Intra-Articular Mineralization on Computerized Tomography of the Knee and Risk of Cartilage Damage: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-articular (IA) mineralization may contribute to osteoarthritis (OA) structural progression. We studied the association of IA mineralization on knee computed tomography (CT) with cartilage damage worsening on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with a focus on location- and tissue-specific effects. METHODS: Participants from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study with knee CT and MRI scans were included. Presence of IA mineralization on CT was defined as a Boston University Calcium Knee Score >0 anywhere in the knee. Cartilage worsening on MRI was defined as any increase in the MRI OA Knee Score, including incident damage. We evaluated the association of whole-knee, compartment-specific (ie, medial or lateral), and subregion-specific (ie, location-matched) IA mineralization at baseline with cartilage worsening at two years' follow-up in the corresponding locations using binomial regression with generalized estimating equations, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: We included 1,673 participants (mean age 60 years, 56% female, mean BMI 29). Nine percent had any IA mineralization in the knee, and 47.4% had any cartilage worsening on follow-up. Mineralization of any tissue in the knee, regardless of location, was not associated with MRI cartilage worsening. However, cartilage mineralization was associated with 1.39 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.88) times higher risk of cartilage worsening in the same compartment, with similar results in subregion-specific analysis. CONCLUSION: CT-detected IA mineralization in the cartilage was associated with higher risk of MRI cartilage worsening in the same compartment and subregion over two years. These findings suggest potential localized, tissue-specific effects of IA mineralization on cartilage pathology in knee OA.

A perspective on the evolution of semi-quantitative MRI assessment of osteoarthritis: Past, present and future.

OBJECTIVE: This perspective describes the evolution of semi-quantitative (SQ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing structural tissue pathologies in osteoarthritis (OA) imaging research over the last 30 years. METHODS: Authors selected representative articles from a PubMed search to illustrate key steps in SQ MRI development, validation, and application. Topics include main scoring systems, reading techniques, responsiveness, reliability, technical considerations, and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI). RESULTS: Based on original research published between 1993 and 2023, this article introduces available scoring systems, including but not limited to Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) as the first system for whole-organ assessment of the knee and the now commonly used MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Specific systems for distinct OA subtypes or applications have been developed as well as MRI scoring instruments for other joints such as the hip, the fingers or thumb base. SQ assessment has proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive, aiding OA investigators in understanding the natural history of the disease and helping to detect response to treatment. AI may aid phenotypic characterization in the future. SQ MRI assessment's role is increasing in eligibility and safety evaluation in knee OA clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SQ MRI assessment in understanding structural aspects of disease onset and progression. SQ scoring has helped explain associations between structural tissue damage and clinical manifestations, as well as disease progression. While AI may support human readers to more efficiently perform SQ assessment in the future, its current application in clinical trials still requires validation and regulatory approval.

Imaging of muscle injuries in soccer.

Accurate diagnosis of muscle injuries is a challenge in everyday clinical practice and may have profound impact on the recovery and return-to-play decisions of professional athletes particularly in soccer. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in addition to the medical history and clinical examination, make a significant contribution to the timely structural assessment of muscle injuries. The severity of a muscle injury determined by imaging findings has a decisive influence on therapy planning and affects prognosis. Imaging is of high importance when the diagnosis or grade of injury is unclear, when recovery is taking longer than expected, and when interventional or surgical management may be needed. This narrative review will discuss ultrasound and MRI for the assessment of sports-related muscle injuries in the context of soccer, including advanced imaging techniques, with the focus on the clinical relevance of imaging findings for the prediction of return to play.

Emerging Quantitative Imaging Techniques in Sports Medicine.

This article describes recent advances in quantitative imaging of musculoskeletal extremity sports injuries, citing the existing literature evidence and what additional evidence is needed to make such techniques applicable to clinical practice. Compositional and functional MRI techniques including T2 mapping, diffusion tensor imaging, and sodium imaging as well as contrast-enhanced US have been applied to quantify pathophysiologic processes and biochemical compositions of muscles, tendons, ligaments, and cartilage. Dual-energy and/or spectral CT has shown potential, particularly for the evaluation of osseous and ligamentous injury (eg, creation of quantitative bone marrow edema maps), which is not possible with standard single-energy CT. Recent advances in US technology such as shear-wave elastography or US tissue characterization as well as MR elastography enable the quantification of mechanical, elastic, and physical properties of tissues in muscle and tendon injuries. The future role of novel imaging techniques such as photon-counting CT remains to be established. Eventual prediction of return to play (ie, the time needed for the injury to heal sufficiently so that the athlete can get back to playing their sport) and estimation of risk of repeat injury is desirable to help guide sports physicians in the treatment of their patients. Additional values of quantitative analyses, as opposed to routine qualitative analyses, still must be established using prospective longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes.

Role of imaging for eligibility and safety of a-NGF clinical trials.

Nerve growth factor (a-NGF) inhibitors have been developed for pain treatment including symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) and have proven analgesic efficacy and improvement in functional outcomes in patients with OA. However, despite initial promising data, a-NGF clinical trials focusing on OA treatment had been suspended in 2010. Reasons were based on concerns regarding accelerated OA progression but were resumed in 2015 including detailed safety mitigation based on imaging. In 2021, an FDA advisory committee voted against approving tanezumab (one of the a-NGF compounds being evaluated) and declared that the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy was not sufficient to mitigate potential safety risks. Future clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of a-NGF or comparable molecules will need to define strict eligibility criteria and will have to include strategies to monitor safety closely. While disease-modifying effects are not the focus of a-NGF treatments, imaging plays an important role to evaluate eligibility of potential participants and to monitor safety during the course of these studies. Aim is to identify subjects with on-going safety findings at the time of inclusion, define those potential participants that are at increased risk for accelerated OA progression and to withdraw subjects from on-going studies in a timely fashion that exhibit imaging-confirmed structural safety events such as rapid progressive OA. OA efficacy- and a-NGF studies apply imaging for different purposes. In OA efficacy trials image acquisition and evaluation aims at maximizing sensitivity in order to capture structural effects between treated and non-treated participants in longitudinal fashion. In contrast, the aim of imaging in a-NGF trials is to enable detection of structural tissue alterations that either increase the risk of a negative outcome (eligibility) or may result in termination of treatment (safety).

Strategic application of imaging in DMOAD clinical trials: focus on eligibility, drug delivery, and semiquantitative assessment of structural progression.

Despite decades of research efforts and multiple clinical trials aimed at discovering efficacious disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drugs (DMOAD), we still do not have a drug that shows convincing scientific evidence to be approved as an effective DMOAD. It has been suggested these DMOAD clinical trials were in part unsuccessful since eligibility criteria and imaging-based outcome evaluation were solely based on conventional radiography. The OA research community has been aware of the limitations of conventional radiography being used as a primary imaging modality for eligibility and efficacy assessment in DMOAD trials. An imaging modality for DMOAD trials should be able to depict soft tissue and osseous pathologies that are relevant to OA disease progression and clinical manifestations of OA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fulfills these criteria and advances in technology and increasing knowledge regarding imaging outcomes likely should play a more prominent role in DMOAD clinical trials. In this perspective article, we will describe MRI-based tools and analytic methods that can be applied to DMOAD clinical trials with a particular emphasis on knee OA. MRI should be the modality of choice for eligibility screening and outcome assessment. Optimal MRI pulse sequences must be chosen to visualize specific features of OA.

Overuse-Related Injuries of the Knee.

Overuse-related injuries of the knee joint and periarticular soft tissues include a heterogenous group of sports and nonsports-related injuries. These conditions include friction and impingement syndromes, bone stress injuries, bursitis, and tendon-related pathology such as tendinopathy and snapping. Traction apophysitis are also discussed as commonly seen in the pediatric population. Although multiple imaging modalities can be used, this review focuses on MR imaging, which is the most common and, often, the only modality used.

