ABSTRACT
AIM: Crohn's disease has debilitating effects on patients' quality of life. Currently, there are limited data on the effect of anastomotic configuration on health-related quality of life after ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease. This study aimed to assess the impact of Kono-S anastomosis on quality of life after ileocolic resection, compared to the conventional side-to-side anastomosis. METHOD: Patients with primary or recurrent Crohn's disease participating in the ongoing SuPREMe-CD trial were interviewed about quality of life using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). The primary endpoint was disease-specific quality of life, assessed with IBDQ. Secondary outcomes were quality of life related to bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, social function and emotional function. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients included, 51 (54%) received the conventional side-to-side anastomosis and 43 (46%) the Kono-S anastomosis. Demographics were comparable between the two groups. The IBDQ was assessed at a mean follow-up of 54.0 ± 18.7 months from surgical intervention. The mean total IBDQ score was 155.1 ± 28.07 in the conventional group and 163.8 ± 25.23 in the Kono-S group (P = 0.11). When considering bowel symptoms and social function, mean scores were 50.7 and 23.5 in the conventional group, and 56.3 and 26.5 in the Kono-S group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.02, respectively). Kono-S anastomosis was independently associated with improved quality of life regarding bowel symptoms (P = 0.006) and social function (P = 0.03) after correcting for other confounding factors on linear regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional side-to-side anastomosis, patients with Kono-S anastomosis presented significantly better bowel symptoms and social function scores at 54 months after surgery.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Although stapled anastomoses have been widely evaluated in the context of the elective surgery, few reports compared manual with stapled anastomoses in patients undergoing emergency surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of hand-sewn end-to-end anastomoses with stapled side-to-side and stapled end-to-side anastomoses in patients undergoing small bowel resection for acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to intestinal obstruction. METHODS: From January 2015 to June 2021 all the hemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency surgery with small bowel resection for intestinal obstruction were enrolled in this study. According to surgical technique in performing anastomosis, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1: hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, group 2: stapled end-to-side anastomosis, and group 3: stapled side-to-side anastomosis. RESULTS: Although the anastomosis failure rate was higher in group 3, it was not significantly different between the three groups (P = 0.78: chi-square test). Likewise, no significant differences in the median hospital stay were found between the patients' groups (P = 0.87: Kruskal-Wallis test). The median operating time was similar in patients undergoing stapled anastomoses and was significantly higher in patients undergoing hand-sewn anastomoses (P = 0.0009: Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing emergency small bowel resection for complicated intestinal obstruction, a similar outcome in terms of dehiscence rate and hospital stay can be achieved performing stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses, even if restoring the intestinal continuity with stapled technique is associated with lower operating time.
