Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Trauma ; 69(3): 562-7, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838127

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Major hepatic necrosis (MHN) is a common complication after angioembolization (AE) for severe liver injuries. We compared the outcomes of two treatment modalities. METHODS: Patients with MHN were retrospectively reviewed from January 2002 to October 2007. Demographics, Injury Severity Scale score, length of stay, admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, mortality, transfusion requirements, intra-abdominal complications, admission physiologic variables, and the number and type of abdominal procedures (operative or nonoperative) were collected. These patients were then divided into two groups-those treated with hepatic lobectomy (HL) and those treated with multiple procedures including serial operative debridements and/or percutaneous drainage (IR/OR). RESULTS: Thirty patients (41%) with MHN were identified from 71 patients who had AE. Sixteen patients with MHN underwent HL and 14 patients underwent multiple IR/OR procedures. The two groups were similar at baseline, except that the HL group had a higher Injury Severity Scale score. Outcomes between the two groups were similar. There was a significantly higher complication rate and increased number of procedures in the IR/OR group. There were no deaths in patients who had early HL (<5 days). There was one death in the later lobectomy group. CONCLUSION: MHN is a common complication after AE. This complication can be safely managed with a series of operative debridements in conjunction with interventional procedures or with HL. Lobectomy is associated with a lower complication rate and a fewer number of procedures. Early lobectomy may be better than a delayed procedure.


Subject(s)
Debridement , Hepatectomy , Liver/surgery , Adult , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Liver/injuries , Liver/pathology , Male , Necrosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
J Trauma ; 66(3): 621-7; discussion 627-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19276729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of high-grade liver injuries often involves a combination of operative and nonoperative strategies. Angioembolization (AE) is frequently used in the management of these injuries. Morbidity in patients with high-grade hepatic injuries remains high despite improvements in mortality with a multimodality approach. Major hepatic necrosis (MHN) is a morbid, but underappreciated complication of AE in this patient population. This study will examine the risk factors and outcomes of patients with high-grade liver injures managed with AE who developed the complication of MHN. METHODS: Patients admitted to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center between January 2002 and December 2007 with high-grade blunt or penetrating liver injuries (grades III-VI) were identified from the trauma registry and the medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and injury specific data, complications, and admission physiologic variables were collected. Patients who had therapeutic AE, either preoperatively or postoperatively, and went on to develop liver-related complications including MHN were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 538 patients with high-grade liver injuries admitted during a 5-year period. One hundred and sixteen patients (22%) underwent angiography, and 71 (13%) had a therapeutic AE. Sixteen patients (22.5%) had grade III injuries, 44 (62%) had grade IV injuries, and 11 (15.5%) had grade V injuries. Overall mortality in this group was 14% with eight patients (11.3%) dying as a result of their liver injury. Complication rates were 18.8%, 65.9%, and 100% in the patients with grades III, IV, and V injuries, respectively, for an overall complication rate of 60.6%. Thirty patients (42.2%) went on to develop MHN. Patients who developed MHN were compared with those who did not. Baseline characteristics, Injury Severity Score, and hemodynamic parameters at admission were no different between the two groups. Patients with MHN had higher grade injuries, required significantly more blood product transfusions, and had a significantly longer length of stay (all p < 0.001). Patients who developed MHN were more likely to have undergone operative intervention (96.7% vs. 41.5%, p < 0.001), with 87% having a damage control laparotomy. Other liver-related complications occurred more frequently in the patients that developed MHN (60.0% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.03). However, mortality was not different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: High-grade liver injuries pose significant challenges to those who care for trauma patients. Many patients can be successfully managed nonoperatively, but there are still patients that require laparotomy. AE is the logical augmentation of damage control techniques for controlling hemorrhage. However, given the nature and severity of these injuries, these therapies are not without complications. MHN was found to be a common complication in our study. It tended to occur in high-grade injures, was associated with higher complication rates, longer hospital length of stay, and higher transfusion requirements. Management of MHN can be challenging. Factors that still need to be elucidated are the role of perihepatic packing and timing of second look operation.


Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/therapy , Liver/injuries , Massive Hepatic Necrosis/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Angiography , Female , Hemoperitoneum/mortality , Hemoperitoneum/pathology , Hemoperitoneum/therapy , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/pathology , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Liver/blood supply , Liver/pathology , Male , Massive Hepatic Necrosis/mortality , Massive Hepatic Necrosis/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
3.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 14(5): 362-6, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16093948

ABSTRACT

Chronic osteomyelitis incidence and severity in 55 hospitalized Pacific Island children between 1990 and 2002 were compared with the expected incidence and reports in the literature. Of these 55 cases, 87% were from Polynesia/Micronesia. The average length of hospital stay was 104 days. Staphylococcus aureus was cultured in 64% of the cases with 43% of those being methicillin resistant S. aureus. A total of 111 bones were involved. Average antibiotic treatment was 135 days. Each case required an average of 1.3 irrigations/debridements and 45% required a sequestrectomy. Ninety-two percent had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate on admission. Sixty-nine percent of the cases involved metaphyseal, diaphyseal and epiphyseal segments of the bone and 29% were multifocal. Results indicate that Pacific Island children have a higher incidence and increased severity of osteomyelitis when compared with non-Pacific Island children in the literature, requiring a high suspicion for multifocal osteomyelitis, extensive bone involvement, S. aureus positive cultures and a longer period of antibiotic treatment.


Subject(s)
Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Debridement/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hawaii/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Therapeutic Irrigation/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL