Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
3.
J Telemed Telecare ; 29(4): 308-317, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461399

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tele-exercise could represent an alternative for remote care in individuals with spinal cord injury at this time of the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019. However, the differences regarding the training loads and implementation between synchronous and asynchronous types are not yet known. The purpose of this study was to compare the implementation and training load between synchronous and asynchronous tele-exercise programs in individuals with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Forty individuals with spinal cord injury were recruited and stratified into tetraplegia and paraplegia groups. All subjects performed 3 weeks of both the synchronous and asynchronous tele-exercise programs, after two weeks of familiarization with the exercises, remote connection tools and methods to record information. The primary outcomes were training load (average daily workload and average and total weekly training load) and implementation (adherence and successful exercise recording). Demographic characteristics were obtained from participants' electronic medical records. RESULTS: Weekly mean workload, total workload, adherence and successful exercise recording presented significantly higher values in the synchronous compared to asynchronous tele-exercises. Average daily workload did not present significant differences between the tele-exercises. DISCUSSION: The training load for each training session presented no differences between synchronous and asynchronous tele-exercises. Both adherence and successful data recording showed more favourable implementation values for synchronous training, thus allowing greater weekly training loads (total and average).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Pandemics , Exercise , Exercise Therapy
4.
Int J Sports Med ; 43(4): 366-372, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34388835

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to validate the perceived exertion scale based on the repetitions in reserve (RIR) of Paralympic Powerlifting (PP) athletes. Twenty-one PP athletes were assessed in the one-maximum repetition test (1RM) of the bench press exercise, maximum repetition strength tests with loads corresponding to 90, 85, 80, and 75% of 1RM, and 4-repetitions strength tests (4-repST) with 100, 90, 85, 80, and 75% of the 1RM. The RIR scale was assessed after each set of the 4-repST and compared to the 1RM and maximum strength tests. For criterion validity, the total estimated repetition was significantly lower compared to the maximum strength test repetitions in the lower scores of the RIR scale (median=7.0 vs. 9.0 for 75% of 1RM). The total estimated repetition correlation with maximum strength was very high and significant (ICC=0.91). Using the Bland and Altman method, the difference between means was 0.9 reps, and the interval around differences was 6.4 reps. For construct validity, and the RIR scale presented high correlation with 1RM intensities (rho=0.86, p≤0.05). The RIR scale was validated and coaches and sports trainers can use this monitoring tool to ensure submaximal loads when improving lift technique, which is extremely rigorous in PP.


Subject(s)
Para-Athletes , Resistance Training , Exercise , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Muscle Strength , Resistance Training/methods , Weight Lifting
6.
Gait Posture ; 78: 65-71, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32268249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) might show muscle fatigability during walking, primarily over long distances. The cause can be related to the motor impairment and walking compensations identified in this population. However, evidence on the occurrence of muscle fatigability after prolonged walking in individuals with iSCI is conflicting. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does prolonged walking cause higher muscle fatigability in individuals with iSCI compared with matched-controls? METHODS: We adopted a repeated measures design, in which maximal voluntary isometric contractions were performed before and after a walking test to induce the fatigability, in 24 individuals with iSCI and 24 matched-controls. Body weight-normalized peak torque (PT/BW), rate of force development (RFD), root mean square (RMS) and neuromuscular efficiency were used to assess the muscle fatigability. A mixed model ANOVA (2 × 2) was used for between-group and within-group comparisons. The significance was set in 5%. RESULTS: Individuals with iSCI showed a greater decline in the PT/BW and RMS after the walking test. However, the RFD presented a greater decrease in the control group. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results showed that prolonged walking caused higher muscle fatigability in individuals with iSCI compared to healthy individuals. Therefore, muscle fatigability should be considered during the rehabilitation planning and in activities of daily living of individuals with iSCI. Moreover, the identification of muscle fatigability in individuals with iSCI might be useful to prevent high levels of physical exertion and, possibly, the risk of fall.


Subject(s)
Muscle Fatigue , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Walking/physiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Isometric Contraction , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Exertion , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Torque
7.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 36(12): 1329-1339, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30686099

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To determine whether the inclusion of three additional items improved the discriminative capacity of the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC). Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 126 men (median age 28.9 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 23.7; 38.5 years]) with spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into three subgroups: high paraplegia (HP), medium paraplegia (MP), and low paraplegia (LP). The participants performed the AMWC with three additional items. Ability score and total time of AMWC (AMWCAS and AMWCTT) and AMWC plus the three additional items (AMWC+3AS and AMWC+3TT), 3 min of overground wheeling test and performance score were evaluated. Results: AMWC was not able to discriminate HP from MP and LP (Wilks' lambda = 0.93; P= 0.07). In contrast, AMWC+3 was able to discriminate between the three subgroups (Wilks' lambda = 0.86; P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3AS presented a better sensitivity compared to AMWCAS (lower success rate for all subgroups, 38.5% vs. 82.1% for HP; 49.0% vs. 75.5% for MP; 78.9% vs. 94.7% for LP). The LP group presented a significant higher AMWC+3AS compared to MP and HP (17.0 vs. 16.5 and 16.5, respectively, P≤ 0.05). AMWC+3TT was significantly lower in LP compared to MP and HP (139.85 s vs. 242.52 s and 326.21 s, respectively, P≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The AMWC+3 outcomes were able to discriminate between HP, MP, and LP subgroups, and the addition of the three items enhanced the sensitivity of the wheelchair circuit. The performance of LP was more evident with significant differences compared to HP and MP for all AMWC+3 outcomes.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Torso/physiopathology , Wheelchairs , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Task Performance and Analysis , Young Adult
8.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil ; 26(4): 314-323, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536737

