Lung ultrasound findings in asymptomatic healthy children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be an effective tool to rapidly diagnose certain causes of pediatric respiratory distress. However, very little is known about LUS findings in pediatric asthma. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to characterize LUS findings in a cohort of pediatric patients with a definitive diagnosis of asthma, outside of an asthma exacerbation. METHODS: Eligible patients, aged 6-17 years old and diagnosed with asthma, underwent LUS during an outpatient visit. LUS was conducted using a six-zone scanning protocol. Presence of a LUS artifact was defined by one or more of the following: ≥3 B-lines per intercostal space, pulmonary consolidation, and/or pleural abnormality. Images were interpreted by an expert sonographer blinded to patient clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included. 10/52 (19.2%) patients demonstrated the presence of LUS artifacts: 8 with ≥3 B-lines, 1 with consolidation >1 cm, and 7 with subpleural consolidations <1 cm, 1 with a pleural line abnormality. Artifacts were seen in the right anterior and lateral zones in 60% of participants and were limited to 1-2 intercostal space(s) within one lung zone in all participants. No association was found between presence of LUS artifacts and asthma control or severity. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of LUS findings in outpatient pediatric asthma. LUS artifacts in asthmatic children can be seen outside of acute exacerbations. Such baseline findings need to be taken into consideration when using LUS for the acute evaluation of a pediatric patient with asthma.

Characterizing pediatric lung ultrasound findings during a chemically induced bronchospasm.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be a useful clinical tool in pediatrics, but very little is known about the LUS findings of asthma in children. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to characterize LUS findings of pediatric patients before and after a chemically induced bronchospasm. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of bronchodilators on LUS findings. METHODS: Eligible children 6-17 years old presenting for a methacholine challenge test (MCT) in a pediatric respiratory clinic were recruited. Patients with viral symptoms were excluded. A six-zone LUS protocol was performed before and after the MCT, and after bronchodilator administration; video recordings were analysed by an expert blinded to the patient characteristics and MCT results. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. Five patients had positive LUS findings at baseline. Nine patients out of 29 (31%) had new-onset positive LUS following a reactive MCT. There was a significant association between having a chemically induced bronchospasm and a positive LUS post-MCT (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 5.3 [1.0-27.7]; p = 0.05). Among patients who developed positive LUS findings post-MCT, four out of nine returned to having a negative LUS postbronchodilator administration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known report of an association between LUS findings and bronchospasm in pediatric patients. It is also the first documentation of resolution of LUS findings postbronchodilator administration. Most LUS findings observed were small and limited to a few intercostal spaces. Further research is required to quantify these findings and evaluate the effect of salbutamol on LUS.

Clinical Reasoning Behind Antibiotic Use in PICUs: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the reasoning processes used by pediatric intensivists to make antibiotic-related decisions. DESIGN: Grounded theory qualitative study. SETTING: Three Canadian university-affiliated tertiary medical, surgical, and cardiac PICUs. PATIENTS: Twenty-one PICU physicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We conducted field observation during morning rounds followed by semistructured interviews with participants to examine the clinical reasoning behind antibiotic-related decisions (starting/stopping antibiotics, or treatment duration) made for patients with a suspected/proven bacterial infection. We used a grounded theory approach for data collection and analysis. Thematic saturation was reached after 21 interviews. Of the 21 participants, 10 (48%) were female, 15 (71%) were PICU attending staff, and 10 (48%) had greater than 10 years in clinical practice. Initial clinical reasoning involves using an analytical approach to determine the likelihood of bacterial infection. In case of uncertainty, an assessment of patient safety is performed, which partly overlaps with the use of intuitive clinical reasoning. Finally, if uncertainty remains, physicians tend to consult infectious diseases experts. Factors that override this clinical reasoning process include disease severity, pressure from consultants, and the tendency to continue antibiotic treatment initiated by colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-related decisions for critically ill children are complex, and pediatric intensivists use several clinical reasoning strategies to decrease the uncertainty around the bacterial etiology of infections. However, disease severity and patient safety concerns may overrule decisions based on clinical evidence and lead to antibiotic use. Several cognitive biases were identified in the clinical reasoning processes.

Treatment of severe bronchiolitis: A survey of Canadian pediatric intensivists.

OBJECTIVE: To describe management practices and the factors guiding admission and treatment decisions for viral bronchiolitis across Canadian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Canadian PICUs. SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A survey using two case scenarios (non-intubated vs intubated patients) was developed using focus groups and a literature review. We analyzed our results using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression. Our response rate was 55% (57/103). Regarding bronchiolitis management, 75% (42/56) of respondents would use inhaled therapies, with nebulized epinephrine (33/56, 59%) and salbutamol (20/56, 36%) being the most common. Antibiotic use within the first hour of admission to PICU almost doubled in frequency (36% vs 71%) in patients who required mechanical ventilation (p 0.0004). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC; 32/56, 57%) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP; 16/56, 29%) were the preferred modes of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). CONCLUSION: The management of severe viral bronchiolitis is similar across Canadian PICUs. The use of NIV, inhaled treatments, and antibiotics is frequent, which differs from the recommendations made by published guidelines. Canadian pediatric intensivists use homogeneous PICU admission criteria based on patients' characteristics and severity of the clinical picture. Clinical practice guidelines for children with viral bronchiolitis should address the management of patients with severe clinical disease.