Predischarge complications were associated with 33.7% (95% CI, 27.2 to 40.2%) of deaths up to 30 days after discharge and 15.0% (95% CI, 12.0 to 17.9%) up to 1 yr. Most of the association with death was due to myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (15.6% [95% CI, 9.3 to 21.9%] of deaths within 30 days, 6.4% [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.7%] within 1 yr), major bleeding (15.0% [95% CI, 8.3 to 21.7%] within 30 days, 4.7% [95% CI, 2.2 to 7.2%] within 1 yr), and sepsis (5.4% [95% CI, 2.2 to 8.6%] within 30 days, 2.1% [95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1%] within 1 yr). CONCLUSIONS: One in 18 patients 45 yr old or older discharged after inpatient noncardiac surgery died within 1 yr, and one quarter were readmitted to the hospital. The risk of death associated with predischarge perioperative complications persists for weeks to months after discharge.

Validation of the stratify scale for the prediction of falls among hospitalized adults in a tertiary hospital in Colombia: a retrospective cohort study.

The STRATIFY scale has been implemented as a preventive strategy for predicting the risk of accidental falls among hospitalized adults. However, there is still uncertainty about its accuracy. This study aimed to perform an external validation of the STRATIFY fall prediction scale in hospitalized adults in one tertiary care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. The study was a retrospective cohort of adult hospitalized patients in a high-level complexity care hospital. The sample selected included admitted patients (age ≥ 18), consecutively by the institution between 2018 and 2020, with an evaluation of the fall risk measured by the STRATIFY score given to each at the time of hospital admission. For assessing the scale's feasibility, its discriminative capability was obtained by calculating sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, and area under the ROC curve. The evaluation included 93,347 patient hospital records (mean 56.9 years, 50.2% women). The overall sensitivity score was 0.672 [IC 95% 0.612-0.723], the specificity score was 0.612 [IC 95% 0.605-0.615], and the positive likelihood ratio was 1.73 [IC 95% 1.589-1.891]. The area under the ROC curve was 0.69 [IC 95% 0.66-0.72]. Subgroups of age obtained similar results. Applying the STRATIFY scale at hospital admission resulted in a lower performance of the tool-predict falls in hospitalized patients. It is necessary to implement an individual evaluation of the risk factors for falls in order to structure appropriate care plans to prevent and improve hospital safety.

Impact of hydrocolloid dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial (PENFUP).

It is uncertain whether hydrocolloid dressings, a more costly intervention than offering standard care with petrolatum, is superior to prevent pressure ulcers among hospitalized high-risk adults. Randomized, parallel-group, open-label, superiority trial with an active control group, blinded for investigators, event validators, and analysts (December 1, 2015 to December 12, 2017). Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age with intact skin judged as high-risk for skin ulcers (Braden scale), admitted to surgical or medical wards of two tertiary-level hospitals. Participants were randomized (1:1) to protection with hydrocolloid dressings or petrolatum. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of pressure ulcers (with post-injury photographs adjudicated by three judges) under intention-to-treat analysis. Based on prior cost analysis, and the available resources (assumed incidence of 6 ulcers/1000 patient-days in controls), inclusion of up to 1500 participants allowed to surpass a one-sided superiority threshold > 5% based on a target efficacy > 40% for dressings. We planned an economic analysis using a decision tree model based on the effectiveness of the study results from a perspective of the third payer of health care. After inclusion of 689 patients (69 events), the trial was stopped for futility after a planned interim analysis (conditional power < 0.1 for all scenarios if the trial was completed). Pressure ulcers had occurred in 34 (10.2%) patients in the intervention group [9.6 per 1000 patient-days] and 35 (9.9%) participants in the control group [7.9 per 1000 patient-days], HR = 1.07 [95% CI 0.67 to 1.71]. The estimated incremental cost for dressings (a dominated strategy) was USD 52.11 per patient. Using hydrocolloid dressings was found similar to petrolatum for preventing pressure ulcers among hospitalized high-risk patients. As it conveys additional costs, and in this study was unlikely to demonstrate enough superiority, this strategy did not overcome conventional skin care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02565745 registered on December 1, 2015.

