Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(6): 484-499, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36942569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spirometry-based studies of occupational lung disease have mostly focused on obstructive or mixed obstructive/restrictive outcomes. We wanted to determine if restrictive spirometry pattern (RSP) is associated with occupation and increased mortality. METHODS: Study participants included 18,145 workers with demographic and smoking data and repeatable spirometry. The mortality analysis cohort included 15,445 workers with known vital status and cause of death through December 31, 2016. Stratified analyses explored RSP prevalence by demographic and clinical variables and trade. Log-binomial regression models explored RSP risk factors while controlling for important confounders such as smoking, obesity, and comorbidities. Cox regression models explored mortality risk by spirometry category. RESULTS: Prevalence of RSP was very high (28.6%). Mortality hazard ratios for RSP were 1.50 for all causes, 1.86 for cardiovascular diseases, 2.31 for respiratory diseases, and 1.66 for lung cancer. All construction trades except painters, machinists, and roofers had significantly elevated risk for RSP compared to our internal reference group. RSP was significantly associated with both parenchymal and pleural changes seen by chest X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Construction trade workers are at significantly increased risk for RSP independent of obesity. Individuals with RSP are at increased risk for all-cause mortality as well as mortality attributable to respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and lung cancer. RSP deserves greater attention in occupational medicine and epidemiology.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Construction Industry , Lung Neoplasms , Respiration Disorders , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Spirometry , Obesity/epidemiology
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(9): 708-720, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35833586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Construction workers at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear weapons facilities are screened to identify DOE-related occupational illnesses, including beryllium sensitization (BeS) and chronic beryllium disease (CBD). The study objectives were to estimate beryllium disease risks and the CBD claims acceptance rate in the energy workers' benefits program. METHODS: Workers diagnosed with BeS via beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT) included in screening examinations were interviewed about subsequent diagnosis of CBD. We estimated the proportion who developed CBD based on the ratio of CBD cases, based on self-reported compensation claim status, to all workers with BeS interviewed. We used stratified analyses to explore trends in disease frequency by age, race, sex, DOE employment duration, site, trade group, and cigarette smoking history. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2020, 21,854 workers received a BeLPT; 262 (1.20%) had BeS (two abnormals or one abnormal plus one borderline test); 212 (0.97%) had a single abnormal BeLPT. Of 177 BeS workers interviewed, 35 (19.8%) reported an accepted CBD compensation claim. The claims acceptance rate among BeS workers increased with years of DOE employment, from 8.4% with <5 years to 33.3% for >25 or more years. Five of 68 interviewed workers with a single positive BeLPT reported CBD claim acceptance; an additional CBD case was confirmed by chart review (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Years of DOE work predict the risk of developing CBD among those sensitized and getting a claim for CBD accepted. Ongoing surveillance and increased awareness of the risk of beryllium exposure and CBD as an occupational disease among construction workers are needed.


Subject(s)
Berylliosis , Construction Industry , Occupational Exposure , Berylliosis/diagnosis , Berylliosis/epidemiology , Berylliosis/etiology , Beryllium , Chronic Disease , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(8): 644-651, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726605