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare a standardized submaximal intensity (based on the rate of perceived exertion [RPE]) with the percentage of the average and peak torque during a familiarization session in individuals with different spinal cord injury (SCI) levels in gravity-resisted and gravity-assisted movements. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study at a rehabilitation hospital. Thirty-six individuals stratified in tetraplegia (TP), high paraplegia (HP), and low paraplegia (LP) groups and 12 matched control participants (CG) were enrolled in the study. Participants performed a maximum strength test using isokinetic dynamometry. The familiarization consisted of 10 submaximal repetitions with a level 2 (i.e., 20% of the maximum score) in the Resistance Exercise Scale (OMNI-RES). Fisher's exact test compared the percentages of the average torque (%ATFam) and peak torque (%PTFam) of the familiarization (based on the peak torque during the maximum strength tests) to the %ATFam and %PTFam attained with 20% of RPE. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to assess the torque dispersion during each familiarization set. RESULTS: The %ATFam was lower for gravity-assisted compared to gravity-resisted movements for HP, LP, and CG (p ≤ .05). The CV was significantly lower in gravity-resisted movements during familiarization for TP, LP, and CG. CONCLUSION: Different RPE levels should be adopted for gravity-resisted or gravity-assisted upper limb exercises to maintain the same relative intensity during a familiarization session.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Physical Exertion/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Test , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength Dynamometer , Torque , Upper Extremity , Young Adult
9.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 35(9): 860-872, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659301

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To translate, culturally adapt and validate the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit (AMWC) into Brazilian-Portuguese. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Sixty-six men (median age of 30.5 years [percentiles 25 and 75: 24.0; 38.3 years]) with traumatic spinal cord injury were consecutively enrolled and divided into two groups: tetraplegia (TP) and paraplegia (PP). The participants performed the AMWC-Brazil and were evaluated by the Spinal Cord Injury Measure version III (SCIM-III). Translation, translation synthesis, back-translation, committee review and construct validity were adopted for the cross-cultural adaptation. Construct validity was performed by testing whether the test scores were significantly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient) to the subjects' injury level, age, time since injury, body mass index (BMI) and SCIM-III scale. Results: All the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes were significantly correlated with SCIM-III total score and subscales (P ≤ 0.01). However, when the analyses were stratified over injury level, only the TP showed a high correlation between the AMWC-Brazil's outcomes and the SCIM-III. For construct validity, 4 of 5 hypotheses were confirmed. Only BMI was not a significant predictor of the AMWC-Brazil outcomes. Conclusion: The AMWC was successfully translated to the Brazilian-Portuguese (AMWC-Brazil) and presented high and satisfactory construct validity.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Disability Evaluation , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Wheelchairs , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Translations , Young Adult
10.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; : 1-7, 2018 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30376444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The functional hamstrings/quadriceps ratio (FH/Q) is useful to detect muscle imbalances after stroke. However, is necessary to investigate possible differences between men and women affected by stroke and controls. OBJECTIVES: To compare the FH/Q between men and women with stroke and matched controls. METHOD: Cross-sectional study. Fifty-six participants (10 men - MSTK and 18 women - WSTK with stroke; and 10 men - MCONT and 18 women - WCONT, matched controls) were recruited. The concentric knee extension (conc) and eccentric flexion exercises (ecc) were performed, and peak torque (PT) was used to calculate the FH/Q. Comparisons of PT between sexes (MSTK vs WSTK; MCONT vs WCONT) and comparisons of FH/Q between sexes and groups (MSTK vs MCONT; WSTK vs WCONT), considering dominant vs non-paretic side and non-dominant vs paretic side were performed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, when applicable. RESULTS: No significant FH/Q differences were found between STK vs CONT and sexes (non-paretic vs dominant). The paretic FH/Q was significantly higher than the non-dominant (CONT), for both sexes. PTconc and PTecc were significant higher for men, considering limbs comparisons. No significant PTecc an PTconc differences were found between STK vs CONT, for men's non-paretic and paretic limb's. However, men's non-dominant limb presented a higher PTconc compared to men's paretic limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that individuals affected by stroke had a higher FH/Q in the paretic limb compared to the non-dominant limb of the control group, for both men and women. One interesting finding was the absence of significant FH/Q differences between men and women with stroke.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL