Nutritional aspects of prehabilitation in adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant.

Malnutrition, sarcopenia (low muscle mass), and physical frailty have gained increasing recognition in candidates for liver transplant (LT) as these conditions can impact postoperative functional capacity. Multidimensional prehabilitation programs have been proposed as a safe intervention in adults awaiting LT but the nutritional pillar of prehabilitation has been understudied. This review summarizes the nutritional recommendations for prehabilitation for individuals with cirrhosis awaiting LT. Three major aspects of nutritional prehabilitation are discussed: (1) Assess: Evaluate nutritional status and assess for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty to guide the nutritional prehabilitation intervention intensity, increasing across universal, targeted, and specialist levels; (2) Intervene: Prescribe a nutritional prehabilitation intervention to meet established nutrition guidelines in cirrhosis with a targeted focus on improving nutritional status and muscle health; (3) Reassess: Follow-up based on the required intensity of nutritional care with as needed intervention adjustment. Topics covered in the review include nutritional care levels for prehabilitation, energy prescriptions across body mass index strata, detailed considerations around protein intake (amount, distribution, and quality), carbohydrate and fat intake, other nutritional considerations, and the potential role of dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. Future research is warranted to more accurately evaluate energy needs, evaluate emerging dietary supplementation strategies, and establish the role of nutraceuticals alongside food-based interventions. While the general principles of nutritional prehabilitation are ready for immediate application, future large-scale randomized controlled trials in this space will help to quantify the benefit that can be gained by transitioning the LT approach from passive "transplant waitlist time" to active "transplant preparation time."

An open label feasibility study of a nutrition and exercise app-based solution in cirrhosis.

Background: Nutrition and exercise are the mainstay of therapy for the prevention and treatment of frailty in cirrhosis. This pilot study assessed feasibility of the online delivery of an app-based semi-supervised nutrition and exercise intervention in this population. Methods: The 11-week pilot recruited adults with cirrhosis who owned internet-connected devices. Patients were encouraged to participate in exercise sessions 3× per week including a combination of online group exercise (weekly) and home-based follow-along exercise (biweekly). They also participated in group nutrition classes (five sessions) and one-to-one exercise and nutrition check-ins delivered through the app. Primary outcome measures pertained to program feasibility: recruitment, retention, adherence, and satisfaction. Exploratory measures included physical performance (liver frailty index [LFI], 6-minute walk test [6MWT]), health behaviour domains, and quality of life. Results: Twenty three patients completed baseline measures. Of these, 18 (72%) completed end of study measures (mean MELD-Na, 9.2; female, 44.4%). Over 70% of participants fulfilled 75% or more of the feasibility criteria. Satisfaction with the program was high (mean, 89%). Exercise program modifications were required for 17 patients to accommodate health events or abilities. Exploratory evaluation showed improvement in the LFI and the 6MWT by -0.58-units (95% CI: -0.91 to -0.25) and 46.0 m (95% CI: 22.7-69.3) respectively without changes in quality of life or health behaviour domains. Conclusions: Outcomes demonstrate feasibility of the app-based delivery of programming with promising exploratory impact on efficacy for physical performance. Findings can guide the design of a large-scale app-based randomized controlled trials in cirrhosis.

Examining Patient Engagement in Chatbot Development Approaches for Healthy Lifestyle and Mental Wellness Interventions: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Chatbots are growing in popularity as they offer a range of potential benefits to end users and service providers. OBJECTIVE: Our scoping review aimed to explore studies that used 2-way chatbots to support healthy eating, physical activity, and mental wellness interventions. Our objectives were to report the nontechnical (eg, unrelated to software development) approaches for chatbot development and to examine the level of patient engagement in these reported approaches. METHODS: Our team conducted a scoping review following the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Nine electronic databases were searched in July 2022. Studies were selected based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were then extracted and patient involvement was assessed. RESULTS: 16 studies were included in this review. We report several approaches to chatbot development, assess patient involvement where possible, and reveal the limited detail available on reporting of patient involvement in the chatbot implementation process. The reported approaches for development included: collaboration with knowledge experts, co-design workshops, patient interviews, prototype testing, the Wizard of Oz (WoZ) procedure, and literature review. Reporting of patient involvement in development was limited; only 3 of the 16 included studies contained sufficient information to evaluate patient engagement using the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and Public (GRIPP2). CONCLUSIONS: The approaches reported in this review and the identified limitations can guide the inclusion of patient engagement and the improved documentation of engagement in the chatbot development process for future health care research. Given the importance of end user involvement in chatbot development, we hope that future research will more systematically report on chatbot development and more consistently and actively engage patients in the codevelopment process.

