Initial experimental experience of triple-knockout pig red blood cells as potential sources for transfusion in alloimmunized patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion remains important in the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, alloimmunization after blood transfusion is associated with patient morbidity and mortality. Triple-knockout (TKO) pigs (i.e., pigs in which the three known xenoantigens to which humans have anti-pig antibodies have been deleted) may be an alternative source of RBCs for these patients because many humans have no preformed antibodies to TKO pig RBCs (pRBCs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In an in vitro study, plasma from alloimmunized (n = 12) or non-alloimmunized (n = 12) SCD patients was used to determine IgM/IgG binding to, and CDC of, TKO pRBCs. In an in vivo study, after an estimated 25% of blood volume was withdrawn from two capuchin monkeys, CFSE-labeled TKO pRBCs were transfused. Loss of TKO pRBCs was monitored by flow cytometry, and 7 weeks later, 25% of blood was withdrawn, and CFSE-labeled monkey RBCs were transfused. RESULTS: The in vitro study demonstrated that plasma from neither alloimmunized nor non-alloimmunized SCD patients bound IgM/IgG to, or induced CDC of, TKO pRBCs. In the in vivo study, survival of TKO pRBCs in the two capuchin monkeys was of 5 and 7 days, respectively, whereas after allotransfusion, survival was >28 days. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, (1) in the present limited study, no antibodies were detected that cross-reacted with TKO pRBCs, and (2) TKO pigs may possibly be an alternate source of RBCs in an emergency if no human RBCs are available.

Evidence for GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO Pigs as the Preferred Organ-source for Old World Nonhuman Primates as a Preclinical Model of Xenotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Triple-knockout (TKO) pigs (in which expression of the 3 known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens has been deleted) are likely to be an optimal source of organs for transplantation into human recipients, many of whom do not have natural antibodies against TKO pig cells. However, old world monkeys, for example, baboons, have natural antibodies directed to TKO cells (to a "fourth" xenoantigen that is exposed after TKO). METHODS: We measured (1) anti-pig IgM/IgG binding, and (2) complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), by flow cytometry to α1,3-galactosyltransfearse gene-knockout (GTKO), GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO (that do not express the "fourth" xenoantigen), and TKO pig peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using 72 baboon sera (30 specific pathogen-free [SPF], and 42 non-SPF baboons). RESULTS: Mean IgM antibody binding to GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO pig PBMCs was significantly lower than to GTKO or TKO pig PBMCs (P < 0.01). Mean IgG antibody binding to GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO pig PBMCs was significantly lower than to TKO PBMCs (P < 0.01). Mean CDC of GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO pig PBMCs was significantly lower than of GTKO or TKO pig PBMCs (P < 0.01). SPF baboon serum IgM and IgG binding to, and CDC of, GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO or TKO PBMCs were significantly lower than non-SPF baboon sera (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although TKO pigs form the basis for proposed clinical trials of xenotransplantation, it is difficult to identify baboons with a low or negative CDC to TKO pigs. For pig-to-baboon organ transplantation, the use of GTKO/ß4GalNT2KO pigs would be preferable. The use of SPF baboons as recipients might be a minor advantage.

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on primate complement-dependent cytotoxicity of genetically engineered pig cells: relevance to clinical xenotransplantation.

Triple-knockout (TKO) pigs may be ideal sources of organs for clinical xenotransplantation because many humans have no preformed antibody to TKO pig cells. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is widely used for severe infection or the treatment/prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in allotransplantation. Anti-pig antibodies in IVIg could be harmful in clinical xenotransplantation. It is unknown whether anti-TKO pig antibodies are present in IVIg. The main aim of this study was to investigate in vitro whether IVIg contains anti-TKO pig antibodies with cytotoxic effect to pig cells. Undiluted pooled human serum (HS) and five different commercial preparations of IVIg were tested for IgM and IgG binding to red blood cells (RBCs) from wild-type (WT), α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO), and TKO pigs by flow cytometry. Complement-dependent lysis of IVIg against these pig pRBCs was measured by hemolytic assay. Pooled HS and 4 of 5 IVIg commercial preparations contained anti-pig IgG that bound to WT and GTKO pRBCs, but not to TKO pRBCs. One preparation of IVIg contained antibodies that bound to TKO pRBCs, but there was no cytotoxicity of IVIg to TKO pRBCs. The results suggest that IVIg administration to human recipients of TKO pig grafts would be safe. However, the specific preparation of IVIg would need to be screened before its administration.

The final obstacle to successful pre-clinical xenotransplantation?

Genetically engineered pigs are now available for xenotransplantation in which all three known carbohydrate xenoantigens, against which humans have natural antibodies, have been deleted (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs). Furthermore, multiple human transgenes have been expressed in the TKO pigs, all of which are aimed at protecting the cells from the human immune response. Many human sera demonstrate no or minimal antibody binding to, and little or no cytotoxicity of, cells from these pigs, and this is associated with a relatively low T-cell proliferative response. Unfortunately, baboons and other Old World NHPs have antibodies against TKO pig cells, apparently directed to a fourth xenoantigen that appears to be exposed after TKO. In our experience, most, if not all, humans do not have natural antibodies against this fourth xenoantigen. This discrepancy between NHPs and humans is providing a hurdle to successful translation of pig organ transplantation into the clinic, and making it difficult to provide pre-clinical data that support initiation of a clinical trial. The potential methods by which this obstacle might be overcome are discussed. We conclude that, whatever currently available genetically engineered pig is selected for the final pre-clinical studies, this may not be the optimal pig for clinical trials.