Characteristics, treatment, and nursing care of patients infected by Sars-CoV-2 hospitalized in intensive care units: multicenter study of colombian hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, evolution, and nursing care of adult patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) during the first peak of the pandemic in Colombia, 2020. METHODS: Multicenter descriptive study of four high-complexity hospitals in Colombia, which included 473 consecutive adult patients admitted to intensive care units with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS CoV-2. Sociodemographic and clinical information - comorbidities, treatment and evolution - and nursing care provided were included. RESULTS: Of the patients included, 43.7% died, 88.8% had pneumonia, and 60.2% developed respiratory distress syndrome. Most of those who died were men. Those who died had a median age of 68.4 years and a higher frequency of comorbidities (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and higher body mass index). They were admitted to the ICU with higher rate of dyspnea, lower oxygen saturation, and higher score of multiorgan failure. They also more often required mechanical ventilation and pronation therapy and were given more vasopressors and renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: People with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 who were hospitalized in the ICU had a high risk of death, especially older patients; males; those with cardiovascular, respiratory, and hypertension comorbidities; those who needed mechanical ventilation; and those with an elevated SOFA score. The nursing care of these critically ill patients focused on respiratory care and the prevention of associated complications.

Evaluation of Indicators of a Vascular Access Device Program led by Nursing Professionals in a High-complexity University Hospital in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: This work sought to evaluate result indicators of the specialized vascular access program led by nursing during the period between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 at Fundación Cardioinfantil -Instituto de Cardiología (Colombia). METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study based on medical records of 1,210 patients who received insertion of vascular access devices by the specialized group of nurses. Result indicators are described. RESULTS: Of all the patients who received insertion of a vascular access catheter, 53.1% were women, with mean age of 34.2 years, admitted to critical care services with cardiovascular problems and sepsis (90.2%). Placement of the peripherally inserted central catheter, midline and arterial was echo-guided between 91% and 100%, with a success rate on the first puncture of 66%. The average duration time of the peripherally inserted central catheter was 25.3 days, that of the midline catheter was 8 days, with a reach of 57% until the end of the treatment. The rate observed per catheter-days of overall phlebitis was 2.03, for positive blood culture of the central peripheral insertion device was 1.9 and thrombosis of 0.50; and arterial line thrombosis was 11.7. CONCLUSIONS: The Vascular Access Device Program led by nursing reported rational use of these elements with structured therapeutic purposes according with the complexity of the patients admitted to hospitalization. Improvement plans must be implemented to increase efficacy in post-admission insertion times, reduce infection rate and thrombosis through effective follow-up and control mechanisms.

Characteristics, treatment, and nursing care of patients infected by Sars-CoV-2 hospitalized in intensive care units: multicenter study of colombian hospitals / Características, tratamiento y cuidados de enfermería de pacientes infectados por SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizados en unidades de cuidados intensivos: estudio multicéntrico de hospitales colombianos / Características, tratamento e cuidados de enfermagem de pacientes infectados por SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizados em unidades de tratamento intensivos: estudo multicêntrico de hospitais colombianos

Objective. To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, evolution, and nursing care of adult patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) during the first peak of the pandemic in Colombia, 2020. Methods. Multicenter descriptive study of four high-complexity hospitals in Colombia, which included 473 consecutive adult patients admitted to intensive care units with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS CoV-2. Sociodemographic and clinical information - comorbidities, treatment and evolution - and nursing care provided were included. Results. Of the patients included, 43.7% died, 88.8% had pneumonia, and 60.2% developed respiratory distress syndrome. Most of those who died were men. Those who died had a median age of 68.4 years and a higher frequency of comorbidities (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and higher body mass index). They were admitted to the ICU with higher rate of dyspnea, lower oxygen saturation, and higher score of multiorgan failure. They also more often required mechanical ventilation and pronation therapy and were given more vasopressors and renal replacement therapy. Conclusion. People with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 who were hospitalized in the ICU had a high risk of death, especially older patients; males; those with cardiovascular, respiratory, and hypertension comorbidities; those who needed mechanical ventilation; and those with an elevated SOFA score. The nursing care of these critically ill patients focused on respiratory care and the prevention of associated complications.

Objetivo. Describir las características clínicas, tratamiento, evolución y cuidados de enfermería de los pacientes adultos con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda grave, positivos para SARS-CoV-2, hospitalizados en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) durante el primer pico de pandemia en Colombia en 2020. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo multicéntrico con la participación de cuatro hospitales de alto nivel de complejidad en Colombia, que incluyó 473 pacientes adultos, admitidos de forma consecutiva en unidades de cuidados intensivos -UCI-, con diagnóstico confirmado para SARS CoV-2. Se incluyó información sociodemográfica, clínica, comorbilidades, tratamiento y evolución, además de los cuidados de enfermería brindados. Resultados. Del total de pacientes incluidos fallecieron el 43.7%, presentaron neumonía el 88.8% y un 60.2% desarrollaron síndrome de dificultad respiratoria. Las personas que fallecieron en su mayoría fueron hombres, con una mediana de edad de 68.4 años, con mayor frecuencia de comorbilidades (hipertensión, enfermedad cardiovascular, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y mayor índice de masa corporal); además ingresaron a UCI con mayor presencia de disnea, menor saturación de oxígeno, y con puntaje mayor de falla multiorgánica. Así mismo, requirieron con más frecuencia de ventilación mecánica, terapia de pronación, uso de vasopresores y terapia de reemplazo renal. Los cuidados de enfermería de estos pacientes en estado crítico se enfocaron al cuidado respiratorio y la prevención de complicaciones asociadas. Conclusión. Las personas con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda grave por COVID-19 que se hospitalizaron en UCI tuvieron un riesgo elevado de fallecer, especialmente los pacientes de mayor edad, sexo masculino y con comorbilidades cardiovasculares, respiratorias e hipertensión arterial, uso de ventilación mecánica y un puntaje puntaje de SOFA elevado. Los cuidados de enfermería de estos pacientes en estado crítico se enfocaron al cuidado respiratorio y la prevención de complicaciones asociadas.

Objetivo. Descrever as características clínicas, tratamento, evolução e cuidados de enfermagem dos pacientes adultos com síndrome de dificuldade respiratória aguda grave, positivos para SARS-CoV-2, hospitalizados nas Unidades de tratamentos Intensivos (UTI) durante o primeiro pico de pandemia na Colômbia em 2020. Métodos. Estudo descritivo multicêntrico com a participação de quatro hospitais de alto nível de complexidade na Colômbia, que incluiu 473 pacientes adultos, admitidos de forma consecutiva nas unidades de tratamentos intensivos -UTI-, com diagnóstico confirmado para SARS CoV-2. Se incluiu informação sociodemográfica, clínica, comorbilidades, tratamento e evolução, além dos cuidados de enfermagens brindados. Resultados. Do total de pacientes incluídos faleceram 43.7%, apresentaram pneumonia 88.8% e um 60.2% desenvolveram síndrome de dificuldade respiratória. As pessoas que faleceram em sua maioria foram homens, com uma média de idade de 68.4 anos, com maior frequência de comorbilidades (hipertensão, doença cardiovascular, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crónica e maior índice de massa corporal); ademais ingressaram a UTI com maior presença de dispneia, menor saturação de oxigeno, e com pontuação maior de falha multiorgânica. Assim mesmo, requereram com mais frequência de ventilação mecânica, terapia de pronação, uso de vasopressores e terapia de substituição renal. Os cuidados de enfermagem destes pacientes em estado crítico se enfocaram ao cuidado respiratório e a prevenção de complicações associadas. Conclusão. As pessoas com síndrome de dificuldade respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19 que se hospitalizaram em UTI tinham um elevado risco de morte, especialmente os pacientes mais velhos; os homens; aqueles com comorbilidades cardiovasculares, respiratórias e hipertensão; aqueles que precisavam de ventilação mecânica; e aqueles com um escore SOFA elevado. Os cuidados de enfermagem destes pacientes criticamente doentes concentraram-se nos cuidados respiratórios e na prevenção de complicações associadas.