The patient generated subjective global assessment short form is a useful screening tool to detect risk for malnutrition in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis. Nutrition risk screening is recommended in cirrhosis nutrition guidelines, but is not routinely completed in practice. The patient-generated subjective global assessment short form (PG-SGA SF) is a patient-completed screen that has potential to be a substitute for more time and resource intensive nutrition screens. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the PG-SGA SF and three other patient-completed screens against the nutrition assessment reference method in cirrhosis, the Royal Free Hospital subjective global assessment (RFH-SGA). We also explored whether being classified "at-risk" on a nutritional screening tool was associated with clinical outcomes of unplanned hospitalization or death. METHODS: Patients completed four nutrition screening tools with or without support from a caregiver. The RFH-SGA was carried out by a blinded registered dietitian. The four screening tools were compared against the RFH-SGA to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included. The PG-SGA SF screened the highest number of patients positive for malnutrition risk (52%), was the most accurate, and had the highest sensitivity. Being at risk for malnutrition on the PG-SGA SF was associated with a higher risk of unplanned hospitalization (unadjusted sHR 2.78 (95% CI 1.3-5.9), p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The PG-SGA SF identifies malnutrition risk at similar or superior rates to other patient-generated screening tools in patients with cirrhosis. Our findings support its potential as a patient completed solution for identifying malnutrition risk in cirrhosis.

Heal-me PiONEer (personalized online nutrition and exercise): An RCT assessing 2 levels of app-based programming in individuals with chronic disease.

Background App-based strategies are a promising solution to deliver nutrition and exercise interventions during social distancing. With limited RCT data in individuals with chronic disease, further information is required both to determine impact, and to guide delivery. The Heal-Me app is an evidence-based, theoretically informed nutrition and exercise solution that can be tailored for use across a range of individuals with chronic disease. As compared to controls receiving educational material, the aim of this study is to assess the acceptability, effectiveness, and cost of Heal-Me app programming delivered alongside two levels of dietitian and exercise-specialist support. Methods Heal-Me PiONEer is a 12-week, 3-arm RCT with randomization to one of three study groups (n=72 per group, 216 total). Group 1 (control: educational material), Group 2 (Heal-Me app + virtual group dietitian/exercise-specialist sessions), Group 3 (Heal-Me app + virtual group and 1-to-1 dietitian/exercise-specialist sessions). Inclusion criteria: adults with cancer, chronic lung disease or status post-transplantation from liver or lung transplant; previous completion of an exercise rehabilitation program; access to an internet-connected device. Study outcomes measured at study weeks 0 and 12 include: Primary - Lower Extremity Functional Scale; Secondary - virtual physical function tests, loneliness, resilience, anxiety, well-being and health-related quality of life; Exploratory outcomes - protein intake, behavioral beliefs around exercise and nutrition, adherence, adverse events, acceptability, and cost-utility. Conclusions The Heal-Me PiONEer RCT holds promise to provide a comprehensive understanding of the delivery and impact of app-based nutrition and exercise programming in a diverse group of participants with chronic disease.

Use of digital technologies in the nutritional management of catabolism-prone chronic diseases: A rapid review.

BACKGROUND: Diet and nutrition applications (apps) have become more readily accessible as smartphone ownership increases. These apps have the potential to improve nutritional outcomes, but it remains unclear whether they are effective in patients with catabolism-prone conditions and specialized nutritional needs. AIMS: The primary aim of this rapid review was to determine if delivery of a nutrition intervention via an app was more effective than standard care in improving nutritional outcomes in patients with a selected set of catabolism-prone chronic diseases. Secondary aims included summarizing intervention components and reviewing adherence and acceptance. METHODS: The research question was developed using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted across three databases. Screening, study selection, extraction, and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were conducted for the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: 15 articles were included, including 5 RCTs; 3/5 RCTs were judged to be at high RoB. The study aims, measured outcomes, and intervention components were diverse. Adherence and acceptance to the app interventions were encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity of study design, nutrition interventions, outcomes, and reporting across studies, we were unable to aggregate data regarding the impact on nutritional outcomes. Reassuringly though, the available evidence suggests high adherence and acceptance, which needs to be interpreted in light of the associated personnel support provided within each study. The use of digital technology to deliver diet and nutrition interventions in catabolism-prone conditions is feasible, easy to adhere to, and well-accepted by participants.