Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
JAAD Case Rep ; 37: 82-84, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37342402
4.
Skinmed ; 20(1): 24-28, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435822

ABSTRACT

Granuloma annulare (GA) is a cutaneous inflammatory disorder of unknown cause, typically characterized by an annular arrangement of dermal papules and nodules. While GA in adults has been linked to diabetes mellitus (DM) and other conditions, these associations have been less studied in children. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all pediatric patients diagnosed with GA at an urban academic institution over a 7-year period. A total of 47 patients were reviewed. Of these, 41 (85.1%) patients had localized GA, 3 (6.38%) had subcutaneous GA, 2 (4.26%) had generalized GA, and 1 (2.13%) had both localized and subcutaneous GA. The extremities were the most common site of involvement across all morphologies. Atopic conditions were determined in 23 (48.9%) patients, 16 (34.0%) of which had asthma, either alone or in conjunction with atopic dermatitis or allergic rhinitis. None of the patients carried a diagnosis of DM, and all 11 patients who were tested within 3 years of the documented visit had normal results. In summary, this retrospective series characterizes the presentation of pediatric GA and highlights a potential association with atopy. An association with DM was not observed.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Granuloma Annulare , Adult , Child , Comorbidity , Granuloma Annulare/diagnosis , Granuloma Annulare/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Skin
5.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 7: 2382120520959691, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33015367

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Wikipedia is commonly used to acquire information about various medical conditions such as chronic pain. Ideally, better online pain management content could reduce the burden of opioid use disorders. Our goal was to improve the quality of the content available on Wikipedia to make it more accurate and applicable to medical students and the general public while training medical students to practice evidence-based medicine and critically assess their sources of information. METHODS: An elective class in Neuroscience, Pain, and Opioids composed of 10 medical students met biweekly to discuss landmark and practice-changing research articles in the fields of acute pain, chronic pain, and opioid management. The professor chose Wikipedia articles relevant to this course. Three independent viewers analyzed the quality of citations, anecdotal medical content, and content value for both patients and medical professionals. As part of their coursework, students then edited the Wikipedia articles. RESULTS: Although some of the Wikipedia pain topic content (6.7% ± 2.0) was anecdotal, financially biased, or inconsistent with Western Medical Practice content, overall articles included primarily high-quality citations (85.6% ± 3.1). On a 0-5 Likert scale, students felt content would be moderately helpful for both medical students/professionals (3.4 ± 0.2) and laypersons (3.5 ± 0.2). Editing and adding citations was feasible, but novel material was often reverted. CONCLUSION: A significant amount of pain medicine content was relevant and amenable to student editing. Therefore, future use of this tactic could provide a unique opportunity to integrate evidence-based medicine into the medical curriculum and have a direct impact on the widely available medical information. Future refinement in the editorial process may also further improve online information.

7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(8): e261-e265, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32175930

