Cognitive functioning following brain irradiation as part of cancer treatment: Characterizing better cognitive performance.

OBJECTIVE: Although brain radiation therapy (RT) impacts cognitive function, little is known about the subset of survivors with minimal cognitive deficits. This study compares the characteristics of patients receiving brain irradiation as part of cancer treatment with minimal cognitive deficits to those with poorer cognitive functioning. METHODS: Adults at least 6 months postbrain RT (N = 198) completed cognitive measures of attention, memory, and executive functions. Cognitive functioning was categorized into better- and poorer-performing groups, with better-performing survivors scoring no worse than 1.5 standard deviations below the published normative mean on all cognitive measures. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with better-performing group membership. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of the sample met the criteria for the better-performing group. In unadjusted analyses, RT type (whole brain irradiation and partial brain irradiation), sedating medications, and fatigue were independently associated with cognition. Sociodemographic and other clinical characteristics were not significant. In adjusted analyses, only fatigue remained significantly associated with group membership (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09, P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: There is a subgroup of survivors with minimal long-term cognitive deficits despite undergoing a full course of brain RT as part of cancer treatment. Lower fatigue had the strongest association with better cognitive performance. Interventions targeting cancer-related fatigue may help buffer the neurotoxic effects of brain RT.

Treatment of Radiation-Induced Cognitive Decline in Adult Brain Tumor Patients.

OPINION STATEMENT: Patients with either primary or metastatic brain tumors quite often have cognitive impairment. Maintaining cognitive function is important to brain tumor patients and a decline in cognitive function is generally accompanied by a decline in functional independence and performance status. Cognitive decline can be a result of tumor progression, depression/anxiety, fatigue/sleep dysfunction, or the treatments they have received. It is our opinion that providers treating brain tumor patients should obtain pre-treatment and serial cognitive testing in their patients and offer mitigating and therapeutic interventions when appropriate. They should also support cognition-focused clinical trials.

Mild cognitive impairment in long-term brain tumor survivors following brain irradiation.

INTRODUCTION: There is no accepted classification of cognitive impairment in cancer survivors. We assess the extent of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) syndrome in brain tumor survivors using criteria adapted from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cognitive data of brain tumor survivors post-radiation therapy (RT) enrolled from 2008 to 2011 in a randomized trial of donepezil versus placebo for cognitive impairment. One hundred and ninety eight adult survivors with primary or metastatic brain tumors who were ≥ 6 months post RT were recruited at 24 sites in the United States. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks post-randomization. For this analysis, we used baseline data to identify MCI and possible dementia using adapted NIA-AA criteria. Cases were subtyped into four groups: amnestic MCI-single domain (aMCI-sd), amnestic MCI-multiple domain (aMCI-md), non-amnestic MCI-single domain (naMCI-sd), and non-amnestic MCI-multiple domain (naMCI-md). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty one of 197 evaluable patients (66%) met criteria for MCI. Of these, 13% were classified as aMCI-sd, 58% as aMCI-md, 19% as naMCI-sd, and 10% as naMCI-md. Patients with poorer performance status, less education, lower household income and those not working outside the home were more likely to be classified as MCI. CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of post-RT brain tumor survivors met NIA-AA criteria for MCI. This taxonomy may be useful when applied to brain tumor survivors because it defines cognitive phenotypes that may be differentially associated with course, treatment response, and risk factor profiles.

Safety of pioglitazone during and after radiation therapy in patients with brain tumors: a phase I clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation-induced cognitive decline (RICD) is a late effect of radiotherapy (RT) occurring in 30-50% of irradiated brain tumor survivors. In preclinical models, pioglitazone prevents RICD but there are little safety data on its use in non-diabetic patients. We conducted a dose-escalation trial to determine the safety of pioglitazone taken during and after brain irradiation. METHODS: We enrolled patients > 18 years old with primary or metastatic brain tumors slated to receive at least 10 treatments of RT (≤ 3 Gy per fraction). We evaluated the safety of pioglitazone at 22.5 mg and 45 mg with a dose-escalation phase and dose-expansion phase. Pioglitazone was taken daily during RT and for 6 months after. RESULTS: 18 patients with a mean age of 54 were enrolled between 2010 and 2014. 14 patients had metastatic brain tumors and were treated with whole brain RT. Four patients had primary brain tumors and received partial brain RT and concurrent chemotherapy. No DLTs were identified. In the dose-escalation phase, there were only three instances of grade ≥ 3 toxicity: one instance of neuropathy in a patient receiving 22.5 mg, one instance of fatigue in a patient receiving 22.5 mg and one instance of dizziness in a patient receiving 45 mg. The attribution in each of these cases was considered "possible." In the dose-expansion phase, nine patients received 45 mg and there was only one grade 3 toxicity (fatigue) possibly attributable to pioglitazone. CONCLUSION: Pioglitazone was well tolerated by brain tumor patients undergoing RT. 45 mg is a safe dose to use in future efficacy trials.