The use of low-energy laser (LEL) for the prevention of chemotherapy- and/or radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: results from two prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: Low-energy laser (LEL) treatment has been suggested as an effective and safe method to prevent and/or treat oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; however, it has not gained wide acceptance so far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted two clinical trials testing the LEL technique: firstly, as a secondary prevention in patients with various solid tumors treated with chemotherapy who all developed severe mucositis after a previous identical chemotherapy and, secondly, as therapeutic intervention (compared to sham illumination in a randomized way) in patients with hematological tumors receiving intensive chemotherapy and having developed low-grade oral mucositis. RESULTS: We entered 26 eligible patients in the first study and 36 were randomized in the second study. The success rate was 81% (95%CI = 61-93%) when LEL was given as a preventive treatment. In the second study, in patients with existing lesions, the therapeutic success rate was 83% (95%CI = 59-96%), which was significantly different from the success rate reached in the sham-treated patients (11%; 95%CI = 1-35%); the time to development of grade 3 mucositis was also significantly shorter in the sham-treated patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results strongly support the already available literature, suggesting that LEL is an effective and safe approach to prevent or treat oral mucositis resulting from cancer chemotherapy.

Growth factors and DLI in adult haploidentical transplant: a three-step pilot study towards patient and disease status adjusted management.

Haploidentical transplant is now established as a procedure of choice for patients who lack a compatible donor. However, they are still referred too late, heavily pretreated, at very advanced stages. We initiated a three-step phase I study trying improve transplant-related mortality, relapse rate, and immunity: G-CSF + DLI, GM-CSF + DLI, patient- and disease-adapted strategy. Thirty-three consecutive leukemia patients, aged 18-55, were investigated (20 very poor risk, 11 poor risk, and 2 better risk). GvH type NK alloreactivity was chosen when possible (18/33) and balanced across the three groups. In the first nine patients, G-CSF was used and escalated prophylactic DLI started at month 1. Thus, G-CSF and 1-3 DLI (10(4) CD3/kg) is safe. It results in faster CD4 recovery and a low rate of infections. However, it was insufficient to induce a GVL effect. In the next 12 patients, GM-CSF was used plus 1 DLI (10(4) CD3/kg) at day 30 unless aGVHD (3 patients). The comparison between the two first groups can be summarized as follows: G-CSF + DLI: TRM at day 100: 0, RR: 6/9, severe aGVHD: 0. GM-CSF + 1 DLI group: RR: 1/12, TRM at day 100: 3, aGVHD > 1: 9/12, price to pay: GVHD resulting in five deaths in total. Step 3 (13 patients) consists of a patient-adapted strategy: no more aspecific DLI (selected anti-CMV and aspergillus DLI planned in all patients); in myeloid disorders with NK alloreactivity: no GF. In the other cases, GM-CSF (at a reduced total dose of 500 mug) is given the follow-up of these 13 patients, although promising is currently short (median 5 months). Overall, TRM at day 100 is 3/29, reflecting the good tolerance of the conditioning in a heavily pretreated population (median age: 43). NRR mortality (8/26) at 1 year is greater in the GM-CSF + DLI group, reflecting the impact of severe aGVHD. We conclude that the third strategy might improve the outcome without exposing patients to unnecessary severe GVHD.

Donor lymphocyte infusions in adult haploidentical transplant: a dose finding study.

Haploidentical transplantation has become a clinical option for patients lacking a compatible donor. However, patients are still referred at advanced stages and are usually heavily pretreated. This results in a high risk of toxicity, relapses and infections. We therefore started a donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) dose-finding protocol, to try to improve both relapse rate and immunity reconstitution. In all, 12 consecutive patients were investigated. All had a refractory, some progressive, disease. Conditioning consisted of TBI, melphalan, ATG, fludarabine and CSA pretransplant. In four rapidly progressive patients, Ara-C had to be given 1 week preconditioning. The graft was T- and B-cell depleted with a fixed reinfused CD3 dose of 5 x 10(4)/kg. All patients engrafted before day 20. G-CSF was given from day 5 post-transplant and replaced with GM-CSF in the last three patients. Nonrelapse related mortality was 0/12 at 1 year. DLI were started at day 28 (3 x 10(4) CD3/kg) in the two first patients. This resulted in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in both, but they did not relapse. The next dose was 1 x 10(4)/kg monthly for 3 months. This was well tolerated with only one grade I GVHD. Given the high relapse rate, we escalated doses (1, 3 and 10 x 10(4)/kg). This produced GVHD in all. We next moved, to GM-CSF and 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg monthly. Overall, 6/12 patients relapsed and received therapeutic DLI, starting at 1 x 10(5) CD3/kg with escalation every 2 weeks. We conclude that prophylactic DLI are feasible in adult haploidentical transplantation, without GVHD at a monthly dose of 1 x 10(4) CD3/kg. They result in faster CD4 recovery and a low rate of infections. The impact of GM-CSF remains to be further investigated. This scheme seems ideal for patients transplanted early in the course of their disease. In very bad prognosis patients, it remains insufficient to rapidly induce a GVL effect. Escalated doses are feasible but the price is aGVHD. Therapeutic DLI can be given at higher doses, depending on the time post-transplant. Haploidentical transplantation with low-dose DLI is a safe procedure that should be considered in all patients needing a transplant, but lacking a matched donor, early in the course of the disease.

Complete remission following donor PBSC after low-dose cytarabine chemotherapy for early relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

A 55-year-old woman with chemotherapy-resistant acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML M2) relapsed 3 months after allogeneic PBSC transplant. The patient was treated with two cycles of low-dose cytarabine chemotherapy followed by G-CSF mobilized donor PBSC after cessation of all immunosuppressive treatment. Hematological and cytogenetic complete remission was observed after the first cycle. The patient had been previously treated for AGVHD after allogeneic PBSC transplantation and experienced a second AGVHD after the second cycles of cytoreductive treatment and donor PBSC infusion. Hematological recovery after donor PBSC infusion was faster than recovery after previous chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy. During treatment no febrile neutropenia was observed. This case shows that donor PBSC infusion cannot only provide prolonged complete hematological and cytogenetic remission but also seems to support accelerated hematopoietic recovery for some patients relapsing after allogeneic BMT.

[Bone marrow autograft in malignant hemopathies. The Team of the Sterile Unit]. / L'autogreffe de moelle dans les hémopathies malignes. L'équipe de l'Unité Stérile.

Only in the last decade have autologous grafts begun to be studied extensively. Their most attractive feature is the avoidance of GVHD. However, GVHD has antitumoral effect on residual leukemic cells called "graft versus leukemia" effect and better understanding of this phenomenon explains the higher relapse rate after autologous bone marrow transplantation. New approaches such as cyclosporin--induced GVHD and IL-2 administration after autograft bring great expectations in this field. Colony stimulating factors and harvesting of peripheral stem cells help to reduce the duration of neutropenia. Finally, various techniques for marrow purging and hematopoietic cell isolation should make it possible to eliminate minimal residual disease. Recent results of autologous bone marrow transplantation in various malignancies are discussed.