Evaluation of Indicators of a Vascular Access Device Program led by Nursing Professionals in a High-complexity University Hospital in Colombia / Evaluación de indicadores de un Programa de Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular liderado por profesionales de enfermería en un hospital universitario de alta complejidad en Colombia / Avaliação de indicadores de um Programa de Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular liderado por profissionais de enfermagem num hospital universitário de alta complexidade na Colômbia

Objective. This work sought to evaluate result indicators of the specialized vascular access program led by nursing during the period between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 at Fundación Cardioinfantil -Instituto de Cardiología (Colombia). Methods. This was a retrospective descriptive study based on medical records of 1,210 patients who received insertion of vascular access devices by the specialized group of nurses. Result indicators are described. Results. Of all the patients who received insertion of a vascular access catheter, 53.1% were women, with mean age of 34.2 years, admitted to critical care services with cardiovascular problems and sepsis (90.2%). Placement of the peripherally inserted central catheter, midline and arterial was echo-guided between 91% and 100%, with a success rate on the first puncture of 66%. The average duration time of the peripherally inserted central catheter was 25.3 days, that of the midline catheter was 8 days, with a reach of 57% until the end of the treatment. The rate observed per catheter-days of overall phlebitis was 2.03, for positive blood culture of the central peripheral insertion device was 1.9 and thrombosis of 0.50; and arterial line thrombosis was 11.7. Conclusion. The Vascular Access Device Program led by nursing reported rational use of these elements with structured therapeutic purposes according with the complexity of the patients admitted to hospitalization. Improvement plans must be implemented to increase efficacy in post-admission insertion times, reduce infection rate and thrombosis through effective follow-up and control mechanisms.

Objetivo. Evaluar los indicadores de resultado del programa especializado de accesos vasculares liderado por enfermería durante el periodo comprendido entre enero 1ro de 2018 -diciembre 31 de 2019 en la Fundación Cardioinfantil -Instituto de Cardiología en Colombia. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo, con base en historias clínicas de 1210 pacientes que recibieron la inserción de dispositivos de acceso vascular por el grupo especializado de enfermeras. Se describen indicadores de resultado. Resultados. Del total de pacientes que recibieron la inserción de un catéter vía acceso vascular, el 53.1% fueron mujeres, con edad promedio de 34.2 años, admitidos en servicios de cuidado crítico con problemas cardiovasculares y sepsis (90.2%). La colocación del catéter central de inserción periférica, de línea media y arterial fue eco-guiada entre el 91-100%, con una tasa de éxito a la primera punción del 66%. El tiempo promedio de duración del catéter central de inserción periférica fue de 25.3 días, la del catéter de línea media fue de 8 días, con un alcance del 57% hasta el final del tratamiento. La tasa observada por días-catéter de flebitis global fue de 2.03, para hemocultivo positivo del dispositivo central de inserción periférica fue de 1.9 y trombosis de 0.50; y trombosis de la línea arterial fue de 11.7. Conclusión. El programa de dispositivos de acceso vascular liderado por enfermería reportó un uso racional de estos elementos con fines terapéuticos estructurados de acuerdo con la complejidad de los pacientes admitidos a hospitalización. Planes de mejora deben ser implementados con el fin de incrementar la eficacia en los tiempos de inserción pos-admisión, reducción de tasa de infección y trombosis mediante mecanismos efectivos de seguimiento y control.