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have defined the risk of hearing impairment and tinnitus after retirement. This report measures hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence among older construction trades workers. METHODS: The study cohort included 21,340 participants in a national medical screening program (www.btmed.org). Audiometric hearing impairment was classified according to the Global Burden of Disease Study. Tinnitus was determined by self-report. An internal subcohort of nonconstruction trades workers served as a reference group. Stratified analyses and multivariate analyses were used to measure the prevalence of hearing impairment and tinnitus by age, sex, and job category. RESULTS: Prevalence of any hearing impairment was 55.2% (males, 57.7%; females, 26.8%) and increased rapidly with age. Construction trades workers were 40% more likely to have hearing impairment than the reference group. The overall prevalence of tinnitus was 46.52% and followed patterns similar to hearing impairment. Workers with hearing impairment were more likely to also have tinnitus, but tinnitus was frequently reported in the absence of measured hearing impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing impairment and tinnitus prevalence were much higher in this study than in previous research. A significant reason for the difference is that BTMed follows participants after they have retired. To draw conclusions about the risk for work-related chronic diseases and disorders it is important to monitor workers through their lifetimes. Also, tinnitus by itself should be given greater significance. These findings reinforce the need to promote noise reduction and hearing conservation in construction.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Hearing Loss , Tinnitus , Audiometry , Female , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Self Report , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/etiology
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(6): 462-475, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A 2010 study of construction workers participating in medical screening programs at the Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear facilities demonstrated increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk. The current study of a larger worker cohort allowed for a more nuanced analysis of COPD risk, including for employment beginning after the mid-1990s. METHODS: Study participants included 17,941 workers with demographic and smoking data and spirometry with a minimum of three recorded expiratory efforts and reproducibility of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) of 0.2 L or less. COPD was defined as a FEV1 /FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal using established prediction equations without use of bronchodilation. Stratified analyses explored COPD prevalence by demographic variables and trade. Logistic regression analyses assessed risks by trade and time periods of trade and DOE site work, controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and smoking. RESULTS: Overall COPD prevalence was 13.4% and 67.4% of cases were classified as moderate to severe. Compared to nonconstruction workers, construction trade workers were at significantly increased risk of all COPD (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.79) and even more so for severe COPD (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.32-1.96). The highest risk trades were cement masons/bricklayers (OR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.71-3.26) and roofers (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.48-3.32). Risk among workers employed after 1995 was elevated but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Construction workers are at increased COPD risk. Results support the prevention of both smoking and occupational exposures to reduce these risks. While the number of participants employed after 1995 was small, patterns of risk were consistent with findings in the overall cohort.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prevalence , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Function Tests , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Spirometry , Vital Capacity
5.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(4): 207-213, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31996473

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined predictors of lung cancer mortality, beyond age and smoking, among construction workers employed at US Department of Energy (DOE) sites to better define eligibility for low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening. METHODS: Predictive models were based on 17 069 workers and 352 lung cancer deaths. Risk factors included age, gender, race/ethnicity, cigarette smoking, years of trade or DOE work, body mass index (BMI), chest X-ray results, spirometry results, respiratory symptoms, beryllium sensitisation and personal history of cancer. Competing risk Cox models were used to obtain HRs and to predict 5-year risks. RESULTS: Factors beyond age and smoking included in the final predictive model were chest X-ray changes, abnormal lung function, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory symptoms, BMI, personal history of cancer and having worked 5 or more years at a DOE site or in construction. Risk-based LDCT eligibility demonstrated improved sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value compared with current US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. The risk of lung cancer death from 5 years of work in the construction industry or at a DOE site was comparable with the risk from a personal cancer history, a family history of cancer or a diagnosis of COPD. LDCT eligibility criteria used for DOE construction workers, which includes factors beyond age and smoking, identified 86% of participants who eventually would die from lung cancer compared with 51% based on age and smoking alone. CONCLUSIONS: Results support inclusion of risk from occupational exposures and non-malignant respiratory clinical findings in LDCT clinical guidelines.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Federal Government , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
6.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(3): 137-142, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415231

