Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 9(5)2017 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492492

ABSTRACT

Controversy exists as to whether high glycemic index/glycemic load (GI/GL) diets increase the risk of chronic inflammation, which has been postulated as a pathogenic intermediary between such diets and age-related alterations in body composition and insulin resistance. We conducted an ancillary study to a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the effects of a whey protein supplement (PRO, n = 38) and a maltodextrin supplement (CHO, n = 46) on bone density to evaluate the impact of a calibrated increase in GI/GL on inflammation, insulin resistance, and body composition in a healthy aging population. Markers of inflammation, HOMA, body composition, and GI/GL (estimated from 3-day food records) were assessed at baseline and 18 months. By 18 months, the GL in the CHO group increased by 34%, 88.4 ± 5.2 → 118.5 ± 4.9 and did not change in the PRO group, 86.5 ± 4.1 → 82.0 ± 3.6 (p < 0.0001). Despite this change there were no differences in serum CRP, IL-6, or HOMA at 18 months between the two groups, nor were there significant associations between GL and inflammatory markers. However, trunk lean mass (p = 0.0375) and total lean mass (p = 0.038) were higher in the PRO group compared to the CHO group at 18 months There were also significant associations for GL and change in total fat mass (r = 0.3, p = 0.01), change in BMI (r = 0.3, p = 0.005), and change in the lean-to-fat mass ratio (r = -0.3, p = 0.002). Our data suggest that as dietary GL increases within the moderate range, there is no detectable change in markers of inflammation or insulin resistance, despite which there is a negative effect on body composition.


Subject(s)
Diet , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Glycemic Index , Inflammation , Insulin Resistance , Aged , Biomarkers , Body Composition , Female , Humans , Polysaccharides/administration & dosage , Postmenopause , United States , Whey Proteins/administration & dosage
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 100(6): 2214-22, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844619

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: It has been assumed that the increase in urine calcium (Ca) that accompanies an increase in dietary protein was due to increased bone resorption. However, studies using stable Ca isotopes have found that dietary protein increases Ca absorption without increasing bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of a moderately high protein diet on bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of protein supplementation daily for 18 months. SETTING: The study was conducted at two institutional research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eight older women and men with a body mass index between 19 and 32 kg/m(2) and a self-reported protein intake between 0.6 and 1.0 g/kg participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were asked to incorporate either a 45-g whey protein or isocaloric maltodextrin supplement into their usual diet for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, body composition, and markers of skeletal and mineral metabolism were measured at baseline and at 9 and 18 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for changes in L-spine BMD (primary outcome) or the other skeletal sites of interest. Truncal lean mass was significantly higher in the protein group at 18 months (P = .048). C-terminal telopeptide (P = .0414), IGF-1 (P = .0054), and urinary urea (P < .001) were also higher in the protein group at the end of the study period. There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that protein supplementation above the recommended dietary allowance (0.8 g/kg) may preserve fat-free mass without adversely affecting skeletal health or renal function in healthy older adults.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/drug effects , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Dietary Proteins/pharmacology , Milk Proteins/pharmacology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/drug effects , Aging/metabolism , Body Composition/drug effects , Bone and Bones/anatomy & histology , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size/drug effects , Whey Proteins , White People
3.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol ; 148: 41-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239596

ABSTRACT

The Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) has identified ID-LC/MS/MS as the reference method procedure (RMP) for 25(OH) vitamin D and NIST Standard SRM2972 as the standard reference material (SRM). As manufacturers align their products to the RMP and NIST standard, a concern is that results obtained in aligned assays will be divergent from those obtained with pre-alignment assays. The Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd., chemiluminescent, 25(OH) vitamin D iSYS platform assay, was recently harmonized to the RMP. To determine the impact of standardization on results obtained with iSYS reagents, 119 single donor serum samples from eight different disease categories were analyzed in four non-standardized and two standardized iSYS assays. There were strong correlations between the four non-standardized and two standardized assays with Spearman's rank r values between 0.975 and 0.961 and four of the eight r values were >0.97. R(2) values for the eight best-fit linear regression equations ranging between 0.947 and 0.916. None of the slopes were found to be significantly different from one another. Bland-Altman plots showed that the bias was comparable when each of the four non-standardized assays was compared to either of the standardized assays. When the data were segregated in values between 6 and 49ng/mL (15-122nmol/L) or between 50 and 100ng/mL (125-250nmol/L) significant associations remained between results obtained with non-standardized and standardized calibrators regardless of the absolute value. When five recent DEQAS unknowns were analyzed in one non-standardized and one standardized assay the mean percent difference from the NIST target in values obtained using standardized vs. non-standardized calibrators were not significantly different. Finally, strong and statistically significant associations between the results were obtained using non-standardized and standardized assays for six of eight clinical conditions. The only exceptions were hypocalcemia and breast cancer, which likely reflect the small sample sizes for each of these diseases. These initial data provide confidence that the move to a NIST standardized assay will have little impact on results obtained with the iSYS platform. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled '17th Vitamin D Workshop'.


Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis/standards , Disease , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood , Automation, Laboratory , Calibration , Humans , Luminescent Measurements/standards , Radioimmunoassay/standards , Reference Standards , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL