Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(1): 7-14, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has posed multiple challenges to the practice of clinical neurology including recognition of emerging neurological complications and management of coexistent neurological diseases. In a fast-evolving pandemic, evidence-based studies are lacking in many areas. This paper presents European Academy of Neurology (EAN) expert consensus statements to guide neurologists caring for patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A refined Delphi methodology was applied. In round 1, statements were provided by EAN scientific panels (SPs). In round 2, these statements were circulated to SP members not involved in writing them, asking for agreement/disagreement. Items with agreement >70% were retained for round 3, in which SP co-chairs rated importance on a five-point Likert scale. Results were graded by importance and reported as consensus statements. RESULTS: In round one, 70 statements were provided by 23 SPs. In round two, 259/1061 SP member responses were received. Fifty-nine statements obtained >70% agreement and were retained. In round three, responses were received from 55 co-chairs of 29 SPs. Whilst general recommendations related to prevention of COVID-19 transmission had high levels of agreement and importance, opinion was more varied concerning statements related to therapy. CONCLUSION: This is the first structured consensus statement on good clinical practice in patients with neurological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that provides immediate guidance for neurologists. In this fast-evolving pandemic, a rapid response using refined Delphi methodology is possible, but guidance may be subject to change as further evidence emerges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Pandemics , Patient Care Management , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Neurology
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(9): 1727-1737, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the main clinical features of COVID-19 infection are pulmonary, several associated neurological signs, symptoms and diseases are emerging. The incidence and characteristics of neurological complications are unclear. For this reason, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) core COVID-19 Task Force initiated a survey on neurological symptoms observed in patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A 17-question online survey was made available on the EAN website and distributed to EAN members and other worldwide physicians starting on 9 April 2020. RESULTS: By 27 April 2020, proper data were collected from 2343 responders (out of 4199), of whom 82.0% were neurologists, mostly from Europe. Most responders (74.7%) consulted patients with COVID-19 mainly in emergency rooms and in COVID-19 units. The majority (67.0%) had evaluated fewer than 10 patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19 (neuro COVID-19). The most frequently reported neurological findings were headache (61.9%), myalgia (50.4%), anosmia (49.2%), ageusia (39.8%), impaired consciousness (29.3%) and psychomotor agitation (26.7%). Encephalopathy and acute cerebrovascular disorders were reported at 21.0%. Neurological manifestations were generally interpreted as being possibly related to COVID-19; they were most commonly recognized in patients with multiple general symptoms and occurred at any time during infection. CONCLUSION: Neurologists are currently and actively involved in the management of neurological issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey justifies setting up a prospective registry to better capture the prevalence of patients with neuro COVID-19, neurological disease characteristics and the contribution of neurological manifestations to outcome.


Subject(s)
Anosmia/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Headache/etiology , Myalgia/etiology , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology , Europe , Health Surveys , Humans , Neurology
4.
Euro Surveill ; 12(4): E7-8, 2007 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17991388

ABSTRACT

In April 2005, a case of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection occurred in a patient undergoing haemodialysis in an Irish hospital. This incident potentially affected patients attending hospitals throughout the country, so a national incident team was set up coordinate the response to the incident.A total of 306 dialysis patients, attending 17 different dialysis centres (14 in Ireland), were identified as having been potentially exposed to HBV as a result of this incident. A programme of HBV serological testing and HBV vaccination was instituted. There was no evidence that any patient acquired HBV infection as a result of cross-infection from the index patient, although 11 patients (3.6%) had evidence of past infection (anti-HBc positive, HBsAg negative). The majority of patients in this cohort were of unknown HBV vaccination status (62.7%), 13.4% were fully vaccinated, 4.6% partially vaccinated and 15.7% unvaccinated. Of 239 tested for anti-HBs, 183 (76.6%) had a titre <10 mIU/ml. Local incidents in dialysis units can have national implications due to the frequent patient transfer between units. This incident highlighted serious deficiencies in current structures and practices, and a lack of appropriate guidelines. However, there were positive outcomes from this incident. The majority of Irish dialysis patients have now been vaccinated against HBV, and lessons learned have been used to develop national guidelines on HBV vaccination and testing and on the management of incidents of blood-borne viral infections in dialysis units.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Ireland/epidemiology , Risk Factors
5.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 74(6): 673-80, 1998 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9881711

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Delayed expression of lethal mutations in the progeny of cells which survived a toxic insult was first shown for ionizing radiation and is one of the signs of induced genomic instability. The effect appears to be related to DNA strand breakage or repair but not to the physical break itself. To investigate this and the relationship of lethal mutations or delayed death to other instability endpoints, cultures of immortal but non-transformed human keratinocytes were exposed to a range of environmental mutagens or cytotoxic compounds with different DNA damaging properties. METHODS: Delayed expression of damage was assessed by scoring a number of endpoints in the progeny of cells which survived exposure and underwent at least 15 population doublings. Endpoints included delayed apoptosis, cloning efficiency of cells in 'healthy' colonies and expression of the apoptosis regulatory proteins bcl-2 and BAX. RESULTS: The results clearly linked expression of delayed lethal mutations with substances that induced DNA strand breaks. All these substances are known also to induce oxidative stress. The occurrence of delayed damage required a threshold level of toxicity in the initially exposed population, which was remarkably similar for all the effective substances except cadmium. Alkylating agents or microtubule poisons that do not permit repair of DNA damage did not cause any delayed death. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that delayed cell death may be caused by widespread radical damage to DNA which is either signalled, thereby inducing an apoptotic response, or (mis-)repaired yielding a weak or unstable genome. It is likely that the process may be an important factor in determining the long-term response of populations to 'sublethal' levels of environmental mutagens whose mechanism of action includes DNA strand breakage and repair.


Subject(s)
Cell Survival/radiation effects , Keratinocytes/radiation effects , Mutagens/toxicity , Mutation/genetics , Radiation, Ionizing , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/radiation effects , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Division/radiation effects , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Clone Cells/drug effects , Clone Cells/radiation effects , DNA Damage/genetics , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Humans , Keratinocytes/drug effects , Phenotype , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/genetics , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , bcl-2-Associated X Protein
6.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...