Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(9): 2520-2523, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916878

ABSTRACT

Background: Family support (FS) is a key social determinant of health for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) young adults. We examined the association between FS and health outcomes in young adults seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) from a US telehealth service. Methods: Cross-sectional data from TGD young adults ages 18-24 (n = 7,740) who provided demographic information and information on FS at intake were analyzed. Relationships between FS, geography, insurance status, rates of depression, and smoking status were examined. Results: Less than half of respondents reported having FS. Patients with FS reported lower rates of depression and higher incidence of previous gender-affirming medical care (e.g., hormone therapy, surgeries), had lower rates of being uninsured, and were more likely to reside in the Northeast or Western United States. Young adults assigned female at birth had higher rates of FS. Conclusion: FS may mitigate mental health disparities in TGD young adults including rates of depression. FS and insurance status are closely related in a geographically diverse population seeking telehealth services. The finding underscores the importance of FS as a social determinant of health and the unique characteristics of patients seeking telehealth services.


Subject(s)
Depression , Telemedicine , Transgender Persons , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Transgender Persons/psychology , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , United States , Depression/epidemiology , Social Support , Adult , Family/psychology , Hormone Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Hormone Replacement Therapy/methods , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Family Support
2.
JAMA Surg ; 157(9): 799-806, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793109

ABSTRACT

Importance: Genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is safe and offers substantial benefits to patients. Geographic accessibility and high out-of-pocket (OOP) costs reportedly hinder access; however, to date, this has not been thoroughly investigated at the national level. Objective: To estimate OOP and total costs for GAS among commercially insured beneficiaries and assess whether costs differed between surgical procedures conducted in and outside the patient's state of residence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used previously collected insurance data from the MarketScan Commercial Database (129 million patients) from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019. Vaginoplasties and phalloplasties were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes among patients aged 18 to 64 years. Out-of-state surgical procedures were identified based on residence at enrollment and place of service of the surgery. Data analysis took place from July 1 to September 31, 2021. Exposures: Vaginoplasty and phalloplasty. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were differences in OOP and total costs by out-of-state designation, census region, age, and insurance type for surgical procedures, estimated using multivariable linear regression models. Results: The study included 771 patients who underwent GAS. A total of 609 underwent vaginoplasty, of whom 249 (41%) underwent surgery in their state of residence (mean [SD] age, 38.7 [13.1] years) and 340 (56%) underwent surgery outside their state (mean [SD] age, 38.1 [13.0] years), and 162 underwent phalloplasty, of whom 66 (41%) underwent surgery in their state of residence (mean [SD] age, of 39.7 [11.6] years) and 81 (50%) underwent surgery outside their state (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [10.9] years); 20 vaginoplasties (3%) and 15 phalloplasties (9%) could not be classified as in or out of state owing to missing data about the facility or residence. Procedures outside the state were associated with 49% (95% CI, 19%-85%) higher OOP costs compared with procedures done in the state of residence. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, 56% of patients who underwent vaginoplasty and 50% of patients who underwent phalloplasty underwent the procedure outside their state of residence. Patients who underwent these procedures outside their state also experienced higher OOP costs than did those who underwent these procedures in their state. Improving geographic access and understanding patient preferences for surgical care may help reduce the cost burden for those planning to undergo GAS.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Sex Reassignment Surgery , Adult , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genitalia , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL