Thirty- and 90-day Readmissions After Spinal Surgery for Spine Metastases: A National Trend Analysis of 4423 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate differences in 30- and 90-day readmissions for spine metastases treated with decompression and/or fusion spine surgery in a nationwide readmission database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with metastases to the spine represent a particularly vulnerable patient group that may encounter frequent readmissions. However, the 30- and 90-day rates for readmission following surgery for spine metastases have not been well described. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database years 2013 to 2015 was queried. Patients were grouped by no readmission (non-R), readmission within 30 days (30-R), and readmission within 31 to 90 days (90-R). Weighted multivariate analysis assessed impact of treatment approach and clinical factors associated with 30- and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: There were a total of 4423 patients with a diagnosis of spine metastases identified who underwent spine surgery, of which 1657 (37.5%) encountered either a 30-or 90-day unplanned readmission (30-R: n = 1068 [24-.1%]; 90-R: n = 589 [13.3%]; non-R: n = 2766). The most prevalent inpatient complications observed were postoperative infection (30-R: 16.3%, 90-R: 14.3%, non-R: 11.5%), acute post-hemorrhagic anemia (30-R: 13.4%, 90-R: 14.2%, non-R: 14.5%), and genitourinary complication (30-R: 5.7%, 90-R: 2.9%, non-R: 6.2%). The most prevalent 30-day and 90-day reasons for admission were sepsis (30-R: 10.2%, 90-R: 10.8%), postoperative infection (30-R: 13.7%, 90-R: 6.5%), and genitourinary complication (30-R: 3.9%, 90-R: 4.1%). On multivariate regression analysis, surgery type, age, hypertension, and renal failure were independently associated with 30-day readmission; rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, and coagulopathy were independently associated with 90-day readmission. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrate several patient-level factors independently associated with unplanned hospital readmissions after surgical treatment intervention for spine metastases. Furthermore, we find that the most common reasons for readmission are sepsis, postoperative infection, and genitourinary complications.Level of Evidence: 3.

Associated risk factors for extended length of stay following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of literature describing the predictors associated with extended length of hospital stay (LOS) for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The aim of this study was to identify the patient- and hospital-level factors associated with extended LOS for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing ACDF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2014. Updated trend weights were used to assess patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, LOS, discharge disposition and total cost. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio for risk-adjusted LOS. The primary outcome was the degree to which patient comorbidities or postoperative complications correlated with extended LOS (>3 days). RESULTS: We identified 144,514 patients with 29,947 (20.7%) experiencing an extended LOS (Normal LOS: 114,567; Extended LOS: 29,947). Comorbidities were overall significantly higher in the extended LOS cohort compared to the normal LOS cohort. Patients with extended LOS had a significantly greater proportion of blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and 2-3 vertebral levels fused (p < 0.001). The overall complication rates were greater in the extended LOS cohort (Normal LOS: 7.4% vs. Extended LOS: 44.8%, p < 0.001). The extended LOS cohort incurred $14,489 more in total cost (Normal LOS: $15,486 [11,787-20,623] vs. Extended LOS: $29,975 [21,286-45,285], p < 0.001) and had more patients discharged to non-routine locations (p < 0.001) compared to the normal LOS cohort. On multivariate logistic regression, several risk-factors were associated with extended LOS including: age, male gender, Black and Hispanic race, patient income, insurance, multiple comorbidities, blood transfusion, and number of complications. The odds ratio for extended LOS was 5.15 (95% CI: 4.68-5.67) for patients with 1 complication and 25.54 (95% CI: 20.54-31.75) for patients with >1 complication. CONCLUSION: Our national cohort study demonstrated multiple patient- and hospital-level factors associated with extended LOS (>3 days) after ACDF for CSM. Specifically, patients with an extended LOS had lower socioeconomic status, higher rate of comorbidities, greater percentage of postoperative complications and non-routine discharges, with greater overall costs. Further investigational studies are necessary to identify quality improvement strategies targeted to better optimizing patients preoperatively and reducing perioperative complications in order to improve quality of patient care and reduce hospital LOS.