Antitumor Activity and Safety of Dostarlimab Monotherapy in Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient Solid Tumors: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) occurs in various cancers, and these tumors are attractive candidates for anti-programmed cell death 1 therapies, such as dostarlimab, a recently approved immune checkpoint inhibitor. Objective: To assess the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR solid tumors. Design, Setting, And Participants: The GARNET trial was a phase 1, open-label, single-group, multicenter study that began enrolling May 8, 2017. Participants had advanced or recurrent dMMR and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered solid tumors. The data cut for this interim analysis was from November 1, 2021, with median follow-up of 27.7 months. Interventions: Patients received 500 mg of dostarlimab intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression, discontinuation, or withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate and duration of response in patients with dMMR solid tumors by blinded independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results: The efficacy population included 327 patients (median [range] age, 63 [24-85] years; 235 [71.9%] female; 7 [2.1%] Asian, 6 [1.8%] Black, and 206 [63.0%] White patients), with 141 patients (43.1%) with dMMR endometrial cancer, 105 patients (32.1%) with dMMR colorectal cancer, and 81 patients (24.8%) with other dMMR tumor types. All patients had at least 1 previous line of therapy. Objective response rate assessed per blinded independent central review for dMMR solid tumors was 44.0% (95% CI, 38.6% to 49.6%). Median duration of response was not reached (range, ≥1.18 to ≥47.21 months); 72.2% of responders (104 of 144) had a response lasting 12 or more months. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months); probability of progression-free survival at 24 months was 40.6% (95% CI, 35.0% to 46.1%). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months to not reached). The most frequent immune-related adverse events were hypothyroidism (25 [6.9%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (21 [5.8%]), and arthralgia (17 [4.7%]). No new safety concerns were identified. Conclusions And Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, dostarlimab was a well-tolerated treatment option with rapid, robust, and durable antitumor activity in patients with diverse dMMR solid tumors. These findings suggest that dostarlimab provides meaningful long-term benefit in a population with high unmet need. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02715284.

Dostarlimab, an anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, does not cause QT prolongation in patients with solid tumours: A concentration-QT analysis.

AIMS: Patients with solid tumours were treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody dostarlimab in the Phase I GARNET trial. This study aimed to examine dostarlimab's effect on corrected QT (QTc) interval and the systemic concentration-QTc interval relationship. METHODS: In GARNET Part 2B, patients received 500 mg dostarlimab every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four cycles, then 1000 mg Q6W. Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were recorded and time-matched pharmacokinetic (PK) samples collected at screening, on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 4, 5, 8, 12 (pre-dose and 0.5 h after infusion end), and at treatment end. Concentration-change from baseline QTcF (ΔQTcF) analysis using a linear mixed effects model, summary statistics, incidence of clinically noteworthy ECG values and rhythm abnormalities were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients were considered for evaluation (n = 15 excluded from concentration-ΔQTcF). There was a non-significant concentration-ΔQTcF relationship (0.001589 ms/µg/mL; P = .5906). Mean ΔQTcF increase was <6 ms (upper-bound two-sided 90% confidence interval [CI], <10 ms at all post-dose timepoints). Highest geometric mean concentration was 414.1 µg/mL (Cycle 5 Day 1, 0.5 h) with predicted mean ∆QTcF of 3.064 ms (upper-bound two-sided 90% CI: 5.071). Mean QTcF prolongation (all concentrations) was 2.4 ms. QTcF prolongation ≥500 ms occurred in five patients (1.3%); 51 (13.6%) and nine patients (2.4%) had ΔQTcF ≥30 ms and ≥60 ms, respectively. Ten patients (2.7%) reported rhythm abnormalities. No U-wave abnormalities, torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation/flutter were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab does not cause clinically significant QTcF prolongation exceeding the regulatory concern threshold.

Safety and Efficacy of Dostarlimab in Patients With Recurrent/Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from Cohort E of the Phase I GARNET Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dostarlimab is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody being evaluated in recurrent/advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in the ongoing Phase I, multi-center, open-label, 2-part (dose escalation and cohort expansion) GARNET study (NCT02715284). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we report an interim analysis of patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC who progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received dostarlimab (500 mg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W] for Cycles 1-4, then 1000 mg Q6W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for > 2 years. The primary endpoints were immune-related objective response rate (irORR) per investigator-assessed irRECIST and safety. RESULTS: As of 8, July 2019, 67 patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC were enrolled and treated with dostarlimab; the majority had programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1% (35.8% of patients) or PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% (29.9% of patients); 7.5% had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, and 26.9% had unknown PD-L1 TPS status. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range: 0.0-22.6). irORR was 26.9%, including 2 complete and 16 partial responses. The median duration of response of 11.6 months (range: 2.8-19.4). Responses were observed in 2 of 24 (16.7%) patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, 4 of 20 (20.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% and 2 of 5 (40.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Fatigue (4.5%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related TRAEs (any grade) were observed in 28.4% of patients. CONCLUSION: Dostarlimab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced/recurrent NSCLC that progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy, including across all PD-L1 subgroups, and has an acceptable safety profile.

