Utility and futility of skin testing to address concerns surrounding messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine reactions.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hypersensitivity reactions is unknown. COVID-19 vaccine excipient skin testing has been used in evaluation of these reactions, but its utility in predicting subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance is also unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient skin testing in both patients with an allergic reaction to their first messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine dose and patients with a history of polyethylene glycol allergy who have not yet received a COVID-19 vaccine dose. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective review, COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient skin testing was performed in patients referred to 1 of 3 large tertiary academic institutions. Patient medical records were reviewed after skin testing to determine subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients underwent skin testing, in whom 12 patients (9.3%) had positive results. There were 101 patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine after the skin testing, which was tolerated in 90 patients (89.1%) with no allergic symptoms, including 5 of 6 patients with positive skin testing results who received a COVID-19 vaccine after the skin testing. The remaining 11 patients experienced minor allergic symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination, none of whom required treatment beyond antihistamines. CONCLUSION: The low positivity rate of COVID-19 vaccine excipient skin testing and high rate of subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance suggest a low utility of this method in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine hypersensitivity reactions. Focus should shift to the use of existing vaccine allergy practice parameters, with consideration of graded dosing when necessary. On the basis of these results, strict avoidance of subsequent COVID-19 vaccination should be discouraged.

Presentation and outcomes of adrenal ganglioneuromas: A cohort study and a systematic review of literature.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the presentation and outcomes of patients with adrenal ganglioneuromas (AGNs). DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective cohort study (1 January 1995 to 31 December 2019) and systematic review of literature (1 January 1980 to 19 November 2019). PATIENTS: Diagnosed with histologically confirmed AGN. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline clinical, imaging and biochemical characteristics, recurrence rates and mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed on tumours with histologic elements of ganglioneuroma and pheochromocytoma (ie composite tumours). RESULTS: The cohort study included 45 patients with AGN, 20 (44%) of which had composite tumours. Compared to pure AGN, patients with composite tumour were older (median age, 62.5 vs. 35 years, p < .001), had smaller tumours (median size, 3.9 vs. 5.7 cm, p = .016) and were discovered incidentally less frequently (65% vs. 84%, p = .009). No recurrences or ganglioneuroma-specific mortality occurred during follow-up (range, 0-266 months). The systematic review included 14 additional studies and 421 patients. The mean age of diagnosis was 39 years, and 47% were women. AGNs were discovered incidentally in 72% of patients, were predominantly unilateral (99%) and had a mean diameter of 5.8 cm and an unenhanced computed tomography (CT) attenuation of -118 to 49 Hounsfield units (HU). On imaging, 69% of AGNs were homogenous, 41% demonstrated calcifications, and 40% were lobulated. CONCLUSIONS: AGNs are rare benign tumours that present with variable imaging features including large size, unenhanced CT attenuation >20 HU, calcifications and lobulated shape. Imaging characteristics can assist in establishing a diagnosis and avoiding an unnecessary adrenalectomy. The association of pheochromocytomas with AGNs is frequent. Diagnosis should include biochemical testing.

Presentation, disease progression and outcomes of adrenal gland metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the presentations and outcomes of patients with adrenal gland metastases are limited. Our objectives were to characterize the prevalence of adrenal metastases subtypes and investigate how varying clinical presentations affect disease progression, development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) and mortality. DESIGN: Single institution tertiary centre, retrospective cohort study from 1997 to 2020. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Adult patients with adrenal metastases. Clinical, radiologic and biochemical presentations and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 579 patients (62.3% men, median age 67 years [range 25-92]) with adrenal metastases (median tumour size of 30 mm [range 5-200]), 339 (58.5%) were discovered during cancer staging, 210 (36.3%) were found incidentally, and 29 (5.0%) based on symptoms. Tumours originated from the lung (226, 39.0%), genitourinary (GU) (160, 27.6%), gastrointestinal (GI) (79, 13.6%) and other (114, 19.7%) organ systems. Bilateral metastases were found in 140 (24.2%) patients at the time of initial diagnosis, and 249 (43.0%) had bilateral disease throughout the study course. PAI developed in 12.4% of patients with bilateral disease and was associated with larger tumour size. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 0-232), and 442 (76.3%) patients died. Higher mortality was independently associated with older age, adrenal metastases originating from the lung, bilateral disease, and the absence of adrenalectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal gland metastases originated most commonly from lung, GU and GI malignancies. Bilateral adrenal metastases occurred in 43% of patients, and PAI occurred in 12.4% of those with bilateral disease, warranting further case detection strategies.