Learning and teaching stage 4 clinical decision making: progression from novice to expert.

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the development of learning from novice to expert in Stage 4: Clinical Decision Making (CDM) in surgery: Postoperative reflection and review. It also outlines some or the assessment and teaching approaches suitable to facilitate that transition in skill level. METHODS: This paper is drawn from a much broader study of learning and teaching CDM, that used qualitative methodology based on Constructivist and Grounded Theory. Data was collected in individual interviews and focus groups. Using thematic analysis the data were analysed to identify key ideas. All participants worked in the Department of Surgery at one large regional hospital in Victoria. RESULTS: For each stage there is a sequence of learning beginning from relying on external resources, gradually developing internal resources to guide and direct the learner's CDM. Those internal resources built through experience include multisensory and kinaesthetic memories that expand to facilitate the ability to cope with complexity. DISCUSSION: Armed with the mind-map and rubric table included in this paper it should be possible for any senior clinician or teacher to diagnose their trainees' progression in Stage 4 CDM. This will enable them to tailor their teaching to best match the capabilities of the trainee and to enable to be more effectively targeted. CONCLUSION: CDM can be taught and both trainees and senior clinicians can benefit from understanding the processes involved.

The influence of experience and expertise on how surgeons prepare to perform a procedure.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature describing how surgeons (either novice or expert) mentally prepare to carry out a surgical procedure. This paper focuses on these processes, and is part of a larger piece of research based on the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Clinical Decision Making model. METHODS: Interviews were conducted over a 3-year period with registrars, trainees, fellows and consultants in the Department of Surgery at one large regional hospital in Victoria. Analysis began from the first interview with no pre-conceived codes. Emerging themes were drawn from participants' interpretation of their experiences. Further information was obtained during discussions in theatre while patients were being prepared for surgery. RESULTS: The findings show that the process of rehearsal changes as a surgeon gains more experience in a procedure. A 'novice' relies on external sources of information, for example textbooks and videos. After participating in a number of similar procedures their reliance gradually moves to their own sensory memories. Surgeons at all levels of experience discuss their preparations with peers, colleagues, senior clinicians, and where appropriate, with members of other disciplines. CONCLUSION: These findings offer insight into how surgeons, at different levels of experience, prepare for a procedure. These understandings have the potential to improve the teaching and learning of this essential component of surgical practice.

Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment in surgery in Australasia.

BACKGROUND: The topic of discrimination, bullying and sexual harassment in surgery was raised in the Australian media earlier in 2015. This led the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) to commission an Expert Advisory Group to investigate and advise the College on their prevalence in surgery in Australia and New Zealand. This paper reports the findings with respect to prevalence of these inappropriate behaviours. METHODS: The data in this paper were drawn from the published results of two quantitative surveys. One was an online survey sent to all RACS members. The other was an invited survey of hospitals, medical institutions and other related professional organizations including surgical societies. RESULTS: The prevalence survey achieved a 47.8% response rate, representing 3516 individuals. Almost half of the respondents 1516 (49.2%) indicated that they had experienced one or more of the behaviours. This proportion was consistent across every specialty. Male surgical consultants were identified as the most likely perpetrators. More than 70% of the hospitals reported that they had instances in their organization of discrimination, bullying or sexual harassment by a surgeon within the last 5 years. Surgical directors or surgical consultants were by far the most frequently reported perpetrators (in 50% of hospitals). CONCLUSIONS: Discrimination, bullying and sexual harassment are common in surgical practice and training in Australia and New Zealand. RACS needs to urgently address these behaviours in surgery. This will involve a change in culture, more education for fellows and trainees, and better processes around complaints including support for those who have suffered.

Diagnostic conversations: Clinical Decision Making in surgery - Part 1.

Sound and efficient decision making are hallmarks of an expert surgeon. Unfortunately, those experts are often unable to explain their thinking processes, or to teach their trainees and colleagues how they do it. Surgeons and staff of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons worked together to develop a model to explain the processes around clinical decision making and used this understanding and knowledge to devise a Clinical Decision Making (CDM) training course. The surgical faculty ensure the model is applicable to specific surgical cases, as well as presenting a framework of how clinical decisions are made. Wendy targets the specific decision making processes that are occurring with each clinical scenario, and highlights some of the learning opportunities that they provide. The conversation in this paper models the kinds of case-based interactions which occur in the development and teaching of the CDM course.

Diagnostic conversations: Clinical Decision Making in surgery - Part 2.

Proceduralists who fail to review their decision making are unlikely to learn from their experiences, irrespective of whether the operative outcome is successful or not. Teaching junior surgeons to develop 'insight' into their own decision making has long been a challenge. Surgeons and staff of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons worked together to develop a model to help explain the processes around clinical decision making and incorporated this model into a Clinical Decision Making (CDM) training course. In this course, faculty apply the model to specific surgical cases, within the model's framework of how clinical decisions are made; thus providing an opportunity to identify specific decision making processes as they occur and to highlight some of the learning opportunities they provide. The conversation in this paper illustrates the kinds of case-based interactions which typically occur in the development and teaching of the CDM course.The focus in this, the second of two papers, is on reviewing post-operative clinical decisions made in relation to one case, to improve the quality of subsequent decision making.

Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it.

Clinical decision making is a core competency of surgical practice. It involves two distinct types of mental process best considered as the ends of a continuum, ranging from intuitive and subconscious to analytical and conscious. In practice, individual decisions are usually reached by a combination of each, according to the complexity of the situation and the experience/expertise of the surgeon. An expert moves effortlessly along this continuum, according to need, able to apply learned rules or algorithms to specific presentations, choosing these as a result of either pattern recognition or analytical thinking. The expert recognizes and responds quickly to any mismatch between what is observed and what was expected, coping with gaps in information and making decisions even where critical data may be uncertain or unknown. Even for experts, the cognitive processes involved are difficult to articulate as they tend to be very complex. However, if surgeons are to assist trainees in developing their decision-making skills, the processes need to be identified and defined, and the competency needs to be measurable. This paper examines the processes of clinical decision making in three contexts: making a decision about how to manage a patient; preparing for an operative procedure; and reviewing progress during an operative procedure. The models represented here are an exploration of the complexity of the processes, designed to assist surgeons understand how expert clinical decision making occurs and to highlight the challenge of teaching these skills to surgical trainees.

Towards a hybrid philosophy of surgical education.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training involves a complex amalgam of skills. This publication seeks to incorporate concepts about higher education into a philosophy of surgical education. METHODS: The core of the present review is derived from a literature search of a computer database (Medline). The notion of competence is used to illustrate the concept of a philosophy of surgical education. CONCLUSION: A predefined philosophy of surgical education may serve as a useful reference point when choices arise during the development of surgical training.