Three-dimensional turbo spin-echo (TSE) MRI assessment of indirect acute muscle injuries in athletes: comparison with two-dimensional TSE MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of acute muscle injuries in elite athletes in comparison with two-dimensional (2D) MRI. METHODS: Elite athletes with clinically suspected acute muscle injury of the thigh who underwent both 2D and 3D MRI protocols on the same day were retrospectively included. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently assessed 2D and 3D MRIs, with both techniques evaluated separately 1-month apart. Muscle injuries were evaluated using the BAMIC and the INSEP classifications. A second assessment of injuries was performed by each reader 2 months after the initial readings. Agreement was determined using weighted kappa statistics. The level of diagnostic confidence in classifying injuries was also assessed for both MRI protocols. RESULTS: A total of 40 athletes were included. Intra-reader agreement when comparing injury grades from 2D vs. 3D for both INSEP and BAMIC classifications was almost perfect for both readers and ranged between 0.84 and 0.98. Inter-reader agreement was substantial to almost perfect and ranged from 0.78 to 0.93 for the 2D protocol, and from 0.78 to 0.95 for the 3D protocol. Intra-reader agreement for each MRI protocol separately was almost perfect to perfect for both readers and ranged between 0.84 and 1.00. Diagnostic confidence for grading injuries improved for both readers when using the 3D protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2D MRI, 3D TSE MRI is a reliable technique for acute muscular injury assessment, providing faster acquisition times and improving the diagnostic confidence. KEY POINTS: • Compared to 2D MRI, 3D TSE MRI is a reliable technique for the assessment of acute muscular injuries. • 3D TSE MRI has the advantage of faster total acquisition times, thinner sections, and multiplanar reconstruction, improving the confidence for structural assessment including connective tissue involvement.

Joint interventions in osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is among the most common diseases affecting both axial and appendicular joints and the lead cause of disability worldwide. OA incidence is rising due to extended life expectancy and the increasing obesity epidemic. Several joint interventions are available to manage pain and joint function in patients with OA, most of these treatments being widely applied using intra-articular injections. In this chapter, we will describe the different joint interventions available for the management of pain in OA focusing on intra-articular injections, including discussion on the evidence regarding the efficacy of these treatments, based on the most recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses available. We also discuss the importance of imaging in guiding these treatments, including the different imaging modalities available for intra-articular injection guidance, their advantages, and disadvantages. Finally, we briefly discuss safety data and the consensus regarding the most used intra-articular treatments to manage pain in OA.

Metacarpophalangeal Joint Impairment in Hand Osteoarthritis and Its Association With Mechanical Factors: Results From the Digital Cohort Osteoarthritis Design Hand Osteoarthritis Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, distribution, and characteristics associated with radiographic metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of baseline data from the Digital Cohort Osteoarthritis Design, a French monocentric cohort including patients with symptomatic hand OA. We evaluated the prevalence of radiographic MCP joint OA, defined as ≥2 MCP joints with a Kellgren/Lawrence score of ≥2. We compared the prevalence of MCP joint OA in the dominant and nondominant hands. Associations between radiographic MCP joint OA and patient characteristics were studied using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Radiographic MCP joint OA was present in 138 of the 425 patients (32.5%) but was not severe. Patients with MCP joint OA had a mean age of 69.2 ± 6.9 years, a body mass index of 25 ± 4.2 kg/m2 , and 86.2% were women. MCP joint OA was more frequent in the dominant hand and predominated at the first and second MCP joints. In the multivariable analysis, MCP joint OA was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01, 1.10] for each year), manual occupation (OR 3.74 [95% CI 1.21, 11.54]), scaphotrapezial OA (OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.27, 3.72]), and a high number of proximal interphalangeal joints with radiographic OA. MCP joint OA was not associated with metabolic syndrome or hand OA symptoms. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study using a hospital-based hand OA cohort, radiographic MCP joint OA was frequent and associated with structural hand OA features rather than with symptom severity. Our results suggest that the involvement of MCP joints in hand OA is predominantly related to mechanical rather than systemic factors in this population.

