Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 36(4): 827-834, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33911212

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), structural OCT and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) to distinguish neovascularisation elsewhere (NVE) from intra retinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) and their use in early detection and possible risk assessment for vitreous haemorrhage. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of a consecutive series of patients with suspected NVE and IRMA using clinical examination and FFA, were examined further with OCT and OCTA. Treated and untreated eyes were also compared. RESULTS: Images from 33 eyes of 26 patients, showed 27 NVE and 14 IRMA lesions based on clinical examination +/- FFA. Lesions were re-classified as NVE in 22 eyes. Ten eyes had received past treatment. In all 10 treated eyes, vascular flow and vitreous connection were found but not FFA leakage. In 18/22 eyes with NVE there was a breach of the internal limiting membrane (ILM), in 4 eyes there was FFA leak, ILM outpouching but no breach. In two eyes, NVE originated from sea fan IRMA. Ten eyes images were classified as IRMA only with no FFA leak, or ILM breach. The relation of pre-retinal NVE to the vitreous can be visualised. CONCLUSION: Lesions, considered to be NVE, after further assessment with OCT and OCTA, can be intra-retinal, with ILM disruption but no ILM breach and leakage on FFA. ILM disruption maybe one of the earliest signs of the development of neovascularisation. Visualisation of the relation to the posterior vitreous is likely to be useful in assessing risk of vitreous haemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Retinal Neovascularization , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/pathology , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Fundus Oculi , Humans , Retinal Neovascularization/diagnosis , Retinal Neovascularization/pathology , Retinal Vessels/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Vitreous Hemorrhage
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 15: 2753-2758, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34211264

ABSTRACT

AIM: Evaluation of real-world outcomes of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in the primary treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of treatment naive patients with myopic CNV who received treatment with either intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept over a 12-year period from September 2007 to May 2020 was performed. Baseline features, treatment factors and outcomes were compared between younger and older patients and final visual outcome was assessed for associated factors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven eyes of 36 patients (24 females, 12 males) were included. Mean age was 58 years (range=26-89 years). Of these patients, 11/36 (31%) were ≤50 years of age and 25/36 (69%) were ≥51 years of age. Seventy-three percent (27/37) of eyes were phakic. One patient received bilateral treatment for myopic CNV. Median spherical equivalent was -8.50 diopters. Seventy percent (26/37) of eyes commenced primary treatment with ranibizumab, and 11/37 (30%) eyes commenced treatment with aflibercept. There were no significant differences between treatment factors and outcomes of younger and older patients. Median number of injections was 3 over a median follow-up period of 24.6 months. Mean CRT decreased by 126µm and median visual improvement was +6 letters. Analysis showed that younger age (p=0.022) and fewer injections (p=0.004) were associated with better visual outcomes. CONCLUSION: Myopic CNV requires less frequent anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy over a shorter follow-up period than both neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. Increased frequency of administration of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment did not improve vision. Younger age is associated with a better final visual outcome. These findings may help to advise patients about the prognosis of treatment and help guide treatment decisions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...