Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Mol Allergy ; 14: 7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27499704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Airborne allergens can induce an immunological chronic disease characterized by airway hyper responsiveness and inflammation, mediated by exaggerated Th2 immune response. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is effective for treating this condition because it is able to modify its natural course by opposing the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and determining immune suppression, immune deviation and tolerance. The rational for the present study was to investigate the possibility of improving allergoid-based IT in terms of efficacy and safety. Recently, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3), the active metabolite of vitamin D3, was described to be a potent inducer of T regulatory cells and to be a good adjuvant in AIT settings. METHODS: We investigated whether the co-administration of VD3 could potentiate the effect of AIT even when added to a low dose of chemically-modified monomeric allergoid of Der p 2 (d2-OID), in a Derp p 2 (d2)-sensitized BALB/c mice model. Control groups where treated with sham, VD3 alone or d2-OID only. RESULTS: The d2-OID alone was not fully successful, as expected for a low dose. VD3 administration was associated with some valuable, although limited, changes in the immunological parameters in the lung. On the contrary, the VD3 adjuvated allergoid vaccine induced the most prominent reduction of airway eosinophilia and Th2 cytokines and concomitant increase of T regulatory cells and IL-10 in the lung and Der p 2-specific IgG2a in the serum. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of VD3 to a conventional AIT protocol would allow the reduction of allergoid dose needed and therefore, the production costs. Moreover, beneficial immunomodulatory effects have been achieved by the oral administration which might favour the management of the therapy by the patients and their adherence, possibly enhancing the efficacy of the treatment.

2.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 29(4): 769-774, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27272161

ABSTRACT

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) association offers a better asthma control than a higher steroid dose with short-acting beta-agonists as needed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the association on bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, as such parameters are positively correlated with increased asthma morbidity and exacerbations. Thirty-six adult patients with mild persistent asthma were enrolled. After a 7-day run-in, they were randomly assigned to three therapy regimens for 6 weeks: Group 1, fluticasone 125 µg + formoterol 5 µg in the same device; Group 2, fluticasone 125 µg + formoterol 12 µg as needed; Group 3, fluticasone 250 µg + formoterol 12 µg as needed. We evaluated changes induced in weekly PEF variability (measured during the entire study and 4 weeks of follow-up) and pre- and post-study PD20 methacholine (MCH). Weekly PEF variability decreased in all groups during treatment with the greatest reduction in Group 1, followed by Group 3, and finally Group 2. During the follow-up, no significant changes were detected in Group 1, whereas a trend towards an increased variability was found in Groups 2 and 3. Post-treatment PD20 MCH was significantly higher versus the pre-treatment. The increase observed in Group 1 was significantly higher compared to Groups 2 and 3 and that observed in Group 3 in respect to Group 2. The study proves that both BHR and PEF variability are influenced by ICS. This effect was greater with fluticasone/formoterol association compared to fluticasone alone with formoterol as needed even at higher steroid dose.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Fluticasone/therapeutic use , Formoterol Fumarate/therapeutic use , Methacholine Chloride/therapeutic use , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate/drug effects , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male
3.
Clin Mol Allergy ; 13(1): 13, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26180517

ABSTRACT

Almost all people in developed countries are exposed to metal nanoparticles (MeNPs) that are used in a large number of applications including medical (for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes). Once inside the body, absorbed by inhalation, contact, ingestion and injection, MeNPs can translocate to tissues and, as any foreign substance, are likely to encounter the innate immunity system that represent a non-specific first line of defense against potential threats to the host. In this review, we will discuss the possible effects of MeNPs on various components of the innate immunity (both specific cells and barriers). Most important is that there are no reports of immune diseases induced by MeNPs exposure: we are operating in a safe area. However, in vitro assays show that MeNPs have some effects on innate immunity, the main being toxicity (both cyto- and genotoxicity) and interference with the activity of various cells through modification of membrane receptors, gene expression and cytokine production. Such effects can have both negative and positive relevant impacts on humans. On the one hand, people exposed to high levels of MeNPs, as workers of industries producing or applying MeNPs, should be monitored for possible health effects. On the other hand, understanding the modality of the effects on immune responses is essential to develop medical applications for MeNPs. Indeed, those MeNPs that are able to stimulate immune cells could be used to develop of new vaccines, promote immunity against tumors and suppress autoimmunity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...