[Analysis of the evolution of surgery for the treatment of primary renal tumors during the period 2006-2010: report of 458 consecutive surgeries]. / Analyse de l'évolution des pratiques chirurgicales pour la prise en charge des tumeurs primitives du rein dans la période 2006-2010: à propos d'une série de 458 chirurgies consécutives.

OBJECTIVE: Most of small renal masses are accessible to conservative surgery, which has proved to maintain carcinological outcome, with a lower cardiovascular morbidity, hospital stay and mortality. Current international guidelines for the management of renal tumours recommend that partial nephrectomy be the new standard of treatment of T1 tumours. In this study, the authors assessed evolutive trends in the surgical management of renal tumours in the period 2006 to 2010 in a university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 446 consecutive patients treated for renal tumour between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS: Overall, 458 surgeries were performed, divided in 184 (40.2%) partial nephrectomy and 274 (49.8%) radical nephrectomy. During the study period, the number of partial nephrectomy increased significantly, with a mean annual increase rate of 10% in T1a tumours (P=0.002). We also observed a non significant increasing trend for conservative surgery in T1b tumours. Furthermore, the number of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy increased significantly, with a mean annual increase rate of 8% (P=0.02). At the end of the study period, one in two patients, whatever the stage, was treated by partial nephrectomy. This change in practice occurred without any increase in per- and postoperative morbidity (P=0.39). CONCLUSION: Analysis of this cohort of patients operated for renal tumour between 2006 and 2010 in our university hospital did not highlight underuse of conservative surgery, taking into account the current international guidelines. This trend for more partial nephrectomy did not underscore an increase in surgical morbidity or decrease in carcinological outcome. However, the higher rate of positive surgical margins in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group should incite to caution.

[Carcinological results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis]. / Résultats de la chirurgie des métastases surrénaliennes par voie laparoscopique.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Indication of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis remains debated. Our aim was to analyze its carcinological results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a series of 332 laparoscopic adrenalectomies, 13 were for adrenal metastasis (kidney=5, lung=3, melanoma=3, breast=1, eye=1). The indication was curative (single metastasis) in nine cases (69%), the four other patients (31%) having a polymetastatic disease. All alive patients were interviewed in August 2010. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meyer method, with comparisons using the log rank test. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 174.2 ± 102 minutes. Blood loss was 351 ± 136 mL. Three conversions (23%) were necessary, for gastric perforation, wound of vena cava and inability to dissect the adrenal. Surgical margins were positive in six cases (46%). The risk of positive margin was lower in case of metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (Fischer, p=0.02). The median of overall survival was 14 months (3-45). Survival was significantly higher in metastases of renal cell carcinoma (p=0.035) than in metastases of other tumors, 24 months (11-36) vs six months (3-45), respectively. There was no difference according to the laparoscopic technique used, neither according to the age, nor according to the tumoral size. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery did not offer sufficient guarantee to be considered as the standard treatment in case of adrenal metastasis. However, with a survival rate of 60%, a lower rate of surgical margins, metastases of renal cell carcinoma seem to be the better candidates for laparoscopic adrenalectomy.