ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As rates of substance use during pregnancy persist, the health and optimal development of infants with prenatal substance exposure remain a key priority. Nurses are tasked with identifying and reporting suspected cases of child maltreatment, including abuse and neglect, which is often assumed to be synonymous with substance use during pregnancy. While policies aimed at protecting infants from child abuse and neglect are well intentioned, literature regarding the short- and long-term social and legal implications of mandatory reporting policies is emerging. PURPOSE: In this article, we explore the intersections between the condition of substance use in pregnancy and policies related to mandatory reporting. METHODS: We provide an overview of historical and current trends in mandatory reporting policies for nurses related to substance use in pregnancy and related ethical and social implications for mother-infant dyads. RESULTS: Nurses often function at the intersection of healthcare and social services, underscoring the important role they play in advocating for ethical and equitable care for both members of the mother-infant dyad affected by substance use. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: We offer recommendations for practice including the integration of respectful care and family-centered support for the mother-infant dyad affected by substance use. Cross-sectoral collaborations, inclusive of the family, are important to the advancement of evidence-based and equity-focused research, advocacy, and policy initiatives to support familial preservation and reduce mother-infant separation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early relational health (ERH) interventions can buffer toxic stress and improve the developmental trajectories of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants. PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine the current state of the science related to multimodal, dyadic ERH interventions implemented in the NICU setting in the United States and identify gaps in the current literature. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo were searched in November 2022 and November 2023 for original studies and conference proceedings from 1970 to present in the English language. Gray literature searches were performed in February 2023 and December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: English language, original research, with a focus on multimodal, dyadic ERH interventions that took place primarily in a NICU in the United States were included. Outcome measures could be related to implementation, relational health, or physical and/or mental health outcomes of parent and/or infant. Eighteen of 2021 reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for author, year, intervention, purpose, methods, sample, paternal inclusion, dyadic components, non-dyadic components, and major outcomes/results and distilled for study characteristics, multimodal, dyadic intervention characteristics, and outcome measures. RESULTS: Several multimodal dyadic interventions exist to aid ERH in the NICU, providing evidence of improved outcomes for infants and families. More research is required using higher sample sizes and replication studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: ERH interventions show promise in improving neurodevelopmental, behavioral, and maternal mental health outcomes and should be considered for implementation into NICU services.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this scoping review is to review the extant literature regarding perinatal health outcomes for women on community supervision in the United States. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Public Health were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in the United States from January 1, 1970, to March 7, 2023. After removal of duplicates and review of 1,412 article titles and abstracts, 19 articles were retrieved for full-text review; this yielded 4 studies for inclusion. Studies range in size from 10 to 292 participants (N = 405) and only two reported geographic locations. Three studies comprised probation or parole and two studies included court-mandated treatment for substance use. All studies examined outcomes during the postpartum period, such as mood disorder or substance use severity. No studies evaluated the health of women during pregnancy and/or childbirth. To enhance health equity and reduce maternal morbidity and mortality among women on community supervision, more inclusive research that examines health outcomes during the perinatal period is needed. Furthermore, there must be interventions that address the social determinants of health, racial and systemic discrimination, socioeconomic barriers, and violence that are often experienced among women with criminal justice system involvement.
Subject(s)
Perinatal Care , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , United States , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Preliminary studies have suggested that women are responsive to using technology to manage their health, due to its discreet, convenient, and cost-effective nature. Yet, there are limited mobile health (mHealth) apps specific to women's needs, particularly those on probation. The purpose of this study was to explore features of 2 existing mHealth applications related to sexual health and safety, specific to interpersonal and sexual violence, to answer research questions related to the usability, barriers, and facilitators of mHealth app use for women on probation. SUBJECTS: We purposefully sampled from a local adult probation site and utilized snow-ball sampling to recruit 11 women who were on probation and owned iPhones. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory intervention development study using a qualitative design. Social Cognitive Theory was used for data synthesize and organization. FINDINGS: Three themes emerged: (1) It made me take time for myself; (2) It helped me to be more respectful of my body; (3) The connectivity .that was helpful. MAJOR IMPLICATIONS: Participants expressed mHealth apps to be usable, feasible, accessible and promoted self-efficacy by allowing them track symptoms and patterns of behavior specific to health and safety in a discreet, convenient, and effective manner. This research suggests that a culturally tailored mHealth app may be an appropriate intervention to provide timely gender-responsive feedback, resources, and health care to women on probation.