Inter-Reader Consistency and Exclusionary Findings During Radiographic Screening for Phase 3 Trials of Tanezumab in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

Objective: Describe the radiograph-based screening program and frequencies of ineligibility in 3 large, international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies of subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Design: Standardized bilateral shoulder, hip, and knee screening radiographs were obtained by trained imaging technologists and centrally read by 1 of 5 musculoskeletal radiology experts trained using a program-specific imaging atlas. Inter-reader consistency was tracked with test cases blindly inserted into the reader queue. Readers attended quarterly calibration meetings. Protocol-specified radiographic exclusion criteria included rapidly progressive OA (RPOA) or risk factors for RPOA (including severe malalignment of the knee, subchondral insufficiency fracture, atrophic OA, and osteonecrosis). Patients reporting disproportionate pain to radiographic evidence of OA in the hip or knee (without other pathology) were ineligible under a nonradiographic exclusion criterion. Results: At >480 international sites, 23,079 patients entered screening and 13,797 were radiographically assessed. Across 6 sets of quarterly testing, pairwise central reader agreement on radiographic eligibility was 72-87% (kappa: 0.41-0.71) and on radiographic OA grading 77-84% (kappa: 0.68-0.75). Among the 5,773/13,797 (41.8%) patients who met exclusionary criteria, 27% had disproportionate pain to radiographic findings (~10% of knee/hip radiographs). RPOA or risk factors for RPOA were each identified in <5% of patients (usually 1 joint) and <3% of knee/hip/shoulders. Conclusions: The phase 3 tanezumab screening program demonstrated the utility of radiographs to screen patients entering NGF inhibitor trials. A high degree of reader concordance was achieved. RPOA and risk factors for RPOA were not commonly observed. NCT02697773, NCT02709486, NCT02528188.

The DIGICOD cohort: A hospital-based observational prospective cohort of patients with hand osteoarthritis - methodology and baseline characteristics of the population.

OBJECTIVE: Despite its prevalence, there are few worldwide hand osteoarthritis (HOA) cohorts. The main objective of DIGItal COhort Design (DIGICOD) cohort is to investigate prognostic clinical, biological, genetic and imaging factors of clinical worsening after 6years follow-up. METHODS: DIGICOD is a hospital-based prospective cohort including patients>35years-old with symptomatic HOA fulfilling: (i) ACR criteria for HOA with≥2 symptomatic joints among proximal/distal interphalangeal joints or 1st interphalangeal joint with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)≥2; or (ii) symptomatic thumb base OA with KL≥2. Main exclusion criteria were inflammatory arthritis and crystal arthropathies. Annual clinical evaluations were scheduled with imaging (X-rays of the hands and of other OA symptomatic joints) and biological sampling every 3years. Hand radiographs are scored using KL and anatomical Verbruggen-Veys scores. Follow-up visits are ongoing. Cohort methodology and baseline characteristics are presented. RESULTS: Between April 2013 and June 2017, from the 436 HOA included patients, 426 have been analysed of whom 357 (84%) are women. Mean age±standard deviation was 66.7±7.3years and mean disease duration was 12.6±9.6years. Metabolic syndrome affected 151 (36.5%) patients. Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) hand pain (0-100mm) was 44.4±26.7mm at activity. Mean FIHOA (0-100) was 19.9±18.6. Elevated serum CRP level (≥5mg/L) involved 10% patients. Mean KL score (0-128) was 46.7±18 and the mean number of joint with KL≥2 was 15.1±6.3. Erosive HOA (defined as≥1 Erosive or Remodeling phase joint according to Verbruggen-Veys score) involved 195/426 (45.8%) patients and the median number (interquartile range) of erosive joints in erosive patients was 3.0 (1.0-5.0). CONCLUSION: DIGICOD is a unique prospective HOA cohort with a long-term 6years standardized assessment and has included severe radiologically HOA patients with a high prevalence of erosive disease.

Sports injuries at the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Paralympic Games: use of diagnostic imaging services.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of imaging-depicted sports-related injuries (bone, muscle, tendon, and ligament injuries) during the Rio 2016 Summer Paralympic Games. METHODS: Descriptive data on all imaging examinations by using radiography, ultrasonography (US), and MRI were collected and retrospectively analyzed centrally by five musculoskeletal radiologists according to imaging modality, country of origin of the athletes, type of sport, type of disability, and type and location of injury. RESULTS: We report 109 injuries in 4378 athletes. A total of 382 radiologic examinations were performed in 261 athletes, including 118 (31%) radiographic, 22 (6%) US, and 242 (63%) MRI examinations. Para athletes from Africa had the highest utilization rate (20.1%, 67 out of 333). Athletes from Europe underwent the most examinations with 29 radiographic, 12 US, and 66 MRI examinations. The highest utilization rate of imaging modalities by sport was among Judo para athletes (16.7%, 22 out of 132). Most injuries were reported in athletics discipline (37.6%, 41 out of 109). Most injuries were also reported among para athletes with visual impairment (40 injuries, 36.7% of all injuries). Bone stress injuries were most common among para athletes with visual impairment (6 out of 7). Para athletes with visual impairment were also more prone to bone stress injuries than traumatic fractures, unlike para athletes with neurologic and musculoskeletal impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging was used in 6.0% of para athletes. MRI comprised 63% of imaging utilization. Identification of patterns of injuries may help building future prevention programs in elite para athletes. KEY POINTS: • The highest imaging utilization rates were found among para athletes competing in Judo, sitting volleyball, powerlifting, and football. • Utilization of diagnostic imaging at the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games demonstrated similar trends to what was observed at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. • Comparison of the rate of imaging-depicted injuries between Olympic and Paralympic athletes is limited due to inherent differences between the two athlete populations and the manner in which injury risk in the Paralympic athlete varies dependent on impairment type, which is not the case for the Olympic athlete.

Improved detection of subchondral erosions in the sacroiliac joints with T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of two different sets of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of subchondral erosions in the sacroiliac joints regarding the application of fat-water separation techniques when acquiring T1-weighted (T1w) images, using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference standard. METHODS: We retrospectively included 31 consecutive patients having or being suspected for axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) assessed using both MRI and MDCT. Three sets of images were independently assessed for the presence of erosions by two musculoskeletal radiologists (R1, R2): (1) MRI with standard T1w without fat suppression, (2) MRI with both T1w with and without fat suppression, and (3) MDCT. The diagnostic performance of both sets of MRIs was assessed using MDCT as the referent. RESULTS: The assessment of T1w images with fat suppression substantially increased sensitivity (76% vs. 63% R1; 70% vs. 60% R2), specificity (97% vs. 84% R1; 96% vs. 81% R2), positive predictive value (85% vs. 45% R1; 81% vs. 40% R2), and overall accuracy (94% vs. 80% R1; 92% vs. 77% R2) in the detection of erosions when compared to the assessment using T1w images without fat suppression. CONCLUSION: The assessment of T1w images with fat suppression substantially improves the diagnostic performance of MRI in the detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints. KEY POINTS: • The presence of erosions in the sacroiliac joints may influence the decision on the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. • T1w fat-suppressed MR imaging relatively increases the contrast between the joint space (high signal) and the adjacent subchondral bone (low signal), potentially improving the detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints. • T1w fat-suppressed images improve the diagnostic performance of MRI in the detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints compared to T1w without fat suppression, using MDCT as the reference.

Frequency of MRI-detected peripheral osteoarthritis in athletes during the Summer Olympics in Rio 2016.

Objective: To describe the frequency and severity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based peripheral osteoarthritis (OA) in athletes during the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic Games. Methods: All MRIs of the peripheral joints in Olympic athletes, performed at the centralized imaging facility, either following acute trauma or for non-traumatic joint pain, were included. All MRIs were retrospectively reviewed for presence and severity of MRI-based OA using an adapted Outerbridge classification for cartilage and adapted classifications for other tissues. Scoring of MRI abnormalities was independently and retrospectively performed without reference to the on-site clinical reports. The frequencies of MRI-detected OA were tabulated and grouped into sports categories, athletes' age (<25; 25-29; and ≥30 years of age), and sex. Results: 11,274 athletes participated in the Games. 320 athletes underwent MRI of the peripheral joints. One hundred sixty (50.0%) were female, 109 (34.1%) were <25 years, 132 (41.3%) between the ages of 25 and 29 years old, and 79 (24.7%) ≥30 years old. 53 (16.6%) had MRI-based OA, with slightly more than half having severe OA. In every age category, severe OA was the most frequent finding and there was a linear trend for increased likelihood of having OA with increasing age (Cochran-Armitage test, p â€‹= â€‹0.009). Frequencies of OA were similar in male and female athletes. The wrist (29.2%) and the knee (23.3%) were the most commonly affected joints. Conclusions: MRI-defined OA was not uncommon among elite athletes in this selected sample.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal reliability of semiquantitative osteoarthritis assessment at 1.0T extremity MRI: Multi-reader data from the MOST study.

Objective: To determine reliability among four experienced and calibrated readers in cross-sectional and longitudinal semi-quantitative MRI assessments of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Design: From all MOST participants with at least one knee with readable 60-month and 84-month paired knee MRIs (1.0 â€‹T extremity systems), we selected 10 subjects having a spectrum of baseline disease severity of cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and meniscal damage and a spectrum of longitudinal changes in severity at 24 months follow-up. MRIs were independently assessed using the WORMS grading system by four musculoskeletal radiologists with the chronological sequence known to the readers. Kappa statistics were used to determine agreement between each pair of readers and Kendall's coefficient of concordance to determine average agreement across readers. Results: For most features, cross-sectional reliability was substantial to almost perfect. Regarding longitudinal reliability (detection of longitudinal change), inter-reader reliability as weighted kappa values ranged from 0.62 to 0.78 for cartilage damage, 0.75-0.88 for bone marrow lesions, 0.75-0.92 for meniscal tears, 0.67-0.95 for meniscal extrusion, 0.51-0.77 for bone attrition, 0.43-0.76 for osteophytes, 0.31-0.70 for Hoffa-synovitis, and 0.47-0.85 for effusion-synovitis. Kendall's coefficient ranged from 0.65 to 0.98. Conclusion: High levels of cross-sectional reliability and moderate to high longitudinal reliability was achieved using four experienced readers in semiquantitative MRI-assessment of most knee OA features.

Absence of pain in subjects with advanced radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the frequency of pain among subjects with advanced radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) defined as Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 4 and clinical features associated with pain. METHODS: Subjects from the Hallym Aging Study (HAS), the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were included. Participants were asked knee-specific questions regarding the presence of knee pain. Clinical characteristics associated with the presence of pain were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 504, 10,152 and 4796 subjects from HAS, KNHANES, and OAI, respectively. KL grade 4 OA was identified in 9.3, 7.6, and 11.5% of subjects, while pain was absent in 23.5, 31.2, and 5.9% of subjects in KL grade 4 knee OA, respectively. After multivariable analysis, female gender showed a significant association with pain in the KNHANES group, while in the OAI group, younger age did. Advanced knee OA patients without pain did not differ from non-OA subjects in most items of SF-12 in both Korean and OAI subjects. Total WOMAC score was not significantly different between non-OA and advanced knee OA subjects without pain in the OAI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a considerable number of subjects with KL grade 4 OA did not report pain. In patients whose pain arises from causes other than structural damage of the joint, therapeutic decision based on knee X-ray would lead to suboptimal result. In addition, treatment options focusing solely on cartilage engineering, should be viewed with caution.

State of the Art: Imaging of Osteoarthritis-Revisited 2020.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent chronic condition with marked implications for affected individuals and public health care. There are available treatments to manage pain and symptoms but no effective treatment for OA. In the past 10 years, joint imaging, particularly MRI, has evolved rapidly due to technical advances and their application to clinical research, which has led to abundant evidence regarding the natural history of the disease. Radiography remains the primary imaging modality in clinical practice for the diagnosis and follow-up of OA. The many developments in MRI techniques capable of assessing cartilage morphologic features and the methods for evaluating its biochemical composition will be discussed. Advances in quantitative morphologic cartilage assessment and semiquantitative whole-organ assessment will be reviewed, as will other modalities such as US, CT and CT arthrography, and nuclear medicine techniques that play a complementary role. Various therapeutic approaches and ongoing developments, including the impact of artificial intelligence on the field of OA imaging, will also be discussed.

MDCT arthrography assessment of the severity of cartilage damage and scapholunate dissociation in regard to specific-component tears of the scapholunate interosseous ligament.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution and severity of cartilage damage and scapholunate dissociation assessed on multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) arthrography in a sample of patients with scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury, in regard to component-specific tears. METHODS: We retrospectively included 37 patients with SLIL tears and 34 patients without SLIL tears who served as controls, all patients had undergone MDCT arthrography. Morphology of SLIL dorsal and volar components was graded as: normal, partial, or complete tear. Cartilage damage was assessed in 14 distinct regions of the wrist using a semiquantitative modified scoring system. Staging of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) for each patient was based on the distribution of cartilage damage seen on MDCT arthrography. Scapholunate dissociation was measured for each patient at the tenth of a millimeter. The Student's t-test (p) and the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test (P) were used to compare the different groups. RESULTS: The cartilage damage scores obtained were greater in patients with complete SLIL dorsal component tear than in other patients (p = 0.0019 and P = 0.0018). Scapholunate dissociation was greater in these patients (p = 0.0003 and P = 0.0013). Scapholunate dissociation was also greater in patients with SLAC wrist (p = 0.0004 and P = 0.0012), with a cut-off value of 3.7 mm for diagnosing SLAC (sensitivity 83.3 % and specificity 89.5 %). CONCLUSION: MDCT arthrography assessment shows that the severity of cartilage damage and scapholunate dissociation is greater when the dorsal component of the SLIL is completely ruptured.

MRI-detected spinal disc degenerative changes in athletes participating in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics games.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and the distribution of degenerative disc disease (DDD) detected in athletes who underwent spine MRI in the 2016 Summer Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro. METHODS: Data on spine MRI examinations from the 2016 Summer Olympics were retrospectively analyzed. We assessed the frequency of DDD of the cervical (Cs), thoracic (Ts), and lumbar (Ls) spine using Pfirrmann's classification. Grade II and III were considered as mild, grade IV as moderate, and grade V as severe disc degeneration. Data were analyzed according to the location of the degenerative disc, type of sport, age-groups, and gender of the athletes. RESULTS: One hundred out of 11,274 athletes underwent 108 spine MRI's (21 C, 6 T, and 81 L) (53% Females (F), 47% Males (M)). The frequency of DDD was 40% (42% F, 58% M) over the entire spine (28% mild, 9% moderate and 3% severe). There were 58% (12%F, 88%M) of the cervical spine discs that showed some degree of degeneration (44% mild, 13.5% moderate and 1% severe). Athletics, Boxing, and Swimming were the sports most affected by DDD in the Cs. There were 12.5% of the thoracic discs that showed some degree of degeneration, all were mild DDD and were exclusively seen in female athletes. There were 39% (53% F, 47% M) of the lumbar discs with DDD (26% mild, 9% moderate, and 4% severe). CONCLUSION: Athletes who underwent spine MRI during the 2016 Summer Olympic Games show a high frequency of DDD of cervical and lumbar spines. Recognition of these conditions is important to develop training techniques that may minimize the development of degenerative pathology of the spine.