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of additional axillary or Velpeau views in evaluating potential shoulder trauma after a standard radiograph series of anteroposterior, Grashey, and/or trans-scapular views. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Level I academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients in a 10-year span who received an initial shoulder radiograph series followed by additional axillary/Velpeau views within 24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The clinical utility of the additional axillary/Velpeau views, including the final diagnosis and treatment plan, as ascertained through examination of radiology reports, progress notes, and radiograph images. RESULTS: A total of 271 cases were reviewed, with 35 patients being excluded from the final cohort because they received post-treatment radiographs to confirm a successful therapeutic outcome. The additional axillary/Velpeau views did not affect clinical decision making in 230 (97.5%) of the remaining 236 cases. All 6 patients whose care benefitted from the additional views carried the diagnosis of shoulder instability, accounting for 40% of this diagnostic group. The additional views confirmed an equivocal finding in 5 of these 6 cases and changed the diagnosis (demonstrating a posterior dislocation that was not evident on initial radiographs) and treatment plan (leading to a closed glenohumeral reduction procedure) in the other case. CONCLUSIONS: Additional axillary/Velpeau views of suspected shoulder trauma rarely led to a change in the final treatment plan, except in patients in which a definitive diagnosis of stability or instability could not be made based on initial radiographs. A cost/benefit analysis is required to weigh the cost of additional radiographs with the benefit of capturing infrequent yet serious dislocations (usually posterior). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Dislocation , Shoulder Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder , Shoulder Dislocation/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging
8.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 46(2): 72-80, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31899155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unplanned reoperation rates represent an important metric in monitoring quality in orthopedic surgery. Previous studies have focused on 30-day reoperation rates, not accounting for complications that may arise beyond this time. This study aimed to understand the frequency, timing, and procedure type of orthopedic reoperations, as well as the complications leading up to these reoperations over a 1-year period. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study reviewed all orthopedic surgeries performed within a three-year period and subsequently identified reoperations within a year following the initial case. Exclusion criteria for reoperations included those that were planned, involved a different body part, or had a different laterality from the first operation. The cases were analyzed by procedure type, timing of reoperation, and causes of reoperation. RESULTS: Of the 10,449 orthopedic surgeries performed between 2012 and 2015, 947 (9.1%) were unplanned reoperations within 1 year. Most (775; 81.8%) unplanned reoperations occurred after 30 days. Infections/wound complications (58.2%) were the most common reason for unplanned reoperations at 1 month from the initial operation, and mechanical complications (49.5%) predominated at the 6-months-to-1-year time frame. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the current paradigm of focusing on reoperations occurring within 30 days of the initial operation captures only a fraction of unplanned reoperations. Stratification of this metric by time and precipitating complication type provides additional information that quality improvement programs may target. A 1-year unplanned reoperation rate could be used as a broad indicator of surgical quality across institutions.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Improvement , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies
9.
Am J Surg ; 217(1): 1-6, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29910072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative communication is an emerging means through which surgical teams prepare for cases, little is known regarding its current state. This study investigated this topic in a survey of surgical team members. METHODS: An 11-question survey regarding the current state of and barriers to preoperative communication among surgical team members (surgeons, anesthesiologists, and surgical nurses and technologists) was distributed at a United States academic medical center utilizing the SurveyMonkey online questionnaire tool. Statistical analyses depended on variable type. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.4% (170 of 344 potential responses). All groups strongly agreed that preoperative communication contributes to health care quality and patient outcomes. Surgeons rated their satisfaction with the current state of preoperative communication more favorably than anesthesiologists (p < 0.05). Satisfaction ratings of the current state were suboptimal across groups. The most common selection for the current timing of preoperative communication across groups was before each case (29.4% of respondents) and for optimal timing, the day before a case (31.2%). The most frequently discussed topic across groups was reported to be operating room and nursing details (72.4% of respondents). The greatest barriers to preoperative communication across groups were thought to be a lack of a standard method of communication (52.4% of respondents), lack of time (51.8%), and difficulty in determining the assigned staff for a given case (50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: There exist differing perceptions of preoperative communication among surgical team members, which conveys an opportunity for improvement across groups. Coordination of the timing of preoperative communication and standardization of the discussed content could help mitigate current barriers.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Communication , Patient Care Team , Preoperative Period , Academic Medical Centers , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
10.
Spine J ; 19(3): 487-492, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29792995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar disc herniation affects more than 3 million people in the United States every year, and the rate of operation continually increases, particularly in patients 60 years or older (Taylor et al., 1994; Jordan et al., 2011). Surgical discectomy is a common treatment for lumbar disc herniation (Taylor et al., 1994; Atlas et al., 1996). One concern for this method is the risk of undergoing additional surgeries (Jordan et al., 2011; Österman et al., 2003; Lebow et al., 2011). There are very limited population-level studies that examine the rate of lumbar fusion after lumbar discectomy. Additionally, there is no study that examines the risk of undergoing lumbar fusion in patients who have undergone lumbar discectomies compared with the risk of lumbar fusion in the general population with no previous lumbar discectomy. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to calculate a more definitive rate of lumbar fusion after a lumbar discectomy procedure using a population-size study of more than 200,000 patients in the Truven Healthcare Analytics Marketscan Research Database who underwent discectomies. Additionally, the study aimed to compare the rate of lumbar fusion in patients who have undergone a lumbar discectomy to the rate of lumbar fusion in patients with no prior lumbar discectomy procedure. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The patients from both parts of the present study were extracted from the Truven Healthcare Analytics Marketscan Research Database. Ten-year fusion after discectomy rates: 223,291 patients who underwent discectomies from the years 2003 to 2015. Fusion rate comparison: 489,975 patients with a previous lumbar ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) diagnosis code who have also been enrolled in the database for at least 10 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ten-year fusion after discectomy rates: The proportion of patients who received a lumbar fusion up to 10 years after a lumbar discectomy. Fusion rate comparison: The proportion of patients who received a lumbar fusion after a lumbar discectomy compared with the proportion of patients who received a lumbar fusion with no previous lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Ten-year fusion after discectomy rates: The patients who had undergone discectomies were filtered in the Marketscan database via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes specific for lumbar discectomy (63030, 63035). Patients who had a lumbar fusion before or concurrently with these indexed lumbar discectomy dates were removed from the index group. The group was then followed up every year up to 10 years after the initial indexed lumbar discectomy dates for reoperation involving a lumbar spinal fusion according to the lumbar fusion CPT codes (22533, 22558, 22612, 22630, 22632, 22633, 22634, 22534, 22585, 22614). Fusion rate comparison: Study population only included patients who had a previous lumbar ICD-9 diagnosis in the Marketscan database (7242, 72210, 72251, 72252, 72273, 72293, 7213, 72142, 72283, 72293, 7243, 72402, 72403, 7244, 7245, 7249). The patients were then separated into two arms: one with patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy after initial lumbar diagnosis and another with patients who had not undergone a lumbar discectomy procedure. Pearson chi-square test was used to assess significance when comparing the proportion of patients who receive lumbar fusion after lumbar discectomy with the proportion of patients who receive lumbar fusion without a prior lumbar discectomy in the general ICD-9 lumbar diagnosis population. RESULTS: For the 10-year trend of lumbar fusion rates after lumbar discectomy, the rate of fusion ranged from 1.69% (1-year time frame after discectomy) to 8.50% (10-year time frame after discectomy). When comparing the two cohorts in the second part of the present study, the fusion rates were 12.50% for the discectomy group and 4.19% for the non-discectomy group. The Pearson chi-square test reported a statistically significant difference between the fusion rates of the two groups (p<.0001, α=.05). We found that people who had a lumbar discectomy procedure were 2.97 (95% confidence interval [2.86, 3.10]) times more likely to undergo a lumbar fusion than those who with a lumbar diagnosis but had not undergone a lumbar discectomy in the past. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the largest population study that explores the rate of lumbar fusion after an initial lumbar discectomy. To our knowledge, it is the first study that concludes that an initial lumbar discectomy is statistically associated with an increased likelihood of a patient undergoing a lumbar fusion in the future. We observed that patients who had previously undergone a lumbar discectomy were roughly three times more likely to undergo a lumbar fusion procedure than a patient with a lumbar diagnosis, but had not undergone a lumbar discectomy. Although not calculated, it stands to reason the difference would be even greater when comparing the discectomy population with a population without lumbar diagnoses. This finding can be an important supplement for the physician-patient discussion regarding expectations and potential for reoperation.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy/adverse effects , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/surgery
11.
PM R ; 9(7): 668-675, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27810582

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although community-based adaptive sports have become a popular means of rehabilitation for individuals with disabilities, little is known regarding the factors that lead to sustained participation. OBJECTIVE: To determine the demographic, environmental, disability-related, and functional factors associated with sustained participation in a community-based adaptive sports program. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Community-based adaptive sports program. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with mobility-related disabilities. METHODS: Data were collected from registration forms and participation logs. Participants were described as "sustainers" if they attended ≥2 sessions, or as "nonsustainers" if they attended 0 or 1 session. We examined the associations between sustained participation and demographic, environmental, disability-related, and functional factors in bivariate and multivariable analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Sustained participation in the adaptive sports program. RESULTS: Of the 134 participants, 78 (58%) were sustainers and 56 (42%) were nonsustainers. In multivariable analyses, participants who ambulated independently had lower odds of being sustainers (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11, 0.96), and those who used an ambulatory assistive device had twice the odds of being sustainers (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 0.65, 6.2) compared to those who used a manual wheelchair. Moreover, participants who lived within 5.3 miles of the program site (OR = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.1, 13.0) and those who lived between 5.3 and 24.4 miles from the program site (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.0, 7.7) had significantly higher odds of sustained participation than those who lived more than 24.4 miles from the program site. CONCLUSION: Sustained participation in community-based adaptive sports is associated with living closer to the program site and the presence of a moderate level of functional impairment. These findings suggest that programs might consider increasing the number of satellite sites and expanding offerings for individuals with mild or more significant mobility-related disabilities to effectively increase program participation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Sports for Persons with Disabilities , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Compliance , Predictive Value of Tests , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...