ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopy is the standard procedure in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, a significant number of clinical relevant lesions may be missed even by experienced endoscopists using current technology. A transparent cap mounted at the tip of a colonoscope may be an easy way to extend the visual field during colonoscopy and may improve the detection rate of mucosal lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The significance of cap assisted (CAC) vs. conventional colonoscopy (CC) on polyp detection rate was evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial in 504 patients. RESULTS: CC and CAC detected polyps in 39.3â% and 31.8, not significantly different. There was also no significant difference between CAC and CC according to age, sex, indication for colonoscopy, diverticulosis, sedation, bowel cleansing, withdrawal time, time/number of attempts to intubate the cecal walve, number, localization, size or histology of polyps,. However, the time to reach the cecal floor and the overall time of colonoscopy were significantly lower for CAC (1 minute). CONCLUSION: CAC was without clinical impact on polyp detection rate or performance of colonoscopy.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonoscopes , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Colonoscopy/instrumentation , Colonoscopy/methods , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopy is the standard procedure in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, a significant number of clinically relevant lesions may be missed even by experienced endoscopists using current technology. Particular problems may occur with blind spots behind the semilunar folds and within the right colon. A transparent cap mounted at the tip of a colonoscope may be an easy way to extend the visual field during colonoscopy and may improve the detection rate of mucosal lesions. However, data in the literature are controversial and the quantity of the potential extension of visualization by a transparent cap has not been reported yet. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The significance of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) to increase visualization within different colonic segments (rectum, sigmoid colon, descending colon, transverse colon, ascending colon, cecum) was quantitatively analyzed by randomized back-to-back colonoscopies with and without cap. The investigations were performed in a colonic training model by 5 investigators. The inner colonic surface was stained by a raster of dots and the number of dots counted during colonoscopy served as a measure for the visible surface area of each segment. RESULTS: The time to advance the colonoscope to the respective colonic segments and the overall time to reach the cecum were not significantly different between conventional and CAC. In contrast, overall withdrawal time and withdrawal times for the cecum, ascending colon, descending colon and rectum were significantly longer for CAC, but not for the transverse and sigmoid colon. Visualization of the colonic surface was significantly increased during CAC. Overall, 59.76 ± 2.70 % of the maximal countable dots were visualized without cap and 85.36 ± 9.62 % with cap. The improvement of visualization was only significant for the right colon, but not for the rectum, sigmoid or descending colon. CONCLUSION: The finding of the present study suggests that the extension of visualization by CAC may be of particular value for the right colon.
