Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Epidemiol Prev ; 47(1-2): 34-46, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971236

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: because of different human behaviours, SARS-CoV-2 spread may be lower in spring/summer. On the contrary, it is not clearly known whether the clinical course/severity of hospitalized patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 can be different in the various seasons.. OBJECTIVES: to understand whether there were differences in severity of COVID-19 in patients who had contracted the infection in winter versus those infected in spring/summer. DESIGN: observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: from the administrative database of the SARS-CoV-2 surveillance system and that of hospital discharge, a cohort of patients (8,221, 653 of which were hospitalized) who tested positive to the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 between 01.12.2020 and 31.07.2021 in the Grosseto province (Tuscany Region, Central Italy) was selected and analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: hospitalization rate and length, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) use, Intensive Care Unite (ICU) admissions, intra-hospital mortality and PaO2/FiO2 values were measured and compared between subjects infected in winter and those who developed COVID-19 in spring/summer. Viral load (cycle threshold, Ct), vitamin D, serum ferritin, IL-6, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein measured in the two periods were also compared. RESULTS: in the considered months, the hospitalization rate among 8,221 patients with COVID-19 was 8%: 370 (8.5%) individuals were hospitalized in winter and 283 (7,3%; p=0.31) in spring/summer; 62 (16.8%), 88 (23.8%), and 63 (17%) in winter and 28 (9.9%), 40 (14.1%), and 36 (12.7%) in spring/summer were admitted in ICU (p=0.01), used CPAP/NIV (p=0.002) and died (p=0.13), respectively. Hospitalization days were 14.5±11.6 in winter and 10.3±8.84 in spring/summer (p=0.001), while minimum PaO2/FiO2, measured during hospital stays was 123.2±38.6 in spring/summer and 112.6±40.8 in winter (p=0.054). Multivariate analysis (adjusted for all confounding factors) also confirmed reduced risks of having ICU admissions (0.53; 95%CI 0.32;0.88; p=0.01) and of using CPAP/NIV (0.48; 95%CI 0.32;0.75; p=0.001) in spring/summer when compared to winter. Hospitalization days and minimum PaO2/FiO2 were also lower in spring/summer (ß= -3.9; 95%CI -5.5;-2.2; p=0.001) and winter (ß= -17; 95%CI -0.93;35; p=0.06), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio of mortality in winter, obtained with a Cox model, was higher of about 38% compared to spring/summer. No Ct values (viral load) differences were found either in winter (19.45±6.18) or spring/summer (20.3±6.7; p=0.343). IL-6, ferritin, procalcitonin, D-dimer were similar. Conversely, CRP was lower whereas vitamin D was higher in the warmer seasons. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 may be less severe during spring/summer in hospitalized patients. This does not seem to be influenced by different SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the different periods considered. C-reactive protein was found to be lower whereas vitamin D higher in the warmer months. It can be hypothesized that higher levels of vitamin D in spring/summer, compared to winter, may be associated to a positive modulation of COVID-19 induced inflammation with a possible disease severity reduction during spring/summer.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , C-Reactive Protein , Seasons , Interleukin-6 , Procalcitonin , Italy/epidemiology , Vitamin D , Ferritins
2.
Acta Biomed ; 92(2): e2021199, 2021 05 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988163

ABSTRACT

Authors present 6 cases of abdominal bleeding associated with COVID-19, representing 1.35% of all hospitalized COVID-19 patients and hypothesize that there could be, although not very frequently, a relationship between SARS-CoV2 and bleeding. They excluded a side effect of the low molecular weight heparin therapy that all patients underwent during the course of the disease or other possible causes. Alterations of the coagulation state or a weakness of the vascular wall due toa presumed endotheliitis SARS-CoV-2 infection induced, are hypothesized by the authors. Investigation and follow-up for possible hemorrhagic problems in patients with COVID-19 is recommended. In particular, clinicians should be vigilant about retroperitoneal hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients. In addition to the fact that these patients are being treated with anticoagulants, anemia and abdominal pain are the signs that should lead us to suspect this type of haemorrhage. More studies are needed to understand if COVID-19 can be directly associated with bleeding. (www.actabiomedica.it)


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticoagulants , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , RNA, Viral
4.
J Infect ; 56(3): 179-84, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18222005

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Streptococcus pneumoniae is frequently isolated from carrier children, but it also causes localized and invasive diseases. Increasing incidence of chemoresistance can affect the efficacy of empiric therapy and it motivates interest in primary prophylaxis. The study aims to investigate clinical and microbiological features of paediatric pneumococcal infections in an Italian province. METHODS: Retrospective clinical analysis of 640 children, hospitalized from 1992 to 2006 with one culture positive for S. pneumoniae, was performed. Chemosusceptibility tests and serotyping were carried out on isolates; statistical analysis was applied to compare variables. RESULTS: Overall, 47.8% were carriers, 49% and 3.2% had, respectively, a localized or invasive disease; S. pneumoniae aetiology accounted for 25% of meningitis and 16% of sepsis. On the total isolates, 10.2% were penicillin non-susceptible, 35.15% were erythromycin resistant, with increasing rates over years. Prevalent invasive serotypes were 1 (38.1%) and 7F (9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The study sustains pneumococcal disease relevance in children, on the strength of a 15 year observation. Long time period can represent a limit due to population characteristics changing; a selection bias could also be present due to hospitalized only patient analysis. However, we documented variable evolution of chemoresistance and a peculiar serotype spreading, offering microbiological basis for an appropriate clinical approach.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/physiopathology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Erythromycin/pharmacology , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Meningitis/epidemiology , Meningitis/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Penicillin Resistance , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Pneumococcal Infections/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/microbiology , Serotyping , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...