Recurrence types 3 years after endovenous thermal ablation in insufficient saphenofemoral junctions.

OBJECTIVE: Although many studies have demonstrated that endovenous therapies have comparable efficacy to crossectomy and stripping, few studies have been published regarding the classification and recurrence patterns of varicose veins after endovenous therapy. This study attempted to provide an objective scheme for the definition and classification of recurrence. Moreover, it describes the types and rates of recurrence after endovenous thermal ablation, as well as factors associated with recurrence. METHODS: This prospective cohort study comprised a cohort of 449 patients with saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) insufficiency who underwent endoluminal varicose vein treatment for the first time in the limb between October 2013 and January 2015. The treatments were performed by a team of three experienced phlebologists. For endovenous laser ablation, Biolitec ELVeS was used with bare, radial or radial slim fibers. Radiofrequency ablation was performed with VNUS ClosureFAST (Medtronic, Deggendorf, Germany). The patients were consecutively scheduled for 3-year follow-up examinations. Detailed ultrasound findings were collected by two experienced phlebologists who classified the observed duplex ultrasound recurrence into different recurrence types. RESULTS: Clinically relevant recurrence was found in only 5.1% of cases. Examining only the recanalizations requiring reintervention resulted in a recurrence rate of 2.6%. However, if every new varicose vein that occurred postoperatively was considered a recurrence, the resultant recurrence rate was almost 54%. Preliminarily, we defined a recurrence as newly developed varicose veins within the region of the SFJ or along the course of the former treated vein distal to the SFJ. According to this definition, we obtained a clinically relevant recurrence rate of 5.3%, thus indicating that neovascular vessels were the largest recurrence type (57.7% within the region of the SFJ and 9.9% distal to the SFJ), followed by recanalization (8.9% within the region of the SFJ and 9.4% distal to the SFJ) and a refluxing anterior accessory saphenous vein (7.5%). We also developed a modified classification of progression to better understand recurrence after treatment of chronic venous insufficiency; the scheme included method failure (recanalization), neovascularizations, and disease progression (refluxing untreated vessels and new varicose veins occurring outside the treated region). The diameter of the treated vein (P = .001) and the clinical class according to CEAP classification (P = .008) were significant predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal therapies are efficient methods for the treatment of varicose veins, which result in low recurrence rates after 3 years. Several factors influence the development of recurrence. This study provides a practice-oriented classification and description of recurrence with clinical relevance, through making distinctions among technical error, progression of the underlying disease and actual recurrence.

Actinic keratosis: where do we stand and where is the future going to take us?

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a chronic disease which is mainly located across areas of sun-exposed skin. Clinical and subclinical lesions coexist across a large area resulting in a field cancerization. As these lesions have the potential to transform into invasive squamous cell carcinoma (iSCC), treatment is crucial. With global prevalence increasing, AK is expected to be the most common in situ carcinoma of the skin.Areas covered: In this article, we cover the established algorithm of treating AK and give an insight into the drugs under development. There are six compounds under development covering different treatment angles, from Sinecatechin a Polyphenon E which targets the link between HPV infection and development of AK, over Tirbanibulin which targets the SRC proto-oncogene and fast proliferating cells, to Tuvatexib a small-molecule dual VDAC/HK2 modulator that has shown that it can compete with the established therapies.Expert opinion: These new treatment options are moving us further toward a more individually tailored treatment for each patient considering his abilities, the size and location of his lesions but also the genetic bases as well as individual risk of transforming into a iSCC and possibly other factors contributing to each patients individual AK lesions.