Abaloparatide in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment: results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial.

Objective: To evaluate, post hoc, the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide by degree of renal impairment.Methods: ACTIVE was a phase 3, 18-month, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, placebo-controlled study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who received subcutaneous abaloparatide 80 µg, placebo, or open-label teriparatide 20 µg daily. Patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL or 1.5-2.0 mg/dL with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <37 mL/min, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula, were excluded.Results: At baseline, 660 patients had eGFR ≥90 mL/min, 1276 had 60 to ˂90 mL/min, and 527 had <60 mL/min. Older age and lower T-scores were associated with greater renal impairment. Among renal-function subgroups, there were no meaningful changes in bone mineral density, fracture risk reduction, or overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the active-treatment arms. Anemia, nausea, hypercalcemia, and upper-respiratory-tract infection tended to be more frequent with increasing renal impairment. Hypercalcemia measured by albumin-adjusted serum calcium occurred significantly less frequently with abaloparatide than teriparatide in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min (3.6% versus 10.9%; p = .008) and in the overall ACTIVE safety population (3.4% versus 6.4%; p = .006). Computed tomography scans in 376 patients revealed no evidence of increased renal calcification.Conclusion: Increased exposure to abaloparatide and teriparatide in patients with renal impairment led to no meaningful differences in efficacy or safety. These results support the use of abaloparatide without dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment, provided those with severe renal impairments are monitored for adverse events.

Pyrexia in dabrafenib-treated melanoma patients is not associated with common genetic variation or HLA polymorphisms.

AIM: Pyrexia is a common adverse event (AE) on dabrafenib treatment (monotherapy or combination with trametinib). Since germline SNPs and HLA alleles are implicated in drug-induced AEs, this study investigated their association with pyrexia. PATIENTS & METHODS: 1006 melanoma subjects from five dabrafenib-trametinib clinical studies underwent genotyping for genome-wide SNPs, which enabled imputation of 150 HLA alleles. SNP/HLA allele frequencies were compared between pyrexia cases (n = 218) and controls (n = 361) out of the 1006 subjects by meta-analysis. RESULTS: This analysis had adequate power to detect association of common SNPs or HLA alleles with moderate to large effects on pyrexia (odds ratio >6), but no significant association was found. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that common genetic variation or HLA polymorphisms do not contribute substantially to dabrafenib-induced pyrexia.

Bone mineral density changes following discontinuation of ronacaleret treatment: off-treatment extension of a randomized, dose-finding phase II trial.

CONTEXT: Parathyroidectomy in patients with hyperparathyroidism can produce subsequent increases in bone mineral density (BMD). Ronacaleret, a selective calcium-sensing receptor antagonist that stimulates endogenous parathyroid hormone release, induced mild hyperparathyroidism. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether BMD changes after cessation of ronacaleret treatment. DESIGN: Observational, off-treatment, extension of a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase II trial. SETTING: Fifteen academic centers in seven countries. PATIENTS: Postmenopausal women with low BMD; 171 out of 569 women in the parent study were enrolled in the extension study. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were treated with ronacaleret 100mg (n=16), 200mg (n=38), 300mg (n=35), or 400mg (n=32) once daily, alendronate 70mg (n=17) once weekly, or matching placebo (n=33) for 10-12months; BMD was measured after discontinuation of ronacaleret or alendronate treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean percent change in lumbar spine areal BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6-12months after discontinuing ronacaleret or alendronate compared with the 10- to 12-month BMD measurement of the parent study. RESULTS: At the lumbar spine, all doses of ronacaleret resulted in gains in BMD while on treatment. These increases in BMD were maintained or increased after discontinuation of ronacaleret. All doses of ronacaleret caused bone loss at the total hip while on active treatment. However, there was an attenuation of this loss in the off-treatment extension study. CONCLUSION: The gain in BMD at the lumbar spine was maintained post-treatment and the loss of BMD at the total hip was attenuated. We hypothesize that there may have been some bone remineralization after cessation of ronacaleret.

Ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, increases trabecular but not cortical bone in postmenopausal women.