Objetivo. Avaliar os indicadores de resultado do programa especializado de acessos vasculares liderado por enfermagem durante o período compreendido entre o dia 1° de janeiro de 2018 -dezembro 31 de 2019 na Fundação Cardio-infantil -Instituto de Cardiologia em Colômbia. Métodos. Estudo descritivo retrospectivo, com base nas histórias clínicas de 1210 pacientes que receberam a inserção de dispositivos de acesso vascular pelo grupo especializado de enfermeiras. Se descrevem indicadores de resultado. Resultados. Do total de pacientes que receberam a inserção de um cateter via acesso vascular, 53.1% foram mulheres, com idade média de 34.2 anos, admitidos em serviços de cuidado crítico com problemas cardiovasculares e sepses (90.2%). A colocação do cateter central de inserção periférica, de linha média e arterial foi ecoguiada entre 91-100%, com uma taxa de sucesso à primeira punção de 66%. O tempo médio de duração do cateter central de inserção periférica foi de 25.3 dias, a do cateter de linha média foi de 8 dias, com um alcance de 57% até o final do tratamento. A taxa observada por dias-cateter de flebites global foi de 2.03, para hemocultura positivo do dispositivo central de inserção periférica foi de 1.9 e trombose de 0.50; e trombose da linha arterial foi de 11.7. Conclusão. O programa de dispositivos de acesso vascular liderado por enfermagem reportou um uso racional destes elementos com fins terapêuticos estruturados de acordo com a complexidade dos pacientes admitidos a hospitalização. Planos de melhora devem ser implementados com o fim de incrementar a eficácia nos tempos de inserção pós-admissão, redução de taxa de infecção e trombose mediante mecanismos efetivos de seguimento e controle.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials: In-hospital use of sensors for prevention of falls.

BACKGROUND: Intra-hospital falls have become an important public health problem globally. The use of movement sensors with alarms has been studied as elements with predictive capacity for falls at hospital level. However, in spite of their use in some hospitals throughout the world, evidence is lacking about their effectiveness in reducing intra-hospital falls. Therefore, this study aims to develop a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing scientific literature exploring the impact of using sensors for fall prevention in hospitalized adults and the elderly population. METHODS: We explored literature based on clinical trials in Spanish, English, and Portuguese, assessing the impact of devices used for hospital fall prevention in adult and elderly populations. The search included databases such as IEEE Xplore, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct databases. The critical appraisal was performed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality was assessed based on the ratings of individual biases. We performed the sum of the results, generating an estimation of the grouped effect (Relative Risk, 95% CI) for the outcome first fall for each patient. We assessed heterogeneity and publication bias. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Results were assessed in three randomized controlled clinical trials, including 29,691 patients. A total of 351 (3%) patients fell among 11,769 patients assigned to the intervention group, compared with 426 (2.4%) patients who fell among 17,922 patients assigned to the control group (general estimation RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04, 1.37, P = .02, I2 = 0%; Moderate GRADE). CONCLUSION: Our results show an increase of 19% in falls among elderly patients who are users of sensors located in their bed, bed-chair, or chair among their hospitalizations. Other types of sensors such as wearable sensors can be explored as coadjutants for fall prevention care in hospitals.

Frequency of repositioning for preventing pressure ulcers in patients hospitalized in ICU: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite being considered preventable, ulcers due to pressure affect between 30 and 50% of patients at high and very high risk and susceptibility, especially those hospitalized under critical care. Despite a lack of evidence over the efficacy in prevention against ulcers due to pressure, hourly repositioning in critical care as an intervention is used with more or less frequency to alleviate pressure on patients' tissues. This brings up the objective of our study, which is to evaluate the efficacy in prevention of ulcers due to pressure acquired during hospitalization, specifically regarding two frequency levels of repositioning or manual posture switching in adults hospitalized in different intensive care units in different Colombian hospitals. METHODS: A nurse-applied cluster randomized controlled trial of parallel groups (two branches), in which 22 eligible ICUs (each consisting of 150 patients), will be randomized to a high-frequency level repositioning intervention or to a conventional care (control group). Patients will be followed until their exit from each cluster. The primary result of this study is originated by regarding pressure ulcers using clusters (number of first ulcers per patient, at the early stage of progression, first one acquired after admission for 1000 days). The secondary results include evaluating the risk index on the patients' level (Hazard ratio, 95% IC) and a description of repositioning complications. Two interim analyses will be performed through the course of this study. A statistical difference between the groups < 0.05 in the main outcome, the progression of ulcers due to pressure (best or worst outcome in the experimental group), will determine whether the study should be put to a halt/determine the termination of the study. CONCLUSION: This study is innovative in its use of clusters to advance knowledge of the impact of repositioning as a prevention strategy against the appearance of ulcers caused by pressure in critical care patients. The resulting recommendations of this study can be used for future clinical practice guidelines in prevention and safety for patients at risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PENFUP phase-2 was Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04604665 ) in October 2020.

