ABSTRACT
Major head and neck surgery poses a threat to perioperative airway patency. Adverse airway events are associated with significant morbidity, potentially leading to hypoxic brain injury and even death. Following a review of the literature, recommendations regarding airway management in head and neck surgery were developed with multicenter, multidisciplinary agreement among all Irish head and neck units. Immediate extubation is appropriate in many cases where there is a low risk of adverse airway events. Where a prolonged definitive airway is required, elective tracheostomy provides increased airway security postoperatively while delayed extubation may be appropriate in select cases to reduce postoperative morbidity. Local institutional protocols should be developed to care for a tracheostomy once inserted. We provide guidance on decision making surrounding airway management at time of head and neck surgery. All decisions should be agreed between the operating, anesthetic, and critical care teams.
Subject(s)
Airway Management , Humans , Airway Management/methods , Ireland , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Tracheostomy , Clinical Decision-Making , Airway ExtubationABSTRACT
Simulation training in healthcare settings has become a valuable training tool. It provides an ideal formative assessment for interdisciplinary teaching. It provides a high fidelity and highly immersive environment where healthcare staff and students can practice developing their skills in a safe and controlled manner. Simulation training allows staff to practice skills that better prepare them for clinical emergencies, therefore possibly optimising clinical care. While the benefits of simulation education are well understood, establishing a programme for use by critical care staff is complex. Complexities include the highly specialised scenarios that are not typically encountered in non-critical care areas, as well as the need for advanced monitoring equipment, ventilation equipment etc. These 12 tips are intended to assist healthcare educators in navigating the complexities in the establishment of a critical care simulation programme, providing advice on selecting target audiences, learning outcomes, creating a critical care simulation environment and recommendations on evaluation and development of the programme.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Braden scale, one of the most widely used risk assessment tools is often criticized when used in the Intensive Care Unit. Most patients in the Intensive Care Unit are at risk of pressure ulcer development meaning that the Braden score will usually indicate high risk for these patients. This study set out to determine the correlation between Sub-Epidermal Moisture measurements and Braden scores among Intensive Care Unit patients. METHODS: This study employed an observational research design. Braden score was assessed on all study days (1-5), in addition to visual skin assessment and Sub-Epidermal Moisture measurements at the sacrum and heels. Sub-Epidermal Moisture measurements were categorised as low (<0.5), borderline abnormal (≥0.5), and high (≥0.8). Correlation was assessed between Sub-Epidermal Moisture levels and Braden scores. RESULTS: A total of 53 participants were recruited. The median (interquartile range) baseline Braden score was 9 (9-10) and 81 % (n = 43) of participants were at very high/high risk of pressure ulcer development. Braden scores remained relatively constant over time with little fluctuation in scores. 19 % (n = 10) of patients had normal (<0.5) Sub-Epidermal Moisture delta measurements on enrolment, and all developed abnormal measurements by day 2. There were no significant correlations between Braden scores and Sub-Epidermal Moisture measurements. CONCLUSION: Although this was not its original intention, a missing link with the Braden scale is that it does not provide information on how patients are responding to the adverse effects of pressure and shear forces. Furthermore, in patients who are critically unwell, most patients are classified as being "at risk" of pressure ulcer development. Therefore, an objective measure of how patients are responding to pressure and shear forces at different anatomical areas is needed. IMPLICATIONS TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Sub-Epidermal Moisture measurements can offer more information, not only on identifying those who are at risk, but also how those patients are tolerating this risk at different anatomical sites.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/physiopathology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/standards , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , AdultABSTRACT
There is considerable interest in the potential for cell-based therapies, particularly mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their products, as a therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MSCs exert effects via diverse mechanisms including reducing excessive inflammation by modulating neutrophil, macrophage and T-cell function, decreasing pulmonary permeability and lung edema, and promoting tissue repair. Clinical studies indicate that MSCs are safe and well tolerated, with promising therapeutic benefits in specific clinical settings, leading to regulatory approvals of MSCs for specific indications in some countries.This perspective reassesses the therapeutic potential of MSC-based therapies for ARDS given insights from recent cell therapy trials in both COVID-19 and in 'classic' ARDS, and discusses studies in graft-vs.-host disease, one of the few licensed indications for MSC therapies. We identify important unknowns in the current literature, address challenges to clinical translation, and propose an approach to facilitate assessment of the therapeutic promise of MSC-based therapies for ARDS.
Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury , COVID-19 , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Lung , Acute Lung Injury/etiology , Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transfer of all severe TBI patients to a neurosurgical unit (NSU) has been advocated irrespective of levels of complexity and prognostic factors. Previous publications have suggested that only 50% of severe TBI patients in Ireland were managed in NSUs. AIMS: This study aims to audit severe TBI referrals to the National Neurosurgical Centre, to evaluate reasons for nonacceptance, assess for differences in the transferred and not transferred cohorts and to analyse observed and expected mortality rates. METHODS: Data on all patients with TBI referred in 2021 were prospectively collected using an electronic referral system. Patients with severe TBI (GCS ≤ 8 and AIS ≥ 3) were included and dichotomised into transferred and not transferred cohorts. RESULTS: Of 118 patients referred with severe TBI, 45 patients (38.1%) were transferred to the neurosurgical centre. Patients in the transferred cohort were significantly younger (p < 0.001), had a higher GCS score (p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of bilaterally unreactive pupils (p < 0.001) compared to the not transferred cohort. 93% (68/73) of those not transferred were either >65 years old, or had bilaterally unreactive pupils, or both. Based on the IMPACT model, the observed to expected mortality ratios in the transferred and not transferred cohorts were 0.65 (95% CI 0.25-1.05) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.11) respectively. CONCLUSION: The observed mortality rate for severe TBI in Ireland was similar to or better than expected mortality rates when adjusted for important prognostic factors. 93% of severe TBI patients not transferred to a neurosurgical centre were either elderly or had bilaterally unreactive pupils or both. These patients have an extremely poor prognosis and recommendation for transfer cannot be made based on current available evidence.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Humans , Aged , Ireland/epidemiology , Glasgow Coma Scale , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/surgery , Prognosis , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a mainstay of care in neonatal ICUs; however, knowledge gaps exist in relation to its accuracy for identifying seizures in older children. We aimed to review the diagnostic accuracy of existing neonatal seizure detection criteria for seizure detection in older children in hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: PICU/Neurophysiology Department in Dublin. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients (2 mo to 16 yr old) were chosen from a database of formal 10-20 system, 21-lead electroencephalography recordings (2012-2020), comprising 30 studies with seizures, 90 without. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Electroencephalography studies containing electrographic seizures (ESzs) were annotated to describe number, duration, distribution, and spread. Two-channel aEEG (using leads C3-P3, C4-P4) recordings were generated and independently reviewed by a professional specialist in clinical neurophysiology blinded to outcome and without reference to the raw electroencephalography trace. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with correct seizure identification on aEEG. Median patient age was 6.1 years. Abnormal recordings featured 123 seizures. Status epilepticus (SE) was evident by electroencephalography in 10 cases. Using neonatal criteria, aEEG had a sensitivity of 70% and negative predictive value of 90% for identifying any ESz. Accurate detection of individual seizures was diminished when seizures were very short or occurred during waking. Sensitivity for individual seizures was 81% when seizures less than 1 minute were excluded. aEEG correctly identified SE in 70% of the 10 cases, although ESz were confirmed to be present in 80% of this subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: aEEG criteria for neonatal seizure identification can be applied with caution to older children and should be supplemented by formal electroencephalography. Seizure identification is better for longer seizures and those arising from sleep. SE is not always recognized by aEEG among older children.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Status Epilepticus , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/diagnosis , Electroencephalography , Intensive Care Units, NeonatalABSTRACT
Rationale: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may modulate inflammation, promoting repair in coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Objectives: We investigated the safety and efficacy of ORBCEL-C (CD362 [cluster of differentiation 362]-enriched, umbilical cord-derived MSCs) in COVID-19-related ARDS. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, allocation-concealed, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03042143), patients with moderate to severe COVID-19-related ARDS were randomized to receive ORBCEL-C (400 million cells) or placebo (Plasma-Lyte 148). The primary safety and efficacy outcomes were the incidence of serious adverse events and oxygenation index at Day 7, respectively. Secondary outcomes included respiratory compliance, driving pressure, PaO2:FiO2 ratio, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Clinical outcomes relating to duration of ventilation, lengths of ICU and hospital stays, and mortality were collected. Long-term follow-up included diagnosis of interstitial lung disease at 1 year and significant medical events and mortality at 2 years. Transcriptomic analysis was performed on whole blood at Days 0, 4, and 7. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty participants were recruited (final analysis: n = 30 received ORBCEL-C, n = 29 received placebo; 1 participant in the placebo group withdrew consent). Six serious adverse events occurred in the ORBCEL-C group and three in the placebo group (risk ratio, 2.9 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-13.2]; P = 0.25). Day 7 mean (SD) oxygenation index did not differ (ORBCEL-C, 98.3 [57.2] cm H2O/kPa; placebo, 96.6 [67.3] cm H2O/kPa). There were no differences in secondary surrogate outcomes or in mortality at Day 28, Day 90, 1 year, or 2 years. There was no difference in the prevalence of interstitial lung disease at 1 year or significant medical events up to 2 years. ORBCEL-C modulated the peripheral blood transcriptome. Conclusion: ORBCEL-C MSCs were safe in subjects with moderate to severe COVID-19-related ARDS but did not improve surrogates of pulmonary organ dysfunction.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Lung , Stromal CellsABSTRACT
Background: Tracheostomy insertion in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents unique challenges. Patients frequently have high ventilatory requirements, and as an aerosol generating procedure, tracheostomy insertion creates the potential for staff transmission. Problems with tracheostomies contribute to morbidity and mortality, and tracheostomy changes may increase risks of staff transmission. We sought to quantify the incidence of clinically necessitated tracheostomy changes, establish the indications for change and investigate the incidence of staff transmission. Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective, observational cohort study of all intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 who had a tracheostomy between March 2020 and April 2021. The institution is a large tertiary referral centre in Ireland. Results: Forty-three patients had a tracheostomy during the study period. All were a Shiley™ Flexible Adult Taperguard or Shiley™ XLT Tracheostomy. 14 patients (33%) required a tracheostomy change, with the majority (57%) involving a change from a standard size to an extended length tracheostomy. Persistent leak was the most common indication for change (71.6%). Other indications included patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, persistent cough and accidental decannulation. No staff transmission of COVID-19 occurred during this study. Conclusions: The incidence of tracheostomy change was 33%, highlighting the importance of selecting the right tracheostomy for each patient. We discuss how key characteristics of tracheostomies such as type, size, length and inner diameter may impact flow, resistance and work of breathing, leading to unplanned tracheostomy change. No staff transmission occurred arising from tracheostomy insertion, adding to increasing evidence that tracheostomy insertion in COVID-19 appears safe with adherence to guidelines describing the correct use of personal protective equipment.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe COVID-19 is associated with marked endothelial cell (EC) activation that plays a key role in immunothrombosis and pulmonary microvascular occlusion. However, the biological mechanisms through which SARS-CoV-2 causes EC activation and damage remain poorly defined. Objectives: We investigated EC activation in patients with acute COVID-19, and specifically focused on how proteins stored within Weibel-Palade bodies may impact key aspects of disease pathogenesis. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with confirmed COVID-19 were recruited. Weibel-Palade body biomarkers (von Willebrand factor [VWF], angiopoietin-2 [Angpt-2], and osteoprotegerin) and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) levels were determined. In addition, EC activation and angiogenesis were assessed in the presence or absence of COVID-19 plasma incubation. Results: Markedly elevated plasma VWF antigen, Angpt-2, osteoprotegerin, and sTM levels were observed in patients with acute COVID-19. The increased levels of both sTM and Weibel-Palade body components (VWF, osteoprotegerin, and Angpt-2) correlated with COVID-19 severity. Incubation of COVID-19 plasma with ECs triggered enhanced VWF secretion and increased Angpt-2 expression, as well as significantly enhanced in vitro EC tube formation and angiogenesis. Conclusion: We propose that acute SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to a complex and multifactorial EC activation, progressive loss of thrombomodulin, and increased Angpt-2 expression, which collectively serve to promote a local proangiogenic state.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prone positioning has been widely used to improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in patients with severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). One major complication associated with prone positioning is the development of pressure ulcers (PUs). AIM: This study aimed to determine the impact of a prevention care bundle on the incidence of PUs in patients with COVID-19 ARDS undergoing prone positioning in the intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-centre pre and post-test intervention study which adheres to the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) guidelines. The intervention included a care bundle addressing the following: increasing frequency of head turns, use of an open gel head ring, application of prophylactic dressings to bony prominences, use of a pressure redistribution air mattress, education of staff in the early identification of evolving PUs through regular and rigorous skin inspection and engaging in bedside training sessions with nursing and medical staff. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PU development. The secondary outcomes of interest were severity of PU development and the anatomical location of the PUs. RESULTS: In the pre-intervention study, 20 patients were included and 80% (n = 16) of these patients developed PUs, comprising 34 ulcers in total. In the post-intervention study, a further 20 patients were included and 60% (n = 12) of these patients developed PUs, comprising 32 ulcers in total. This marks a 25% reduction in the number of patients developing a PU, and a 6% decrease in the total number of PUs observed. Grade II PUs were the most prevalent in both study groups (65%, n = 22; 88%, n = 28, respectively). In the post-intervention study, there was a reduction in the incidence of grade III and deep tissue injuries (pre-intervention 6%, n = 2 grade III, 6% n = 2 deep tissue injuries; post-intervention no grade III ulcers, grade IV ulcers, or deep tissues injuries were recorded). However, there was an increase in the number of unstageable PUs in the post-intervention group with 6% (n = 2) of PUs being classified as unstageable, meanwhile there were no unstageable PUs in the pre-intervention group. This is an important finding to consider as unstageable PUs can indicate deep tissue damage and therefore need to be considered alongside PUs of a more severe grade (grade III, grade IV, and deep tissue injuries). CONCLUSION: The use of a new evidence-based care bundle for the prevention of PUs in the management of patients in the prone position has the potential to reduce the incidence of PU development. Although improvements were observed following alterations to standard practice, further research is needed to validate these findings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of a new, evidence-based care bundle in the management of patients in the prone position has the potential to reduce the incidence of PUs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pressure Ulcer , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Prone Position , Ulcer/complications , COVID-19/complications , Intensive Care Units , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Suppuration/complicationsABSTRACT
The pathophysiology of sepsis and its accompanying hyper-inflammatory response are key events that lead to multi-organ failure and death. A growing body of literature now suggests that the vascular endothelium plays a critical role in driving early events of sepsis progression. In this study, we demonstrate how endothelial-derived exosomes contribute to a successive pro-inflammatory phenotype of monocytes. Exosomes isolated from S. aureus infected endothelial cells drive both CD11b and MHCII expression in monocytes and contribute dysregulated cytokine production. Conversely, healthy endothelial exosomes had no major effect. microRNA (miRNA) profiling of exosomes identified miR-99 upregulation which we hypothesised as driving this phenotypic change through mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Knockdown of mTOR with miR-99a and miR-99b mimetics in S. aureus infected monocytes increased IL-6 and decreased IL-10 production. Interestingly, inhibition of miRNAs with antagomirs has the opposing effect. Collectively, endothelial exosomes are driving a pro-inflammatory phenotype in monocytes through dysregulated expression of miR-99a and miR-99b.
Subject(s)
Exosomes , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Sepsis , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Exosomes/metabolism , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , Sepsis/genetics , Sepsis/metabolism , Sepsis/pathology , Staphylococcus aureus/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) displaying some typical histological features. These include diffuse alveolar damage with extensive pulmonary coagulation activation. This results in fibrin deposition in the microvasculature, leading to the formation of hyaline membranes in the air sacs. Well-conducted clinical trials have found that nebulised heparin limits pulmonary fibrin deposition, attenuates progression of ARDS, hastens recovery and is safe in non-COVID ARDS. Unfractionated heparin also inactivates the SARS-CoV-2 virus and prevents entry into mammalian cells. Nebulisation of heparin may therefore limit fibrin-mediated lung injury and inhibit pulmonary infection by SARS-CoV-2. Based on these findings, we designed the CHARTER-Ireland Study, a phase 1b/2a randomised controlled study of nebulised heparin in patients requiring advanced respiratory support for COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This is a multi-centre, phase 1b/IIa, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study. The study will randomise 40 SARs-CoV-2-positive patients receiving advanced respiratory support in a critical care area. Randomisation will be via 1:1 allocation to usual care plus nebulised unfractionated heparin 6 hourly to day 10 while receiving advanced respiratory support or usual care only. The study aims to evaluate whether unfractionated heparin will decrease the procoagulant response associated with ARDS up to day 10. The study will also assess safety and tolerability of nebulised heparin as defined by number of severe adverse events; oxygen index and respiratory oxygenation index of intubated and unintubated, respectively; ventilatory ratio; and plasma concentration of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL6, IL-8, IL-10 and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, fibrinogen and lactate dehydrogenase as well as the ratios of IL-1ß/IL-10 and IL-6/IL-10. These parameters will be assessed on days 1, 3, 5 and 10; time to separation from advanced respiratory support, time to discharge from the intensive care unit and number tracheostomised to day 28; and survival to days 28 and 60 and to hospital discharge, censored at day 60. Some clinical outcome data from our study will be included in the international meta-trials, CHARTER and INHALE-HEP. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide evidence of potential therapeutic benefit while establishing safety of nebulised heparin in the management of ARDS associated with SARs-CoV-2 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04511923 . Registered on 13 August 2020. Protocol version 8, 22/12/2021 Protocol identifier: NUIG-2020-003 EudraCT registration number: 2020-003349-12 9 October 2020.
Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury , COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Acute Lung Injury/diagnosis , Acute Lung Injury/etiology , Animals , Fibrin , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Interleukin-10 , Ireland , Mammals , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Split ventilation (using a single ventilator to ventilate multiple patients) is technically feasible. However, connecting two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and differing lung mechanics to a single ventilator is concerning. This study aimed to: (1) determine functionality of a split ventilation system in benchtop tests, (2) determine whether standard ventilation would be superior to split ventilation in a porcine model of ARDS and (3) assess usability of a split ventilation system with minimal specific training. The functionality of a split ventilation system was assessed using test lungs. The usability of the system was assessed in simulated clinical scenarios. The feasibility of the system to provide modified lung protective ventilation was assessed in a porcine model of ARDS (n = 30). In bench testing a split ventilation system independently ventilated two test lungs under conditions of varying compliance and resistance. In usability tests, a high proportion of naïve operators could assemble and use the system. In the porcine model, modified lung protective ventilation was feasible with split ventilation and produced similar respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and biomarkers of lung injury when compared to standard ventilation. Split ventilation can provide some elements of lung protective ventilation and is feasible in bench testing and an in vivo model of ARDS.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Animals , Lung , Respiration , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Mechanics , SwineABSTRACT
AIM: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a bedside neuromonitoring tool, standard within neonatal critical care provision. Its application in children is increasing but normative data underpinning such use are lacking. We present a dataset of normative aEEG values for children aged 2 months to 16 years. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study derives aEEG normative amplitude characteristics from electroencephalograms (EEGs) recorded in Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin. aEEG was derived from 350 normal EEGs, recorded in children aged 2 months to 16 years. Supplementary aEEGs were derived from children with abnormal EEG traces. Median upper and lower margin amplitudes and bandwidth were calculated from 5 min waking and sleeping EEG epochs. RESULTS: aEEG amplitudes vary with age and state, increasing over the first 2 years of life before diminishing. Upper and lower margin amplitudes and bandwidth are greater during sleep for children <6 years. Reference ranges may be cohorted into two groups (upper and lower reference limits; <6 years - 38 µV/7 µV awake, 54 µV/10 µV asleep; >6 years - 33 µV/5 µV awake, 36 µV/6 µV asleep). CONCLUSION: aEEG traces evolve with age in childhood and differ from neonatal values. We provide a comprehensive set of aEEG normatives to facilitate clinical interpretation in older children.
Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , IrelandABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess evidence related to the measuring of subepidermal moisture (SEM) to detect early, nonvisible development of pressure ulcers (PUs). METHOD: Using systematic review methodology, all quantitative animal and human research studies written in English were considered. In January 2021, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched. The primary outcome of interest was the validity of SEM measurement to detect early PU development. The secondary outcome was time to PU detection, sensitivity and specificity of SEM measurement, and the impact of SEM measurements on PU prevention. Data analysis was undertaken using RevMan and narrative synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. In all studies, a consistent abnormal deviation in SEM measurements corresponded with evidence of visual PU development. Time to PU development, explored in four studies, showed earlier detection of PU development using SEM measurement. RevMan analysis identified the mean difference in time to PU development (SEM measurement versus visual skin assessment, VSA) was 4.61 days (95% confidence interval: 3.94-5.28; p=0.0001) in favour of SEM measurements. The sensitivity of SEM measurements was reported in four studies, and scores varied from 48.3% to 100.0%. Specificity was also reported in four studies and scores ranged from 24.4% to 83.0%. The impact of the detection of abnormal SEM measurements on PU prevention was explored by one study. Results showed a 93% decrease in PU rates when staff acted on the results of the SEM readings. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review identified that SEM measurement detects PU development earlier than VSA. Furthermore, when staff responded to abnormal SEM measurements, prevention strategies were enhanced, with a subsequent reduction in visible PU development. SEM measurement may therefore be a useful addition to PU prevention strategies. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The School of Nursing & Midwifery, RCSI has a research agreement with Bruin Biometrics. Funding for the study was through an Irish Research Council PhD Enterprise Partnership Scheme with Bruin Biometrics. The authors have no other conflicts of interest.
Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Physical Examination , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skin CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prolonged recovery is common after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning Long COVID syndrome remain unknown. VWF/ADAMTS-13 imbalance, dysregulated angiogenesis, and immunothrombosis are hallmarks of acute COVID-19. We hypothesized that VWF/ADAMTS-13 imbalance persists in convalescence together with endothelial cell (EC) activation and angiogenic disturbance. Additionally, we postulate that ongoing immune cell dysfunction may be linked to sustained EC and coagulation activation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients were reviewed at a minimum of 6 weeks following acute COVID-19. ADAMTS-13, Weibel Palade Body (WPB) proteins, and angiogenesis-related proteins were assessed and clinical evaluation and immunophenotyping performed. Comparisons were made with healthy controls (n = 20) and acute COVID-19 patients (n = 36). RESULTS: ADAMTS-13 levels were reduced (p = 0.009) and the VWF-ADAMTS-13 ratio was increased in convalescence (p = 0.0004). Levels of platelet factor 4 (PF4), a putative protector of VWF, were also elevated (p = 0.0001). A non-significant increase in WPB proteins Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) was observed in convalescent patients and WPB markers correlated with EC parameters. Enhanced expression of 21 angiogenesis-related proteins was observed in convalescent COVID-19. Finally, immunophenotyping revealed significantly elevated intermediate monocytes and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in convalescence, which correlated with thrombin generation and endotheliopathy markers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data provide insights into sustained EC activation, dysregulated angiogenesis, and VWF/ADAMTS-13 axis imbalance in convalescent COVID-19. In keeping with the pivotal role of immunothrombosis in acute COVID-19, our findings support the hypothesis that abnormal T cell and monocyte populations may be important in the context of persistent EC activation and hemostatic dysfunction during convalescence.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemostatics , ADAMTS13 Protein , Angiopoietin-2 , COVID-19/complications , Convalescence , Humans , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Osteoprotegerin , Platelet Factor 4 , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombin , von Willebrand Factor/metabolism , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be of benefit in ARDS due to immunomodulatory and reparative properties. This trial investigates a novel CD362 enriched umbilical cord derived MSC product (REALIST ORBCEL-C), produced to Good Manufacturing Practice standards, in patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to COVID-19 and ARDS due to other causes. METHODS: Phase 1 is a multicentre open-label dose-escalation pilot trial. Patients will receive a single infusion of REALIST ORBCEL-C (100 × 106 cells, 200 × 106 cells or 400 × 106 cells) in a 3 + 3 design. Phase 2 is a multicentre randomised, triple blind, allocation concealed placebo-controlled trial. Two cohorts of patients, with ARDS due to COVID-19 or ARDS due to other causes, will be recruited and randomised 1:1 to receive either a single infusion of REALIST ORBCEL-C (400 × 106 cells or maximal tolerated dose in phase 1) or placebo. Planned recruitment to each cohort is 60 patients. The primary safety outcome is the incidence of serious adverse events. The primary efficacy outcome is oxygenation index at day 7. The trial will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT 2010) statement. DISCUSSION: The development and manufacture of an advanced therapy medicinal product to Good Manufacturing Practice standards within NHS infrastructure are discussed, including challenges encountered during the early stages of trial set up. The rationale to include a separate cohort of patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 in phase 2 of the trial is outlined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03042143. Registered on 3 February 2017. EudraCT Number 2017-000584-33.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Monitoring and optimisation of brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) has been associated with improved neurological outcome and survival in observational studies of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We carried out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to determine if PbtO2-guided management is associated with differential neurological outcomes, survival, and adverse events. Searches were carried out to 10 February 2022 in Medline (OvidSP), 11 February in EMBASE (OvidSP) and 8 February in Cochrane library. Randomized controlled trials comparing PbtO2 and ICP-guided management to ICP-guided management alone were included. The primary outcome was survival with favourable neurological outcome at 6-months post injury. Data were extracted by two independent authors and GRADE certainty of evidence assessed. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes with PbtO2-guided management (relative risk [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.08; p = 0.07; I2 = 0%, very low certainty evidence) but PbtO2-guided management was associated with reduced mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.93; p = 0.03; I2 = 42%; very low certainty evidence) and ICP (mean difference (MD) - 4.62, 95% CI - 8.27 to - 0.98; p = 0.01; I2 = 63%; very low certainty evidence). There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events. PbtO2-guided management in addition to ICP-based care was not significantly associated with increased favourable neurological outcomes, but was associated with increased survival and reduced ICP, with no difference in respiratory or cardiovascular adverse events. However, based on GRADE criteria, the certainty of evidence provided by this meta-analysis was consistently very low. MESH: Brain Ischemia; Intensive Care; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Randomized Controlled Trial; Craniocerebral Trauma.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Intracranial Pressure , Brain , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Humans , OxygenABSTRACT
Background: Patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop a febrile pro-inflammatory cytokinemia with accelerated progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Here we report the results of a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous (IV) plasma-purified alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) for moderate to severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 (EudraCT 2020-001391-15). Methods: Patients (n = 36) were randomized to receive weekly placebo, weekly AAT (Prolastin, Grifols, S.A.; 120 mg/kg), or AAT once followed by weekly placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentration at 1 week. In addition to assessing safety and tolerability, changes in plasma levels of IL-1ß, IL-8, IL-10, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and clinical outcomes were assessed as secondary endpoints. Findings: Treatment with IV AAT resulted in decreased inflammation and was safe and well tolerated. The study met its primary endpoint, with decreased circulating IL-6 concentrations at 1 week in the treatment group. This was in contrast to the placebo group, where IL-6 was increased. Similarly, plasma sTNFR1 was substantially decreased in the treatment group while remaining unchanged in patients receiving placebo. IV AAT did not definitively reduce levels of IL-1ß, IL-8, and IL-10. No difference in mortality or ventilator-free days was observed between groups, although a trend toward decreased time on ventilator was observed in AAT-treated patients. Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe ARDS, treatment with IV AAT was safe, feasible, and biochemically efficacious. The data support progression to a phase 3 trial and prompt further investigation of AAT as an anti-inflammatory therapeutic. Funding: ECSA-2020-009; Elaine Galwey Research Bursary.