ABSTRACT
The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a challenge for healthcare systems, especially in case of patients undergoing major surgery. Despite a proven significant reduction in postoperative complications and hospital lengths of stay, ERAS protocols are inconsistently used in real-world practice, and barriers have been poorly described in a cohort comprising medical and paramedical professionals. This study aims to assess the proportion of French healthcare providers who practiced ERAS and to identify barriers to its implementation amongst those surveyed. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to survey healthcare providers about their practice of ERAS using an online questionnaire. Healthcare providers were contacted through hospital requests, private hospital group requests, professional corporation requests, social networks, and personal contacts. The questionnaire was also designed to explore barriers to ERAS implementation. Identified barriers were allocated by two independent assessors to one of the fourteen domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is an integrative framework based on behavior change theories that can be used to identify issues relating to evidence on the implementation of best practice in healthcare settings. One hundred and fifty-three French healthcare providers answered the online questionnaire (76% female, median age 35 years (IQR: 29 to 48)). Physiotherapists, nurses, and dieticians were the most represented professions (31.4%, 24.2%, and, 14.4%, respectively). Amongst those surveyed, thirty-one practiced ERAS (20.3%, 95%CI: 13.9 to 26.63). Major barriers to ERAS practice were related to the "Environmental context and resources" domain (57.6%, 95%CI: 49.5-65.4), e.g., lack of professionals, funding, and coordination, and the "Knowledge" domain (52.8%, 95%CI: 44.7-60.8), e.g., ERAS unawareness. ERAS in major surgery is seldom practiced in France due to the unfavorable environment (i.e., logistics issues, and lack of professionals and funding) and a low rate of procedure awareness. Future studies should focus on devising and assessing strategies (e.g., education and training, collaboration, institutional support, the development of healthcare networks, and leveraging telehealth and technology) to overcome these barriers, thereby promoting the wider implementation of ERAS.
ABSTRACT
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is one of the leading causes of admission to the intensive care unit, often triggered by a respiratory tract infection of bacterial or viral aetiology. Managing antibiotic therapy in this context remains a challenge. Respiratory panel molecular tests allow identifying viral aetiologies of AECOPD. We hypothesized that the systematic use of a respiratory multiplex PCR (mPCR) would help antibiotics saving in severe AECOPD. Our objectives were to describe the spectrum of infectious aetiologies of severe AECOPD, using a diagnostic approach combining conventional diagnostic tests and mPCR, and to measure antibiotics exposure. The study was bicentric, prospective, observational, and included 105 critically ill patients with a severe AECOPD of presumed infectious aetiology, in whom a respiratory mPCR with a viral panel was performed in addition to conventional microbiological tests. Altogether, the microbiological documentation rate was 50%, including bacteria alone (19%), respiratory viruses alone (16%), and mixed viruses and bacterial species (16%). The duration of antibiotic therapy was shorter in patients without documented bacterial infection (5.6 vs. 9 days; P = 0.0006). This pilot study suggests that molecular tests may help for the proper use of anti-infective treatments in critically ill patients with severe AECOPD.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Viruses , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Illness , Disease Progression , Intensive Care Units , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pilot Projects , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the elderly. We aimed to assess if the effectiveness of long-term NIV of patients ≥ 80 years (older) was not greatly inferior to that of patients < 75 years (younger). METHODS: This retrospective exposed/unexposed cohort study included all patients established on long-term NIV treated at Rouen University Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Follow-up data were collected at the first visit following NIV initiation. The primary outcome was daytime PaCO2 with a non-inferiority margin of 50% of the improvement of PaCO2 for older patients compared to younger patients. RESULTS: We included 55 older patients and 88 younger patients. After adjustment on the baseline PaCO2, the mean daytime PaCO2 was reduced by 0.95 (95% CI: 0.67; 1.23) kPa in older patients compared to1.03 (95% CI: 0.81; 1.24) kPa in younger patients for a ratio of improvements estimated at 0.95/1.03 = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.59; 1.27, one-sided p = 0.007 for non-inferiority to 0.50). Median (interquartile range) daily use was 6 (4; 8.1) hours in older versus 7.3 (5; 8.4) hours in younger patients. No significant differences were seen in the quality of sleep and NIV safety. The 24-months survival was 63.6% in older and 87.2% in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: effectiveness and safety seemed acceptable in older patients, with a life expectancy long enough to expect a mid-term benefit, suggesting that initiation of long-term NIV should not be refused only based on age. Prospective studies are needed.
Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapyABSTRACT
Video abstracts have been proposed as a tool to disseminate research through to social networks. However, its association with metrics of research dissemination has not been adequately investigated, particularly in the field of medical research. The aim of this study was to assess the association between video abstracts and citations, views and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) of research papers. A cross-sectional study of research reports published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) over a 3-year period was conducted. An inverse binomial regression was used to assess factors associated with citations, views and AAS. The model included the presence of video abstracts as well as other independent covariables as potential confounding factors. 500 research reports were included in the analysis and 152 benefited from a video abstract. The median time from publication was 3.0 (2.2 to 3.6) years and 72% were RCTs. Research reports published with a video abstract were associated with an increase in citations (IRR 1.15), although this estimate came with uncertainty ranging from virtually no effect to a worthwhile effect (95% CI 0.98 to 1.35). There were also associated with a worthwhile increase in views (IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.54) as well as with an increase in AAS (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.44). To conclude, video abstracts are associated with a worthwhile increase in the number of views of research reports. They are also associated with an increase in citations and social attention, although the association may be small. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-023-04675-9.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Respiratory muscle activity is increased in patients with chronic respiratory disease. 18 F-FDG-PET/CT can assess respiratory muscle activity. We hypothesized that respiratory muscles metabolism was correlated to lung function impairment and was associated to prognosis in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery based on the research question whether respiratory muscle metabolism quantitatively correlates with the severity of lung function impairment in patients? Does respiratory muscle hypermetabolism have prognostic value? METHODS: Patients undergoing 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and pulmonary function tests prior to lung cancer surgery were identified. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVm) were measured in each respiratory muscle group (sternocleidomastoid, scalene, intercostal, diaphragm), normalized against deltoid SUVm. Respiratory muscle hypermetabolism was defined as SUVm >90th centile in any respiratory muscle group. Clinical outcomes were collected from a prospective cohort. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six patients were included, mostly male [110 (71%)], 53 (34%) with previous diagnosis of COPD. Respiratory muscle SUVm were: scalene: 1.84 [1.51-2.25], sternocleidomastoid 1.64 [1.34-1.95], intercostal 1.01 [0.84-1.16], diaphragm 1.79 [1.41-2.27]. Tracer uptake was inversely correlated to FEV1 for the scalene (r = -0.29, p < 0.001) and SCM (r = -0.17, p = 0.03) respiratory muscle groups and positively correlated to TLC for the scalene (r = 0.17, p = 0.04). Respiratory muscle hypermetabolism was found in 45 patients (28.8%), who had a lower VO2 max (15.4 [14.2-17.5] vs. 17.2 mL/kg/min [15.2-21.1], p = 0.07) and poorer overall survival when adjusting to FEV1% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings show respiratory muscle hypermetabolism is associated with lung function impairment and has prognostic significance. 18 F-FDG/PET-CT should be considered as a tool for assessing respiratory muscle activity and to identify high-risk patients.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Humans , Male , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Prospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Prognosis , Positron-Emission Tomography , Respiratory Muscles , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oxygen uptake (VÌO2) and heart rate (HR) kinetics during a constant work-rate test (CWRT) are used to evaluate the response to exercise in healthy subjects as well as subjects with various pathologies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the feasibility of these measures and their responsiveness to a prehabilitation program in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHOD: This study is preregistered (NCT04041297) ancillary analysis of a subgroup of individuals with NSCLC included in the Preo-Dens study (NCT03936764). Thirty individuals performed a moderate-CWRT before and after a 15-session prehabilitation program between July 2019 and April 2021. VÌO2 and HR on-kinetics were extracted from the first 240 s of breath-by-breath data using Box-Jenkins transfer functions. RESULTS: Pre/post VÌO2 on-kinetic feature values were reliable for 25/30 participants, and pre/post HR kinetic feature values were reliable for 19/30. VÌO2 time constant (τ) and mean response time reduced from pre-post prehabilitation (mean difference -7.8 s; 95% CI: -14.6 to -1.0, and -8.4 s; 95% CI: -14.7 to -2.0, respectively). For HR on-kinetics, τ did not change from pre-post prehabilitation (median difference -4.0 s; 95% CI: -36.0 to +11.0). VÌO2 and HR response amplitudes reduced significatively from pre-post prehabilitation (mean difference -38.6 mL/min; 95% CI: -73.3 to -3.9, and -3.1 beats/min; 95% CI: -6.4 to -0.2, respectively). CONCLUSION: VÌO2 on-kinetic analysis during moderate-CWRT is feasible in individuals with scheduled NSCLC resection, and results are responsive to prehabilitation. These results support a true speeding of the adaptation of aerobic metabolism after a 15-session prehabilitation program.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Heart Rate , Preoperative Exercise , Kinetics , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Exercise Test , Oxygen/metabolism , Oxygen Consumption/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) are electively admitted for inpatient initiation of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We hypothesised that outpatient NIV setup would be more cost-effective. METHODS: Patients with stable OHS referred to six participating European centres for home NIV setup were recruited to an open-labelled clinical trial. Patients were randomised via web-based system using stratification to inpatient setup, with standard fixed level NIV and titrated during an attended overnight respiratory study or outpatient setup using an autotitrating NIV device and a set protocol, including home oximetry. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness at 3 months with daytime carbon dioxide (PaCO2) as a non-inferiority safety outcome; non-inferiority margin 0.5 kPa. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using EQ-5D-5L (5 level EQ-5D tool) and costs were converted using purchasing power parities to £(GBP). RESULTS: Between May 2015 and March 2018, 82 patients were randomised. Age 59±14 years, body mass index 47±10 kg/m2 and PaCO2 6.8±0.6 kPa. Safety analysis demonstrated no difference in ∆PaCO2 (difference -0.27 kPa, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.17 kPa). Efficacy analysis showed similar total per-patient costs (inpatient £2962±£580, outpatient £3169±£525; difference £188.20, 95% CI -£61.61 to £438.01) and similar improvement in HRQL (EQ-5D-5L difference -0.006, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.04). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: There was no difference in medium-term cost-effectiveness, with similar clinical effectiveness, between outpatient and inpatient NIV setup. The home NIV setup strategy can be led by local resource demand and patient and clinician preference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02342899 and ISRCTN51420481.
Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome/therapy , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality of Life , Outpatients , InpatientsABSTRACT
QUESTIONS: How well do the 6-minute stepper test (6MST) and sit-to-stand test (STST) predict complications after minimally invasive lung cancer resection? Do the 6MST and STST provide supplementary information on the risk of postoperative complications in addition to the prognostic variables that are currently used, such as age and the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score? DESIGN: Prospective inception cohort study with follow-up for 90 days. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of adults undergoing major lung resection with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients had a preoperative functional evaluation with the 6MST and STST. The number of steps, heart rate change, saturation and dyspnoea during the 6MST and the number of lifts during the STST were recorded. Complications graded ≥ 2 on the Clavien-Dindo classification were recorded for 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and November 2019, 118 patients with a mean age of 65 years (SD 9) were included and analysed. Their surgeries were via VATS in 88 (75%) and via RATS in 30 (25%). For predicting a postoperative complication graded ≥ 2 on the Clavien-Dindo classification, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was: 0.82 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.90) for the number of steps during the 6MST, with an optimum cut-off of 140 steps; and 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.93) for the number of lifts during the STST, with an optimum cut-off of 20 lifts. CONCLUSION: The 6MST and STST predicted morbidity and mortality after lung cancer resection via minimally invasive surgery. The preoperative use of these exercise tests in clinical practice may be useful for risk stratification. REGISTRATION: NCT03824977.
Subject(s)
Exercise Test , Lung Neoplasms , Aged , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
QUESTION: In people with non-small cell lung cancer, what is the effect of condensing 15 prehabilitation sessions into a 3-week regimen compared with a 5-week regimen? DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessment of the primary outcome. PARTICIPANTS: People with diagnosed or suspected non-small cell lung cancer and moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications. INTERVENTION: Fifteen supervised prehabilitation sessions delivered with either a dense regimen of five sessions/week for 3 weeks (experimental group) or a non-dense regimen of three sessions/week for 5 weeks (control group). OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in cardiorespiratory fitness measured by the VÌO2peak in ml/kg/min. The secondary outcomes were the change in other variables of interest measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, non-invasive nutritional markers, quadriceps maximal voluntary isometric contractions, maximal inspiratory pressure, quality of life, adherence and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Changes with the experimental regimen were similar to or better than changes with the control regimen for: VÌO2peak (MD 1.2 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -0.1 to 2.6); VÌE/VÌCO2 slope (MD -3.6 points, 95% CI -8.7 to 1.5); and work rate at ventilatory threshold (MD 3.7 W, 95% CI -5.6 to 13.0). The two regimens had similar effects on: peak work rate (MD 1.3 W, 95% CI -6.4 to 9.0), VÌO2 at ventilatory threshold (MD 0.0 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -1.4 to 1.4); body mass index (MD -0.2 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.1); and maximal inspiratory pressure (MD -0.7 cmH2O, 95% CI -9.8 to 8.4). The relative effect was uncertain for quadriceps maximal voluntary isometric contractions, quality of life and complications. CONCLUSION: Condensing prehabilitation sessions led to similar or better improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness and did not decrease adherence or increase adverse events. This could increase the number of patients who can be referred for prehabilitation, despite short presurgical periods. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03936764.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Exercise Test , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Preoperative Exercise , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Exercise training before lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer is believed to decrease postoperative complications (POC) by improving cardiorespiratory fitness. However, this intervention lacks a strong evidence base. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of preoperative exercise training compared with usual care on POC and other secondary outcomes in patients with scheduled lung resection. METHODS: A systematic search of randomised trials was conducted by two authors. Meta-analysis was performed, and the effect of exercise training was estimated by risk ratios (RR) and mean differences, with their CIs. Clinical usefulness was estimated according to minimal important difference values (MID). RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 791 participants were included. Compared with usual care, exercise training reduced overall POC (10 studies, 617 participants, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75) and clinically relevant POC (4 studies, 302 participants, Clavien-Dindo score ≥2 RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69). The estimate of the effect of exercise training on mortality was very imprecise (6 studies, 456 participants, RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.22). The main risks of bias were a lack of participant blinding and selective reporting. Exercise training appeared to improve exercise capacity, pulmonary function and also quality of life and depression, although the clinical usefulness of the changes was unclear. The quality of the evidence was graded for each outcome. CONCLUSION: Preoperative exercise training leads to a worthwhile reduction in postoperative complications. These estimates were both accurate and large enough to make recommendations for clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Exercise , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) (primarily composed of an exercise training program (ET) and educational workshops) is an effective intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although factors which influence participation in the full PR program have been reported, specific data on the educational component of PR have not been published. We aimed to identify factors which predict refusal to participate in the educational component of PR. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 201 patient charts were retrospectively included in the analysis. Patients were classified according to their acceptance or refusal to participate in the educational workshops. RESULTS: The location of ET outside the center was independently related to refusal to participate in the educational workshops (OR = 0.01 [95%CI 0.00 to 0.17]). Patients who refused the workshops were less disabled according to the number of prescriptions of noninvasive ventilation, use of medical transport, oxygen consumption and workload achieved during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. CONCLUSIONS: The location of exercise sessions during PR influences patients' decisions to refuse or accept center-based educational workshops. When center-based PR programs are limited, and the ET is relocated to the patient's home, the educational workshops should also be relocated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04301245).
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Clinical Trials as Topic , Exercise , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has recently shown clinical benefits in hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients, while the value of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) remains debated. The primary end-point was to compare alveolar recruitment using global end-expiratory electrical lung impedance (EELI) between HFNC and NIV. Secondary end-points compared regional EELI, lung volumes (global and regional tidal volume variation (V T)), respiratory parameters, haemodynamic tolerance, dyspnoea and patient comfort between HFNC and NIV, relative to face mask (FM). A prospective randomised crossover physiological study was conducted in patients with hypoxaemic ARF due to pneumonia. They received alternately HFNC, NIV and FM. 16 patients were included. Global EELI was 4083 with NIV and 2921 with HFNC (p=0.4). Compared to FM, NIV and HFNC significantly increased global EELI by 1810.5 (95% CI 857-2646) and 826 (95% CI 399.5-2361), respectively. Global and regional V T increased significantly with NIV compared to HFNC or FM, but not between HFNC and FM. NIV yielded a significantly higher pulse oxygen saturation/inspired oxygen fraction ratio compared to HFNC (p=0.03). No significant difference was observed between HFNC, NIV and FM for dyspnoea. Patient comfort score with FM was not significantly different than with HFNC (p=0.1), but was lower with NIV (p=0.001). This study suggests a potential benefit of HFNC and NIV on alveolar recruitment in patients with hypoxaemic ARF. In contrast with HFNC, NIV increased lung volumes, which may contribute to overdistension and its potentially deleterious effect in these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: When home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is initiated, five goals need to be achieved: a daily use >4 h/day, an improvement in gas exchange, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and sleep quality without side effects. Our aim was to assess how frequently these five goals were reached and the factors predictive of achievement. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric cohort study that included patients electively established on home NIV over 2 years. HRQL was assessed at baseline and follow-up by the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire. Adequate initiation was defined as the achievement of at least three of five goals and successful initiation as the achievement of all. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty patients were included at baseline. NIV was initiated for: obesity hypoventilation syndrome (n = 95; 38%), neuromuscular disease (n = 70; 28%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 66; 26%) and chest wall disease (n = 19; 8%). At follow-up, measures of all five goals were available in 141 (56%) patients. NIV initiation was adequate for 96 (68%) patients and successful for 12 (9%) patients. In multivariate analysis, a tidal volume ≥ 7.8 ml/kg of ideal body weight was associated with an increased likelihood of adequate NIV initiation (hazard ratio: 5.765 [95% CI:1.824-18.223], p = 0.006]. Improvement in daytime partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2 ) was not correlated to improvement in HRQL or sleep quality. Severe to very severe NIV-related side effects occurred in 114 (47%) patients and were associated with higher daytime PaCO2 (6.35 ± 1.08 vs. 5.92 ± 0.79 kPa, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Successful home NIV initiation is rarely achieved in real life. HRQL and NIV tolerance should be assessed to improve patient-centred outcomes.
Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Insufficiency , Cohort Studies , Humans , Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome/therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Quality of Life , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Sleep QualityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess physical fitness and its relationship with functional dyspnea in survivors of COVID-19 6 months after their discharge from the hospital. METHODS: Data collected routinely from people referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) following hospitalization for COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Persistent dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale. RESULTS: Twenty-three people with persistent symptoms were referred for CPET. Mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score was 1 (SD = 1) and was significantly associated with peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak; %) (rho = -0.49). At 6 months, those hospitalized in the general ward had a relatively preserved VO2peak (87% [SD = 20]), whereas those who had been in the intensive care unit had a moderately reduced VO2peak (77% [SD = 15]). Of note, the results of the CPET revealed that, in all individuals, respiratory equivalents were high, power-to-weight ratios were low, and those who had been in the intensive care unit had a relatively low ventilatory efficiency (mean VE/VCO2 slope = 34 [SD = 5]). Analysis of each individual showed that none had a breathing reserve <15% or 11 L/min, all had a normal exercise electrocardiogram, and 4 had a heart rate >90%. CONCLUSION: At 6 months, persistent dyspnea was associated with reduced physical fitness. This study offers initial insights into the mid-term physical fitness of people who required hospitalization for COVID-19. It also provides novel pathophysiological clues about the underlaying mechanism of the physical limitations associated with persistent dyspnea. Those with persistent dyspnea should be offered a tailored rehabilitation intervention, which should probably include muscle reconditioning, breathing retraining, and perhaps respiratory muscle training. IMPACT: This study is the first, to our knowledge, to show that a persistent breathing disorder (in addition to muscle deconditioning) can explain persistent symptoms 6 months after hospitalization for COVID-19 infection and suggests that a specific rehabilitation intervention is warranted.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Fatigue/physiopathology , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Physical Fitness/physiology , Dyspnea/virology , Exercise Test , Fatigue/virology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pilot Projects , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 aerosolization during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation may endanger health care professionals. Various circuit setups have been described to reduce virus aerosolization. However, these setups may alter ventilator performance. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the consequences of the various suggested circuit setups on ventilator efficacy during CPAP and noninvasive ventilation (NIV)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight circuit setups were evaluated on a bench test model that consisted of a three-dimensional printed head and an artificial lung. Setups included a dual-limb circuit with an oronasal mask, a dual-limb circuit with a helmet interface, a single-limb circuit with a passive exhalation valve, three single-limb circuits with custom-made additional leaks, and two single-limb circuits with active exhalation valves. All setups were evaluated during NIV and CPAP. The following variables were recorded: the inspiratory flow preceding triggering of the ventilator, the inspiratory effort required to trigger the ventilator, the triggering delay, the maximal inspiratory pressure delivered by the ventilator, the tidal volume generated to the artificial lung, the total work of breathing, and the pressure-time product needed to trigger the ventilator. RESULTS: With NIV, the type of circuit setup had a significant impact on inspiratory flow preceding triggering of the ventilator (P < .0001), the inspiratory effort required to trigger the ventilator (P < .0001), the triggering delay (P < .0001), the maximal inspiratory pressure (P < .0001), the tidal volume (P = .0008), the work of breathing (P < .0001), and the pressure-time product needed to trigger the ventilator (P < .0001). Similar differences and consequences were seen with CPAP as well as with the addition of bacterial filters. Best performance was achieved with a dual-limb circuit with an oronasal mask. Worst performance was achieved with a dual-limb circuit with a helmet interface. INTERPRETATION: Ventilator performance is significantly impacted by the circuit setup. A dual-limb circuit with oronasal mask should be used preferentially.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Noninvasive Ventilation , Air Filters , Benchmarking/methods , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/adverse effects , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/trends , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Noninvasive Ventilation/instrumentation , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Research Design , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Ventilators, MechanicalABSTRACT
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention to manage symptoms related to chronic obstructive respiratory diseases (CORD). Paradoxically, few people with CORD actually engage in PR, and of those, up to one-third do not complete the program. Additionally, some of those who complete the program do not achieve worthwhile benefits. Therefore, the main challenge for the next decades is to offer PR to as many people (that would potentially benefit from it) as possible. This raises questions about factors influencing participation, completion, and responsiveness to PR programs. Among these factors, urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent among people with CORD (much more than in the general population) and may worsen during PR exercise sessions. Paradoxically, UI is poorly explored in routine and scarcely assessed in research, and none of the actual guidelines about PR mention it. However, its potential influence on engagement, completion, and response to PR is of real concern. Therefore, the aim of this perspective is to describe the mechanisms of UI, particularly in the context of CORD, as well as to highlight its prevalence among people with CORD, their burden, and how it could affect a PR approach based on sustained and regular physical activity.
Subject(s)
Physical Therapy Modalities , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Humans , Prevalence , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
QUESTIONS: How effective is home-based exercise therapy delivered using advanced telehealth technology (ATT-ET) for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with: no exercise therapy (ET), in/outpatient ET, and home-based ET without ATT? DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. PARTICIPANTS: People with stable COPD referred for ET. INTERVENTION: ATT-ET. OUTCOME MEASURES: Exercise capacity, quality of life, functional dyspnoea, cost-effectiveness and various secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen eligible trials involved 1,522 participants. Compared with no ET, ATT-ET improved exercise capacity (four studies, 6-minute walk test MD 15 m, 95% CI 5 to 24) and probably improved quality of life (four studies, SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43) and functional dyspnoea (two studies, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Dyspnoea MD 2, 95% CI 0 to 4). ATT-ET had a similar effect as in/outpatient ET on functional dyspnoea (two studies, SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.29) and a similar or better effect on quality of life (two studies, SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.50) but its relative effect on exercise capacity was very uncertain (three studies, 6-minute walk test MD 6 m, 95% CI -26 to 37). ATT-ET had a similar effect as home-based ET without ATT on exercise capacity (three studies, 6-minute walk test MD 2 m, 95% CI -16 to 19) and similar or better effects on quality of life (three studies, SMD 0.79, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.62) and functional dyspnoea (two studies, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Dyspnoea MD 2, 95% CI 0 to 4). ATT-ET had effects on most secondary outcomes that were similar to or better than each comparator. CONCLUSION: ATT-ET improves exercise capacity, functional dyspnoea and quality of life compared with no ET, although some benefits may be small. Its benefits are generally similar to in/outpatient ET and similar to or better than home-based ET without ATT. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020165773.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Telemedicine , Exercise Therapy , Exercise Tolerance , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Quality of Life , TechnologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Maximal oxygen consumption (VË O2max) is the most frequently used variable to determine postoperative risk in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however patients frequently cannot provide the necessary maximum effort to ensure the validity of the VË O2 measurements. The aim of this observational study was to assess exercise-limiting factors and the rate of achievement of the currently recommended maximality criteria in patients with NSCLC who had been routinely referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to assess their postoperative risk. METHODS: Patient data, including peak exercise variables and markers used to designate the exercise test as maximal, were retrospectively analysed from 203 preoperative CPET assessments that were performed at Rouen University Hospital from January 2014 until July 2019. RESULTS: Ventilatory limitation was the most common physiological cause of exercise cessation. A total of 62 patients (or 30.5%) achieved either one, or no, markers of maximality. The mean duration of the incremental phase (after the 3-minute warm-up) was 5.1±2 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of the patients in this study did not generate maximum effort during CPET. As a result, it is likely that their VË O2peak was underestimated and that their post-operative risk was overestimated. It is therefore important to incorporate strategies to verify VË O2peak results for patients with values close to the risk threshold.