Preoperative walking recommendation for non-cardiac surgery patients to reduce the length of hospital stay: a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Even though the importance of preparing patients for a surgical event is recognized, there are still gaps about the benefit of improving functional capacity by walking during the waiting time among patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pre-surgical walking in-hospital length of stay, early ambulation, and the appearance of complications after surgery among patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: A two-arm, single- blinded randomized controlled trial was developed from May 2016 to August 2017. Eligible outpatients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery, capable of walking, were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive a prescription of walking 150 min/week during the whole pre-surgical waiting time (n = 249) or conventional care (n = 119). The primary outcome was the difference in hospital length of stay, and secondary results were time to first ambulation during hospitalization, description of ischemic events during hospitalization and after six months of hospital discharge, and the walking continuation. We performed an intention to treat analysis and compared length of stay between both groups by Kaplan-Meier estimator (log-rank test). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay between both groups (log-rank test p = 0.367) and no differences in the first ambulation time during hospitalization (log-rank test p = 0.299). Similar rates of postoperative complications were observed in both groups, but patients in the intervention group continued to practice walking six months after discharge (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first clinical trial evaluating the impact of walking before non-cardiac surgery in the length of stay, early ambulation, and complications after surgery. Prescription of walking for patients before non-cardiac surgery had no significant effect in reducing the length of stay, and early ambulation. The results become a crucial element for further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PAMP-Phase2 was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03213496 on July 11, 2017.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies: In-hospital mobilization for patients admitted for medical treatment.

AIM: To determine the impact of strategies to promote mobilization on physical function in hospitalized adults with medical conditions. BACKGROUND: Slow progress is noted on the promotion of mobilization during hospitalization for adult patients admitted for medical conditions. This may reflect the limited evidence on the evaluation of the impact of progressive mobilization activities on clinical endpoints in adult patients throughout hospitalization. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials in any language. DATA RESOURCES: The literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, CINAHL online, HealthStar, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Registry and LILACS databases (January 2000-February 2017). REVIEW METHODS: Two authors independently identified randomized trials meeting inclusion criteria, assessed their quality and extracted relevant data. Outcomes assessed were the changes in physical function evaluated by scales measuring either the aerobic (metres walked/second) or the balance domain (using the Time Up and Go test, in seconds), length of hospital stay (days), and adverse clinical events. We calculated pooled mean differences or Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for continuous or dichotomous outcome data and obtained heterogeneity statistics across studies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, including in total 2,703 participants, met our eligibility criteria. Patients in the intervention group showed significant improvement in physical function (aerobic domain), reduced length of stay, and a reduction of pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Patients and health providers should consider a course of therapy that enhances the functional capacity of medical patients during hospitalization.

Digital Photography: a Tool for Nursing on the Assessment of Pressure Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This work sought to assess the inter-observer agreement among expert nurses by using digital photographs and between these experts and the nursing registries in the electronic clinical record in the identification and degree of PL. METHODS: This was an observational study, including 225 photographic records (184 patients, 97 with pressure lesion and 128 registries without lesion) randomly selected from the total of photographs registered in the PENFUP clinical trial (without lesion). Three expert evaluators assessed said photographs in masked manner. The notes from nursing of patients included related with the description of PL were evaluated. The Kappa index was calculated along with the composite agreement ratio for each evaluation. RESULTS: Good agreement was observed among expert evaluators of photographic records on the presence of PL and between good-moderate for the degree of PL (I-II). Likewise, upon evaluating the agreement between the nursing registries of PL and the photographic assessment of the three expert evaluators of the same areas, good agreement was observed to determine the presence of PL and moderate agreement for the degrees of PL. CONCLUSIONS: Photographic records are a tool that permits recognizing the types of wounds, as well as the visualization of the different layers of skin injured. The study highlights the importance of assessment and validation by experts, given that it permits identifying existing problems that can lead to the underestimation or overestimation of PL when conducted by a single caregiver.

Inactivity and Its Associated Factors in Adults Scheduled for Noncardiac Surgery: The PAMP Phase I Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of physical inactivity and its associated factors in adult patients admitted to hospital for noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Five hundred able-bodied patients (age ≥45 years) admitted to hospital, also participants in the VISION study, were recruited before noncardiac surgery. The physical activity level (PAL) was assessed with the International Physical of Activity Questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the associations between a number of predetermined factors and physical inactivity. FINDINGS: Overall, 59.8% were inactive. Factors associated with inactivity included age, assistance with activities of daily living, and insulin-dependent diabetes. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery are inactive. Elderly patients, those needing assistance, and those with long-lasting diabetes may benefit from PAL assessment before surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare providers should identify PALs and monitor for known risk factors to prepare patients for surgical procedures.

Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) in Vascular Surgical Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic relevance, clinical characteristics, and 30-day outcomes associated with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in vascular surgical patients. BACKGROUND: MINS has been independently associated with 30-day mortality after noncardiac surgery. The characteristics and prognostic importance of MINS in vascular surgery patients are poorly described. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of 15,102 noncardiac surgery patients 45 years or older, of whom 502 patients underwent vascular surgery. All patients had fourth-generation plasma troponin T (TnT) concentrations measured during the first 3 postoperative days. MINS was defined as a TnT of 0.03 ng/mL of higher secondary to ischemia. The objectives of the present study were to determine (i) if MINS is prognostically important in vascular surgical patients, (ii) the clinical characteristics of vascular surgery patients with and without MINS, (iii) the 30-day outcomes for vascular surgery patients with and without MINS, and (iv) the proportion of MINS that probably would have gone undetected without routine troponin monitoring. RESULTS: The incidence of MINS in the vascular surgery patients was 19.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.7%-22.6%). 30-day all-cause mortality in the vascular cohort was 12.5% (95% CI 7.3%-20.6%) in patients with MINS compared with 1.5% (95% CI 0.7%-3.2%) in patients without MINS (P < 0.001). MINS was independently associated with 30-day mortality in vascular patients (odds ratio, 9.48; 95% CI, 3.46-25.96). The 30-day mortality was similar in MINS patients with (15.0%; 95% CI, 7.1-29.1) and without an ischemic feature (12.2%; 95% CI, 5.3-25.5, P = 0.76). The proportion of vascular surgery patients who suffered MINS without overt evidence of myocardial ischemia was 74.1% (95% CI, 63.6-82.4). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 patients experienced MINS after vascular surgery. MINS was independently associated with 30-day mortality. The majority of patients with MINS were asymptomatic and would have gone undetected without routine postoperative troponin measurement.

Mobilization patterns of patients after an acute myocardial infarction: a pilot study.

This study was aimed to identify the mobilization patterns of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients during their first three days in the coronary care unit (CCU) by performing a prospective observational pilot study design. The study included 31 diagnosed AMI patients admitted to three CCUs. Mobilization patterns classified as bed rest, semi-fowler, transfer to chair, and standing/walking were documented by CCU nurses for 72 consecutive hours after patient admission to the CCU. Of 2,232 possible mobilization periods (72 hr × 31 patients), 1,385 recorded observations of mobilization (62%) were obtained. Bed rest and semi-fowler positions were the most common mobilization patterns; together they accounted for 70% of the documented positions over the first 72 hr in the CCU. Patients who experience an uncomplicated AMI spend the majority of their first 72 hr in CCU in bed.

Impacto de la ambulación temprana en la reducción de cefalea y dolor lumbar en pacientes sometidos a anestesia espinal: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de estudios experimentales / Impact of early ambulation on the reduction of headache and back pain after spinal anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies

Objetivo: Determinar el impacto de la ambulación temprana (AT) en la presencia de cefalea y dolor lumbar en pacientes sometidos a procedimientos quirúrgicos bajo anestesia espinal. Material y método: Revisión sistemática y meta-análisis que revisó las bases de datos MEDLINE, CINAhL online, HealthStar, EMBASE, el Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Registry, LILACS y consulta de expertos. Incluyó estudios experimentales aleatorizados en cualquier idioma comparando pacientes sometidos a anestesia subaracnoidea aleatorizados durante su hospitalización a un grupo de ambulación temprana (intervención) o a un grupo control/cuidado estandarizado (reposo cama). La elegibilidad y la calidad de los artículos fue realizada por cuatro revisores de manera independiente. Luego se realizó la extracción de la información. Se calculó riesgo relativo (RR), 95 por ciento de intervalos de confianza usando el modelo de efecto random. Resultados: Respecto de la cefalea y dolor lumbar 24 h posteriores a la anestesia espinal se identificaron seis estudios entre 1988-2008, teniendo en cuenta los criterios de elegibilidad. Se observaron 41 cefaleas (16.9 por ciento de 242) y 24 dolor lumbar (21.6 por ciento de 111) entre pacientes asignados a una ambulación temprana (DT), comparado con 54 cefaleas (22.3 por ciento de 207) y 32 dolor lumbar (27.5 por ciento de 116) entre pacientes con anestesia espinal asignados al grupo control (RR=0.67, 95 por ciento CI 0.44,1.02; y RR= 0.79, IC 95 por ciento 0.46, 1.34 respectivamente). Conclusión: El meta-análisis sugiere que puede existir beneficio hacia una disminución de cefalea y dolor lumbar en pacientes que reciben AT posterior a anestesia espinal.

Objective: To determine the impact of early ambulation (EA) versus late ambulation on total headache and back pain after spinal anaesthesia. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis, used data Sources such as MEDLINE, CINAhL online, HealthStar, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Registry, LILACS and experts. Methods: Published randomized controlled trials in all languages comparing spinal anesthesia patients allocated to any in-hospital early ambulation or a control/standard treatment (bed rest). Four reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality; and also performed data extraction. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95 percent confdence intervals (CIs) using the random-effects model. Outcomes: cefalea or back pain 24 h post-spinal anaesthesia. Results: Six studies met our eligibility criteria published between 1988-2008. There were 41 cefalea events (16.9 percent of 242) and 24 back pain events (21.6 percent of 111) among patients receiving EM, compared with 54 cefalea events ( 22.3 percent of 207) and 32 back pain events (27.5 percent of 116) among spinal patients receiving control treatment (for cefalea RR=0.67, 95 percent CI 0.44,1.02; and for lumbar pain RR= 0.79, IC 95 percent 0.46, 1.34). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that there is a possible beneft towards decreased cefalea and back pain with EA after spinal anaesthesia.

Early mobilisation for patients following acute myocardiac infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of early mobilisation (EM) on total mortality and non-fatal re-infarction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, HealthStar, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Registry and experts. METHODS: Target studies included published and unpublished experimental, controlled studies in any language comparing AMI patients allocated to any in-hospital early mobilisation or a control/standard treatment. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random-effects model. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality or re-infarction up to 1-year post-AMI. RESULTS: Out of 385 potentially relevant studies, 14 met our eligibility criteria (13 published before 1983). There were 149 deaths (9.3% of 1607) and 82 non-fatal re-infarctions (5.2% of 1580) among post-AMI patients receiving EM, compared with 179 deaths (11.6% of 1541) and 80 non-fatal re-infarctions (5.3% of 1518) among AMI patients receiving control treatment (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.68, 1.05 and RR=1.02, 95% CI 0.75, 1.39 respectively). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated a trend towards decreased mortality with EM after AMI. However, there is uncertainty about early mobilisation and more research should be developed having into account all kind of differences among patients receiving treatment after AMI worldwide.