ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but serious complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). An accurate diagnosis of PJI preoperatively does not exist. Alpha-defensin (AD) is a proven and common indicator. The diagnostic marker of leukocyte esterase (LE) promises some advantages: feasibility, availability, and fast result reporting. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the predictive quality and correlation between both diagnostic tools in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between April 2018 and August 2022. All patients with suspicion of PJI on hip and knee joint were included and underwent a routine and standardized joint punction. For laboratory diagnostics of AD, the synovial liquid was analyzed by ELISA. The sample was additionally applied to a LE test strip (Combur 10 Test, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were examined (mean age 67.12 ± 11.89; gender distribution man/woman 139 (55.8%)/110(44.2%), hip/knee 71(28.5%)/178 (71.5%). According to EBJIS criteria, PJI was diagnosed in 54 (21.7%) patients. AD showed excellent results with an AUC of 0.930 (sensitivity/specificity 0.870/0.990). LE yielded very good results with an AUC of 0.820 (sensitivity/specificity 0.722/0.918). Both parameters showed a strong positive correlation. CONCLUSION: LE is a rapidly available alternative in PJI diagnostics. The simultaneous determination of both markers may enhance diagnostic reliability. A routine usage may shorten the time from diagnosis to treatment of PJI.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Prosthesis-Related Infections , alpha-Defensins , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , alpha-Defensins/analysis , Prospective Studies , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Synovial Fluid/chemistry , Biomarkers/analysis , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with a higher risk of neurological events for both the transfemoral and transapical approach than surgical valve replacement. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging has revealed more new, albeit clinically silent lesions from procedural embolization, yet the main source and predominant procedural step of emboli remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent transfemoral (Medtronic CoreValve [MCV(TF)], n=32; Edwards Sapien [ES(TF)], n=26) and transapical (ES(TA): n=25) TAVI. Serial transcranial Doppler examinations before, during, and 3 months after TAVI were used to identify high-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a surrogate for microembolization. Procedural HITS were detected in all patients, predominantly during manipulation of the calcified aortic valve while stent valves were being positioned and implanted. The balloon-expandable ES prosthesis caused significantly more HITS (mean [95% CI]) during positioning (ES(TF), 259.9 [184.8-334.9]; ES(TA), 206.1[162.5-249.7]; MCV(TF), 78.5 [25.3-131.6]; P<0.001) and the self-expandable MCV prosthesis during implantation (MCV(TF), 397.1 [302.1-492.2]; ES(TF), 88.2 [70.2-106.3]; ES(TA), 110.7 [82.0-139.3]; P<0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences between transfemoral and transapical TAVI or between the MCV and ES prostheses. No HITS were detected at baseline or 3-month follow-up. There was 1 major procedural stroke that resulted in death and 1 minor procedural stroke with full recovery at 3-month follow-up in the MCV group. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural HITS were detected by transcranial Doppler in all patients. Although no difference was observed between the transfemoral and the transapical approach with the balloon-expandable ES stent valve, transfemoral TAVI with the self-expandable MCV prosthesis resulted in the greatest number of HITS, predominantly during implantation.
