Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Blood Adv ; 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713893

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor, has a promising single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), but remissions were generally short, which calls for rational drug combinations. Using a panel of 21 lymphoma and leukemia cell lines and 28 primary samples we demonstrated strong synergy between venetoclax and A1155463, a BCL-XL inhibitor. Immunoprecipitation experiments, and studies on clones with knockout of expression, or transgenic expression of BCL-XL confirmed its key role in mediating inherent and acquired venetoclax resistance. Of note, the venetoclax and A1155463 combination was synthetically lethal even in the cell lines with lack of expression of the pro-apoptotic BCL2L11/BIM, and in the derived clones with genetic knockout of BCL2L11/BIM. This is clinically important because BCL2L11/BIM deletion, downregulation, or sequestration results in venetoclax resistance. Immunoprecipitation experiments further suggested that the pro-apoptotic effector BAX belongs to principal mediators of the venetoclax and A1155463 mode of action in the BIM-deficient cells. Lastly, the efficacy of the new pro-apoptotic combination was confirmed in vivo on a panel of 9 PDX models including MCL (n = 3), B-ALL (n = 2), T-ALL (n = 1), and DLBCL (n = 3). Because continuous inhibition of BCL-XL causes thrombocytopenia, we proposed and tested an interrupted 4 days ON / 3 days OFF treatment regimen, which retained the desired anti-tumor synergy with manageable platelet toxicity. The proposed VEN and A1155463 combination represents an innovative chemotherapy-free regimen with significant preclinical activity across diverse BCL2-positive hematologic malignancies irrespective of the BCL1L11/BIM status.

3.
Leukemia ; 38(2): 318-325, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38129513

ABSTRACT

Membrane transporters are important determinants of drug bioavailability. Their expression and activity affect the intracellular drug concentration in leukemic cells impacting response to therapy. Pharmacogenomics represents genetic markers that reflect allele arrangement of genes encoding drug transporters associated with treatment response. In previous work, we identified SNP rs460089 located in the promotor of SLC22A4 gene encoding imatinib transporter OCTN1 as influential on response of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. Patients with rs460089-GC pharmacogenotype had significantly superior response to first-line imatinib treatment compared to patients with rs460089-GG. This study investigated whether pharmacogenotypes of rs460089 are associated with sustainability of treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients from the EUROpean Stop Kinase Inhibitor (EURO-SKI) trial. In the learning sample, 176 patients showed a significantly higher 6-month probability of molecular relapse free survival (MRFS) in patients with GC genotype (73%, 95% CI: 60-82%) compared to patients with GG (51%, 95% CI: 41-61%). Also over time, patients with GC genotype had significantly higher MRFS probabilities compared with patients with GG (HR: 0.474, 95% CI: 0.280-0.802, p = 0.0054). Both results were validated with data on 93 patients from the Polish STOP imatinib study. In multiple regression models, in addition to the investigated genotype, duration of TKI therapy (EURO-SKI trial) and duration of deep molecular response (Polish study) were identified as independent prognostic factors. The SNP rs460089 was found as an independent predictor of TFR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Membrane Transport Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
4.
Front Oncol ; 11: 744373, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34616685

ABSTRACT

Somatic mutations are a common molecular mechanism through which chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells acquire resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy. While most of the mutations in the kinase domain of BCR-ABL1 can be successfully managed, the recurrent somatic mutations in other genes may be therapeutically challenging. Despite the major clinical relevance of mutation-associated resistance in CML, the mechanisms underlying mutation acquisition in TKI-treated leukemic cells are not well understood. This work demonstrated de novo acquisition of mutations on isolated single-cell sorted CML clones growing in the presence of imatinib. The acquisition of mutations was associated with the significantly increased expression of the LIG1 and PARP1 genes involved in the error-prone alternative nonhomologous end-joining pathway, leading to genomic instability, and increased expression of the UNG, FEN and POLD3 genes involved in the base-excision repair (long patch) pathway, allowing point mutagenesis. This work showed in vitro and in vivo that de novo acquisition of resistance-associated mutations in oncogenes is the prevalent method of somatic mutation development in CML under TKIs treatment.

6.
Haematologica ; 103(12): 2016-2025, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30049824

ABSTRACT

The fusion oncoprotein BCR-ABL1 exhibits aberrant tyrosine kinase activity and it has been proposed that it deregulates signaling networks involving both transcription factors and non-coding microRNAs that result in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Previously, microRNA expression profiling showed deregulated expression of miR-150 and miR-155 in CML. In this study, we placed these findings into the broader context of the MYC/miR-150/MYB/miR-155/PU.1 oncogenic network. We propose that up-regulated MYC and miR-155 in CD34+ leukemic stem and progenitor cells, in concert with BCR-ABL1, impair the molecular mechanisms of myeloid differentiation associated with low miR-150 and PU.1 levels. We revealed that MYC directly occupied the -11.7 kb and -0.35 kb regulatory regions in the MIR150 gene. MYC occupancy was markedly increased through BCR-ABL1 activity, causing inhibition of MIR150 gene expression in CML CD34+ and CD34- cells. Furthermore, we found an association between reduced miR-150 levels in CML blast cells and their resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although TKIs successfully disrupted BCR-ABL1 kinase activity in proliferating CML cells, this treatment did not efficiently target quiescent leukemic stem cells. The study presents new evidence regarding the MYC/miR-150/MYB/miR-155/PU.1 leukemic network established by aberrant BCR-ABL1 activity. The key connecting nodes of this network may serve as potential druggable targets to overcome resistance of CML stem and progenitor cells.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics , Genes, myc/genetics , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Adult , Aged , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic/drug effects , HL-60 Cells , Humans , K562 Cells , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
7.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 36(1): 55, 2017 04 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Through high-throughput next-generation sequencing of promoters of solute carrier and ATP-binding cassette genes, which encode drug transporters, we aimed to identify SNPs associated with the response to imatinib administered for first-line treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. METHODS: In silico analysis using publicly available databases was done to select the SLC and ABC genes and their promoters for the next-generation sequencing. SNPs associated with the imatinib response were identified using Fisher's exact probability tests and subjected to the linkage disequilibrium analyses with regulatory loci of concerned genes. We analyzed cumulative achievement of major molecular response and probability of event free survival in relation to identified SNP genotypes in 129 CML patients and performed multivariate analysis for determination of genotypes as independent predictors of outcome. Gene expression analysis of eight cell lines naturally carrying different genotypes was performed to outline an impact of genotypes on the gene expression. RESULTS: We observed significant differences in the frequencies of the rs460089-GC and rs460089-GG (SLC22A4) genotypes among rs2631365-TC (SLC22A5) genotype carriers that were associated with optimal and non-optimal responses, respectively. Loci rs460089 and rs2631365 were in highly significant linkage disequilibrium with 12 regulatory loci in introns of SLC22A4 and SLC22A5 encoding imatinib transporters. Genotype association analysis with the response to imatinib indicated that rs460089-GC carriers had a significantly higher probability of achieving a stable major molecular response (BCR-ABL1 transcript level below or equal to 0.1% in the international scale). In contrast, the rs460089-GG represented a risk factor for imatinib failure, which was significantly higher in rs460089-GG_rs2631365-TC carriers. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study depicted potentially important genetic markers predicting outcome of imatinib treatment, which may be helpful for tailoring therapy in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Organic Cation Transport Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Solute Carrier Family 22 Member 5/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Genotype , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , K562 Cells , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Linkage Disequilibrium , Male , Mutation Rate , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Symporters , Treatment Outcome
8.
PLoS One ; 11(5): e0155959, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27214026

ABSTRACT

Bone marrow transplantation or ponatinib treatment are currently recommended strategies for management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) harboring the T315I mutation and compound or polyclonal mutations. However, in some individual cases, these treatment scenarios cannot be applied. We used an alternative treatment strategy with interferon-α (IFN-α) given solo, sequentially or together with TKI in a group of 6 cases of high risk CML patients, assuming that the TKI-independent mechanism of action may lead to mutant clone repression. IFN-α based individualized therapy decreases of T315I or compound mutations to undetectable levels as assessed by next-generation deep sequencing, which was associated with a molecular response in 4/6 patients. Based on the observed results from immune profiling, we assumed that the principal mechanism leading to the success of the treatment was the immune activation induced with dasatinib pre-treatment followed by restoration of immunological surveillance after application of IFN-α therapy. Moreover, we showed that sensitive measurement of mutated BCR-ABL1 transcript levels augments the safety of this individualized treatment strategy.


Subject(s)
Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Female , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/drug effects , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Interferon-alpha/pharmacology , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
9.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0152234, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27010793

ABSTRACT

GATA-1 and PU.1 are two important hematopoietic transcription factors that mutually inhibit each other in progenitor cells to guide entrance into the erythroid or myeloid lineage, respectively. PU.1 controls its own expression during myelopoiesis by binding to the distal URE enhancer, whose deletion leads to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We herein present evidence that GATA-1 binds to the PU.1 gene and inhibits its expression in human AML-erythroleukemias (EL). Furthermore, GATA-1 together with DNA methyl Transferase I (DNMT1) mediate repression of the PU.1 gene through the URE. Repression of the PU.1 gene involves both DNA methylation at the URE and its histone H3 lysine-K9 methylation and deacetylation as well as the H3K27 methylation at additional DNA elements and the promoter. The GATA-1-mediated inhibition of PU.1 gene transcription in human AML-EL mediated through the URE represents important mechanism that contributes to PU.1 downregulation and leukemogenesis that is sensitive to DNA demethylation therapy.


Subject(s)
GATA1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Cell Differentiation/genetics , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1 , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/genetics , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/metabolism , DNA Methylation/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , GATA1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , Histones/genetics , Humans , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/biosynthesis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/biosynthesis , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
10.
PLoS One ; 9(2): e87448, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24498324

ABSTRACT

CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) can both activate as well as inhibit transcription by forming chromatin loops between regulatory regions and promoters. In this regard, Ctcf binding on non-methylated DNA and its interaction with the Cohesin complex results in differential regulation of the H19/Igf2 locus. Similarly, a role for CTCF has been established in normal hematopoietic development; however its involvement in leukemia remains elusive. Here, we show that Ctcf binds to the imprinting control region of H19/Igf2 in AML blasts. We also demonstrate that Smarca5, which also associates with the Cohesin complex, facilitates Ctcf binding to its target sites on DNA. Furthermore, Smarca5 supports Ctcf functionally and is needed for enhancer-blocking effect at ICR. We next asked whether CTCF and SMARCA5 control the expression of key hematopoiesis regulators. In normally differentiating myeloid cells both CTCF and SMARCA5 together with members of the Cohesin complex are recruited to the SPI1 gene, a key hematopoiesis regulator and leukemia suppressor. Due to DNA methylation, CTCF binding to the SPI1 gene is blocked in AML blasts. Upon AZA-mediated DNA demethylation of human AML blasts, CTCF and SMARCA5 are recruited to the -14.4 Enhancer of SPI1 gene and block its expression. Our data provide new insight into complex SPI1 gene regulation now involving additional key epigenetic factors, CTCF and SMARCA5 that control PU.1 expression at the -14.4 Enhancer.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Acute Disease , Adenosine Triphosphatases/metabolism , Animals , Azacitidine/pharmacology , CCCTC-Binding Factor , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA Methylation/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genomic Imprinting , HeLa Cells , Humans , Immunoblotting , Insulin-Like Growth Factor II/genetics , Insulin-Like Growth Factor II/metabolism , K562 Cells , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/metabolism , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid/metabolism , Leukemia, Myeloid/pathology , Microscopy, Confocal , Protein Binding , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , RNA Interference , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Trans-Activators/metabolism
11.
Kidney Blood Press Res ; 38(1): 142-55, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24685986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Podocytes are typically cultured on collagen I; however, collagen I is absent from healthy glomerular basement membranes. Erythropoietin (EPO) is thought to protect podocytes in vivo. Here, we studied how various types of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and EPO affect podocytes in culture. METHODS: Primary rat podocytes were replated on collagen I, collagen IV, whole ECM extract, laminin, or bare plastic. Cellular adhesion (8 hours after plating), proliferation (5 days, 10 % serum), and resistance to serum deprivation (3 days, 0.5 % serum) were assessed. BrdU incorporation and expression of podocyte-specific markers were employed as measures of cellular proliferation and differentiation, respectively. qPCR was used to verify expression of EPO receptor in cultured podocytes. RESULTS: Cellular adhesion was similar on all ECM proteins and unaffected by EPO. Proliferation was accelerated by laminin and the ECM extract, but the final cell density was similar on all ECM surfaces. Collagen IV supported the serum-deprived cells better than the other ECM proteins. EPO (2-20 ng/ml) improved viability of serum-deprived podocytes on collagen I, collagen IV, and ECM, but not on laminin or bare plastic. The cells expressed mRNA for EPO receptor. CONCLUSION: The physiological ECM proteins are more supportive of primary podocytic cultures compared with collagen I. The protective effects of EPO during serum deprivation are modulated by the cultivation surface.


Subject(s)
Erythropoietin/pharmacology , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/physiology , Kidney Glomerulus/drug effects , Podocytes/drug effects , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Coloring Agents , Extracellular Matrix/drug effects , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Primary Cell Culture , Rats , Receptors, Erythropoietin/biosynthesis , Receptors, Erythropoietin/drug effects , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Tetrazolium Salts , Thiazoles
12.
Blood ; 117(14): 3816-25, 2011 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21296997

ABSTRACT

Elevated levels of microRNA miR-155 represent a candidate pathogenic factor in chronic B-lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). In this study, we present evidence that MYB (v-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog) is overexpressed in a subset of B-CLL patients. MYB physically associates with the promoter of miR-155 host gene (MIR155HG, also known as BIC, B-cell integration cluster) and stimulates its transcription. This coincides with the hypermethylated histone H3K4 residue and spread hyperacetylation of H3K9 at MIR155HG promoter. Our data provide evidence of oncogenic activities of MYB in B-CLL that include its stimulatory role in MIR155HG transcription.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Oncogene Proteins v-myb/physiology , Chromatin/chemistry , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Cluster Analysis , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , HeLa Cells , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/metabolism , Microarray Analysis , Oncogene Proteins v-myb/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Transcription, Genetic/physiology , Transfection , Tumor Cells, Cultured
13.
Mol Cancer Res ; 7(10): 1693-703, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19825991

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1 bind each other on DNA to block transcriptional programs of undesired lineage during hematopoietic commitment. Murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells that coexpress GATA-1 and PU.1 are blocked at the blast stage but respond to molecular removal (downregulation) of PU.1 or addition (upregulation) of GATA-1 by inducing terminal erythroid differentiation. To test whether GATA-1 blocks PU.1 in MEL cells, we have conditionally activated a transgenic PU.1 protein fused with the estrogen receptor ligand-binding domain (PUER), resulting in activation of a myeloid transcriptional program. Gene expression arrays identified components of the PU.1-dependent transcriptome negatively regulated by GATA-1 in MEL cells, including CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (Cebpa) and core-binding factor, beta subunit (Cbfb), which encode two key hematopoietic transcription factors. Inhibition of GATA-1 by small interfering RNA resulted in derepression of PU.1 target genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and reporter assays identified PU.1 motif sequences near Cebpa and Cbfb that are co-occupied by PU.1 and GATA-1 in the leukemic blasts. Significant derepression of Cebpa and Cbfb is achieved in MEL cells by either activation of PU.1 or knockdown of GATA-1. Furthermore, transcriptional regulation of these loci by manipulating the levels of PU.1 and GATA-1 involves quantitative increases in a transcriptionally active chromatin mark: acetylation of histone H3K9. Collectively, we show that either activation of PU.1 or inhibition of GATA-1 efficiently reverses the transcriptional block imposed by GATA-1 and leads to the activation of a myeloid transcriptional program directed by PU.1.


Subject(s)
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/genetics , GATA1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Leukemia/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/metabolism , GATA1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , HeLa Cells , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Leukemia/metabolism , Leukemia/physiopathology , Myeloid Cells/metabolism , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Transcriptional Activation/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...