A 32-month evaluation of lithium disilicate cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses to replace a missing maxillary incisor.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The absence of a tooth in the esthetic zone can cause emotional and social distress. The use of minimally invasive and visually pleasing lithium disilicate resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) may be a suitable option for replacing a missing maxillary incisor. However, the available literature on lithium disilicate cantilever RBFDPs is limited. PURPOSE: This retrospective multicenter study assessed the survival and success rates of lithium disilicate anterior cantilever RBFDPs with an average follow-up period of 3 years up to 9 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RBFDPs delivered by 3 operators were clinically assessed for survival using a modified United States Public Health Service criteria list. The incidence density was determined for each criterion and operator. The standard error and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each incidence density difference (α=.05 for all analyses). RESULTS: A total of 108 RBFDPs were evaluated after a mean period of 32.45 months, ranging from 14 days to 111 months. None of the restorations exhibited failure, carious lesions, or fractures during the follow-up period. The primary reasons for reduced success rates were inflammation of the surrounding soft tissues and discoloration, with incidence densities of 0.074 and 0.057 per year, respectively. Significant differences were observed among RBFDPs from different operators for criteria that included adaptation, color match, marginal adaptation, polishability, surface staining, gingival health, and antagonist wear. CONCLUSIONS: Cantilever lithium disilicate RBFDPs appear to be suitable for short-term restoration. RBFDPs exhibited visible changes after short-term follow-up. However, these changes did not result in failure.

The Tunnel Wall Approach and Enamel Matrix Derivative to Cover Exposed Roots and Improve Clinical Attachment Levels in Cairo Class III Defects Associated with an Intrabony Lesion in the Anterior Area: Three Cases.

These case reports present a surgical technique to improve the clinical attachment level and cover the exposed root surface in Cairo Class III situations associated with a one- to two-wall combined intrabony defect in the anterior area. The tunnel wall approach combined previously described concepts and placed a CTG into a modified tunnel-type flap through a vertical releasing incision. The CTG acted both as a buccal soft tissue wall to stabilize the blood clot and as a space maintainer to coronally move the tissue. The decontaminated root surfaces were treated with enamel matrix derivative, and a bone filler material was placed from the bottom of the intrabony defect up to the cementoenamel junction to support the proximal soft tissue architecture. Healing of the four presented sites was uneventful. Clinical measurements up to 12 months showed significant probing depth reduction, clinical attachment gain, and coverage of the buccal recession in each case. Papilla improvement was reported in three cases. Radiographic examinations confirmed intrabony defect healing and the presence of embedded bone filler material in the soft tissue above the bone crest. The tunnel wall approach seems to be a valuable option to safely enhance the clinical attachment level and cover the exposed root in Cairo Class III situations associated with a one- to two-wall combined intrabony defect in the anterior area.

Successful Surgical Protocols in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to identify and evaluate those surgical protocols reporting on positive clinical outcomes for treating peri-implantitis with 12 or more months of follow-up. Method of surface decontamination (SDC) was evaluated for any correlation with outcomes. RESULTS: A literature search was performed of all articles published in English between January 1, 2001 and April 30, 2015. Of the 639 identified, 26 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcomes reported on included reductions in bleeding on probing (BoP) and probing depth (PD), mean radiographic bone fill (RBF), and mean change in marginal soft tissue levels (MR±). Methods of SDC included mechanical debridement (MD) with and without saline use, MD plus laser or photodynamic therapy, MD with air powder abrasion, MD with chemotherapeutic implant surface decontamination, and combination approaches. The results suggested that various methods of SDC were effective. Heterogeneity of the studies made it impossible to determine correlations between clinical outcome and SDC method. Most studies over 12 months reporting better treatment outcomes employed a bone replacement. Additionally, studies where patients with periodontitis were treated before their peri-implantitis care also had better outcomes. CONCLUSION: The current review failed to reveal any correlation between any particular method for SDC or defect treatment protocol and positive clinical outcomes. Further comparative studies are warranted to determine the most appropriate approach for both of these topics.