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to assess women's vulnerability to becoming involved with the legal system as it relates to their exposure, sensitivity, and resiliency to specific experiences associated with incarceration before, during, and after their confinement using the vulnerability framework. We sampled 12 women who self-identified as Latina mothers from local jail annexes, probation department offices, and substance use treatment centers in South Central Texas. We conducted a qualitative, secondary analysis. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) "[The abuse] just kept happening;" (2) "[Incarceration] was an excessive interference;" and (3) "I wasn't there back then [for my children], but now I can be [there for them] in some way." We also identified subthemes. More research and culturally tailored programming are needed to bridge services across legal system sites (jails, prisons, probation) that interact with this population of women to provide supportive services. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We would like to recognize community stakeholders who work in the local jail, probation, and medication treatment centers who helped with the distribution of fliers and participant recruitment along with the women who shared their experiences following incarceration for the original study's data used in this secondary analysis.
Subject(s)
Incarceration , Prisoners , Humans , Female , Child , Prisons , Mothers , Hispanic or Latino , Adaptation, PsychologicalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The potential benefits of perinatal doula support are many; however, doulas are underutilized, which may heighten pregnancy-related complications. In this scoping review, we assess the influence of perinatal doula support on pregnancy-related complications and death in the United States. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Alt HealthWatch for literature on doula support and its influence on pregnancy-related complications (maternal fever or infection, postpartum hemorrhage, amniotic fluid embolism, complications from anesthesia, preeclampsia, eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary or thrombotic embolism, and cerebrovascular accident). Peer-reviewed articles written in English and conducted in the United States from 1969 to 2021 were included. Screening at all levels was blinded. We extracted data based on title, author, year, design, population, sample size, methods, limitations, recommendations, and definition of doula support. RESULTS: Following removal of duplicates, review of 3679 article titles and abstracts yielded 42 articles for full-text review; 3 articles met final inclusion criteria. One included study focused on intrapartum doula support and 2 on doula support that extended throughout the perinatal period. Within the included studies, doula support was associated with decreased rates of intrapartum maternal fever and gestational hypertension; however, it was not associated with decreased rates of gestational diabetes or depression. DISCUSSION: The literature has addressed the benefits of perinatal doula support, but studies with validated tools to examine associations between doula support and pregnancy-related complications and death are lacking. The studies that addressed intrapartum and continuous doula care included large generalizable samples, from which future research can draw to improve the practice of caring for patients during the perinatal period. Extensive research shows that unfavorable conditions can influence perinatal outcomes across generations. Implementing doula support may offer a potential approach to reduce and help alleviate resulting disparities in perinatal health.
Subject(s)
Doulas , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy , United States , Female , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Use the Life Course Theory (LCT) to explore the effects of involvement with the justice system on the health of Latina women and their children. DESIGN: A supplementary analysis was conducted using data collected from the original study to answer a new research question. SETTING: South Central Texas. PARTICIPANTS: A primary qualitative data set from 12 Latina women involved with the justice system. METHODS: We applied LCT principles and used thematic content analysis as such we employed categoric distinction: lifespan development, time and place in individuals' lives, the timing of lives, human agency, and linked lives to analyze participants' narratives. RESULTS: Five themes emerged that aligned with LCT principles: (1) It feels like I'm living in my own prison; (2) What do I have to live for now; (3) It is like double punishment; (4) They made my choices; and (5) People didn't really understand. Participants felt helpless with few options to overcome their prior adversities, which affected their ability to make positive future choices. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the potential, long-term, negative health consequences that may result from incarceration. Considering that justice system involvement can lead to more profound maternal and child health disparities, our findings suggest that greater advocacy from the nursing profession would increase accessibility to equitable and respectful maternity and women's health care services. Key points Involvement with the justice system can result in negative health consequences for women and their children. Maternal and child health disparities are often more profound after involvement with the justice system. Greater advocacy is needed from the nursing profession to ensure access to equitable and respectful maternity and women's health care services.
Subject(s)
Incarceration , Life Course Perspective , Child , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Prisons , TexasABSTRACT
Transgender and gender-nonconforming people remain excluded from women's health spaces, and nurses with expertise in women's health best serve their needs when they seek sexual, reproductive, gynecologic, or obstetric care. However, commentary regarding the term "women" and exclusionary policies and behaviors in health care marginalize gender-nonconforming patients and contribute to health disparities. Therefore, the purpose of this article is twofold. First, we review terminology related to gender-nonconforming populations and their known health care needs; provide a brief historical overview of gender and health care; and describe the influence of White supremacist, misogynist, and heteronormative influences in women's health care. Second, we generate a call to action and specifically discuss the responsibilities of nurses and nursing organizations to ensure the provision of gender-equitable and respectful care and generate clinical recommendations for the specialty.
Subject(s)
Transgender Persons , Women's Health , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Gender Identity , Sexual Behavior , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There are approximately 231,000 women detained daily within the nation's jail and prison systems with women of color making up nearly half of those experiencing incarceration. The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the literature on the reproductive autonomy of Black women influenced by incarceration, using the three tenets of reproductive justice. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and PsycINFO for research related to reproductive justice written in English and published in the United States from 1980 to 2022. A review of 440 article titles and abstracts yielded 32 articles for full-text review; nine articles met inclusion. RESULTS: Eight addressed Tenet 1; five mentioned Tenet 2; none addressed Tenet 3. Recognition of the influence of incarceration on the reproductive autonomy of Black women is limited. CONCLUSION: The findings from this review suggest a need to address (a) reproductive choice, (b) support goals, and (c) support of justice-involved Black women.
Subject(s)
Black People , Correctional Facilities , Personal Autonomy , Prisoners , Reproductive Rights , Female , Humans , Correctional Facilities/ethics , Reproductive Rights/ethics , United States , Social JusticeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications have gained popularity in assisting high-risk, hard-to-reach groups in self-management of health conditions. One such population with high rates of health disparities comprises women under community supervision. In this review, we examine the literature on mHealth applications to address health disparities among women under community supervision. METHODS: We searched CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycInfo for peer-reviewed research articles conducted in the U.S. After removal of duplicates, review of 231 article titles and abstracts and 36 articles for full-text review yielded five articles for analysis. Extracted data include author, year, design, sample, objectives, conclusions, measures, interventions and analytic approach. RESULTS: Of the five studies that addressed health disparities of individuals under community supervision, one was done with participants on probation, four with participants on medication therapy for substance use disorder, and one with participants in a drug court program. Only one article was specific to women or controlled for ethnicity. No studies were done with those on parole. None done with populations outside the U.S. CONCLUSION: Few studies focused on health disparities of women under community supervision. mHealth applications that address substance use, reproductive and sexual health, and safety issues specific to women under community supervision are warranted.
mhealth apps can assist with alleviating health disparities in hard-to reach populations.Women on community supervision have unique health care needs based on their intersectionality.Conditions such as substance use disorder and violence often go under reported or undertreated.
Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Telemedicine , Text Messaging , Humans , FemaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While a growing body of literature has established the role of human milk as a mechanism of protection in the formation of the infant gut microbiome, it remains unclear the extent to which this association exists for infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. PURPOSE: The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the current state of the literature regarding the influence of human milk on infant gut microbiota in infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for original studies published from January 2009 through February 2022. Additionally, unpublished studies across relevant trial registries, conference proceedings, websites, and organizations were reviewed for possible inclusion. A total of 1610 articles met selection criteria through database and register searches and 20 through manual reference searches. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were primary research studies, written in English, published between 2009 and 2022, including a sample of infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome/neonatal abstinence syndrome, and focusing on the relationship between the receipt of human milk and the infant gut microbiome. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently conducted title/abstract and full-text review until there was consensus of study selection. RESULTS: No studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, which resulted in an empty review. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Findings from this study document the paucity of data exploring the associations between human milk, the infant gut microbiome, and subsequent neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Further, these results highlight the timely importance of prioritizing this area of scientific inquiry.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Humans , Milk, Human , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Distribution of naloxone and training on its proper use are evidence-based strategies for preventing opioid overdose deaths. In-person naloxone training was conducted in major metropolitan areas and urban centers across Texas as part of a state-wide targeted opioid response program. The training program transitioned to a live, virtual format during the COVID-19 public health emergency declaration. This manuscript describes the impact of this transition through analyses of the characteristics of communities reached using the new virtual training format. CASE PRESENTATION: Training participant addresses were compared to county rates of opioid overdose deaths and broadband internet access, and census block comparison to health services shortages, rural designation, and race/ethnicity community characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual training format reached more learners than the in-person events. Training reached nearly half of the counties in Texas, including all with recent opioid overdose deaths. Most participants lived in communities with a shortage of health service providers, and training reached rural areas, those with limited broadband internet availability, and majority Hispanic communities. In the context of restrictions on in-person gathering, the training program successfully shifted to a live, online format. This transition increased participation above rates observed pre-pandemic and reached communities with the need for equipping those most likely to witness an opioid overdose with the proper use of naloxone.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Overdose , Opiate Overdose , Humans , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pandemics/prevention & control , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Opiate Overdose/prevention & control , Opiate Overdose/drug therapy , Texas/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Historically, childbearing women from diverse and systematically hard-to-reach populations have been excluded from nursing research. This practice limits the generalizability of findings. Maximizing research strategies to meet the unique needs of these populations must be a priority. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide methodological context for the comprehensive application of reproductive justice strategies to guide research methods and promote engagement of underrepresented childbearing women while decreasing systemic bias. METHODS: In this article, we use a reproductive justice lens to characterize and define strategies for enhancing ethical and equitable engagement in research involving childbearing women who are often systematically underrepresented using a case study approach. Using a specific case study exemplar, the core tenets of reproductive justice are outlined and affirm the need to advance research strategies that create ethical engagement of diverse populations, transform oppressive social structures, and shift research paradigms so research objectives intentionally highlight the strengths and resiliency inherent to the targeted communities. RESULTS: We begin by describing parallels between the tenets of reproductive justice and the ethical principles of research (i.e., respect for persons, beneficence, and justice). We then apply these tenets to conceptualization, implementation (recruitment, data management, and retention), and dissemination of research conducted with childbearing women from diverse backgrounds who are systemically underrepresented. We highlight our successful research strategies from our case study example of women with histories of incarceration. DISCUSSION: To date, outcomes from our research indicate the need for multilevel strategies with a focus on respectful, inclusive participant and key community partner engagement; the time investment in local communities to promote equitable collaboration; encouragement of the patient's autonomous right to self-determination; and mitigation of power imbalances. Nurse researchers are well positioned to advance research justice at the intersection of reproductive justice and ethics to fully engage diverse populations in advancing health equity to support the best health outcomes.
Subject(s)
Health Equity , Humans , Female , Social JusticeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Prescription opioid use during pregnancy poses risk to maternal and infant health. However, there is limited research on proximate risk factors for prescription opioid use during pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between stressful life events experienced in the 12 months prior to birth and prescription opioid use during pregnancy. METHODS: Data from the 2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were analyzed (N = 17,812 women who delivered a live birth in 2019). Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between levels of stressful life events (0, 1-2, 3-5, or 6+) on (1) prescription opioid use, (2) combined opioid use (mono- or poly-opioid use), and (3) patterns of opioid use (pain management, opioid misuse) during pregnancy while controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, patterns of substance use prior to pregnancy, and pregnancy-related characteristics. RESULTS: Women with a greater accumulation of stressful life events in the 12 months prior to birth-especially 6 or more-had increased likelihood of prescription opioid use. Accumulating stressful life events were also associated with a higher risk of poly-opioid use, as well as using prescription opioids for pain management and patterns of opioid misuse. CONCLUSION: Stressful life events are a risk factor for prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Considering the harms posed by both stressors and opioid use for maternal and infant wellbeing, future research should assess efforts to prevent and manage stressful life events to reduce opioid use during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Opioid-Related Disorders , Infant , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Prescriptions , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this study was to critically analyze the role of stigma in the care of pregnant and parenting individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) through the theoretical lens of the Reproductive Justice (RJ) framework. Background: Overdose related maternal mortality, often involving opioids, is a national growing public health concern. OUD is a highly stigmatized condition that may negatively influence the well-being of pregnant/parenting individual's reproductive and human rights. Study Design: Secondary qualitative data analysis. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted using individual interviews (N = 23) from a larger study aimed at examining contextual factors surrounding pregnant/parenting individual's experiences with opioid use return to use and/or overdose. The RJ framework was used as a framework to examine the influence of OUD-related stigma and a person's right to bodily autonomy, their right to parent, and their right to parent the children they have in safe and sustainable environments. Results: The RJ framework supported the examination of factors that perpetuate stigma in this population. Individuals described stigmatizing experiences in the health care setting. Verbal and nonverbal interactions with health care providers and fear of child welfare involvement were counterproductive to recovery and potentially triggered OUD recurrence and/or overdose. Conclusions: Due to existing stigma, pregnant and parenting individuals with OUD often avoided health care and recovery support services; therefore, there should be the removal of barriers that prevent this population from accessing life-saving services. Future efforts should focus on health policy-related research to support structural changes within institutions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize current knowledge and identify gaps in the literature related to microaggression as an experience of racism and its influence on perinatal health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Race Relations Abstracts, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus using the keywords "micro-aggression" and "microaggression." Because microaggression is an all-encompassing term, we included articles that used keywords such as "racism," "prejudice," and/or "discrimination" because these terms are precursors to and touch on aspects of microaggression. We also included terms related to perinatal health outcomes. STUDY SELECTION: We included articles in which researchers reported on studies conducted in the United States. Articles focused on perinatal health outcomes, referred to microaggressions or related concepts, and were published in English from January 2014 through July 2020. We chose these dates because the term microaggression became more common in the literature around 2017 and is used primarily in the United States. Following removal of duplicates, we reviewed 2,331 titles and abstracts and identified 103 articles for full-text review. Thirteen articles met inclusion for the final sample. Screening at all levels was blinded. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data, including setting, study type, study design, microaggression type, results, health outcomes, and definitions of microaggression. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the selected articles, researchers addressed microaggression as an experience of racism in relation to the following perinatal health outcomes: small-for-gestational-age newborns, hypertension, preterm birth, low birth weight, and symptoms of postpartum depression or anxiety. CONCLUSION: In this scoping review, inconsistencies in how it was defined, measured, and controlled made it difficult to draw conclusions about the role microaggression plays in perinatal health outcomes. We recommend more research to explore, document, and understand this phenomenon.
Subject(s)
Premature Birth , Racism , Anxiety Disorders , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Microaggression , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hispanic mothers are one of the largest groups to give birth. They also experience high rates of morbidity and mortality; however, there is limited data related to their health inequities. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate systemic inequities associated with discrimination using the Reproductive Justice Framework to observe factors that influenced depressive symptomology in Hispanic women. METHODS: A path analysis was conducted to evaluate systemic inequities that influenced postpartum depression using the public database, Listening to Mothers III (LMIII). The sub-sample consisted of n = 406 Hispanic mothers. Data was initially collected between the years 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: Hispanic mothers were more likely to experience occurrences of perceived discrimination while seeking perinatal healthcare. These occurrences of discrimination led to lower trust in their healthcare providers, lower satisfaction with care, more instances of unwanted medical procedures, the need to feel to hold back comments about their health which ultimately resulted in higher rates of self-reported postpartum depression. The model fit indices supported the model's plausibility (χ2 /df ratio = 3.16, Comparative Fit Index = 0.91, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This data supported our hypothesis that the pathway of discriminatory barriers Hispanic mothers experience during pregnancy influence postpartum depression.