Intermittent injections of parathyroid hormone have osteoanabolic effects that increase bone mineral density (BMD). Ronacaleret is an orally administered calcium-sensing receptor antagonist that stimulates endogenous parathyroid hormone release from the parathyroid glands. Our objective was to compare the effects of ronacaleret and teriparatide on volumetric BMD (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial at 45 academic centers with 31 sites participating in the substudy. Patients included 569 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density; vBMD was assessed at the spine and hip in a subset of 314 women. Patients were treated for up to 12 months with open-label teriparatide 20 µg subcutaneously once daily or randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to ronacaleret 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, or 400 mg once daily, alendronate 70 mg once weekly, or matching placebos. Ronacaleret increased spine integral (0.49% to 3.9%) and trabecular (1.8% to 13.3%) vBMD compared with baseline, although the increments were at least twofold lower than that attained with teriparatide (14.8% and 24.4%, respectively) but similar or superior to that attained with alendronate (5.0% and 4.9%, respectively). There were small non-dose-dependent decreases in integral vBMD of the proximal femur with ronacaleret (-0.1 to -0.8%) compared with increases in the teriparatide (3.9%) and alendronate (2.7%) arms. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) elevations with ronacaleret were prolonged relative to that seen historically with teriparatide. Ronacaleret preferentially increased vBMD of trabecular bone that is counterbalanced by small decreases in BMD at cortical sites. The relative preservation of trabecular bone and loss at cortical sites are consistent with the induction of mild hyperparathyroidism with ronacaleret therapy.

Ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, has no significant effect on radial fracture healing time: results of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Fractures cause significant morbidity, mortality, and use of health care resources. An oral agent that enhances fracture healing could reduce costs and prevent future disabilities. In Phase I studies, ronacaleret, a novel calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, stimulated parathyroid hormone (PTH) release and increased bone formation markers, suggesting that it may act as an effective oral anabolic agent to enhance fracture healing. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial in 85 male and female subjects who had sustained a closed, unilateral, extra-articular fracture of the distal radius and were receiving conservative treatment. Subjects were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to ronacaleret 200 mg twice daily, ronacaleret 400 mg once daily or matching placebo and followed for 12 weeks. Fracture healing was assessed by radiographs and quantitative computed tomography (CT), and bone turnover markers were measured. The study was terminated early for futility based on the results of an unplanned interim analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups in time to radiographic fracture healing (74, 65 and 68 days for placebo, 200 mg twice daily and 400 mg once daily dose groups, respectively), cortical bridging, grip strength, pain and swelling, time to cast removal, or range of motion. Markers of bone formation and levels of whole PTH, intact PTH and serum calcium increased following treatment with ronacaleret. CONCLUSION: Ronacaleret had no significant effect on duration of healing by radiograph or CT scan, time to cast removal, clinical symptoms, grip strength, or range of motion.

The effects of ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

CONTEXT: Ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist that stimulates PTH release from the parathyroid glands, was evaluated as an oral osteoanabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the effects of ronacaleret, teriparatide, and alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover. DESIGN AND SETTING: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial, spine and hip BMD were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bone turnover markers were measured. PATIENTS: Patients included 569 postmenopausal women with low BMD. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were offered open-label 20 µg teriparatide sc once daily or were randomized to 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg oral ronacaleret once daily, 70 mg alendronate once weekly, or placebo and were followed for up to 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was assessed at month 12. RESULTS: With ronacaleret, the increases in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months (0.3-1.6%) were significantly lower than those attained with teriparatide (9.1%) or alendronate (4.5%). There were small decreases in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD at month 12 with ronacaleret compared with increases in the teriparatide and alendronate arms. Bone turnover markers increased in the ronacaleret and teriparatide arms and decreased in the alendronate arm. PTH elevations with ronacaleret were prolonged relative to those previously reported with teriparatide. CONCLUSION: The densitometric findings in the context of prolonged PTH elevation and increased bone turnover suggest ronacaleret induces mild hyperparathyroidism. Ronacaleret only modestly increased lumbar spine BMD and decreased BMD at hip sites.

Comparison of radiographic joint space width with magnetic resonance imaging cartilage morphometry: analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography are established imaging modalities for the assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of our study was to compare the responsiveness of radiographic joint space width (JSW) with MRI-derived measures of cartilage morphometry for OA progression in participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). METHODS: This study examined the baseline and 12-month visits of a subset of 150 subjects from the OAI. Measurement of radiographic JSW was facilitated by the use of automated software that delineated the femoral and tibial margins of the joint. Measures of medial compartment minimum JSW and JSW at fixed locations were compared with cartilage morphometry measures derived from MRI. The results were stratified by Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scale grade and by tibiofemoral anatomic axis angle. In order to examine the relative responsiveness of various techniques, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM) between the 2 visits. RESULTS: The SRM for radiographic JSW measured at the optimal location was -0.32 compared with -0.39 for the most responsive MRI measure. For the subgroup with a K/L scale grade of 2 or 3, the most responsive SRM values were -0.34 for radiographic JSW and -0.42 for MRI. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that new measures using a software analysis of digital knee radiographic images are comparable with MRI in detecting OA progression, and potentially superior when considering the cost-effectiveness of the 2 imaging modalities.