ABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease affecting all age groups, particularly children. This systematic review provides an overview of the humanistic and economic disease burden in the pediatric population with AD in Spain. The evidence, collected from 11 observational studies published over the past 10 years, exhibits the most common characteristics of the patients, disease burden, patient-reported outcomes, use of resources, and treatment patterns. The burden of AD extends beyond physical symptoms, with associated comorbidities such as asthma and impaired health-related quality of life and mental health disorders, particularly in severe cases. Traditional therapies, primarily topical corticosteroids, face adherence and efficacy challenges. Despite promising innovative treatments and available biological therapies, their use is still limited in the pediatric population. The findings of the present review highlight the scarce scientific evidence on the economic burden of pediatric AD, as well as the most updated humanistic evidence on this disease. At the same time, the need for individualized care and innovative therapeutic interventions to address the multifaceted challenges of pediatric AD in Spain is evident.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Migraine symptoms vary significantly between patients and within the same patient. Currently, an increasing number of therapeutic options are available for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Guidelines encourage physicians to use shared decision-making (SDM) in their practice, listening to patients' treatment preferences in order to select the most suitable and effective therapy. Although training for healthcare professionals could increase their awareness of SDM, results concerning its effectiveness are inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the impact of a training activity to promote SDM in the context of migraine care. This was addressed by evaluating the impact on patients' decisional conflict (main objective), patient-physician relationship, neurologists' perceptions of the training and patient's perception of SDM. METHODS: A multicenter observational study was conducted in four highly specialized headache units. The participating neurologists received SDM training targeting people with migraine in clinical practice to provide techniques and tools to optimize physician-patient interactions and encourage patient involvement in SDM. The study was set up in three consecutive phases: control phase, in which neurologists were blind to the training activity and performed the consultation with the control group under routine clinical practice; training phase, when the same neurologists participated in the SDM training; and SDM phase, in which these neurologists performed the consultation with the intervention group after the training. Patients in both groups with a change of treatment assessment during the visit completed the Decisional conflict scale (DCS) after the consultation to measure the patient's decisional conflict. Also, patients answered the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (CREM-P) and the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The mean ± SD scores obtained from the study questionnaires were calculated for both groups and compared to determine whether there were significant differences (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 180 migraine patients (86.7% female, mean age of 38.5 ± 12.3 years) were included, of which 128 required a migraine treatment change assessment during the consultation (control group, n = 68; intervention group, n = 60). A low decisional conflict was found without significant differences between the intervention (25.6 ± 23.4) and control group (22.1 ± 17.9; p = 0.5597). No significant differences in the CREM-P and SDM-Q-9 scores were observed between groups. Physicians were satisfied with the training and showed greater agreement with the clarity, quality and selection of the contents. Moreover, physicians felt confident communicating with patients after the training, and they applied the techniques and SDM strategies learned. CONCLUSION: SDM is a model currently being actively used in clinical practice for headache consultation, with high patient involvement in the process. This SDM training, while useful from the physician's perspective, may be more effective at other levels of care where there is still room for optimization of patient involvement in decision-making.
ABSTRACT
Background Moderatesevere atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. Methods This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. Results Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. Conclusions Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD (AU)
Antecedentes La dermatitis atópica (DA) moderada-grave tiene un impacto significativo en la vida de los pacientes, muchos de los cuales requieren tratamiento sistémico para controlar los síntomas (p. ej., prurito). Algunos tratamientos son usados fuera de indicación. Este estudio describió características sociodemográficas y clínicas, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos sanitarios (URS) y costes asociados en adultos con DA que iniciaron tratamiento sistémico o fototerapia en la práctica habitual. Métodos Este estudio observacional retrospectivo de historias clínicas electrónicas en la base de datos BIG-PAC identificó adultos con diagnóstico previo de DA (CIE-9: 691.8 o 692.9) que comenzaron con corticosteroides orales, inmunosupresores, biológicos o fototerapia entre el 01/01/2012 y el 31/12/2016. Se siguió a los pacientes durante 3 años desde el inicio del tratamiento, hasta 31/12/2019. Los datos sobre las características clínicas de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, URS y costes se analizaron de forma descriptiva. Resultados Los pacientes (N = 1995) tenían una edad media de 60 años, el 64% eran mujeres, con una media de 23 años desde el diagnóstico (84% tenían ≥ 18 años al inicio de la DA). Las principales comorbilidades fueron ansiedad (38%), hipertensión arterial (36%) y dislipidemia (35%). La mayoría de los pacientes utilizaron corticosteroides orales como primer tratamiento sistémico (84%; duración media 29 días) e inmunosupresores en el 13% de los pacientes (duración media 117 días, ciclosporina en el 5% y metotrexato en el 4%). La mitad de los pacientes requirieron una segunda línea de tratamiento sistémico y el 12% una tercera. El uso de inmunosupresores y biológicos aumentó simultáneamente con las líneas de tratamiento. Aproximadamente el 13% de los pacientes recibieron tratamientos sistémicos de forma continua durante los 3 años de seguimiento. El coste medio por paciente a 3 años fue de 3.835 euros, con un coste medio anual de 1.278 euros (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Health Care Costs , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/economics , Retrospective Studies , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Phototherapy , Severity of Illness Index , SpainABSTRACT
Antecedentes La dermatitis atópica (DA) moderada-grave tiene un impacto significativo en la vida de los pacientes, muchos de los cuales requieren tratamiento sistémico para controlar los síntomas (p. ej., prurito). Algunos tratamientos son usados fuera de indicación. Este estudio describió características sociodemográficas y clínicas, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos sanitarios (URS) y costes asociados en adultos con DA que iniciaron tratamiento sistémico o fototerapia en la práctica habitual. Métodos Este estudio observacional retrospectivo de historias clínicas electrónicas en la base de datos BIG-PAC identificó adultos con diagnóstico previo de DA (CIE-9: 691.8 o 692.9) que comenzaron con corticosteroides orales, inmunosupresores, biológicos o fototerapia entre el 01/01/2012 y el 31/12/2016. Se siguió a los pacientes durante 3 años desde el inicio del tratamiento, hasta 31/12/2019. Los datos sobre las características clínicas de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, URS y costes se analizaron de forma descriptiva. Resultados Los pacientes (N = 1995) tenían una edad media de 60 años, el 64% eran mujeres, con una media de 23 años desde el diagnóstico (84% tenían ≥ 18 años al inicio de la DA). Las principales comorbilidades fueron ansiedad (38%), hipertensión arterial (36%) y dislipidemia (35%). La mayoría de los pacientes utilizaron corticosteroides orales como primer tratamiento sistémico (84%; duración media 29 días) e inmunosupresores en el 13% de los pacientes (duración media 117 días, ciclosporina en el 5% y metotrexato en el 4%). La mitad de los pacientes requirieron una segunda línea de tratamiento sistémico y el 12% una tercera. El uso de inmunosupresores y biológicos aumentó simultáneamente con las líneas de tratamiento. Aproximadamente el 13% de los pacientes recibieron tratamientos sistémicos de forma continua durante los 3 años de seguimiento. El coste medio por paciente a 3 años fue de 3.835 euros, con un coste medio anual de 1.278 euros (AU)
Background Moderatesevere atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. Methods This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. Results Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. Conclusions Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Health Care Costs , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/economics , Retrospective Studies , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Phototherapy , Severity of Illness Index , SpainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients' lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Patients (N=1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Spain/epidemiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients' lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Spain/epidemiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic useABSTRACT
La dermatitis atópica (DA) es una enfermedad cutánea inflamatoria crónica con síntomas tales como el prurito, que pueden causar una carga significativa en la vida del paciente. Los resultados percibidos por los pacientes (PRO) complementan a los resultados clínicos evaluados en la DA por los médicos. Esta revisión sistemática tiene como objetivo identificar y describir las medidas de los resultados percibidos por los pacientes (PROM) utilizadas en estudios observacionales de DA durante la última década en España. Se identificaron 18 PROM para medir 13 PRO diferentes que evalúan múltiples aspectos de la enfermedad, incluyendo los síntomas y la gravedad de la enfermedad, la interferencia con las actividades diarias, el impacto psicosocial y laboral, el empoderamiento del paciente y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS). La CVRS, los síntomas (principalmente el prurito) y la ansiedad/depresión fueron los PRO más evaluados, siendo el Dermatology Life Quality Index, la Escala Visual Analógica del prurito y la Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, las PROM más frecuentemente empleadas, respectivamente. El número creciente de estudios observacionales sobre DA que incluyen PROM en España sugiere un aumento de la importancia de los PRO en el manejo de la DA (AU)
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with symptoms such as pruritus that can be a major burden for patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) complement clinician-reported outcomes in AD. This systematic review aims to identify and describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) used in observational studies of AD over the last decade in Spain. Eighteen PROM were identified to measure 13 different PRO that assess multiple aspects of the disease, including symptoms and disease severity, impact on daily activities and on work productivity/functioning, psychosocial impact, patient empowerment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL, symptoms (particularly pruritus), and anxiety/depression were the most frequently assessed PRO, and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index, the Visual Analogue Pruritus Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were the most frequently used PROM, respectively. The growing number of observational studies on AD including PROM in Spain suggests that PRO are becoming increasingly important in the management of AD (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Quality of Life , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Chronic Disease , Pruritus , SpainABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with symptoms such as pruritus that can be a major burden for patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) complement clinician-reported outcomes in AD. This systematic review aims to identify and describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) used in observational studies of AD over the last decade in Spain. Eighteen PROM were identified to measure 13 different PRO that assess multiple aspects of the disease, including symptoms and disease severity, impact on daily activities and on work productivity/functioning, psychosocial impact, patient empowerment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL, symptoms (particularly pruritus), and anxiety/depression were the most frequently assessed PRO, and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index, the Visual Analogue Pruritus Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were the most frequently used PROM, respectively. The growing number of observational studies on AD including PROM in Spain suggests that PRO are becoming increasingly important in the management of AD (AU)
La dermatitis atópica (DA) es una enfermedad cutánea inflamatoria crónica con síntomas tales como el prurito, que pueden causar una carga significativa en la vida del paciente. Los resultados percibidos por los pacientes (PRO) complementan a los resultados clínicos evaluados en la DA por los médicos. Esta revisión sistemática tiene como objetivo identificar y describir las medidas de los resultados percibidos por los pacientes (PROM) utilizadas en estudios observacionales de DA durante la última década en España. Se identificaron 18 PROM para medir 13 PRO diferentes que evalúan múltiples aspectos de la enfermedad, incluyendo los síntomas y la gravedad de la enfermedad, la interferencia con las actividades diarias, el impacto psicosocial y laboral, el empoderamiento del paciente y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS). La CVRS, los síntomas (principalmente el prurito) y la ansiedad/depresión fueron los PRO más evaluados, siendo el Dermatology Life Quality Index, la Escala Visual Analógica del prurito y la Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, las PROM más frecuentemente empleadas, respectivamente. El número creciente de estudios observacionales sobre DA que incluyen PROM en España sugiere un aumento de la importancia de los PRO en el manejo de la DA (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Quality of Life , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Chronic Disease , Pruritus , SpainABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with symptoms such as pruritus that can be a major burden for patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) complement clinician-reported outcomes in AD. This systematic review aims to identify and describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) used in observational studies of AD over the last decade in Spain. Eighteen PROM were identified to measure 13 different PRO that assess multiple aspects of the disease, including symptoms and disease severity, impact on daily activities and on work productivity/functioning, psychosocial impact, patient empowerment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL, symptoms (particularly pruritus), and anxiety/depression were the most frequently assessed PRO, and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index, the Visual Analogue Pruritus Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were the most frequently used PROM, respectively. The growing number of observational studies on AD including PROM in Spain suggests that PRO are becoming increasingly important in the management of AD.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Quality of Life , Chronic Disease , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Humans , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pruritus , SpainABSTRACT
Objetivo: Estimar el impacto presupuestario de utilizar somatropina (Genotonorm®) en el tratamiento del déficit de hormona de crecimiento (DGH) durante la transición entre edad pediátrica y adulta.Material y métodosSe diseñó un modelo desde la perspectiva del sistema sanitario español, con un horizonte de 5 años. El cálculo de pacientes susceptibles de tratarse se estimó aplicando datos de prevalencia de la enfermedad (0,02%) a la población española. Del total de DGH se estima que un 60% es persistente, que serían los pacientes candidatos. Un panel de expertos asumió que un 20% de los candidatos rechazaría el tratamiento y un 8% de los que aceptaran abandonará anualmente la terapia. En los costes se incluyeron: costes farmacológicos, costes del diagnóstico (visitas médicas y tests) y costes del seguimiento incluyendo las visitas para ajuste de dosis.ResultadosLos pacientes en tratamiento serían 49, 93, 132, 186 y 199 para cada año (2010-2014). El impacto total de la utilización de Genotonorm® durante el periodo de transición sería de 367.691, 655.430, 1.044.874, 1.334.059 y 1.594.670 € en los años 1 a 5. El coste medio anual/paciente sería de 7.506, 7.059, 7.903, 7.960 y 7.995 €.Conclusión: El tratamiento con GH en fase de transición en España supondría un impacto promedio anual de 7.684 €/paciente (AU)
Objective: To estimate the budget impact of somatrophin (Genotonorm®) use in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patients during the transition between childhood and adulthood.MethodA budget impact model was designed under the Spanish National Health System with a 5-year time horizon. Calculations of susceptible patients were based on disease prevalence (0.02%) applied to Spanish population. From total GHD cases, 60% was considered persistent and treatment candidates. An expert panel assumed that 20% of candidates would reject the treatment and 8% would withdraw therapy annually. Considered costs included: therapy costs, diagnosis (test and medical visit) and follow-up cost.ResultsThere would be 49, 93, 132, 186 and 199 patients undergoing treatment each year (2010-2014). The total impact of Genotonorm® use during the transition phase would be €367 691, €655 430, €1044 874, €1334 059, and €1594 670 for years 1 to 5. The average annual cost per patient would be €7506, €7059, €7903, €7960, €7995.ConclusionsGHD treatment during the transition phase in Spain poses an annual average layout of €7684/patient (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Human Growth Hormone/deficiency , Growth Disorders/drug therapy , Health Care Rationing/trendsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of somatrophin (Genotonorm) use in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) patients during the transition between childhood and adulthood. METHOD: A budget impact model was designed under the Spanish National Health System with a 5-year time horizon. Calculations of susceptible patients were based on disease prevalence (0.02%) applied to Spanish population. From total GHD cases, 60% was considered persistent and treatment candidates. An expert panel assumed that 20% of candidates would reject the treatment and 8% would withdraw therapy annually. Considered costs included: therapy costs, diagnosis (test and medical visit) and follow-up cost. RESULTS: There would be 49, 93, 132, 186 and 199 patients undergoing treatment each year (2010-2014). The total impact of Genotonorm use during the transition phase would be 367,691, 655,430, 1044,874, 1334,059, and 1594,670 for years 1 to 5. The average annual cost per patient would be 7506, 7059, 7903, 7960, 7995. CONCLUSIONS: GHD treatment during the transition phase in Spain poses an annual average layout of 7684/patient.
Subject(s)
Budgets , Human Growth Hormone/economics , Adolescent , Algorithms , Child , Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine/economics , Drug Costs , Drug Monitoring/economics , Drug Utilization , Hospital Costs , Human Growth Hormone/deficiency , Human Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Humans , Models, Theoretical , National Health Programs/economics , Puberty, Delayed/drug therapy , Puberty, Delayed/economics , Puberty, Delayed/epidemiology , Recombinant Proteins/economics , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Spain/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Sunitinib, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, delays disease progression, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years, improves quality of life and is becoming the first-line standard of care for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC). PURPOSE To assess the economic value of sunitinib as fi rst-line therapy in mRCC within the Spanish healthcare system. METHODS An adapted Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of sunitinib vs. sorafenib (SFN) and bevacizumab/interferon-α (BEV/IFN) as first-line mRCC therapy from the Spanish third-party payer perspective. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data from sunitinib, SFN and BEV/IFN pivotal trials were extrapolated to project survival and costs in 6-week cycles. Results, in progression-free life-years (PFLY), life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with costs and benefits discounted annually at 3%, were obtained using deterministic and probabilistic analyses. RESULTS Sunitinib was more effective and less costly than both SFN (gains of 0.52 PFLY, 0.16 LY, 0.17 QALY) and BEV/IFN (gains of 0.19 PFLY, 0.23 LY, 0.16 QALY) with average cost savings/patients of 1,124 and 23,218, respectively. Using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000/QALY, sunitinib achieved an incremental net benefit (INB) of 9,717 and 31,211 compared with SFN and BEV/IFN, respectively. At this WTP, the probability of sunitinib providing the highest INB was 75%. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggests that sunitinib is a costeffective alternative to other targeted therapies as first-line mRCC therapy in the Spanish healthcare setting.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/economics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/economics , Indoles/economics , Kidney Neoplasms/economics , Models, Economic , Pyrroles/economics , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzenesulfonates/economics , Benzenesulfonates/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Indoles/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/economics , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Markov Chains , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/economics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyridines/economics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sorafenib , SunitinibABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Sunitinib, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, delays disease progression, with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 2 years, improves quality of life and is becoming the first-line standard of care for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC). PURPOSE To assess the economic value of sunitinib as fi rst-line therapy in mRCC within the Spanish healthcare system. METHODS An adapted Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of sunitinib vs. sorafenib (SFN) and bevacizumab/interferon-α (BEV/IFN) as first-line mRCC therapy from the Spanish third-party payer perspective. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS data from sunitinib, SFN and BEV/IFN pivotal trials were extrapolated to project survival and costs in 6-week cycles. Results, in progression-free life-years (PFLY), life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with costs and benefits discounted annually at 3%, were obtained using deterministic and probabilistic analyses. RESULTS Sunitinib was more effective and less costly than both SFN (gains of 0.52 PFLY, 0.16 LY, 0.17 QALY) and BEV/IFN (gains of 0.19 PFLY, 0.23 LY, 0.16 QALY) with average cost savings/patients of 1,124 and 23,218, respectively. Using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000/QALY, sunitinib achieved an incremental net benefit (INB) of 9,717 and 31,211 compared with SFN and BEV/IFN, respectively. At this WTP, the probability of sunitinib providing the highest INB was 75%. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggests that sunitinib is a costeffective alternative to other targeted therapies as first-line mRCC therapy in the Spanish healthcare setting (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/economics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Indoles/economics , Indoles/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/economics , Kidney Neoplasms/economics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Models, Economic , Pyrroles/economics , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/economics , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzenesulfonates/economics , Benzenesulfonates/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Costs and Cost AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To asses the association of conjunctival hyperemia with the use of a fixed combination of latanoprost/timolol, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: A systematic review of published clinical trials of latanoprost/timolol and other competitors was conducted in Medline, Embasse and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register, between 2000 and 2007. Statistical analysis included calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model of Mantel-Haenszel and the random effects model of Der Simonian and Laird. To assess the heterogeneity between trials the Cochrane Q test and the I(2) rate were calculated. The conjunctival hyperemia rates obtained were compared with the Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 8 clinical trials comparing latanoprost/timolol fixed combination with different therapeutic options were found. As trial heterogeneity was moderate (Q: 14.64; df=7; p=0.041; I(2)= 52.2%) a random effects model was used. The final OR was 0.47 (CI 95%: 0.24-0.90); p = 0.024. The total conjunctival hyperemia incidence was 2.9% in the latanoprost/timolol group and 7.0% for the competitors (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a fixed combination of latanoprost/timolol is associated with a significant reduction (53%; CI 95%: 10%-76%) in the development of conjunctival hyperemia against the other compared options for the treatment of glaucoma.
Subject(s)
Conjunctival Diseases/prevention & control , Hyperemia/prevention & control , Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Timolol/administration & dosage , Aged , Brimonidine Tartrate , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Cloprostenol/adverse effects , Cloprostenol/analogs & derivatives , Cloprostenol/therapeutic use , Conjunctival Diseases/chemically induced , Conjunctival Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Combinations , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Humans , Hyperemia/chemically induced , Hyperemia/epidemiology , Latanoprost , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Odds Ratio , Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/adverse effects , Prostaglandins F, Synthetic/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Thiazines/administration & dosage , Thiazines/therapeutic use , Timolol/therapeutic use , TravoprostABSTRACT
Objetivo: Valorar la asociación de hiperemia conjuntival con el uso de la combinación fija de la tanoprost/timolol en el tratamiento del glaucoma, a través de una revisión sistemática y de un metaanálisis. Métodos: Se efectuó una búsqueda de los ensayos clínicos publicados de la tanoprost/timolol y distintos comparadores en las bases de datos Medline, Embasse y Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register, entre 2000 y 2007. La medida para valorar el tamaño del efecto ha sido la odds ratio (OR) y su intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95 %, habiéndose calculado mediante el modelo de efectos fijos de Mantel-Haenszel y el de efectos aleatorios de DerSimonian and Laird. Para valorar la existencia de heterogeneidad entre los estudios, se llevó a cabo la prueba Q de Cochran así como el cálculo del índiceI2. Los porcentajes de hiperemia hallados se han comparado a través de la prueba de Chi-cuadrado. Resultados: Se encontraron 8 ensayos clínicos que comparaban la tanoprost/timolol con distintas opciones terapéuticas. La heterogeneidad de los estudios fue moderada (Q: 14,64; df = 7; p = 0,041;I2 = 52,2%) por lo que se utilizó el modelo de efectos aleatorios. La OR final fue de 0,47 (IC 95%:0,24-0,90); p = 0,024. La incidencia total de hiperemia fue de 2,9% en el grupo la tanoprost/timolol y de 7,0% para los comparadores (p < 0,0001). Conclusiones: El uso de la tanoprost/timolol se asocia con una disminución significativa de la aparición de hiperemia conjuntival del 53% (IC 95%:10%-76%) frente a otras opciones de tratamiento en el manejo del glaucoma (AU)
Purpose: To asses the association of conjuntival hiperemia with the use of a fixed combination of la tanoprost/timolol, through a systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical trials in patients with glaucoma. Methods: A systematic review of published clinical trials of la tanoprost/timolol and other competitors was conducted in Medline, Embasse and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register, between 2000 and 2007. Statistical analysis included calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model of Mantel-Haenszel and the random effects model of Der Simonian and Laird. To assess the heterogeneity between trials the Cochran Q test and the I2 ratewere calculated. The conjuntival hyperemia rates obtained were compared with the Chi-square test. Results: A total of 8 clinical trials comparing la tanoprost/timolol fixed combination with different therapeutic options were found. As trial heterogeneity was moderate (Q: 14.64; df = 7; p = 0.041; I2 = 52.2%) a random effects model was used. The fina lOR was 0.47 (CI 95%: 0.24-0.90); p = 0.024. The total conjuntival hyperemia incidence was 2.9% inthe latanoprost/timolol group and 7.0% for the competitors (p< 0.0001). Conclusions: The use of a fixed combination of la tanoprost/timolol is associated with a significant reduction (53%; CI 95%: 10%-76%) in the development of conjuntival hyperemia against the other compared options for the treatment of glaucoma (AU)