Malignancies in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative kidney transplant recipients: A case-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Malignancies and lymphoma are common complications after kidney transplantation. However, no link has been made between the incidence of malignancies and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in this setting. This case-controlled study compared the incidence of malignancies, including lymphoma, between kidney transplant (KT) patients with or without HCV replication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 99 HCV-positive RNA-positive KT patients were matched with 198 (1:2) anti-HCV-negative patients according to age, gender, and date of transplantation, and were followed for 145.8±78.4 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 28 HCV-positive (28%) cases developed at least one cancer, and 64 (32%) patients developed cancer in the HCV-negative group (P=not significant [ns]). Survival without a cancer was similar between both groups. Thirteen HCV-positive patients (13%) developed at least one solid cancer vs 29 (15%) HCV-negative patients (P=ns). Survival without a solid cancer was similar between both groups. Three patients from the HCV-positive and 4 from the HCV-negative group developed a lymphoma. Only 2 patients from the HCV group died from hepatocellular carcinoma. Survival without a skin cancer was similar between both groups. Patient and death-censored graft survival rates were significantly lower in the HCV group. CONCLUSION: The incidences and types of malignancies were similar in the HCV-positive and HCV-negative KT patients.

A 3-month course of ciprofloxacin does not prevent BK virus replication in heavily immunosuppressed kidney-transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: In vitro and retrospective studies of kidney-transplant patients have shown that quinolones can efficiently prevent BK virus (BKV) replication. However, in a prospective study, a 3 month-course of levofloxacin did not decrease the rate of BK viruria in kidney-transplant patients treated with standard immunosuppression. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a 3-month course of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis on BKV replication in kidney-transplant patients that had received heavy immunosuppression (plasma exchange or immunoadsorption and rituximab) to achieve desensitization before undergoing HLA- and/or ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-nine patients were given ciprofloxacin (500mg/d) for 3 months, starting immediately after transplantation. The results were compared with results from a previous study where patients had received a similar immunosuppression regimen without ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (n=43). Around 60% of patients had undergone a retransplantation. After transplantation, all patients were given induction therapy, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and steroids. BK viruria and viremia were monitored at months 1, 3, 6 and 12 post-transplantation. RESULTS: The rates of BK viruria, BK viremia, and BKV-associated nephropathy did not differ between patients who were given or not given ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. These rates were also identical when patients received quinolones at any time within the first year after transplantation compared to those that had not. The rate of bacterial infection was also similar in patients who had or had not received ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: The use of quinolones seemed to not have any beneficial effect in preventing BKV replication in kidney-transplant patients receiving heavy immunosuppression.

Conventional and innate lymphocytes response at the acute phase of HEV infection in transplanted patients.

OBJECTIVES: The hepatitis E virus (HEV) causes usually benign and spontaneously resolving acute hepatitis in immunocompetent individuals. In immunocompromised patients with a solid-organ transplant (SOT), chronic infections occur in about 2/3 of cases. We aimed to evaluate the immune cells implicated at the acute phase of HEV infection. METHODS: We studied the activation and memory markers on CD4, CD8, γδ and NK cells in 32 HEV-free control SOT patients and 23 SOT recipients, including 14 who became chronically infected. Samples from 7 immunocompetent individuals with an acute infection and 8 healthy donor samples were included for comparison. RESULTS: In acutely-infected SOT patients, NK and Vδ2 cells, but not other γδ cells, had an increased expression of CD69. Based on CD45RA/CD27 markers, solid-organ recipients infected with HEV contained a larger pool of circulating naive subsets among lymphocyte Tγδ cells. However, these alterations of Vδ2 cells were not associated with HEV clearance. Only the adaptive IFN-γ responses to HEV peptides, determined by ELISpot, were associated with a favorable outcome in immunocompromised patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transplanted patients mobilized their γδ cells at the acute phase of infection. Their precise role in HEV infection will thus deserve further investigations as they could be specifically immunomanipulated.

De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies mediated rejection in liver-transplant patients.

The incidence and consequences of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) after liver transplantation (LT) are not well known. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and complications associated with de novo DSAs in this setting. A total of 152 de novo liver-transplant patients, without preformed anti-HLA DSAs, were tested for anti-HLA antibodies, with single-antigen bead technology, before, at transplantation, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation, and thereafter annually and at each time they presented with increased liver-enzyme levels until the last follow-up, that is, 34 (1.5-77) months. Twenty-one patients (14%) developed de novo DSAs. Of these, five patients had C1q-binding DSAs (24%). Younger age, low exposure to calcineurin inhibitors, and noncompliance were predictive factors for de novo DSA formation. Nine of the 21 patients (43%) with de novo DSAs experienced an acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Positive C4d staining was more frequently observed in liver biopsies of patients with AMR (9/9 vs. 1/12, P < 0.0001). Eight patients received a B-cell targeting therapy, and one patient received polyclonal antibodies. Only one patient required retransplantation. Patient- and graft-survival rates did not differ between patients with and without DSAs. In conclusion, liver-transplant patients with liver abnormalities should be screened for DSAs and AMR.

An Early Viral Response Predicts the Virological Response to Ribavirin in Hepatitis E Virus Organ Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Ribavirin is efficient at treating chronic hepatitis E virus infection in solid-organ transplant patients. However, the early kinetics of viral replication under therapy and the impact of immunosuppressant regimens on viral replication are unknown: thus, determining the aim of our study. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with a solid-organ transplant and chronic hepatitis E virus infection were given ribavirin for 3 months. The hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA concentrations were determined before treatment, at days 7, 15, and 21 and at months 1, 2, and 3 during therapy and after ribavirin cessation. RESULTS: A sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 63%. Decreased viral concentration within the first week post-ribavirin therapy was an independent predictive factor for SVR, and a decreased HEV concentration of 0.5 log copies/mL or greater had an 88% positive predictive value. No correlation between ribavirin trough level on day 7 or at month 2 with a virological response or an SVR was observed. Before therapy, HEV RNA concentration was significantly greater in patients receiving mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppression compared to patients given calcineurin inhibitors. The use of mycophenolic acid did not impact on the response to ribavirin. CONCLUSION: An early response to ribavirin can be used to define the optimal duration of therapy in the setting of HEV infection.

Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with pegylated interferon, ribavirin and sofosbuvir after a combined kidney-liver transplantation.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a classical but rare and severe form of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation. Classical anti-HCV therapy, that is pegylated-interferon (peg-interferon) and ribavirin, has been shown to have limited efficacy in treating FCH. Herein, we report on the first case of successful use of peg-interferon, ribavirin, plus sofosbuvir to treat HCV-induced FCH in a combined liver-kidney transplant patient. Antiviral therapy was given for 24 weeks. HCV clearance occurred within 4 weeks after starting therapy and was maintained until 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Antiviral tolerance was good. We conclude that the use of sofosbuvir-based anti-HCV therapy can be successfully used to treat FCH after a liver or combined kidney-liver transplantation.