Association between Bispectral Index System and airway obstruction: an observational prospective cohort analysis during third molar extractions.

BACKGROUND: Sedation regimes during oral procedures frequently associated with airway obstruction. The aim of this study was to define the association of Bispectral Index (BIS) to the depth of sedation and airway obstruction events. METHODS: Forty-seven patients between 14-21 years old, who were candidates for 3rd molar teeth extraction, were enrolled in this study. Patients received a total of 4 mg midazolam, 100 microgram fentanyl followed by titrated incremental propofol in 10 mg. The Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) was used to assess the depth of sedation. Each patient was attached to BIS monitor, while clinicians were not involved in the data collection process. Apnea, airway obstruction, O2 saturation, timing and interventions for controlling the situation were recorded. All data was synchronized with BIS data monitoring. RESULTS: The results show that 97.5% of cases were ASA 1 and 2, with average age of 17.3 years (±1.4) and a median BMI of 26.1. By using linear regression, for every unit decrease of median RASS (less than zero), there was 1.78 decrease in mean BIS Score (P=0.045, 95% CI: 0.08-3.47). The mean BIS Index (over 1 minute) with airway obstruction was 64 (±10.2), which was significantly lower than the BIS during non-airway obstruction (77±11.6), (P<0.001). By using logistic regression analysis, for every on unit increase in BIS Index, there is 24% decrease in odds in having airway obstruction (P=0.0009, 95% CI: 0.65-8.94). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the BIS could potentially be a valid continuous monitoring method to avoid airway obstruction during sedation for patients undergoing dental surgery.

An evaluation of intranasal sufentanil and dexmedetomidine for pediatric dental sedation.

Conscious or moderate sedation is routinely used to facilitate the dental care of the pre- or un-cooperative child. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has little respiratory depressant effect, possibly making it a safer option when used as an adjunct to either opioids or benzodiazepines. Unlike intranasal (IN) midazolam, IN application of DEX and sufentanil (SUF) does not appear to cause much discomfort. Further, although DEX lacks respiratory depressive effects, it is an α2-agonist that can cause hypotension and bradycardia when given in high doses or during prolonged periods of administration. The aim of this feasibility study was to prospectively assess IN DEX/SUF as a potential sedation regimen for pediatric dental procedures. After IRB approval and informed consent, children (aged 3-7 years; n = 20) from our dental clinic were recruited. All patients received 2 µg/kg (max 40 µg) of IN DEX 45 min before the procedure, followed 30 min later by 1 µg/kg (max 20 µg) of IN SUF. An independent observer rated the effects of sedation using the Ohio State University Behavior Rating Scale (OSUBRS) and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). The dentist and the parent also assessed the efficacy of sedation. Dental procedures were well tolerated and none were aborted. The mean OSUBRS procedure score was 2.1, the UMSS procedure score was 1.6, and all scores returned to baseline after the procedure. The average dentist rated quality of sedation was 7.6 across the 20 subjects. After discharge, parents reported one child with prolonged drowsiness and one child who vomited at home. The use of IN DEX supplemented with IN SUF provided both an effective and tolerable form of moderate sedation. Although onset and recovery are slower than with oral (PO) midazolam and transmucosal fentanyl, the quality of the sedation may be better with less risk of respiratory depression. Results from this preliminary study showed no major complications from IN delivery of these agents.

Noise level measurement, a new method to evaluate effectiveness of sedation in pediatric dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric dentists perform moderate sedation frequently to facilitate dental treatment in uncooperative children. Assessing the depth and quality of sedation is an important factor in the clinical utilization of moderate sedation. We aimed to determine if the level of noise, created by the children who are undergoing moderate sedation during dental procedures, could be used as a nonsubjective measurement of the depth of sedation and compare it to the Ohio State Behavior Rating Score (OSBRS). METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval and after receiving informed consent, we studied 51 children with a mean age of 4.2 years and average weight of 18.5 kg, who were undergoing restorative or extractive dental procedures, requiring moderate sedation. Sedation efficacy was assessed using OSBRS at several stages of the procedure. The noise level was measured by using a NoisePRO logging device to record the noise level at a rate of every second throughout the procedure. RESULTS: The depth of sedation assessed by OSBRS during the operative procedure was significantly correlated with noise level. The act of administering the local anesthesia and the operative procedure itself were two phases of the encounter that were significantly associated with higher OSBRS as well as noise levels. CONCLUSION: Measurement of noise level can be used as an effective guide to quantify the depth of sedation at different stages of the dental procedure. It is a nonsubjective and continuous measurement, which could be useful in clinical practice for the administration of moderate sedation during dental procedures. By using noise level analysis we are able to determine successful, poor, and failed sedation outcome.

An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: efficacy, tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels compared with those of a vehicle (placebo) gel for the temporary relief of toothache pain. They also assessed the compliance with the label dose administration directions on the part of participants with toothache pain. METHODS: Under double-masked conditions, 576 participants self-applied study gel to an open tooth cavity and surrounding oral tissues. Participants evaluated their pain intensity and pain relief for 120 minutes. The authors determined the amount of gel the participants applied. RESULTS: The responders' rates (the primary efficacy parameter), defined as the percentage of participants who had an improvement in pain intensity as exhibited by a pain score reduction of at least one unit on the dental pain scale from baseline for two consecutive assessments any time between the five- and 20-minute points, were 87.3 percent, 80.7 percent and 70.4 percent, respectively, for 20 percent benzocaine gel, 10 percent benzocaine gel and vehicle gel. Both benzocaine gels were significantly (P ≤ .05) better than vehicle gel; the 20 percent benzocaine gel also was significantly (P ≤ .05) better than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. The mean amount of gel applied was 235.6 milligrams, with 88.2 percent of participants applying 400 mg or less. CONCLUSIONS: Both 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels were more efficacious than the vehicle gel, and the 20 percent benzocaine gel was more efficacious than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. All treatments were well tolerated by participants. Practical Implications. Patients can use 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels to temporarily treat toothache pain safely.

Reducing the pain of intranasal drug administration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research study was to develop a score to assess intranasal (IN) drug administration discomfort and then assess 3 different approaches to reduce the pain associated with the administration of an IN citrate study solution. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and with informed consent, volunteers intranasally received 0.3 M solution of citrate, on 4 different days. In stage 1, the citrate was administered via syringe or by aerosol. Stage 2 compared the IN citrate before and 60 seconds after 2% lidocaine was given. Stage 3 compared the IN citrate to an IN mixture of 2% lidocaine and citrate. A placebo of IN saline was also used on one occasion. The degree of pain, burning, and unpleasant taste was recorded using a scale of 1 to 10 to give an overall intranasal discomfort score (INDS). RESULTS: The citrate proved significantly more unpleasant and painful than the placebo saline. The mean INDS was 12.1, which was significantly higher following IN citrate compared to saline. Lidocaine, both pretreatment and mixed, significantly reduced the INDS. CONCLUSIONS: The intranasal discomfort score appeared reproducible for assessing painful intranasal drug administration. The addition of lidocaine appeared to reduce the discomfort of intranasal citrate in adult volunteers.

A comparison of four sedation techniques for pediatric dental surgery.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed the efficacy and side effects of four sedation techniques in our dental clinic: oral midazolam, intranasal (IN) midazolam, IN midazolam combined with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC), and IN midazolam combined with IN sufentanil. MATERIALS & METHODS: With IRB approval, a nonrandomized open label study of moderate sedation in children undergoing dental surgery was administered during a 6 -month period. The sedation regimen was rotated daily at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Each sedation was monitored by a research nurse who assessed the quality of sedation and the frequency of complications. All children were monitored during the procedure and recovery for at least 20 min, before discharge based on the University of Michigan Sedation and Ohio State behavior rating scores. RESULTS: One hundred and two children were sedated in the dental clinic during this period. The sedation was successful in 73% (range 64% to 88%) of the children. The time to onset was greatest with OTFC (37 min) and least with IN midazolam (17 min) compared with the other two groups (20 and 30 min). Recovery after OTFC was prolonged (39 min) significantly compared with the other three groups (26.5-30 min). Efficacy of sedation and frequency of complications (9% incidence of nausea and 6% of mild hemoglobin desaturation) were similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: All four sedation regimens were equally effective in this cohort of healthy children. The onset and recovery with OTFC was significantly delayed compared with the other regimens. The frequency of side effects was small; there were no side effects in the PO midazolam group.

Intranasal flumazenil and naloxone to reverse over-sedation in a child undergoing dental restorations.

We describe a 3-year-old child who became over-sedated after receiving intranasal (IN) midazolam (0.53 mg.kg(-1)) and IN sufentanil (1 mcg.kg(-1)) for dental restorations in the dental office. Desaturation was attributed to laryngospasm, which was managed with positive pressure ventilation and oxygen. The sedation was reversed with a combination of IN flumazenil and naloxone.

Telescoping tracheal tubes into catheters minimizes epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation in children.

BACKGROUND: Numerous strategies have been used to reduce epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation. The authors compared the severity of epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation in children with tubes at room temperature, warm tubes, and tubes telescoped into catheters. METHODS: Children who were scheduled for elective dental surgery were randomly assigned to undergo nasotracheal intubation using a tube at room temperature (control), warmed in saline, or whose distal end had been telescoped into a red rubber catheter. After an inhalational induction and intravenous propofol, a lubricated tube or red rubber catheter was inserted into the right naris. Tracheal intubation was achieved by direct laryngoscopy and tube placement using Magill forceps. The pharynx was swabbed for blood by an observer who was blind to the treatment. The severity of bleeding was rated using reference figures. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. P < 0.05 was accepted. RESULTS: The demographics of the three groups were similar. The estimated median area of the gauze in the catheter group that was covered with blood (0%) was significantly less than the areas in the control (40%) and warm (20%) groups. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (>or= 40% of the gauze area covered in blood) in the catheter group (5%) was significantly less than in the control (56%) and warm (39%) groups. The incidence of no detectable blood in the catheter group (59%) was significantly greater than in the control (21%) and warm (26%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Telescoping the endotracheal tube into a catheter significantly reduces epistaxis in children undergoing nasotracheal intubation.