Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 34(12): 3089-3095, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36121639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-reported symptom causes of mobility difficulty that contribute to  fear of falling (FOF) in older adults has not been fully explored as an area for intervention. AIMS: Identify the prevalence of self-reported symptoms causing mobility difficulties and to examine the difference in FOF by symptom category. METHODS: Conduct a secondary data analysis of a population-based cohort of community-dwelling older adults, ≥ 70 years, enrolled in the MOBILIZE Boston study. The analysis included 242 older adults reported difficulty walking » mile (0.4 km) and/or climbing one flight of stairs. Participants identified the main symptom cause of the mobility difficulty from a list of 32 symptoms, grouped into five categories. FOF was measured using the Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale. RESULTS: Pain was the primary symptom causing mobility difficulty (38%), followed by endurance (21%), weakness (13%), balance (9%), and other (3%). Although a greater proportion of participants who identified balance as the primary symptom category had significantly higher FOF compared to others, there was a greater number overall who reported pain as their main symptom who also had FOF. Therefore, pain contributed to a higher relative burden of FOF in the population than did balance symptoms. DISCUSSION: Various symptoms affect mobility and are associated with FOF, a known fall risk factor. Many older adults identify pain as the main cause of their mobility difficulty and report FOF. CONCLUSIONS: Improving pain symptoms for older adults may improve mobility and reduce fear of falling, potentially averting further decline in mobility and independence.


Subject(s)
Fear , Independent Living , Humans , Aged , Self Report , Pain/epidemiology
2.
Appl Nurs Res ; 63: 151517, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034708

ABSTRACT

Studies show decreased well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for healthcare providers from Asia. Less is known about the psychological responses of working during the pandemic on hospital-based registered nurses (RNs) in the United States (US). Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to report the well-being of U.S.-based hospital RNs working during the initial acute phase of COVID-19 and compare it with well-being among healthcare workers described in two global meta-analyses. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in May-June 2020 (N = 467). Well-being was measured using the following tools: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-2 for depressive symptoms, Impact of Events Scale-Revised for traumatic stress, and the Insomnia Severity Index. Compared with global rates from two meta-analyses, US-based RNs reported significantly more traumatic stress (54.6% vs. 11.4% and 21.5%; p < .001) and depressive symptoms (54.6% vs. 31.8% and 21.7%; p < .001). Rates of insomnia were also higher in U.S.-based RNs than in the meta-analysis that reported insomnia (32.4% vs 27.8%; p < .033). Rates of anxiety symptoms among US-based RNs did not differ from that reported in one meta-analysis (37.3% vs. 34.4%), while it was significantly higher in the other (37.3% vs. 22.1%; p < .001). Hospital-based RNs from the US exhibited over twice the rates of trauma and nearly double the rates of depressive symptoms than shown in reports from hospital workers globally during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. The lasting effects of this distress are unknown and warrant ongoing evaluation and solutions to better support emotional well-being and prevent burnout in the workplace.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Anxiety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Personnel, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
3.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 10(10): e30757, 2021 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34582354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early in the development of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was evident that health care workers, first responders, and other essential workers would face significant stress and workplace demands related to equipment shortages and rapidly growing infections in the general population. Although the effects of other sources of stress on health have been documented, the effects of these unique conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic on the long-term health and well-being of the health care workforce are not known. OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 Study of Healthcare and Support Personnel (CHAMPS) was designed to document early and longitudinal effects of the pandemic on the mental and physical health of essential workers engaged in health care. We will investigate mediators and moderators of these effects and evaluate the influence of exposure to stress, including morbidity and mortality, over time. We will also examine the effect of protective factors and resilience on health outcomes. METHODS: The study cohort is a convenience sample recruited nationally through communities, professional organizations, networks, social media, and snowball sampling. Recruitment took place for 13 months to obtain an estimated sample of 2762 adults who provided self-reported information administered on the web through structured questionnaires about their work environment, mental and physical health, and psychosocial factors. Follow-up questionnaires will be administered after 6 months and annually thereafter to ascertain changes in health, well-being, and lifestyle. Participants who consented to be recontacted form the longitudinal cohort and the CHAMPS Registry may be contacted to ascertain their interest in ancillary studies for which they may be eligible. RESULTS: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and launched in May 2020, with grants from Travere Therapeutics Inc, McKesson Corporation, anonymous donors, and internal funding from the M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing at Villanova University. Recruitment ended in June 2021 after enrolling 2762 participants, 1534 of whom agreed to participate in the longitudinal study and the registry as well as to be contacted about eligibility for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: The CHAMPS Study and Registry will enable the acquisition of detailed data on the effects of extended psychosocial and workplace stress on morbidity and mortality and serve as a platform for ancillary studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04370821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04370821. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30757.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...