ABSTRACT
Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based vectors are widely used for gene therapy, but the effect of pre-existing antibodies resulting from exposure to wild-type AAV is unclear. In addition, other poorly defined plasma factors could inhibit AAV vector transduction where antibodies are not detected. To better define the relationship between various forms of pre-existing AAV immunity and gene transfer, we studied valoctocogene roxaparvovec (BMN 270) in cynomolgus monkeys with varying pre-dose levels of neutralizing anti-AAV antibodies and non-antibody transduction inhibitors. BMN 270 is an AAV5-based vector for treating hemophilia A that encodes human B domain-deleted factor VIII (FVIII-SQ). After infusion of BMN 270 (6.0 × 1013 vg/kg) into animals with pre-existing anti-AAV5 antibodies, there was a mean decrease in maximal FVIII-SQ plasma concentration (Cmax) and AUC of 74.8% and 66.9%, respectively, compared with non-immune control animals, and vector genomes in the liver were reduced. In contrast, animals with only non-antibody transduction inhibitors showed FVIII-SQ plasma concentrations and liver vector copies comparable with those of controls. These results demonstrate that animals without AAV5 antibodies are likely responders to AAV5 gene therapy, regardless of other inhibiting plasma factors. The biological threshold for tolerable AAV5 antibody levels varied between individual animals and should be evaluated further in clinical studies.
ABSTRACT
Most patients receiving Naglazyme (galsulfase, rhASB) enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis type VI develop an antibody response. To evaluate the impact of this response, two in vitro neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays were developed based on the two steps of the mechanism of action. Neutralization of enzyme activity was detected by inhibition of rhASB cleavage of a fluorogenic substrate. Neutralization of receptor binding was detected by decreased binding of labeled rhASB to immobilized soluble receptor. For the enzyme activity NAb assay, serum pretreatment was required to isolate antibodies from interfering phosphate ions, with sensitivity of < or =5 microg/mL. The receptor binding NAb assay used a five-fold dilution, with sensitivity of < or =40 microg/mL. Cutpoints for percent inhibition were based on 95% confidence intervals from naïve sera. Clinical samples were similarly likely to be positive in both assays than positive for neutralization of only one step in the mechanism of action. The two NAb assays yielded complementary information about potential neutralization of rhASB. Relative estimated sensitivity between neutralization assays did not correlate with the number of positive clinical samples or patients. In vitro NAb assays based on a well-understood mechanism of action provide specific information about the NAb mechanism.