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends two pathways for eligibility for Early Lung Cancer Detection (ELCD) programmes. Option 2 includes individuals with occupational exposures to lung carcinogens, in combination with a lesser requirement on smoking. Our objective was to determine if this algorithm resulted in a similar prevalence of lung cancer as has been found using smoking risk alone, and if so to present an approach for lung cancer screening in high-risk worker populations. METHODS: We enrolled 1260 former workers meeting NCCN criteria, with modifications to account for occupational exposures in an ELCD programme. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.6% had a lung cancer diagnosed, a rate similar to the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST). Among NLST participants, 59% were current smokers at the time of baseline scan or had quit smoking fewer than 15 years prior to baseline; all had a minimum of 30 pack-years of smoking. Among our population, only 24.5% were current smokers and 40.1% of our participants had smoked fewer than 30 pack-years; only 43.5% would meet entry criteria for the NLST. The most likely explanation for the high prevalence of screen-detected lung cancers in the face of a reduced risk from smoking is the addition of occupational risk factors for lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposures to lung carcinogens should be incorporated into criteria used for ELCD programmes, using the algorithm developed by NCCN or with an individualised risk assessment; current risk assessment tools can be modified to incorporate occupational risk.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Aged , Carcinogens , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 61(4): 326-335, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A prior study of this construction worker population found significant noise-associated hearing loss. This follow-up study included a much larger study population and consideration of additional risk factors. METHODS: Data included audiometry, clinical chemistry, personal history, and work history. Qualitative exposure metrics for noise and solvents were developed. Analyses compared construction workers to an internal reference group with lower exposures and an external worker population with low noise exposure. RESULTS: Among participants (n = 19 127) an overall prevalence of hearing loss of 58% was observed, with significantly increased prevalence across all construction trades. Construction workers had significantly increased risk of hearing loss compared to reference populations, with increasing risk by work duration. Noise exposure, solvent exposure, hypertension, and smoking were significant risk factors in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Results support a causal relationship between construction trades work and hearing loss. Prevention should focus on reducing exposure to noise, solvents, and cigarette smoke.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Solvents , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Audiometry , Female , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
8.
Occup Environ Med ; 74(10): 701-708, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28515054

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposures to vapours, gasses, dusts and fumes (VGDF) and chest X-ray abnormalities by the International Labour Office (ILO) classification system are associated with reduced lung function, with the majority of published studies being cross-sectional. We examined the effects of VGDF exposures, as well as ILO parenchymal changes, pleural plaque and diffuse pleural thickening (DPT) on reduction in lung function in a longitudinal study. METHODS: Chest radiographs and spirometry for 3150 ageing construction workers enrolled in a medical screening programme with a baseline and at least one follow-up examination were studied. Indices for VGDF exposure, parenchymal changes, pleural plaque and DPT severity were developed and used in longitudinal mixed models of lung function. RESULTS: Smoking and VGDF exposure were associated with decreased FEV1 and FVC at baseline as well as accelerated rates of annual decline. High VGDF exposure was associated with a yearly decline of -19.5 mL for FEV1 and -15.7 mL for FVC. Parenchymal abnormalities, pleural plaque and DPT were more strongly associated with reduced FVC. An increase of one unit in the pleural plaque severity index resulted in approximately -5.3 mL loss of FVC and -3.3 mL loss of FEV1, with a possible non-linear effect of plaque on FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing pleural plaque severity was associated with progressively greater loss of FVC and FEV1, supporting a causal association. VGDF exposures were associated with reduced FVC and FEV1 at baseline as well as accelerated annual loss of lung function.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Dust , Gases , Lung/drug effects , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pleura/pathology , Aged , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Pleural Diseases/pathology , Spirometry , Vital Capacity , Work
9.
J Occup Environ Med ; 59(1): 67-73, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28045800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A study of medical outcomes among 6857 elderly construction workers who received an initial and at least one periodic follow-up examination as a result of participating in a medical screening program was undertaken. METHODS: We compared results from the initial examination to follow-up examinations delivered at least 3 years after the initial examination for the following outcomes: body mass index (BMI); total serum cholesterol; nonhigh-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol; hemoglobin A1c, hypertension; current cigarette smoking; and 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed for all measures except BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a periodic medical screening program for elderly construction workers is associated with a favorable impact on common health outcomes. When presented with a program designed for them, blue-collar workers are motivated to seek improvements in their health status.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Obesity/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Secondary Prevention , Aged , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Cigarette Smoking , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Smoking Cessation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...